Forum On Gender Equality And Women’s Empowerment Policies

PUBH6300 Public Health

PUBH6300 Public Health

Key Principles for Policy Development

With the collaboration of the WO=MEN, KIT Gender has made a forum on 16 January 2014. This form of one day event have brought together over 60 practitioners, makers of policies, researchers, lobbyists and the specialists of gender with the single aim for stimulating the discussions for the transformation practices and the approaches towards the rights of women and gender equality (Allwood, 2013).

The forum has been examining the two key principles that have been shaped for forming the policy for the development. Firstly, the empowerment takes place through the rise in the population and the form of integration from the economy and secondly, the high demand impacts the measurable and the quantifiable form of data. Both the factors have the detrimental form of effects on the advancements of the equality towards the gender and they have the undetermined form of approaches that are very critical for having a change in the society. Therefore, it is extremely important for analyzing the shaping of the knowledge about gender and for the identification of the critical form of the engagement.

The forum also identified the various transformation approaches and the practices that are necessary for the equity of the rights of the women in their challenging form of the landscape. The speeches and the key aspects delivered by Wendy Harcourt, Maitrayee Mukhopadhay and six other representatives of the organizations have shared the opportunities, dilemmas and the challenges that are being experienced for promoting the rights of the women and the gender equality in the era of neoliberalization (Eerdewij & Davids, 2014).

The nature of the good practices are often used for the promotion of the equity and sharing the experiences for the mainstreaming of the gender into the various policies and the programmes that are being practiced by the member of the State Institutions (Hills, 2015). After the comparisons drawn between the definitions and the sources that are termed as good practice, best practices, or the lessons learned that are generally used interchangeably. 

References

Allwood, G. (2013, August). Gender mainstreaming and policy coherence for development: Unintended gender consequences and EU policy. In Women’s Studies International Forum (Vol. 39, pp. 42-52). Pergamon.

Alston, M. (2014, December). Gender mainstreaming and climate change. In Women’s Studies International Forum (Vol. 47, pp. 287-294). Pergamon.

Davids, T., Driel, F., & Parren, F. (2014). Feminist change revisited: Gender mainstreaming as slow revolution. Journal of International Development, 26(3), 396-408.

Hills, J. (2015). Addressing gender quotas in South Africa: Women empowerment and gender equality legislation. Deakin L. Rev., 20, 153.

Morley, L. (2014). Lost leaders: Women in the global academy. Higher Education Research & Development, 33(1), 114-128.

Phillips, R. (2015). How ‘empowerment’may miss its mark: gender equality policies and how they are understood in women’s NGOs. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 26(4), 1122-1142.

Prügl, E., & True, J. (2014). Equality means business? Governing gender through transnational public-private partnerships. Review of International Political Economy, 21(6), 1137-1169.

Sen, G., & Mukherjee, A. (2014). No empowerment without rights, no rights without politics: Gender-equality, MDGs and the post-2015 development agenda. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 15(2-3), 188-202.

Waithanji, E., & Grace, D. (2014). Tools and concepts for mainstreaming gender in aflatoxin research at the International Livestock Research Institute. ILRI (aka ILCA and ILRAD).

Wisborg, P. (2014). Transnational land deals and gender equality: Utilitarian and human rights approaches. Feminist Economics, 20(1), 24-51.

Yurdakul, G., & Korteweg, A. C. (2013, December). Gender equality and immigrant integration: Honor killing and forced marriage debates in the Netherlands, Germany, and Britain. In Women’s Studies International Forum(Vol. 41, pp. 204-214). Pergamon.