Financial Analysis Of JB HI-FI: Latest Annual Report 2017

Cash Flow Analysis

The selected firm is a consumer goods retailor named JB HI-FI. The company’s 2017 annual report is the latest and hence the financial statements used for this task would correspond to June 30, 2017 position.  The key analysis of the requisite items is carried out below.

• The operational cash flow of the company is illustrated as follows (JB Hi-Fi, 2017).

For the items highlighted in the above screenshot, the relevant description is given below (JB Hi-Fi, 2017).

• “Receipts are customers”– This item highlights the amount of money that the customers have paid to the company on account of the buying of the various products. It is noteworthy that revenue highlighted as part of the income statement is accrual based unlike customer receipts which highlight the actual cash paid by the customers.  This has clearly increased by more than 40% driven by the acquisition of a new business by the company in FY2017.
• “Payments to suppliers and employees” – On the end of the company, for procurement of goods, supplier need to be paid. Further, there are employees doing various organisational roles who need to be given salaries. Owing to the new business, there is a proportional increase in these payments also.

Further, there certain finance revenue and associated costs besides taxes paid. These form a very small proportion of the cash flows from operations.

The investing related cash flow of the company is illustrated as follows.

For the items highlighted in the above screenshot, the relevant description is given below (JB Hi-Fi, 2017).

• “Payment for business combination” – This indicates the amount of money that the company has spent during the year for acquiring business. For FY2017, the relevant entry clearly shows that a total of $ 836.6 million has been paid for acquiring a business.
• “Payments for plant and equipment” – This indicates the amount of money that was paid by the company with regards to plant and property acquisition. There has been no major change in FY2017 for this when compared to the previous year value.
• “Proceeds from sale of plant and equipment” – This indicates the amount of money that has been realised by the company through liquidation of certain fixed assets i.e. plant and equipment. In absolute terms, the change in this is negligible.

The financing related cash flow of the company is illustrated as follows (JB Hi-Fi, 2017).

For the items highlighted in the above screenshot, the relevant description is given below.

• “Proceeds from issues of shares” – This indicates the total money that company has obtained through share issue in the time period given.  In comparison to FY2016, FY2017 saw a huge increase in these proceeds as it increased to $ 395.9 million from $6 million.
• “Proceeds/(repayment) of borrowings” – This indicates the amount of money that company has raised by taking extra borrowings or any decrease in the borrowings level through repayment. There is an increase in borrowings by $ 450 million that has occurred in FY2017.

• The trends in cash flow of the company visible over the last three years are as highlighted below (JB Hi-Fi, 2017).

In relation to operational cashflows, the company seems to be performing well since the cash flow generated is on the increase.  The investing activities related cash outflow remained at low levels for FY2015 and FY2016 but this has altered in FY2017 as the company has acquired business and hence the outflow has witnessed a significant rise. For the two financial years, preceding FY2017, the focus of the company was on reducing the debt level and strengthen the balance sheet by raising more equity, but in FY2017 significant incremental borrowings have been drawn primarily on account of acquisition. However, a positive trend is that the incremental money raising through equity has continued even in FY2017 and significant amount has been raised (Damodaran, 2015).

• The screenshot of the OCI statement is captured as indicated below (JB Hi-Fi, 2017).

• The OCI statement elements have been briefly explained as shown below.
• “Changes in the fair value of cash flow (hedges) net of tax” – The company has foreign operations and the revenue in these operations is realised in a foreign currency i.e. not AUD. This gives rise to foreign exchange risk that required mitigation for which cash flow hedges have been procured by the company. These refer to financial instruments whose underlying value is determined based on the rate of foreign exchange. Since the exchange rate tends to fluctuate in real time, hence the value of cash flow hedge also alters. It is therefore required that any notional gain/(loss) derived should be captured in the financial statements for which the value of these instruments at the opening day of the financial year and closing day of the financial year is compared (Arnold, 2015).
• “Exchange differences on translation of foreign operations” – Considering the fact that the company has foreign operations, the foreign currency would have to be translated into AUD which acts as the functional currency.  This translation process may lead to possible gains or losses owing to the translation not proceeding at the same moment when foreign currency revenue is obtained (Petty et. al., 2015).

• The key reasons why the items enlisted are listed as part of the separate OCI statement are listed as follows (Brealey, Myers and Allen, 2014).
• It is requirement as per the existing accounting regulations along with presentation of financial statements guidelines offered by bodies such as IASB.
• For certain items such as cash hedge, the loss or gain booked may be notional only and not realised. It is possible that over the next year this notional gain or loss is erased owing to opposite movement.
• These items are usually not intended towards earning income even though they serve an important function. Also, listing of certain items as part of the OCI statement does not imply that they lack importance.

