The revised framework was issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board so that industries in the global market can be able to eliminate the differences that occur in their financial records. This they did in conjunction with the Internal accounting Standards Board to come up with internationally accepted standards that is the IFRS (International Financial Reporting Standards). The revised framework is aimed at eliminating this differences and it contains two qualitative characteristics for achieving this. These characteristics are the fundamental characteristics and the enhancing qualitative characteristics.
Fundamental characteristics include two aspects that are relevance and faithful representation (Board, F.A.S. 1980). CFO’s believe that the financial information is useless. In other words, the financial information is not relevant and does not help investors in making similar comparisons between the statements. For information to be relevant, it has to have predictive value, confirmatory value or both. If it does not meet this, then it will not be useful to the investors. Relevance of the financial statements is very important to the CFO’s because it will help them in making financial decisions. If the CFO’s believe that the information is useless then it will not help them in making informed financial decisions.
For information to qualify as faithful representation then it has to have three qualities. The information needs to be complete, accurate and free from error. This is so that the information can be reliable enough in making financial decisions. However, the CFO’s believed that the information was too much and could not be relied on because it was unmanageable. They could not rely on the information because it contained many errors and was incomplete. Therefore this did not meet the terms of faithful representation.
Second feature is the enhancing qualitative characteristics which comprise of comparability, timeliness, verifiability, and understandability (FASB, 1980). The IFRS aims to ensure that investors can compare financial records between companies but the CFO’s says that they are useless. This means that even with the standards, investors are still unable to make comparisons that are similar. The CFO’s also add that the disclosures have gone to unmanageable levels and this also affects the aim of comparability. If they cannot manage the disclosures then it means that they will be unable to compare them to make financial decisions.
Also, the revised framework aims at understandability, but according to the article, if analysts were to look at IFRS accounts, they would misinterpret them. The financial reports on the IFRS accounts could only be read by trained professionals which affects timeliness because more time is spent on looking for professionals to make sense of the reports. Therefore we see that the standards do not provide information that one can understand and comprehend to make a financial decision.
The framework does not achieve verifiability. This is because the CFO’s are unable to understand their financial statements and cannot even interpret them thus when wanting to make decisions between companies they cannot reach a consensus because they are not able to agree. Therefore the framework is not verifiable. Therefore according to the CFO’s it is accurate to say that the revised framework has not helped them to achieve comparability, verifiability, timeliness and understandability.
The opinions in the article are not consistent with the belief that corporate financial reporting satisfies the objective of financial information. This is because they view that the disclosures do not provide any financial information that will help investors in making financial decisions. Also, the disclosures have gone to a level that is unmanageable which is not an objective in the Conceptual Framework. Therefore instead of making comparability between companies in the global market easier, it has made it twice harder. The information in financial records is also misinterpreted by most investors causing them to make decisions based on the misleading information. This is also not consistent with the objective of making financial statements reliable and easy to comprehend. In conclusion the revised framework does not meet the needs of corporate financial reporting that it aimed at.
In this theory, regulations are set by the industries based on the supply and demand. The government supplies while the demand is from the interest groups. The industry sets the rules in a way that is of advantage to the company, and the government approves the set regulations. In this theory, we see that it is not essential for the government to set up the regulation laws because the industry itself is capable of setting the rules (Berry and Wilcox 2018).
One advantage of this theory is that the industry sets the rules and regulations. This way they can set standards that will lead to achievement in the industry’s goals and objectives. Also, they need to regulate the environment. What is the demand in the environment? The industry has to set the rules in regards to the supply and demand which is the market force. Hence the regulation will be of benefit to both the public and the industry itself.
For example, if a sports club convinces the government to fund the building of a stadium for sporting activities, then the government has supplied to the rules set by the sports club. This they might have done because they want to save the money they earn and thus want the government to chip in (Mansbridge 2018). However, the interest groups which in this case are the fans of the club may not agree with this decision. The fans may view that the club needs to fund the building of the stadium because they can afford it due to the high ticket prices that they pay. The club will have to adjust to the demand from the fans so that they do not lose them. Thus regulation by the government is not needed because the club is driven by the demand in the market force.
According to this theory, a government agency that is set to regulate an industry so that it can act in the interest of the public ends up being captured by the industry and acts in the benefit of the industry. In this case, the government will notify the industry players on the directions to take and provide disclosures that will lead to the overall success of the company (Gans and Ryall 2017). The government aims at helping the industry players to benefit the members of the company.
However, the regulation by the government is not necessary to industries. This is because a company does not need guidelines from the regulators on what to do so that the industry can benefit. The industry is capable on its own of evaluating the market force and knowing what actions to take to help it. It needs to cater to the market force (Henderson 2017). Therefore, governments are not required to set regulations for industries because they are capable on their own.
