Identification Of Continuing Professional Development

Academic Experience

Write an essay on Identification of Continuing Professional Development.

I was a Reservoir engineer based in Aberdeen, with 10 years’ experience in various aspects of reservoir and petroleum engineering. I have competencies in expertise in E&P Field Development Planning, Production Optimisation, Reservoir Management, Simulation, Performance and Production forecasting, Reservoir Model Building and Development, Reservoir Fluid Characterization. I moreover have experience in Classical Reservoir Engineering, Pressure Transient Analysis and Design, Uncertainty Analysis & Management, and Economic Evaluation of projects.

Masters of Science (Petroleum Engineering) from Heriot-Watt University, Institute Of Petroleum Engineering, Edinburgh, in the year 2009-2010 with distinction

Bachelor of Engineering (Petroleum Engineering) from University Of Benin, Benin City, Nigeria, in the year 2005 in Second Class Upper Division

Simulator: CMG / IMEX, ECLIPSE, VIP, NEXUS, Petroleum Expert Tools (MBAL, PROSPER and GAP)

Well-test Analysis: SAPHIR, PANSYSTEM, PIE, and ECLIPSE WELLTEST 200

Miscellaneous: MS Office, MS Excel, Power Point, Visio, Outlook and Access

Geo-modeling / Visualization: RMS, CoViz, PETREL

PVT: Winprop and PVTP

MS Office Tool: Microsoft Excel, Word, PowerPoint, Microsoft Project

Programming: VBA, Perl, and XML

Moreover, I am a team player with Analytical, Problem solving, and Communication and Interpersonal skills as well.

I had attended several trainings and courses in my professional and academia career. Some of the events are the following.

Event Name	Year
Schlumberger Petrel Training	2015
Water Flood Principle and Practices  (BP)	2014
Option Evaluation Using Top Down Reservoir Modelling (BP)	2014
Applied Reservoir Simulation (BP)	2014
Classical Reservoir Engineering (BP)	2013
Subsurface uncertainty and Risk management (SURM)	2013
Basic Water Flood Awareness (BP)	2012
Applied Reservoir Engineering (Petroskills)	2012
Integrated asset modelling (IAM) with petroleum Expert Tool Kit (PROSPER, MBAL & GAP), BP	2011
Intermediate Nexus Course, Landmark, (Reservoir simulation)	2011
Reservoir Fluids and Basics of EOS, BP	2011
Fundamentals of Reservoir Surveillance, BP	2011
Integrated Reservoir Modelling, Institute of Petroleum Engineering	2010
Workshop on Uncertainty Management, Institute of Petroleum Engineering	2010
Field Development Best Practices, Institute of Petroleum Engineering	2010
Reservoir Monitoring & Management in Laser Engineering	2007
Technical report Writing and Presentation Skills in Laser Engineering	2008

From 2012 until date:

BP, Aberdeen-United Kingdom

I was employed as a Reservoir Engineer with Reservoir Simulation and Depletion Planning in Support of Clair phase1 Field Development job description. Some of the other responsibilities were as

Economic Evaluation of infill options

Develop alternative Field Development Scenarios and perform Economic Evaluation on these options.

Reservoir Engineering/Simulation studies in support of infill wells (producers/injectors)

Provide Reservoir Engineering input for evaluating the value of 4D seismic acquisition in Clair Phase 1. 

Until 2011

BP, Aberdeen-United Kingdom

I was employed as an Offshore Reservoir Engineer with Daily production Optimisation of Clair field Wells. I followed other roles as

Coordinate all reservoirs and well work activities that ensure optimal reservoir recovery as well as higher well productivity on the Clair field.

Communicate the significance and value of reservoir management and surveillance strategy to the offshore

Acquire, analyze and interprets surveillance data for reservoir and well limits.

Until 2010

BP, Aberdeen-United Kingdom

Post: Reservoir / Petroleum Engineer 

From 2008 until 2009

Laser Engineering & Resources Consultants Limited / Laser Geo-science Training and Research Centre), Port Harcourt

Post: Reservoir Engineer / Lecturer 

Skill Profile

During 2007 to 2008

Shell Petroleum Development Company, Warri, Nigeria (Consultant Staff representing Laser Engineering & Resources Consultants Limited), Port Harcourt

Post: Reservoir Engineer / Consultant Well Test Analyst 

During 2006 to 2007

Ankor Pointe Integrated (API) Port Harcourt

I declare that afore mentioned competencies and skill information are genuine and proper. I have completed Bachelors and Masters in Petroleum Engineering and I have sufficient expertises to belong to several organizations. I ensure the concerned authority that I am aware of the relevant workplace code of ethics to work with sustainability and at the same time with reliability.

Name:

Date:

Place:

Name of the Project: Alternative Field Development Options in a Water-Flood Field

Duration of Project: Please Fill

Project Location: Please Fill

Name of the Organisation: Please Fill

Role and Designation: Please Fill

The primary focus of the project was to develop an alternative field option in water flood field for appropriately planning of water resource projects. The engineering project was intended to identify ways of utilization of available water for field development purposes. For successful accomplishment of the project, it required a proper application of the major skills and knowledge of reservoir and petroleum engineering technologies. The project further involved sufficient concepts of geological modelling as well as employing effective water flooding mechanisms. The initial design of the project involved estimation of different parameters based on the location and number of wells required to be drilled per injection location. Furthermore, the water flood patterns and selective injection design was utilized for determining the water flow regulators (WFRs).

