Recognition of various factors that would have added to an augmented inherent risk evaluation at the functional statement level
It is the responsibility of the auditor to determine risks at the time of working with clients. In that way, one of the risks that auditors need to be aware of is inherent risk. At the time of assessing the level of risk, it happen those auditors ignore the fact on whether the client has internal control in that place like minor appraisal of monetary declaration for mitigating the inherent risk (Soh, Leung and Leong 2015). It is necessary for the auditor to believe the strength of the internal controls at the time of assessing the control risk of the clients. It is the job of the auditor to assess the inherent risk for evaluating on how to suspect the financial statement declaration that are material misstated based on the nature of client business (Simnett, Zhou and Hoang 2016). There are few key features that can augment inherent risk to some extent and these are listed below with proper justification:
Environment and external factors- There are several environment as well as external factors that lead to increased high inherent risk.
Recognition on which of these factors may be recognized during the planned trade risk appraisal
It is a known fact that financial statements as well as annual reports guide proper ways for determining a true and fair value for any company. There are different types of statements that help in predicting the financial position of a given company such as income statement, balance sheet and cash flow statement (Simnett, Carson and Vanstraelen 2016).
Inherent risk is one of the risks that arises from material misstated figures that are present in the financial statement and arises due to error or omission as a result of factors other than the stoppage of controls (Soh, Leung and Leong 2015). These factors causes because of misstatement due to lack or descend of controls that are treated unconnectedly for assessing the control risk. In addition to that, inherent risk are those risk that are normally treated to be high where high degree of decision as well as judgment gets involved or where dealings of the business entity that are highly multifaceted in nature (Simnett and Huggins 2015).
For instance, inherent risk in the audit for any business organization that has significant trade and exposure in complex derivative instruments needs to be treated significantly higher after comparing it to the audit of a well-managed business enterprise that operates in a relatively stable competitive environment (Soh, Leung and Leong 2015). Here, operational and business plan is one of the factors where the business plans for undertaking all the types that gets connected with the new business plan after determining the alternatives in the most appropriate way. Market condition is one of the factors where the business reports in getting proper financial information after identifying the risks and linking it with the future changes (Sethi, Martell and Demir 2015).
Recognition of various inherent risk factors that would have added to an augmented inherent risk estimation at the report balance level
It is necessary for the auditor to recognize as well as assess the risks of material misstatement at the financial statement level as well as declaration level (Seguí?Mas, Bollas?Araya and Polo?Garrido 2015). It is important to understand the fact where it requires identifying as well as assessing the risks of material misstatement, it is needed for an auditor to recognize the risk of misstatement by using the information that is accessible from performing risk assessment procedures as well as considering the accounts and the revelation in the financial statements. The assessor needs to evaluate a situation on whether the recognized risks directly narrate with the financial statements that affect at an assertion level (Soh, Leung and Leong 2015). Further, an auditor needs to evaluate with the types of potential misstatements that effect from the recognized risks, assertions as well as accounts and disclosures that could be affected in some form or other. It is needed for an auditor to assess the likelihood of misstatement that takes into account possibility of multiple misstatements as well as magnitude of potential misstatements for determining the possibility where risk results in material misstatements of the financial statements (Redmayne 2013).
Area of going concern that should be charged as high, medium or low and based on decision according to those criteria
The Going Concern concept is one of the concepts that state an assumption where business should be considered as they will carry on functioning indefinitely or at least long enough so that they achieve with the purpose (Moroney et al. 2014). Addition to that, the idea assumes that business will have the longer life and not closed or sold in the intermediate future. Therefore, companies that are predictable to close in the near future cannot be treated as going concern. This idea is enormously vital to generally accepted accounting principles. It is noted that companies would not have the ability to prepay or accrue expenses without the existence of going concern assumptions (Knechel and Salterio 2016).
Liquidity ratio help in analyzing the ability of the business to pay off both its current liabilities as they become due and long-term liabilities as they become current (Simnett, Zhou and Hoang 2016)
From the above graph, current ratio of One Tel has been shown for the year 1999 and 2000. It is noted that current ratio has been decreased from 1999 to 2000 but has maintained 1.5 in both the years (Kend, Houghton and Jubb 2014). The current ratio help investors as well as creditors to appreciate the liquidity of One Tel Company and how easily that business will be paying off its current liabilities
From the above graph, solvency ratio of One Tel has been shown for the year 1999 and 2000. Debt ratio for the year 1999 arrives at 0.31 and 0.34 in the year 2000 that reveals there is significant decrease in the debt ratio for One Tel Company. The company has lower debt ratio in both the years that reveals a more steady trade with the possible of long life because lower debt means lower overall debt at the same time. Equity ratio for the year 1999 arrives at 0.69 and 0.66 in the year 2000. There is negligible decrease in the equity ratio from 1999 to 2000. One Tel has higher equity ratio should have less financing as well as debt service costs than companies with lower ratios (Soh, Leung and Leong 2015). Debt to equity ratio for the year 1999 arrives at 0.45 and 0.52 for the year 2000. There is significant increase in debt to equity ratio from 1999 to 2000. The given ratio means that One Tel has half as many liabilities as there is equity (Junior, Best and Cotter 2014).