• The tax expense for JB Hi Fi for FY2017 is $ 86.8 million which is highlighted in the income statement. Also, compared to the previous year i.e. FY2016, the tax expense has seen a jump of around 30% (JB Hi-Fi, 2017).

• For JB Hi Fi, the pre-tax accounting income for FY2017 has come out as $ 259.2 million. Besides, a 30% corporate tax rate is prevalent. Hence, the expected tax expense would be (30/100)*259.2 or $ 77.8 million. It can be seen from the income statement that the actual tax expense is much higher at about $ 86.8 million. The income tax related schedule can help in understanding the differences (JB Hi-Fi, 2017).

The above table clearly shows that tax expense commences calculation from the theoretical value of $ 77.8 million only post which adjustments are carried out which are necessitated in order to reconcile between the income derived from tax and that obtained through accounting principles. Also, some expenses may be there where deduction can be claimed for tax but it is not so under accounting treatment (JB Hi-Fi, 2017). As a result, there is the necessity to make requisite deductions which have been highlighted above.

• Deferred Tax Assets

In accordance with their name, these are essentially tax assets and hence lead to lower tax related outflow in future based on present transactions.  As on the last day of FY2017, the amount so deferred tax assets on the balance sheet of the company stood at $ 105 million. The requisite break up in this regards is indicated below(JB Hi-Fi, 2017).

Investing Activities

The origin or creation of these assets is attributed to the carrying value related temporary differences that tend to arise due to differential treatment of tax and accounting rules. For the year ending on June 30, 2017, the deferred tax assets have shown a significant rise which is related to deferred revenue based temporary revenue which in the future would result in lower tax outflow by the company to the tune of $ 55.2 million.

In accordance with their name, these are essentially tax liabilities and hence lead to lower tax related outflow in future based on present transactions.  As on the last day of FY2017, the amount so deferred tax liabilities on the balance sheet of the company stood at $ 113.2 million. The requisite break up in this regards is indicated below (JB Hi-Fi, 2017).

The origin or creation of these liabilities is attributed to the carrying value related temporary differences that tend to arise due to differential treatment of tax and accounting rules. For the year ending on June 30, 2017, the deferred tax liabilities have shown a significant rise which is related to brand name based temporary revenue which in the future would result in higher tax outflow by the company to the tune of $ 85.2 million (JB Hi-Fi, 2017).

• The balance sheet of JB Hi Fi as on June 30, 2017 highlights that current tax liabilities do exist with an amount of $ 11.8 million. This figure has increased when compared to the current tax liabilities as on June 30, 2016 when the corresponding amount was $ 10.9 million. Since these tax liabilities are current, hence it implies that tax amount has to be paid in FY2018.

The is divergence between income tax payable and also income tax expense. This is because income tax expense denotes the total amount that the company should pay as tax for a given financial year to the tax authorities. However, this amount is made available only after the year is closed and therefore during the year, accurate payment is not possible and hence only approximate money is paid as tax. As a result, there is some pending amount of tax payable in a given year identified as current tax liabilities which is paid the next year. Further, the amount of tax paid in a year comprises of the outstanding tax liability of the previous year along with tax for the current year based on estimates of profits (Parrino and Kidwell, 2014).

• It is evident by comparing the two figures that income tax expense and income tax paid in the latest financial statement does not match. The difference in the amounts arises because it is quite possible that a portion of the tax outstanding for FY2016 would be reported as current tax liability. In FY2017, the current liability for the previous year would be paid besides the tax for the current year which would be based on estimates. This way a part of the tax is usually paid in the next financial year (Damodaran, 2015).

• In context of tax treatment, the most interesting aspect would be the treatment of deferred tax assets/liabilities which at times was quite complex. This however enabled higher clarity in tax related concepts as the various concepts covered in class were being applied here. In relation to the tax expense, the aspect that gained by attention as the reconciliation and the related adjustment which ought to be made so as to ensure that tax expense is as per the tax norms applicable for the company.

References

Arnold, G. (2015) Corporate Financial Management. 3^rd ed. Sydney: Financial Times Management.   

Brealey, R. A., Myers, S. C., & Allen, F. (2014) Principles of corporate finance, 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Inc.

Damodaran, A. (2015). Applied corporate finance: A user’s manual 3rd ed. New York: Wiley, John & Sons.

JB HI-FI (2017) Annual Report 2017. Retrieved from https://www.jbhifi.com.au/Documents/2017%20Annual%20Report.pdf 

Parrino, R. and Kidwell, D. (2014) Fundamentals of Corporate Finance, 3rd ed. London: Wiley Publications

Petty, J.W., Titman, S., Keown, A., Martin, J.D., Martin, P., Burrow, M., & Nguyen, H. (2015). Financial Management, Principles and Applications, 6^th ed..  NSW: Pearson Education, French Forest Australia.