The primary objective of the project is to establish effective means to identify alternative field development options with advanced reservoir and petroleum engineering skills and knowledge. For this purpose, we built the field development team for undertaking the pattern establishment based on achievable measures of areal sweep efficiency. Moreover, for accomplishing the goal of the project, I collaborated with my team members to conduct a suitable drilling campaign for planning and placement of the producers and injectors. Additionally, the project essentially involved the objective of identifying and establishing alternative field development options for water flood field. The particular objectives are:

To identify field development options for water flood field

To study optimized ways for effective water flooding management using water flow regulators

To recognize the reservoir pressure and permeability influence the water flow

To estimate a proper design for field development

To present the project with well-documented end results to the project supervisor

Professional Certificate

My particular area of work in this project was based on identifying the primary design and requirement specifications for executing the project in an efficient manner. For this specific purpose, I identified the undeveloped areas of the field and arranged the field water flow in a proper way. Furthermore, I reviewed and managed the water flood program with injectors and producers of water channelling following an adequate mobility ratio. In addition to that, I also significantly contributed in the process of determining the effectiveness of water flow from the injector wells and configuring the design in accordance with the requirements.

In this project, the specific duties and responsibilities that I have performed are listed underneath:

I identified the major project requirements for formulating the alternative water flood program

I maintained all the safety and security requirements throughout the project

I took the responsibility of design and placement of wells

I undertook an in-depth study on reservoir management guidelines for successful accomplishment of the plan

I divided the project deliverables into subtasks and assigned them into individual teammates according to their area of expertise

I successfully contributed some creative ideas in the project implementation phase

I took the responsibility of developing the primary budget plan of the project

I applied my skills and knowledge particularly gained in the area of reservoir and petroleum engineering to develop the primary strategy to be followed for actualizing the project. Furthermore, I have understood the use of alternative as well as the stand by injection wells. The confinement process was to be understood to keep the injected produced water within the horizons specifications. Apart from this, the project sufficiently focused on basic alternative strategies in case injection is suspended for extended time or even the injection operation is terminated. Additionally, the injection well abandonment operations require effective plugging strategies. For avoiding any unwanted circumstances, it is important to incorporate continuous monitoring of the injection pressure. To execute the injection and monitoring operations, the key parameters are identified that also involve the use of new well diagnostics tools.

Figure: Enhanced Recovery Flood Pattern

I performed all of the necessary reservoir and petroleum engineering activities to develop the water flood program and identify the appropriate pattern for the injector and producer design. I collaborated, coordinated with my fellow team members for the field development activities, including areal sweep efficiency, and organized the proper drilling campaign for planning and placement of injectors and producers. I employed advanced reservoir management and engineering approaches to monitor the overburden and horizontal stress and fracture closure pressure. I also conducted an extensive study to identify the applicable regulations, codes and standards to be adhered for the project development process.

Working Experience

I actively participated in the field development team to carry out the primary activities involved in the project. For this purpose, I coordinated with my team members and kept a constant contact with them through phone calls and emails for exchanging important information during the project development phase. Apart from that, I identified the major project deliverables and scheduled appropriate resources and time duration for each of the subtasks. I also demonstrated adequate competency in recognizing and developing a concept of the individual areas of strengths and weaknesses of each of team members and thereby contributed to assigning some tasks to the best person to perform the specific activity.

Significant problems were encountered regarding the well specifications activities. The initial state of the model before executing water flood program and in the early phase of the project initiation, the field development team faced difficulties and complexities in the process of specifying the five-spot pattern reservoir model along with the different marginal positions so as to ensure best outcomes that demonstrates the individual impact of the different parameters.

I, along with my teammates, have been successfully able to overcome the specific issues encountered during the project with the special help and guidance from our project supervisor. Apart from that, I performed some exhaustive analysis and research on the reservoir flow management methods and techniques, which in turn helped me significantly, identify the sources of problems. Thereafter, we conducted a reservoir simulation for predicting the overall vertical as well as areal extent of the injected produced water on a field scale.

In this project, the phase in water flood design was performed in accordance with the codes and standards applicable. The reservoir management activities were required to follow the minimum economic and technical criteria for an appropriate water-flood design implementation. In addition to that, the surface facilities to handle the produced water for the reservoir are to adhere to a design using adequate flexibility. Similarly, for injection water requires specific surface facilities and maintains high water quality as well. The injection water treatment is focused on preventing the reservoir from being inoculated with bacteria. I specifically undertook the responsibility of performing all the major engineering and technical calculations for a successful water flood field development using a great detailed approach. More precisely, my area of 

activity also involved looking into different relevant literature sources for conducting a full range of geosciences and engineering studies.

Declaration

Figure: Possible Injection Water Sources

I have performed my duties as a reservoir engineer and maintained a consistent approach throughout the project development process. I effectively coordinated with my fellow team members in the process of developing the Gantt chart and allocating appropriate time and resources for each of the subtasks involved in the project. . Apart from that, I confidently approached our team leader, the project supervisor with any issues or confusion faced, and they have actively assisted and supported our effort throughout the process.

The project was successfully completed with the alternative strategies for field development adequately affecting the efficiency of the water flood program. With the accomplishment of the project, we also potentially discovered the additional reservoir methods and techniques using the newly acquired data. I personally acquired advanced practical skills in the reservoir engineering technologies to execute the major activities of field development options for water flood field.

For successful execution of the project, I undertook significant responsibilities throughput the project life cycle, especially in project initiation and implementation phases. I identified the major requirements and estimated the primary or initial budget plan required for the project. To be more precise, I recognized the suitable injection properties as well as the confinement zone geo-mechanical properties for formulating the well specifications. Besides, I effectively coordinated and collaborated with my team members for accomplishing the project goal and objectives in a proper manner. 

