Discuss about the Credit And Cross-Country Predictable Firm Return.
Foreign exchange rate is one of the essential parts of shaping the international trade, which stands for the value of domestic currency in terms of the monetary value of the foreign currency (Cooper 2014). Among many supply and demand framework is the simplest macroeconomic models that can effectively aid the economy to predict and determine the exchange rate of the domestic currency compared to the foreign currency (Corazza and Malliaris 2015). It not only determines the value of foreign exchange rate of domestic currency against the foreign currency, in addition to this, it aids to determine various key factors that can affect the economy’s exchange rate (Gabaix and Maggiori 2015).
Figure 1, showcase the foreign exchange market demand and supply outline of a nation, where the demand is perceived through the demand of export of a nation and the supply is achieved through the importable demand of the domestic market (Caballero, Farhi and Gourinchas 2016). Utilising the derived demand, AUD demand curve ‘D’ has been drawn and aggregate demand of the importable has been utilised to draw the supply curve ‘S’. Now, if the initial equilibrium occurs at E, then it can be seen that exchange rate of each unit of AUD is 80C in terms of USD and the demand of the importable is represented through Q. Considering, a rise in demand of the AUD from Q to Q1, it can be seen that there will be appreciation of the AUD. At new equilibrium E1, exchange rate of each unit of AUD is 81C in terms of USD (hypothetically). However, if there is fall in demand from Q to Q2, then the exchange rate will fall to from initial equilibrium situation, where the exchange rate is determined at 77C USD for every unit of AUD. Through this analysis it can be seen that demand and supply framework can easily explain the relative price of domestic currency compared to the foreign currency and in addition it can explain the factor too that influence the exchange rate (Knittel and Pindyck 2016).
According to the above mentioned analysis of AUD under the purview of supply and demand, it can be said that there are various factors that can lead to alteration in the demand and supply condition of the AUD, which can in turn lead to fluctuation in the exchange rate of AUD. Key factors that can alter the foreign exchange rate of AUD are as follows:
Nominal exchange rate is the value of domestic currency, which is required to buy a unit of foreign currency (Eichenbaum et al. 2017). If there is rise in nominal exchange rate of a nation’s currency, then it is acknowledged as the nominal appreciation of the domestic currency. And in case of loss of purchasing power, there will be nominal depreciation. Trade Weighted Index (TWI) on the other hand is the multilateral exchange rate which is calculated through providing weighted average to magnitude of business with the partner country (Albuquerque et al. 2015).
Considering the nominal exchange rate of Australia for last three years (figure 2) along with the TWI o Australia for the same time frame (figure 3) it can be seen that there has been various fluctuations. From figure 2, it can be seen that AUD was at its best compared to USD during May of 2015; however, it fell sharply till November of the same year due to fall in the demand of the Australian goods and services in the market of US. Next to this, AUD rose to a moderate .76C USD for each unit of AUD during January of 2016 marking policy effectiveness of the Australian government (Baumgartner 2016). Apparently from the figure 2, it can be seen that there was a uplift of the US demand for the Australian goods and services along with this and weakening USD has allowed the AUD to soar to the 80C USD for each unit of AUD.
Figure 3, highlights the same figure as it has been seen in the figure 2. TWI of AUD hit its lowest during September of 2015 due to comparative fall in export to the US and it has been rising since then. Though there has been fluctuation in TWI over the time, however it has managed itself to remain steady. Presently with rise in demand of the Australian trade with US, TWI is rising again and leading itself towards 80C USD for each unit of AUD (Engel 2016).
Figure 2, and Figure 3, both highlights that foreign exchange rate of AUD is rising in terms of the USD since 2015. This rise has been christened from various sources and among them most important is the weakening USD. According xxx, under the floating exchange rate system, if a currency gets weaker compared to the other, then it inherently makes the other currency stronger compared to itself. Utilising this phenomenon, it can be said that though there is very little rise in demand of the AUD, weakening USD is allowing the Australian dollar to rise. On the other hand it can also been seen that there is very little rise in demand of Australian tech metals in US market that has aided the AUD to have some upward boost. This rise in demand has caused the AUD to rise against USD leading to better AU-US business situation in future.
Given report highlights various reasons for the rise in AUD compared to USD. According to the given article, recent slump in the USD is one of the main reasons that lead to rise in Australian dollar compared to the USD (Ismail, 2018). Besides this, rising price of iron ore is another key element that has lead to rise in the AUD. However, according to the given report, Australian dollar appreciation is not sustainable owing to the stagnant inflation rate of the country as well as persistent labour wage rate. In addition to this, Hong et al. (2017), argues that it has been seen that recently there is a fall in demand of Australian iron due to rise in Chinese export promotion as well as Fed hikes are amongst the key factors that leading to rise in interest gap between the two countries. The report concludes with the idea that AUD will fall back to 70C USD soon, once the US interest rate outshine the prevailing bank interest rate of Australia (Arteta et al. 2015).