The public interest theory explains that a company or organisation sets its objectives or strategies in a way that benefits the public at large. Regulations are placed in a manner that will be in favour of the public at large. This theory aims at fulfilling the interests of the society which at most times is the market force or the customers. This theory however to some extent is not necessary because the market force is the most critical asset to a company. Without the market then a company or organisation has no purpose and can lead to failure (Grunig 2017).
If two companies provide loans and people interest rates are lower than the other, then the one with little interest is more likely to gain more customers. The loan company with high-interest rates will have to adjust so that they can cater to what their customer base wants. Therefore the government does not need to set regulation laws because a company will always work in regards to the market force (Grunig 2017).
The efforts of FASB are directed towards impairment costs that are associated with non-current assets are accounted for and that non-current assets are not evaluated to the fair value. These changes are made so that financial reports can use one accounting model in long-lived assets that are disposed of by sale (Hashim Li and O’Hanlon 2016). This will lead to the value of information for financial reporting to improve because of the provision of relevant information. One model will allow the financial information to be of relevance thus can be used in making decisions by the investors (Khan, Ryan and Varma 2017). The Statement also aims at expanding discontinued operations to include more transactions so that the accounting for similar transactions will be the same. By expansion, the Statement will allow all relevant information to be provided for the discontinued operations (Gray, Jorge and Rodriguez 2015). Thus the users or investors will have all the relevant information they need.
B: Effects on company’s financial statements are
Not using the revaluation model will significantly affect the shareholders in a company. Revaluation ensures that the returns in investments are more and also the gains in assets are more. When more returns on investments are earned, then the shareholders can receive dividends that are consistent and also acquire new investments. Thus the shareholders will face a massive loss in profits if they do not apply this model (Malmendier, Opp and Saidi 2016).
Also, the return in assets ensures that shareholders are getting returns in the investments. Therefore if the revaluation model is not used, there will be no return in investors, and thus the shareholders will be affected. This is because they will not be able to get any dividends from the company (Chen and Tang 2017).
References
Berry, J.M. and Wilcox, C., 2018. The interest group society. Routledge.
Board, F.A.S., 1980. Qualitative characteristics of accounting information. Statement of Financial Accounting Concept No, 2.
Chen, K.C. and Tang, F., 2017. Post?IFRS Revaluation Adjustments and Executive Compensation. Contemporary Accounting Research, 34(2), pp.1210-1231.
FASB, 1980. Qualitative Characteristics of Accounting Information.
Gans, J. and Ryall, M.D., 2017. Value capture theory: A strategic management review. Strategic Management Journal, 38(1), pp.17-41.
Gray, D., Jorge, M. and Rodriguez, L., 2015. Goodwill Accounting Alternative: Private Versus Non-private Companies. Journal of Social Science Studies, 3(1), p.159.
Grunig, J.E., 2017. Symmetrical presuppositions as a framework for public relations theory. In Public relations theory(pp. 17-44). Routledge.
Hashim, N., Li, W. and O’Hanlon, J., 2016. Expected-loss-based accounting for impairment of financial instruments: The FASB and IASB proposals 2009–2016. Accounting in Europe, 13(2), pp.229-267.
Henderson, K., 2017. Capture Theory & State Regulation of Animal Cruelty.
Islam, M., Nusrat, F. and Karim, A.K.M., 2016. Revaluation of Property, Plant and Equipment (PPE) in Bangladesh: Motivations, Value R
Khan, U., Ryan, S. and Varma, A., 2017. Fair Value versus Amortized Cost Measurement and the Timeliness of Other-than-Temporary Impairments: Evidence from the Insurance Industry.
Malmendier, U., Opp, M.M. and Saidi, F., 2016. Target revaluation after failed takeover attempts: Cash versus stock. Journal of Financial Economics, 119(1), pp.92-106.
Mansbridge, J.J., 2018. A deliberative theory of interest representation. In The politics of interests (pp. 32-57). Routledge.
Essay Writing Service Features
Our Experience
No matter how complex your assignment is, we can find the right professional for your specific task. Contact Essay is an essay writing company that hires only the smartest minds to help you with your projects. Our expertise allows us to provide students with high-quality academic writing, editing & proofreading services.
Free Features
Free revision policy
$10Free bibliography & reference
$8Free title page
$8Free formatting
$8How Our Essay Writing Service Works
First, you will need to complete an order form. It's not difficult but, in case there is anything you find not to be clear, you may always call us so that we can guide you through it. On the order form, you will need to include some basic information concerning your order: subject, topic, number of pages, etc. We also encourage our clients to upload any relevant information or sources that will help.
Complete the order form
Once we have all the information and instructions that we need, we select the most suitable writer for your assignment. While everything seems to be clear, the writer, who has complete knowledge of the subject, may need clarification from you. It is at that point that you would receive a call or email from us.
Writer’s assignment
As soon as the writer has finished, it will be delivered both to the website and to your email address so that you will not miss it. If your deadline is close at hand, we will place a call to you to make sure that you receive the paper on time.
Completing the order and download