Name of the Project: Planning of Wells for Infill Drilling Campaign on Clair Field

Duration of Project: PLEASE FILL

Project Location: PLEASE FILL

Name of the Organisation: PLEASE FILL

Role and Designation: PLEASE FILL

Clair Oilfield is an offshore field potential of oil asset in Scottish territory. It is situated 75 kilometres west of Shetland with water depth of 460 ft. The filed extends to 220 square kilometres with coverage of five licence blocks. The aim of this infill campaign is to research over the selected site for recommending well construction. The well pattern will accelerate the oil recovery or check for recovery techniques. This was the project criteria as well the project description for certain objectives. The research is performed in Clair field for well planning for infill campaign. A handful numbers of major study had been conducted over the infill campaign and as per the previous results, the mature production was in deepwater from Neocene age as in Miocene, Pliocene, and Pleistocene reservoirs. The below graph depicts the oil recovery factors in non-water flooded Neocene age reservoirs.

Career Episode 1

Figure: Oil recovery factors in non-water flooded Neocene age reservoirs

The project is mainly centred in the planning of well construction for oil recovery in Clair filed. The objectives were the following:

To research over the site Clair field

To provide overall report to the authority for infill campaign and well planning

To identify the oil recovery factors in this site

To manage the project with assigning tasks to the other teammates

I worked as a project manager in particular project with allocating tasks to the members levelling the resources. The Gantt chart design will be helpful to tackle the challenging work of management. The Gantt chart utilizes timeline with available slack management and hence, the scheduling was flawless. On the other hand, I had to research on the site and characteristics. Therefore, I could grasp the entire project activity with my understanding of work. In most of the cases, the deepwater reservoirs are identified as the oil resources; therefore, I had to review the site with analyzing the underwater depth. I had to identify the IOR processes to add substantial reserves in the Clair field site.

In the project, I had several duties as well. The project deliverables were to deepwater asset characterization for reservoir properties determination, search for key causes of captured hydrocarbons, gaps in leading recoveries determination, and concepts to secure gaps. I was the project manager and team leader in the project team. I had followed the duties as follows.

I had to identify the IOR processes to add substantial reserves in the Clair field site.

I identified the ‘technical issues and lack of study’ in IOR processes application.

I moreover recommended the future R&D programs that can be implemented in order to minimize the technical limitations

The understanding of the entire project is depicted in the below diagram with two phases of activities.

Figure: Stages of work in Project

After approval from the concerned authority on the entire project activity, the project is advanced with the above conceptual framework. Once the approval phase is over, the project is conducted with preparing a detailed Gantt chart including all the significant activities with timeline. The activities were included as research work, IOR review, data collection from the industry expertises, oil-trapping techniques, project management planning, IOR evaluation, gap identification, advisory meeting, reporting, and sign-off. The entire project was conducted in systematic way with each activity completion.

1.1 Introduction

The site is viewed for start-up oil reservoirs and their existence in the area. The overall view is shown below. The two phases are identified with respect to the fractured oil reservoirs in Clair field.

Figure: Clair Field infill campaign sit

I

Figure: Clair Field infill campaign sitemap

The Neocene prioritized IOR concepts are identified in the following table. The table is included for identification of IOR processes.

IOR Process	Low	High	Field Count	Target OOIP of the field (MMSTB)	Technical Readiness level	Process ranking
Conventional Water Injection	4%	25%	14	10021	7	1
Seafloor Water Injection	4%	18%	18	10350	4	2
Inâ€ÂWell ESP	3%	7%	13	12221	6	5
Inâ€ÂWell Gas Lift	3%	7%	21	10518	6	6
Hydrocarbon Gas Injection	3%	12%	5	7096	5	7
Nitrogen Injection	3%	12%	8	7980	4	9
Low Cost Wells	4%	9%	74	29748	0	18

Table: Identified IOR processes

In this activity completion, I had to apply my knowledge of reservoir simulation, well test analysis, and oil field development. The engineering knowledge was applicable with project managerial activities.

In this project, the bulk of task was assigned to us from the site managers. The site managers include the team members for serving one or more than one specific purposes, therefore, I had to decompose the task into several smaller activities. The smaller activities were assigned to the teammates for faster completion within time. As I was accomplished with project management knowledge, therefore, it was never an issue to me to allocate activities to the team members with assessing their individual capabilities.

The problems were identified in the project as with the project completion within time and as well with deviating from the primary scope of the project. The scope was to recommend for wells in the selected site and oil reservoirs. The problems were as follows

The teammates became deviated from the primary project scope; they were involved in the analysis for field data for oil trapping mechanisms. The problem turns out to be shortage of time, as they allocated more effort to the single activity.

Again, the second issue turn out to be the misunderstanding between the team members. I was the team leader however, to some extent; I was unable to resolve their issues.

Final issue was to derive the technical gap analysis in this project aspect. The gap analysis was to be performed under the secondary research, however, we lacked in the data collection part.

We approached to the project advisor and supervisor for reporting about the identified issues in the project activity. They helped us for mitigating the problems. First, they conducted a counselling session in between the team members for resolving the individual issues to enhance team integrity for improvement or teamwork. They additionally restructured the project scope to minimize the scope related deviation. The technical gap analysis issue was resolved with providing relevant studies for the purpose. Their effort was outstanding and supportive in this issue scenario.

1.2 Background

In the project, the locations for fractured oil reservoirs are identified as in the figure.

Figure: The reservoir location

The Infill Campaign result summary is included in the location details. The phase II infill drilling campaign is conducted with reusing the slots to tie in six new wells. The rig platform should be supported with Tender Support Vessel for drilling services.

Location	Field type	First production	Water depth (m)
206/8-15	Oil	Q4 / 2013	2000
206/8-1A	Oil	Q4 / 2014	2400
206/8-11A	Oil	Q4 / 2014	2500
206/13A-2	Oil	Q4 / 2015	2300

Table: Infill Campaign result

Ultimately, after resolving the team issues, we felt coordination within team for improving the project work. I learnt the idea of compact teamwork and support from my practical experience in this project. I realized that their effort was effective in order to commence the project with relevant revision to the scope. They followed the scheduling process as well and the scheduling helped us to devise the project within time.