In order to explain the effect of the abovementioned driving force on the AUD considers the Figure 4. Point E highlights the present equilibrium situation of the , where exchange rate is Ex. With rise in the demand of Australian iron ore and enhancement in the Fed rate gap, demand of AUD shifts from D to D1, which caused in a rise in exchange rate from Ex to Ex1 (Feenstra 2015). Once there will be fall in demand of the AUD, demand curve D1 will shift to D2, making new equilibrium E2, where the exchange rate is Ex2, which is much lower than the initial equilibrium.
If the AUD is going to cheaper compared to the USD one year from now, then it will hamper the country’s economy positively. On the other hand, being the manager of an Australian firm, it can be said that the firm will face loss with weak AUD compared to the USD. According to the general economic theory, if there is depreciation of one currency, then importable will be expensive compared to the present situation (Cole and Nightingale 2016). In addition to this, higher price of the importable will lead to rise in the price of the importable, which will force the aggregate demand of the importable to fall. With falling demand, price will rise again and the cycle will continue until there is balance between the demand and supply of the importable (Friedman 2017). Considering the company that imports electric machinery from the US, it can be said as a manager of the firm, that it will face loss. With stronger USD, the firm will fail to import as much as goods that it is importing now. With lesser importable, the firm will raise the price to keep the profit intact, which will in turn lead to fall in the demand (Galbraith 2015). With lower demand firm will face loss, however, it will raise the price again to cover the Average Variable Cost. Further deterioration in demand will take place with rising price and the cycle will continue until equilibrium is established between the supply and demand of the electrical machinery.
On the other hand with weaker AUD, there will high demand of the Australian goods and services in the US market (Dwyer et al. 2016). With higher export, Australia will have better trading proposition, which will enhance the Balance of Trade of Australia as well as, with higher trade, TWI of Australia-US will be better off.
If the government wants to enhance the AUD/USD exchange rate from 72C USD to 80C USD, then there are various plans. Australia is growing at 6.9% annual growth rate and a large portion of its GDP comes from the mining sector (Nakamura et al. 2017). There has been substantial drop in Australian mining good in US market during past few years. Presently with rise in demand of tech metals, mining trade with US is rising and utilising this situation Australian government can use export promotion and enhance its exchange rate through increased trade with US (Irwin 2015). On the other hand there is large gap in Australian and US interest rest, which is leading to fall in foreign investment in the Australian banks. Thus if the Australian Reserve Bank can enhance its interest rate, then there will substantial rise in US investment in Australian banks, leading to rise in AUD compared to USD (Calomiris et al. 2016). Next to this, import substitution can be handy if the Australian government want to restrict the importable that hurt the Balance of Payment of the country largely.
Bringing in AUD/USD exchange rate from 72C USD to 80C, has both the bright and dark side. If the government of Australia need to promote growth, then it would be require for the government to implement the aforementioned policies so that the country can have stronger AUD compared to the USD. With stronger AUD, the country can enhance its trade balance and let the trading participating as an engine of country’s economic growth. On the other hand, with stronger AUD, imports will raise leading to deterioration of the Australian trade balance (Hofman et al. 2016). Moreover, import quota is not possible under the AUSFTA pact between these two trade participating countries (Gantz 2016). Besides this, once the AUD gets appreciated through raising the interest rate, it will dry up the market leading to fall in aggregate demand. Thus it can be said that, government can use these actions to gauge the deteriorating AUD, however it need to be aware of the side effect (Blanchard et al. 2016). Proper balance between interest rate and market liquidity and import substitution can be helpful for the Australian government.
Reference:
Albuquerque, R., Ramadorai, T. and Watugala, S.W., 2015. Trade credit and cross-country predictable firm returns. Journal of Financial Economics, 115(3), pp.592-613.
Arteta, C., Kose, M.A., Ohnsorge, F. and Stocker, M., 2015. The Coming US Interest Rate Tightening Cycle: Smooth Sailing or Stormy Waters?.
Baumgartner, L., 2016. Adaptive management in action: using chemical marking to advance fish recovery programs in the Murray–Darling Basin.
Blanchard, O., Ostry, J.D., Ghosh, A.R. and Chamon, M., 2016. Capital Flows: Expansionary or Contractionary?. American Economic Review, 106(5), pp.565-69.
