Whether a valid contract has formed between Rachel and ChunkyChicken by fulfilling all the essential elements of the contract?
A contract is referred to a legal agreement which his formed between two or more parties. This agreement gives them the right to enforce the contractual terms on each other. The terms of the contracts bind its parties, and they have to comply with its terms. However, this right is available only in case a valid contract is formed between the parties. A valid contract is formed when its parties fulfil all the essential elements of the contract. These elements include offer, acceptance, capacity, legality, intention and consideration. Firstly, an offer is made to form a contract which is referred to a proposal or proposition which gives rise to an agreement between parties after receiving acceptance. It can be expressed or implied, and it must be clear and unambiguous. An offer can be revoked by a party at any time before its acceptance unless it is supported by consideration as given in the case of Goldsborough Mort & Co Ltd v Quinn.
Moreover, it is important that parties must differentiate between offer and an invitation to treat. Certain examples of invitation to treat include broacher, advertisement and display of goods for sale. In Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain v Boots Cash Chemists (Southern) Ltd case, it was held by the court that goods which are displayed on shelf for the sale of customers are not considered as a valid offer instead it is considered as an invitation to treat. A valid acceptance is another key element of the contract which is referred to clear and undoubted assent to the offer to comply with all of its terms. Certain rules must be fulfilled in order to constitute acceptance as valid. It must be clear and undoubted and must be communicated. It must be given with appropriate knowledge, and the party must use correct method while communicating acceptance.
The acceptance must be free from any condition, and it must be given for all the terms of the offer in order to constitute as valid as given in Hyde v Wrench case. Consideration is another key element of a valid contract. It is referred to the price for which the promise of another party is brought which makes the contract legally enforceable. It is the bargain of the contract in which one party’s gain is another party’s detriment. Consideration must be present in all simple contracts, and it must not be vague or illusionary as given in White v Bluett case. The consideration must be sufficient in the eyes of the law as given in the case of Hercules Motors Pty Ltd v Schubert.
In the given scenario, ChunkyChicken has implemented a self-service facility for its customers where they can select what they want to order by clicking on the image or icon of the product. The display of these products are not a valid offer, instead, they are invitation to treat. As discussed in Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain v Boots Cash Chemists (Southern) Ltd case, the items which are displayed by the show on the shelf are not considered as available for sale. Similarly, showing the items of the display is not a valid offer; instead, it is an invitation to treat. The customers who wanted to purchase something can make an offer by clicking on the screen to place their order. Rachel made an offer to purchase the new gourmet chunkier chicken burger and hand cut chips in the screen, and this offer was accepted by ChunkyChicken when a printed ticket was issued immediately in which an order number and price is given which matched the terms of the offer made by Rachel (Hyde v Wrench).
However, a valid contract has not formed between the parties at the movement because the element of consideration is missing which is a key element to form a valid contract. The consideration is paid by Rachael to the cashier when she paid $17.50 for the burger. The consideration paid by her was not vague or illusionary, and it was sufficient for the product purchased by Rachel, hence, it was a valid consideration (White v Bluett). The consideration paid by Rachel for the burger was sufficient in the eyes of the law (Hercules Motors Pty Ltd v Schubert). Thus, a contract is formed between Rachel and ChunkyChicken when a payment of $17.50 was made by Rachel to the cashier after which all the necessary elements which are necessary to form a contract were present.
Conclusion
Based on the above analysis, it can be concluded that a valid contract has formed between Rachel and ChunkyChicken because all the essential elements of a contract were present.
Whether ChunkyChicken can rely on the clause included in the electronic terms and conditions in order to avoid liability towards Rachael?
The terms which are included in a valid contract are enforceable on its parties. It means that the victim party can enforce the contractual terms on another contractual party if they are not complying with such terms. In case the contractual terms are not fulfilled by the party, then the aggrieved party has the right to hold the breaching party liable for such violation. The victim has the option to enforce the terms on another party or demand damages for the loss suffered by the aggrieved party. However, this liability can be eliminated by the party by including an exclusion clause in the contract. The exclusion clause or unfair term is referred to a contractual term that seeks to either completely eliminate or limit the liability of a party which arise based on the breach of the contract. As per the rule of exclusion clause, if a party signs a contract, then they are bound by all of its terms. This rule was given in L’Estrange v Graucob Ltd case which applies whether or not the party has read or understood the term or not which is known as the signature rule. In the case of unsigned documents, the court relies on two tests to determine whether an exclusion clause is valid to ensure that it did not violate the right of customers.