I had achieved experience of teamwork, team maintenance as well as Reservoir Simulation knowledge application from this project. The outcome of the project was a report depicting well construction planning infill campaign in Clair field. I utilized ECLIPSE WELLTEST 200 software for well test analysis in this context. The project was appraised from the concerned authority with admiring our effort in enormous hard work within time. I was admired as best leader in the team, serving role of project management as well as reservoir engineer. I was happy to complete the project with confidence and adaptability. My project supervisor and advisor published the project report online and presented the paper later in project Expo.

I worked as a team leader and project manager to the project. Therefore, my responsibility was greater rather than any of my teammate with role comparison. I managed the pressure in the project activities in order to complete the project within time and meeting all objectives. 

Name of the Project: Reservoir Model Build and History Matching in support of Production Forecasting

Duration of Project: PLEASE FILL

Project Location: PLEASE FILL

Name of the Organisation: PLEASE FILL

Role and Designation: PLEASE FILL

The primary criterion of the overall project is to matching the production forecasting data for reservoir modelling. The reservoir model will be developed as per the simulated models in software interfaces. The quality and accuracy of uncertain production forecasting is dependent over the reservoir models in oil and gas production organizations. The two principle approaches of production forecast were on the stochastic and probabilistic. The probabilistic decisions were considered in the criteria of the project. The oil reservoir model should be according to the production forecasting prior to the model building. The project criteria was somewhat complex for relating with the uncertainty and reality.  

1.2.1 Criteria of Overall Engineering Project

The project objectives were the following as regarding to the project deliverables. The objectives were approved from the concerned authority and then we could continue with it. Otherwise, the project may turn out to be a disaster afterwards.

1. To gather the geophysical information about the geometry of the reservoir
2. To collect data about the well-log with measurement within the well-bore
3. To reduce uncertainty in reservoir modelling with production forecasting
4. To identify the parameters that can be utilized to increase the multiple point statistics

My work in this project was as a project manager in particular project with allocating tasks to the members levelling the resources. On the other hand, I had to research about the production forecasting process. The Gantt chart design will be helpful to tackle the challenging work of management. The Gantt chart utilizes timeline with available slack management and hence, the scheduling was flawless. Therefore, I could grasp the entire project activity with my understanding of work. In most of the cases, the reservoir modelling is implemented with all aspects of production facility.

Img 10

In the project, I had several duties as well. The project deliverables were to deepwater asset characterization for reservoir properties determination, search for key causes of captured hydrocarbons, gaps in leading recoveries determination, and concepts to secure gaps. I was the project manager and team leader in the project team. I had followed the duties as follows.

1. I had to gather the geophysical information about the geometry of the reservoir
2. I had to compare collected data about the well-log with measurement within the well-bore
3. I had to understand the uncertainty factors in reservoir modelling with production forecasting

1. I had to identify all the parameters with teammates that can be utilized to increase the multiple point statistics

The entire project activities are decomposed in to separate activities of nine deliverables as

The project deliverables were critical in some cases as in dynamic data inclusion, history matching, defining of targets, and prediction of production, and decision management. Hence, the project deliverables were matched with the concerned authority for better guidance and help. The project guide incorporated the solution in order to mitigate the difficulties with including one separate deliverable omitting others. The new deliverable was to research the secondary studies for devising the ideas in the project. For history matching process, we took permeability of reservoir layers as low perm and high perm cases. The identified samples for the research were the customers those are interested with update their reservoir models. The update will be provided with prediction and decision management about the new production process. The proposed process will help the sample with accurate field performance data and clarifications in diverse modelling. The aim of the study was to performance evaluation, production data influence, handling the multiple objectives and history matching with uncertain estimation. The history matching is performed with the framework as below.

The stochastic methods are improved with genetic algorithm analysis. The GA analysis was better in this project, as we were dealing with making certain decisions. The decision-making is entirely supported with Genetic Algorithm with considering separate solutions and their individual impact on the process. The history matching process is easier with GA analysis, and comparing several solutions. The evolutionary strategies are moreover supportive with the project aspects regarding history matching for production forecasting and reservoir modelling change management.

1.2.2 Project Objective

In this venture, the greater part of task was allocated to us from the site supervisors. The site supervisors incorporate the colleagues for serving one or more than one particular purposes, in this manner; I needed to disintegrate the activity into a few number of activities. The activities were allotted to the fellow team members for quicker utilization of time. As I was proficient with undertaking project leadership, along these scenarios, it was never an issue to me to allot activities to the colleagues with surveying their individual capacities.

3.3.4.1 Problems

The problems were identified in the project as with the project completion within time and as well with deviating from the primary scope of the project. The scope was to change the modelling of reservoirs with reduce uncertainty. The problems were as follows

The teammates became deviated from the primary project scope; they were involved in the analysis for collect data about the well log. The problem turns out to be shortage of time, as they allocated more effort to the single activity.

Again, the second issue turns out to be the misunderstanding between the team members. I was the team leader however, to some extent; I was unable to resolve their issues.

Final issue was to identify the parameters that can be utilized to increase the multiple point statistics. The parameter identification was to be performed under the secondary research, however, we lacked with multiple point statistics.

We approached to the project advisor and supervisor for reporting about the identified issues in the project activity, they helped us for mitigating the problems. First, they conducted a counselling session in between the team members for resolving the individual issues to enhance team integrity for improvement or teamwork. They additionally restructured the project scope to minimize the scope related deviation. The Parameter Identification Process problems were resolved with providing relevant studies for the purpose. Their effort was outstanding and supportive in this issue scenario.  

The applied approach in the project was as in the researching methods. The creative work of the project was about identification of the parameters and factors. The certain parameters are identified with the production forecasting. The production forecasting is probabilistic with respect to the reservoir modelling. The entire project was innovative, as we had devised genetic algorithm for optimizing the production process in business. The project outcome was with reporting the organization. The evolutionary strategies are important with the project completion within timeline.

