Whether the four elements required for creating a contract were presented between Lila and the store; and Dina and Lila, or not?
A contract is to be defined as an undertaken promise where one side of the party promise to pay the contractual consideration and the other side promises to undertake the contractual promise. For creating a contract, there is a need for the presence of certain elements, which includes offer, acceptance, consideration and intention of the parties. For creating a contract, the first step is for an offer to be made. It is important to differentiate between an offer and acceptance, as the former shows intent of creating a legal relationship and the latter denotes the intent of negotiating upon the offer. The advertisements in general are deemed as an invitation. It is also important to differentiate between an offer and a request for information. Harvey v Facey was a case where the Privy Council stated that answering about the lowest price of pen was a request of information and not an offer as there was a lack of intention. Also, the offer can be revoked before the same is accepted by the other party.
This offer has to be then accepted by the party to which the offer had been made. The date of acceptance is such date on which the acceptance is attained by the party which made the offer. However, the postal rules of acceptance prove to be an exception and provide that the date of acceptance is such date on which the acceptance letter is posted and the date of receipt remains irrelevant. This is because the postal office is considered as an agent of offering party, as per Byrne v Van Tienhoven & Co, which means the receipt of postal office is the receipt of the offering party. The postal rules of acceptance are applicable on the electronic mails as well; so the date of sending the email is the date of particular offer/ acceptance based on section 14 of the Electronic Transaction Act, 1999. Also, the offer has to be accepted as had been made. If anything is changed in it, it is deemed as a counter offer as per Hyde v. Wrench which leads to the expiry of original offer.
The next requirement is for the contract to have a valid consideration, which has economic value. Lastly, the parties need to have the legal intention of getting into the contract. Once all the four elements are present together, a valid contract is formed.
Lila and Store
In this case, an offer was made by Lila to the store for the phone at $1000 on which a counter offer was made by the store to Lila to purchase the phone at $1500. This was because the consideration had been changed and as per Hyde v. Wrench, the original offer expired with this counter offer. However, even this counter offer was not accepted as the products changed later on to add an iPad and scanner. So, a new contract was formed at this stage, where the three products were to be bought by Lila at $2500. The discount voucher was not something which had been purchased and so, it did not form a part of the contract. This discount promotion was instead an offer which could be accepted by Lila in the next six months period. And since the offer was revoked through email three months ago, the date of revocation would be three months ago. Hence, due to the lack a standing offer and an absence of a contract in this regard, a contract was not formed between Lila and the store for the discount promotion.
There was no offer made in this case. The advertisement which was given in the newspaper was an invitation to treat. On this, an offer could have been made, had it not contained a question. An offer has to explicitly state the terms which are being offered. Here, there was uncertainty about the furniture being how old. Hence, this was not an offer. And neither was the reply of Dina an offer as this was only information given before the contract was formed. This entire communication was a pre-contractual negotiation. And without an offer, a contract cannot proceed.
Conclusion
Hence, no contract was formed between Lila and store, and Dina and Lila, owing to lack of valid acceptance in first case and lack of offer in second case.
Whether the advertisement was an offer to sell the item or not?
Partridge v Crittenden provides that the advertisements are to be deemed as an invitation treat and not an offer.
Based on Partridge v Crittenden, the television advertisement would be deemed as an invitation to treat.
Conclusion
Hence, the advertisement was not an offer to sell the item.
Whether the displayed IPhone Max at the store was an offer to sell the item or not?
Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain v Boots provides that goods kept on shelf are an invitation to treat. And that an offer is only made when the person picks up the product from the shelf and goes to the cashier.
Based on Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain v Boots, the displayed IPhone Max at the store would be deemed as an invitation to treat.
Conclusion
Hence, the displayed IPhone Max at the store was not an offer to sell the item.
Whether the inaccurate price tag be deemed as a breach of contract by the store, or not?
A breach of contract takes place only when a contract has been formed, and the promise made under the contract is not upheld.
The price tag is only an invitation to treat and also, no contract was formed which could lead to a breach of contract.
Conclusion
Hence, the inaccurate price tag cannot be deemed as a breach of contract by the store.
Whether the promotion promising a discount on purchase of items of at least $2500, an offer or not?
The promotions, like the advertisements are deemed as an invitation to treat.
The promotion was an invitation to treat, which converted into an offer once it was acted upon. Only when the purchase was made, was an offer made, which then had to be accepted by the cashier to give the discount.
Conclusion
Hence, the promotion promising a discount on purchase was an invitation to treat and not an offer.
Whether the discount promotion was validly withdrawn or not or whether there was a breach of contract?
(Same as above)
As has been stated earlier, the offer was revoked before it could be accepted and this was done three months before the acceptance was given.
Conclusion
Hence, the discount promotion was validly withdrawn and owing to a lack of contract, the same was not breached.
[Already discussed under issue (a)]
What type of clause was found on the docket Jane received?
An exclusion clause can be defined as such a clause of a contract, which has the power of limiting or restricting the liabilities of the contracting parties.
As the clause which Jane received had the power of restricting the liability under negligence or breach of contract of the drycleaners, it would be deemed as an exclusion clause.
Conclusion
Hence, an exclusion clause was given to Jane.
Was the clause effectively incorporated into the contract?
In order for the exclusion clause to be valid, the same has to be such that it does not restrict the applicability of any law. Also, the same has to be brought to the attention of the parties. However, where an exclusion clause is inserted into the contract, before the same is signed, and the person signs the contract, the exclusion clause is deemed as valid irrespective of the fact that the other person read it or not as per L’Estrange v Graucob.