There are three types of profitability ratio that are calculated and presented through use of graphs are return on capital employed, return on assets and return on equity (Soh, Leung and Leong 2015). It can be noted that there is negative figure for each of the profitability ratio that cannot be treated as favorable condition for One Tel. The company failed to generate enough of profits or cash revenues for the given years 1999 and 2000. The company could not meet operational expenses that can be noted after close analysis of cash flow statement of One Tel. Therefore, the company faces shortage of funds and continues with operations from retained earnings as well as additional capital funding issue (Hardy 2014).
It is noted that One Tel Company is suffering from net loss as well as shortage of funds. Still, One Tel Company has adequate assets where they can cover the liabilities as well as losses and can be considered to be medium going concern (Cohen and Simnett 2014).
Reference List
Botica?Redmayne, N., 2013. Auditing and Assurance Services in Australia: An Integrated Approach. Pacific Accounting Review.
Carson, E., Fargher, N. and Zhang, Y., 2016. Trends in Auditor Reporting in Australia: A Synthesis and Opportunities for Research. Australian Accounting Review, 26(3), pp.226-242.
Cohen, J.R. and Simnett, R., 2014. CSR and assurance services: A research agenda. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 34(1), pp.59-74.
Hardy, C.A., 2014. The messy matters of continuous assurance: Findings from exploratory research in Australia. Journal of Information Systems, 28(2), pp.357-377.
Junior, R.M., Best, P.J. and Cotter, J., 2014. Sustainability reporting and assurance: a historical analysis on a world-wide phenomenon. Journal of Business Ethics, 120(1), pp.1-11.
Kend, M., Houghton, K.A. and Jubb, C., 2014. Competition issues in the market for audit and assurance services: Are the concerns justified?. Australian Accounting Review, 24(4), pp.313-320.
Knechel, W.R. and Salterio, S.E., 2016. Auditing: assurance and risk. Routledge.
Moroney, R., Campbell, F., Hamilton, J. and Warren, V., 2014. Auditing: A Practical Approach. Wiley Global Education.
Redmayne, N.B., 2013. Auditing and Assurance Services and Ethics in Australia: An Integrated Approach. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change.
Seguí?Mas, E., Bollas?Araya, H.M. and Polo?Garrido, F., 2015. Sustainability assurance on the biggest cooperatives of the world: an analysis of their adoption and quality. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 86(2), pp.363-383.
Sethi, S.P., Martell, T.F. and Demir, M., 2015. Enhancing the role and effectiveness of corporate social responsibility (CSR) reports: The missing element of content verification and integrity assurance. Journal of Business Ethics, pp.1-24.
Simnett, R. and Huggins, A.L., 2015. Integrated reporting and assurance: where can research add value?. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 6(1), pp.29-53.
Simnett, R., Carson, E. and Vanstraelen, A., 2016. International Archival Auditing and Assurance Research: Trends, Methodological Issues, and Opportunities. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 35(3), pp.1-32.
Simnett, R., Zhou, S. and Hoang, H., 2016. Assurance and other credibility enhancing mechanisms for integrated reporting. In Integrated Reporting (pp. 269-286). Palgrave Macmillan UK.
Soh, D.S. and Martinov-Bennie, N., 2015. Internal auditors’ perceptions of their role in environmental, social and governance assurance and consulting. Managerial Auditing Journal, 30(1), pp.80-111.
Soh, D.S., Leung, P. and Leong, S., 2015. The development of integrated reporting and the role of the accounting and auditing profession. In Social Audit Regulation (pp. 33-57). Springer International Publishing.
Essay Writing Service Features
Our Experience
No matter how complex your assignment is, we can find the right professional for your specific task. Contact Essay is an essay writing company that hires only the smartest minds to help you with your projects. Our expertise allows us to provide students with high-quality academic writing, editing & proofreading services.
Free Features
Free revision policy
$10Free bibliography & reference
$8Free title page
$8Free formatting
$8How Our Essay Writing Service Works
First, you will need to complete an order form. It's not difficult but, in case there is anything you find not to be clear, you may always call us so that we can guide you through it. On the order form, you will need to include some basic information concerning your order: subject, topic, number of pages, etc. We also encourage our clients to upload any relevant information or sources that will help.
Complete the order form
Once we have all the information and instructions that we need, we select the most suitable writer for your assignment. While everything seems to be clear, the writer, who has complete knowledge of the subject, may need clarification from you. It is at that point that you would receive a call or email from us.
Writer’s assignment
As soon as the writer has finished, it will be delivered both to the website and to your email address so that you will not miss it. If your deadline is close at hand, we will place a call to you to make sure that you receive the paper on time.
Completing the order and download