Eventually, in the wake of determining the group issues, we felt coordination is essential inside of group for enhancing the venture work. I learnt the thought of minimized collaboration and inefficient lack from my reasonable involvement in this venture. I understood that their teamwork was compelling with keeping in mind that the primary criterion was to begin the venture with applicable correction to the extension. They considered the planning process necessary and the management helped us to devise the venture inside timeline.  

The outcome of the project was reservoir model building with production forecasting matching. The production forecasting process was a challenging task in the project whereas, the scenario helped me well to deal with the process. On the other I was experienced with production management process, therefore, I had to match the reservoir model specification for better outcomes. I had achieved experience of teamwork, team maintenance as well as Reservoir Simulation knowledge application from this project. The project was appraised from the concerned authority with admiring our effort in enormous hard work within time. I was admired as best leader in the team, serving role of project management as well as reservoir engineer. I was happy to complete the project with confidence and adaptability.  

I worked as a team leader and project manager to the project. Therefore, my responsibility was greater rather than any of my teammate with role comparison. I managed the pressure in the project activities in order to complete the project within time and meeting all objectives.

Competency Element	A brief summary of how you have applied the element	Paragraph number in the career episode(s) where the element is addressed
PE 1: KNOWLEDGE AND SKILL BASE
PE 1.1 Comprehensive, theory based understanding of the underpinning natural and physical sciences and the engineering fundamentals applicable to the engineering discipline	I had attenuated my knowledge of Petroleum Engineering in the infill projects. I had also gained experience of teamwork in projects.	CE 1.2.3, CE 1.3.1 and CE 1.3.2 CE 2.3.1 and CE 2.3.3 CE 3.2.1, CE 3.3.1 and CE 3.3.2
PE1.2 Conceptual understanding of the mathematics, numerical analysis, statistics, and computer and information sciences which underpin the engineering discipline	I had technical application of software in designing of engineering modules with quality measurement and analysis.	CE 1.3.1 CE 2.3.2, CE 2.3.3 and CE 2.3.4 CE 3.3.1
PE1.3 In-depth understanding of specialist bodies of knowledge within the engineering discipline	I had used every possible resource in the team. I had also assigned the tasks with suitable capability assessment.	CE 1.3.1 CE 2.3.1, CE 2.3.4, CE 2.2.5 and CE 2.4.2 CE 3.3.1.1,  CE 3.3.3
PE1.4 Discernment of knowledge development and research directions within the engineering discipline	I had practical knowledge of the normal calculation for the data analysis in the project.	CE 1.2.5, CE 1.3.1.2, CE 1.4.2  and CE 1.4.3, CE 2.3.2,  CE 2.3.4 and CE 2.4.1, CE 3.3.2, CE 3.3.3 and CE 3.4.1
PE1.5 Knowledge of contextual factors impacting the engineering discipline.	I had to undertake the project with understanding the project objectives and aim.	CE 1.2.1, CE 2.2.1, CE 3.2.1, CE 1.2.2, CE 2.2.2, CE 3.2.2
PE1.6 Understanding of the scope, principles, norms, accountabilities and bounds of contemporary engineering practice in the specific discipline	It was the main criteria of being in a team and maintaining responsibilities in a team.	CE 1.2.3, CE 1.3.1, CE 1.3.4, CE 1.3.2, CE 2.2.3, CE 2.3.1, CE 2.3.1.1, CE 2.3.2, CE 3.2.3, CE 3.3.1, CE 3.3.1.1 and CE 3.3.2
PE 2 ENGINEERING APPLICATION ABILITY
PE2.1 Application of established engineering methods to complex engineering problem solving	I had the ability to use my practical knowledge in the project whereas the complex problem analysis. I had to resolve the issues with every problem understanding.	CE 1.2.4,  CE 1.3.1, CE 1.4.2  and CE 1.4.3 CE 2.3.3,  CE 2.3.4 and CE 2.4.1, CE 2.4.2 CE 3.3.1, CE 3.3.2 and CE 3.4.2
PE2.2 Fluent application of engineering techniques, tools and resources	It was the main criteria of being in a team and maintaining responsibilities in a team.	CE 1.3.3, CE 1.3.2, CE 1.3.1.1 and CE 1.3.3
PE2.3 Application of systematic engineering synthesis and design processes	I had the ability to use my practical knowledge in the project whereas the complex problem analysis. I had to resolve the issues with every problem understanding.	CE 1.2.3, CE 1.3.1, CE 1.3.1.1 and CE 1.3.2 CE 2.3.3 and CE 2.3.4 CE 3.2.2
PE2.4 Application of systematic approaches to the conduct and management of engineering projects	I had designed reservoirs as per the organization project requirements	CE 1.3.1, CE 1.3.1.1, CE 1.3.1.2 and CE 1.3.2 CE 2.2.3, CE 2.3.1, CE 2.3.2 and CE 2.3.3 CE 3.3.1.1, and CE 3.3.2
PE 3: PROFESSIONAL AND PERSONAL ATTRIBUTES
PE3.1 Ethical conduct and professional Accountability	I can communicate with others as well as with the company’s chief authority for any meeting and discussion. I am enriched with both personal and interpersonal communication skills.	CE 1.2.3, CE 1.3.3 and CE 1.4.1 CE 2.2.3, CE 2.3.5, CE 2.4.2 and CE 2.4.3 CE 3.3.3, CE 3.4
PE3.2 Effective oral and written communication in professional and lay domains	I had also managed the tasks with my colleagues’ ability to work.	CE 1.2.3, CE 1.3.3 and CE 1.4.1 CE 2.2.3, CE 2.3.5, CE 2.4.2 and CE 2.4.3 CE 3.3.3, CE 3.4
PE3.3 Creative, innovative and pro-active demeanor	I had capacity of understanding the project as well with innovative approach of the implementation.	CE 1.3, CE 1.4 and CE 1.5 CE 2.3, CE 2.4 CE 2.5 and CE 2.4.3 CE 3.2, CE 3.3
PE3.4 Professional use and management of information	I understood ethical value of any project work with complete professional environment support.	CE 1.2.3, CE 1.2.5, CE 1.4.2 CE 2.2.3, CE 2.2.5, CE 2.4.2 CE 3.2.3, CE 3.2.5, CE 3.4.2
PE3.5 Orderly management of self and professional conduct	I had the ability to make out the teamwork as well with team leading and team collaboration.	CE 1.4.3, CE 1.3.1.1 and CE 1.3.2 CE 2.4.3, CE 2.3.2, CE 2.3.3 and CE 2.3.4 CE 3.4.3, CE 3.3.1.1 and CE 3.3.2
PE3.6 Effective team membership and team leadership	I had the professional ability of develop the project outcomes and all by myself. I also had several appraisements for my behaviour.	CE 1.4.1, CE 1.4.3, CE 2.4.1, CE 2.4.3, CE 3.4, CE 3.4.1, CE 3.4.3