In this case, the exclusion clause was signed by Jane and on the basis of L’Estrange v Graucob, it would be deemed as valid.
Conclusion
Hence, the exclusion clause was effectively incorporated in this case.
Would your answer for (b) be different if the receipt was not signed?
When the exclusion clause is not signed, it has to be brought to the attention of the other party.
The exclusion clause was brought to the attention of Jane by the employee of drycleaners. Also, she had already asked about the clause, which showed that she was aware of the exclusion clause.
Conclusion
Hence, the exclusion clause, even when was not signed, was properly brought to the attention of Jane, thus making it valid.
What was the legal effect of the representative’s reply to Jane’s question about the clause on the receipt?
There are certain vitiating factors in a contract which have the capacity of making the contract void or voidable. One of these is misrepresentation. Where an individual is forced or is induced in a manner so that such person gets into a contract, it is deemed as misrepresentation. The false statement has to be one of fact and not of opinion, as per Bisset v Wilkinson.
In this case, the wordings of representative were such so that Jane would simply go forward with the dry-cleaning. This was a false statement of fact and as per Bisset v Wilkinson, this would be deemed as misrepresentation. His reply misrepresented that the clause meant that it was nothing when it avoided the liability of the drycleaners from damage to the cloth.
Conclusion
Hence, the representative’s reply was misrepresentation.
Was the wording of the clause clear?
The exclusion clause, for being valid, has to be such that it is clear and not ambiguous.
The wordings of the exclusion clause were very clear and easily comprehensible.
Conclusion
Hence, the wordings of the clause were clear.
Is the four corners rule relevant here?
As per the four corners rule, the written contract has to be interpreted solely as per its textual context.
In this case, the four corner rule cannot be applied owing to misrepresentation of the employee of the drycleaners.
Conclusion
Hence, the four corners rule is not relevant here.
Overall, are you of the opinion that Jane can claim for her damaged gown?
Curtis v Chemical Cleaning and Dyeing Co was a case where the court held that even when the exclusion clause is properly inserted into the contract and is signed by the parties, an exception to L’Estrange v Graucob would be made, when there is an element of misrepresentation included in such transaction. The facts of this case are similar to the given case study also. So the ruling of this has to be applied here.
In the given case study, it has already been established that the exclusion clause was even though signed, but covered the misrepresentation of the employee of the drycleaners. So, because of the misrepresentation of the effects of the exclusion clause, reliance cannot be made on the exclusion clause, despite it being signed. And based on Curtis v Chemical Cleaning and Dyeing Co, the drycleaner would be liable for the negligence in properly cleaning up the dress. And the drycleaner would have to compensate Jane for her loss.
Conclusion
Hence, Jane can sue the drycleaners for her damaged gown and the exclusion clause would not allow the drycleaner in evading their liability arising from negligence, owing to misrepresentation by their employee.
A. Articles/ Books/ Reports
Andrews N, Contract Law (Cambridge University Press, 2nd ed, 2015)
Davies PS, JC Smith’s the Law of Contract (Oxford University Press, 2016)
Elliott C, and Quinn F, Contract Law (Pearson Education Limited, 9th ed, 2013)
Furmston M, and Tolhurst GJ, Contract Formation: Law and Practice (Oxford University Press, 2010)
Gibson A, and Fraser D, Business Law (Pearson Higher Education AU, 2013)
Latimer P, Australian Business Law 2012 (CCH Australia Limited, 31st ed, 2012)
Marson J, and Ferris K, Business Law Concentrate: Law Revision and Study Guide (Oxford University Press, 3rd ed, 2016)
McKendrick E, Contract Law (Pearson Education Limited, 11th ed, 2015)
Poole J, Casebook on Contract Law (Oxford University Press, 2016)
Stone R and Devenney J, Text, Cases and Materials on Contract Law (Routledge, 3rd ed, 2014)
B. Cases
Bisset v Wilkinson [1927] AC 177
Byrne v Van Tienhoven & Co (1880) LR 5 CPD 344
Curtis v Chemical Cleaning and Dyeing Co [1951] 1 KB 805
Harvey v Facey [1893] AC 552
Hyde v. Wrench (1840) 3 Beav 334
L’Estrange v Graucob [1934] 2 KB 394
Partridge v Crittenden (1968) 2 All ER 421
Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain v Boots [1953] 1 QB 401
C. Legislations
Electronic Transaction Act, 1999 (Cth)
Essay Writing Service Features
Our Experience
No matter how complex your assignment is, we can find the right professional for your specific task. Contact Essay is an essay writing company that hires only the smartest minds to help you with your projects. Our expertise allows us to provide students with high-quality academic writing, editing & proofreading services.
Free Features
Free revision policy
$10Free bibliography & reference
$8Free title page
$8Free formatting
$8How Our Essay Writing Service Works
First, you will need to complete an order form. It's not difficult but, in case there is anything you find not to be clear, you may always call us so that we can guide you through it. On the order form, you will need to include some basic information concerning your order: subject, topic, number of pages, etc. We also encourage our clients to upload any relevant information or sources that will help.
Complete the order form
Once we have all the information and instructions that we need, we select the most suitable writer for your assignment. While everything seems to be clear, the writer, who has complete knowledge of the subject, may need clarification from you. It is at that point that you would receive a call or email from us.
Writer’s assignment
As soon as the writer has finished, it will be delivered both to the website and to your email address so that you will not miss it. If your deadline is close at hand, we will place a call to you to make sure that you receive the paper on time.
Completing the order and download