The first test is nature of the document which is an objective test which evaluates whether a reasonable person would expect the contract to contain such term as given in Chapelton v Barry Urban District Council case. The reasonable notice test provided that the party must take reasonable steps to bind the clause into the notice of the customer while the contract is being formed as given in case. Thus, clause hidden on the back of pillar in the car parking is not considered as valid in the case of Thornton v Shoe Lane Parking Co. The Competition and Consumer Act 2010 gives the definition of a consumer under section 3. Section 3 (1) provided that a consumer is referred to such person who purchases any good for personal, domestic or household consumption and the payment about did not exceed $40,000. Section 24 of the act defines unfair as a term which causes imbalance between contractual parties’ rights and obligations and it did not protect their legitimate interest. Section 26 provides that unfair terms in consumer contracts are considered ineffective.
In the given scenario, the electronic terms and conditions contained the exclusion clause based on which ChunkyChicken wanted to eliminate its liability towards Rachael. The contract formed between parties was an unsigned document, thus, the validity of the term can be determined by two tests. Based on the first test, it was not reasonable to include such term in the contract because it violates customers’ rights (Chapelton v Barry Urban District Council). Based on second test, reasonable steps were not taken by ChunkyChicken to bring the term into the attention of Rachael. It was also not included when the contract was formed between the parties which were at the time when Rachael paid for the food (Thornton v Shoe Lane Parking Co). Moreover, Rachael is a consumer as per the definition given under section 3 of the Australian Consumer Law. Thus, the term included by ChunkyChicken which violates her right is considered as ineffective as per the provision gave under section 26 of the act.
Conclusion
In conclusion, ChunkyChicken cannot rely on the defence of the exclusion clause because it was not valid and Rachael has right under the Australian Consumer Law to receive compensation from ChunkyChicken.
A Articles/Books/Reports
Burrows, Andrew, A casebook on contract (Bloomsbury Publishing, 2013).
McKendrick, Ewan and Liu, Qiao, Contract Law: Australian Edition (Macmillan International Higher Education, 2015).
Monaghan, Chris and Monaghan, Nicola, Beginning Contract Law (Routledge, 2013).
Parker, David and Box, Gerald, Business law for business students (Lawbook Co., 2013).
Russell, Carron Ann, Opinion in Contract Law (Routledge, 2012).
B Cases
Chapelton v Barry Urban District Council [1940] 1 KB 532
Goldsborough Mort & Co Ltd v Quinn (1910) 10 CLR 674
Hercules Motors Pty Ltd v Schubert (1953) 53 SR (NSW) 301
Hyde v Wrench (1840) 49 ER 132
L’Estrange v Graucob Ltd (1934) 2 KB 394
Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain v Boots Cash Chemists (Southern) Ltd [1952] 2 QB 795
Thornton v Shoe Lane Parking Co [1971] 4 CLR 379
White v Bluett (1853) 23 LJ 23 Ex
C Legislation
Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth)
D Others
Austlii, Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (2018) < https://classic.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/caca2010265/toc-sch2.html>.
Essay Writing Service Features
Our Experience
No matter how complex your assignment is, we can find the right professional for your specific task. Contact Essay is an essay writing company that hires only the smartest minds to help you with your projects. Our expertise allows us to provide students with high-quality academic writing, editing & proofreading services.
Free Features
Free revision policy
$10Free bibliography & reference
$8Free title page
$8Free formatting
$8How Our Essay Writing Service Works
First, you will need to complete an order form. It's not difficult but, in case there is anything you find not to be clear, you may always call us so that we can guide you through it. On the order form, you will need to include some basic information concerning your order: subject, topic, number of pages, etc. We also encourage our clients to upload any relevant information or sources that will help.
Complete the order form
Once we have all the information and instructions that we need, we select the most suitable writer for your assignment. While everything seems to be clear, the writer, who has complete knowledge of the subject, may need clarification from you. It is at that point that you would receive a call or email from us.
Writer’s assignment
As soon as the writer has finished, it will be delivered both to the website and to your email address so that you will not miss it. If your deadline is close at hand, we will place a call to you to make sure that you receive the paper on time.
Completing the order and download