Abdollahzadeh, A., Reynolds, A., Christie, M., Corne, D.W., Williams, G.J. and Davies, B.J., 2013. Estimation of distribution algorithms applied to history matching. SPE Journal, 18(03), pp.508-517.

Al-Hajeri, N. and Anthony, E., 2015, October. Tandem ESP-Packer Dumpflood Completion Application in North Kuwait Field-A Successful Alternative to Conventional Encapsulated ESP systems-Case Study. In SPE Kuwait Oil and Gas Show and Conference. Society of Petroleum Engineers.

Al-Obaidy, R.T., Gringarten, A.C. and Sovetkin, V., 2014, October. Modeling of Induced Hydraulically Fractured Wells in Shale Reservoirs Using ‘Branched’Fractals. In SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. Society of Petroleum Engineers.

Al-Shamma, B.R., Gosselin, O., King, P., Christie, M. and Mendez, M., 2015, June. Comparative Performance of History Matching Algorithms Using Diverse Parameterization Methods: Application to a Synthetic and North Sea Case. In EUROPEC 2015. Society of Petroleum Engineers.

Anand, A., van Batenburg, D., Parker, A., Eikmans, D. and Boersma, D., 2015, August. ASP as a Brown Field Re-Development Opportunity-Based on a Case Study. In SPE Asia Pacific Enhanced Oil Recovery Conference. Society of Petroleum Engineers.

Anderson, D.M., Turco, F., Virues, C.J.J. and Chin, A., 2013, November. Application of Rate Transient Analysis Workflow in Unconventional Reservoirs: Horn River Shale Gas Case Study. In SPE Unconventional Resources Conference and Exhibition-Asia Pacific. Society of Petroleum Engineers.

Arnold, D., Christie, M. and Demyanov, V., 2014, June. Geologically Realistic Priors for History Matching. In 76th EAGE Conference and Exhibition 2014.

Arnold, D., Demyanov, V., Tatum, D., Christie, M., Rojas, T., Geiger, S. and Corbett, P., 2013. Hierarchical benchmark case study for history matching, uncertainty quantification and reservoir characterisation. Computers & Geosciences, 50, pp.4-15.

Arnold, D., Demyanov, V., Tatum, D., Christie, M., Rojas, T., Geiger, S. and Corbett, P., 2013. Hierarchical benchmark case study for history matching, uncertainty quantification and reservoir characterisation. Computers & Geosciences, 50, pp.4-15.

Attanasi, E.D. and Freeman, P.A., 2015. Evaluation of Development Options for Alaska North Slope Viscous and Heavy Oil. Natural Resources Research, 24(1), pp.85-106.

Attanasi, E.D. and Freeman, P.A., 2015. Evaluation of Development Options for Alaska North Slope Viscous and Heavy Oil. Natural Resources Research, 24(1), pp.85-106.

Azoug, Y. and Patel, H., 2014, November. Field Development Plan (FDP) Optimization of a Giant Field for Plateau Extension and Recovery Improvement. In Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition and Conference. Society of Petroleum Engineers.

Callegaro, C., Bartosek, M., Nobili, M., Masserano, F., Pollero, M., Baz, D.M.M. and Kortam, M.M., 2015, November. Design and Implementation of Low Salinity Waterflood in a North African Brown Field. In Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition and Conference. Society of Petroleum Engineers.

Cao, F., Luo, H. and Lake, L.W., 2015, February. Oil Rate Forecast by Inferring Fractional Flow Models from Field Data. InSPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium. Society of Petroleum Engineers.

Cao, F., Luo, H. and Lake, L.W., 2015, February. Oil Rate Forecast by Inferring Fractional Flow Models from Field Data. InSPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium. Society of Petroleum Engineers.

Chetri, H., Al-Quene, A., Jamal, M. and Al-Zaabi, H., 2015, November. After 14 years of Water Flooding a Giant Reservoir in North Kuwait: Lessons Learnt, Experiences Gained and Way Forward. In Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition and Conference. Society of Petroleum Engineers.

Chong, E.E., Wan Mohamad, W.N., Rae, S.F., Lim, L. and Flew, S., 2015, October. Integrated Static and Dynamic Modelling Workflow for Improved History Matching and Uncertainty Modelling. In SPE/IATMI Asia Pacific Oil & Gas Conference and Exhibition. Society of Petroleum Engineers.

Cottin, H., Kotler, J.M., Bartik, K., Cleaves II, H.J., Cockell, C.S., de Vera, J.P.P., Ehrenfreund, P., Leuko, S., Ten Kate, I.L., Martins, Z. and Pascal, R., 2015. Astrobiology and the Possibility of Life on Earth and Elsewhere…. Space Science Reviews, pp.1-42.