Bussière, M., Delle Chiaie, S. and Peltonen, T.A., 2014. Exchange rate pass-through in the global economy: the role of emerging market economies. IMF Economic Review, 62(1), pp.146-178.
Caballero, R.J., Farhi, E. and Gourinchas, P.O., 2016. Safe asset scarcity and aggregate demand. American Economic Review, 106(5), pp.513-18.
Calomiris, C.W., Flandreau, M. and Laeven, L., 2016. Political foundations of the lender of last resort: A global historical narrative. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 28, pp.48-65.
Cole, D. and Nightingale, S., 2016. Sensitivity of Australian trade to the exchange rate. Reserve Bank of Australia Bulletin, pp.13-20.
Cooper, R.N., 2014. Exchange rate choices.
Corazza, M. and Malliaris, A.T.G., 2015. Multi-fractality in foreign currency markets.
Dwyer, L., Pham, T., Jago, L., Bailey, G. and Marshall, J., 2016. Modeling the impact of Australia’s mining boom on tourism: a classic case of Dutch disease. Journal of Travel Research, 55(2), pp.233-245.
Eichenbaum, M., Johannsen, B.K. and Rebelo, S., 2017. Monetary policy and the predictability of nominal exchange rates (No. w23158). National Bureau of Economic Research.
Engel, C., 2016. International coordination of central bank policy. Journal of International Money and Finance, 67, pp.13-24.
Feenstra, R.C., 2015. Advanced international trade: theory and evidence. Princeton university press.
Friedman, M., 2017. Quantity theory of money. The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, pp.1-31.
Gabaix, X. and Maggiori, M., 2015. International liquidity and exchange rate dynamics. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 130(3), pp.1369-1420.
Galbraith, J.K., 2015. The new industrial state. Princeton University Press.
Gantz, D.A., 2016. Increasing the Host State’s Regulatory Flexibility Under FTA Investment Chapters: US Approaches Under NAFTA, the AUSFTA and the TPP.
Ghosh, A.R., Ostry, J.D. and Chamon, M., 2016. Two targets, two instruments: monetary and exchange rate policies in emerging market economies. Journal of International Money and Finance, 60, pp.172-196.
Hofmann, B., Shim, I. and Shin, H., 2016. Sovereign yields and the risk-taking channel of currency appreciation.
Hong, J., Yu, W., Marinova, D., Guo, X. and Gollagher, M., 2017. Implication for China’s Resource Demand on Sustainability in Australia. In Technology, Society and Sustainability (pp. 323-334). Springer, Cham.
Irwin, D.A., 2015. Free trade under fire. Princeton University Press.
Ismail, N. (2018). Australian dollar tipped to slide back to 70 US cents. [online] The Sydney Morning Herald. Available at: https://www.smh.com.au/business/investments/australian-dollar-tipped-to-slide-back-to-70-us-cents-20180129-h0pp8v.html [Accessed 26 Mar. 2018].
Knittel, C.R. and Pindyck, R.S., 2016. The simple economics of commodity price speculation. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 8(2), pp.85-110.
Nakamura, E., Sergeyev, D. and Steinsson, J., 2017. Growth-rate and uncertainty shocks in consumption: Cross-country evidence. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 9(1), pp.1-39.
Reserve Bank of Australia. (2018). Historical Data | RBA. [online] Available at: https://www.rba.gov.au/statistics/historical-data.html#exchange-rates [Accessed 3 Mar. 2018].
Essay Writing Service Features
Our Experience
No matter how complex your assignment is, we can find the right professional for your specific task. Contact Essay is an essay writing company that hires only the smartest minds to help you with your projects. Our expertise allows us to provide students with high-quality academic writing, editing & proofreading services.Free Features
Free revision policy
$10Free bibliography & reference
$8Free title page
$8Free formatting
$8How Our Essay Writing Service Works
First, you will need to complete an order form. It's not difficult but, in case there is anything you find not to be clear, you may always call us so that we can guide you through it. On the order form, you will need to include some basic information concerning your order: subject, topic, number of pages, etc. We also encourage our clients to upload any relevant information or sources that will help.
Complete the order formOnce we have all the information and instructions that we need, we select the most suitable writer for your assignment. While everything seems to be clear, the writer, who has complete knowledge of the subject, may need clarification from you. It is at that point that you would receive a call or email from us.
Writer’s assignmentAs soon as the writer has finished, it will be delivered both to the website and to your email address so that you will not miss it. If your deadline is close at hand, we will place a call to you to make sure that you receive the paper on time.
Completing the order and download