Dashti, L., Banagale, M.R., Zhang, M.Q., Bond, D., Filak, J.M. and Ali, F.M., 2015, October. The Well Simulation Modeling Studies for Field Development of Wara Reservoir, Greater Burgan Field, Kuwait. In SPE Kuwait Oil and Gas Show and Conference. Society of Petroleum Engineers.

Dezayes, C., Lerouge, C., Sanjuan, B., Ramboz, C. and Brach, M., 2015, April. Toward a better understanding of the fluid circulation in the Rhine Graben for a better geothermal exploration of the deep basins. In World Geothermal Congress 2015.

Dezayes, C., Lerouge, C., Sanjuan, B., Ramboz, C. and Brach, M., 2015, April. Toward a better understanding of the fluid circulation in the Rhine Graben for a better geothermal exploration of the deep basins. In World Geothermal Congress 2015.

Duliman, B., 2013. Variable Stimulated Reservoir Volume (SRV) simulation: eagle ford shale case study. Unconventional Resources Technology Conference (URTEC).

Dyatlov, G., Lyngra, S., Marsala, A.F., Loermans, A.M., Georgi, D.T., Vasilevskiy, A., Dashevsky, Y. and Edwards, C.M., 2014, October. Reservoir Monitoring of Hydrocarbon-Water Flood Front by Gravimetry Integrated within Reservoir Simulation. In SPE Russian Oil and Gas Exploration & Production Technical Conference and Exhibition. Society of Petroleum Engineers.

Ellis, J.B., 2013. Sustainable surface water management and green infrastructure in UK urban catchment planning.Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 56(1), pp.24-41.

Erbas, D., Duncan, E., Zhang, P., Brodie, J.A. and Daae, V., 2013, September. BP North Sea Miscible Gas Injection Projects Review. In SPE Offshore Europe Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition. Society of Petroleum Engineers.

Eriksrud, M., 2014. Seabed permanent reservoir monitoring (PRM)–A valid 4D seismic technology for fields in the North Sea. First Break, 32(5), pp.67-73.

Espinola, O., Mehranfar, R., Salama, D., Santafe, E., Nuñez, F., Martínez Mendoza, J.F., Ortega, H., Espinosa, A. and Alarcón, H., 2015, November. Defining the Optimum Exploitation Strategy Combining Water Injection, Field Development and Artificial Lift Analysis to a Mature Field through Surface and Sub-surface Coupled Models. In SPE Latin American and Caribbean Petroleum Engineering Conference. Society of Petroleum Engineers.

Espinola, O., Rocha, M., Alvarez, N.C., Ramirez, J.R., Solis, A. and Guzman-Arevalo, J.D., 2014, June. A Case Study of Integrated Asset Modeling To Support Reservoir Management Strategies For Four Dry Gas Fields Sharing Production Facilities. In SPE Energy Resources Conference. Society of Petroleum Engineers.

Faisal, A., Mlacnik, M.J., Harahap, A.E. and Ramdani, D.A., 2015, October. Case Study: Reservoir Management of Kerisi Field-Lesson Learned After Seven Years of Production. In SPE/IATMI Asia Pacific Oil & Gas Conference and Exhibition. Society of Petroleum Engineers.

Faisal, A., Mlacnik, M.J., Harahap, A.E. and Ramdani, D.A., 2015, October. Case Study: Reservoir Management of Kerisi Field-Lesson Learned After Seven Years of Production. In SPE/IATMI Asia Pacific Oil & Gas Conference and Exhibition. Society of Petroleum Engineers.

Gaafar, G.R., Tewari, R.D. and Zain, Z.M., 2015, August. Overview of Advancement in Core Analysis and Its Importance in Reservoir Characterisation for Maximising Recovery. In SPE Asia Pacific Enhanced Oil Recovery Conference. Society of Petroleum Engineers.

Gaimster, M., 2012. Post-medieval fieldwork in Britain, Northern Ireland and the Channel Isles in 2011. Post-Medieval Archaeology, 46(2), pp.367-432.

Gallent, N. and Robinson, S., 2012. Neighbourhood planning: Communities, networks and governance. Policy Press.

Gardner, H.D., 2012. The First Girl Guide: The Story of Agnes Baden-Powell. Amberley Publishing Limited.

Goloborodko, A., Belova, N. and Thomas, T., 2013, September. Integrated Workflow Towards Characterizing Hydraulic Fractures in Tight Gas Reservoirs-Modeling, Uncertainty Analysis, History Matching & Production Forecasting. In SPE Reservoir Characterization and Simulation Conference and Exhibition. Society of Petroleum Engineers.

Heffer, K., 2015. Percolation of the interacting elastic stress fields of aligned cracks as an alternative explanation of critical crack densities. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 409(1), pp.31-47.

Holden, A., Lehmann, C., Ryder, K., Scott, B. and Almond, K., 2014, September. Integration of Production Logs Helps to Understand Heterogeneity of Mishrif Reservoir in Rumaila. In SPWLA 55th Annual Logging Symposium. Society of Petrophysicists and Well-Log Analysts.

Jahangiri, H.R., Adler, C., Shirzadi, S., Bailey, R., Ziegel, E., Chesher, J. and White, M., 2014, April. A Data-Driven Approach Enhances Conventional Reservoir Surveillance Methods for Waterflood Performance Management in the North Sea. In SPE Intelligent Energy Conference & Exhibition. Society of Petroleum Engineers.

Jia, H. and Sheng, J.J., 2016. Numerical modeling on air injection in a light oil reservoir: Recovery mechanism and scheme optimization. Fuel, 172, pp.70-80.

Jia, L., Kumar, N., Kumar, K., Nicolo, M., Dexcote, Y. and Peyret, A., 2015, December. An Integrated Full-Field Development of a Giant Mature Field using CO 2 EOR. In International Petroleum Technology Conference. International Petroleum Technology Conference.

Johann, P., Seth, S., Maas, S., Bunn, B., Metzbower, R., Wersich, E., Thedy, E. and Lisboa, W., 2013, June. Full Solution Deep-water PRM Project in the Jubarte Field in Brazil for Petrobras by PGS. In 75th EAGE Conference & Exhibition incorporating SPE EUROPEC 2013.

Karacali, O., Hernandez, E.R. and Al-Ghaithi, A., 2015, November. Advancements in Gas Condensate Reservoir Surveillance: Well Testing to Production Forecasting. In Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition and Conference. Society of Petroleum Engineers.

Khatib, Z. and Walsh, J.M., 2014, October. Extending the Life of Mature Assets: How integrating subsurface & surface knowledge and best practices can increase production and maintain integrity. In SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. Society of Petroleum Engineers.

Litvak, M.L., Del Mundo, F., Schott, D.W. and Isebor, O., 2013, September. Effective Method for Field Development Optimization and Its Application in Gulf of Mexico Oil Field. In SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. Society of Petroleum Engineers.

Lowerre, A., 2012. Hailes Abbey, Stanway, Gloucestershire: Hailes Abbey Culvert Evaluation Assessment Report. English Heritage.

Luo, P., He, B., Takara, K., Xiong, Y.E., Nover, D., Duan, W. and Fukushi, K., 2015. Historical assessment of Chinese and Japanese flood management policies and implications for managing future floods. Environmental Science & Policy, 48, pp.265-277.

Mantopoulos, A., Marques, D.A., Hunt, S.P., Ng, S., Fei, Y. and Haghighi, M., 2015, October. Best Practice and Lessons Learned for the Development and Calibration of Integrated Production Models for the Cooper Basin, Australia. In SPE/IATMI Asia Pacific Oil & Gas Conference and Exhibition. Society of Petroleum Engineers.

Mathias, S.A., Gluyas, J.G., Mackay, E.J. and Goldthorpe, W.H., 2013. A statistical analysis of well production rates from UK oil and gas fields–implications for carbon capture and storage. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 19, pp.510-518.

Mohaghegh, S.D., 2013. Reservoir modeling of shale formations. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 12, pp.22-33.

Muggeridge, A., Cockin, A., Webb, K., Frampton, H., Collins, I., Moulds, T. and Salino, P., 2014. Recovery rates, enhanced oil recovery and technological limits. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A, 372(2006), p.20120320.

Nallani, K.R., Jha, M., Kumar, A., Kumar, P. and Aggarwal, S., 2014, October. PCP Application for Development of Waxy Bhagyam Field in Onshore India. In SPE Artificial Lift Conference & Exhibition-North America. Society of Petroleum Engineers.

Nevada, S., 2013. Ruby Pipeline Project.

Noguera, C., 2014, June. Lessons Learned from Production History Matching in Single Cell Numerical Models in an Integrated Asset Model. In SPE Energy Resources Conference. Society of Petroleum Engineers.

Ogunyomi, B.A., Patzek, T.W., Lake, L.W. and Kabir, C.S., 2014, October. History matching and rate forecasting in unconventional oil reservoirs using an approximate analytical solution to the double porosity model. In SPE Eastern Regional Meeting. Society of Petroleum Engineers.

Rabani, M.N.A., Adams, E., Ryba, A., Harwijanto, J., Warrlich, G., Fui, L.H., Shields, D., Tan, A., Mukhopadhyay, A., Chai, X. and Amir, A., 2014, March. An integrated approach to understand the remaining potential and ultimate hydrocarbon recovery of a giant carbonate gas field, offshore Sarawak, Malaysia. In Offshore Technology Conference-Asia. Offshore Technology Conference.

Robinson, J., 2012. Bushman of the Red Heart. Boolarong Press.

Rose, P.T. and Pyle, J.R., 2015. The habitat of bypassed pay in the Forties Field. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 403(1), pp.333-354.

Savazzi, M., Folcini, F., Latronico, M., Negri, E., Nigido, R., Conti, S. and Thomas, S., 2015, June. Ground Model: A High Value Support to Deepwater Giant Developments. In Offshore Mediterranean Conference and Exhibition. Offshore Mediterranean Conference.

Schulze-Riegert, R., Chataigner, F., Kueck, N., Pajonk, O., Baffoe, J., Ajala, I., Awofodu, D. and Almuallim, H., 2013, March. Strategic Scope of Alternative Optimization Methods in History Matching and Prediction Workflows. In SPE Middle East Oil and Gas Show and Conference. Society of Petroleum Engineers.

Shekhar, S., Nikam, A. and Parasher, A., 2013. Water Flood Conformance-Innovative and Sequential Approach.

Shrivastava, S.K., Rizal, M.B.A., Ho, A.C., Rasid, R.B.A. and Sedaralit, M.F., 2014, January. Shifting Reservoir Development Focus to IWAG for a Matured Water Flood Case. In IPTC 2014: International Petroleum Technology Conference.

Sifuentes, W., Moreno, J., Kumaran, P., Hamdan, R., Salim, M.M., Som, M.M., Lee, H.W., Ahmad, A., Pangereyeva, N., Biniwale, S.S. and Rodriguez, N.J., 2015, October. Samarang Integrated Operations (IO): Integrated Asset Modeling-An Innovative Approach For Long Term Production Planning Focused On Enhance Oil Recovery. In SPE/IATMI Asia Pacific Oil & Gas Conference and Exhibition. Society of Petroleum Engineers.

Thomson, B., Apanel, A., Tester, R., Marques, G. and Mateus, G., 2013, March. What Matters to Flow: West Africa Field Case History. In IPTC 2013: International Petroleum Technology Conference.

Wherity, S., Sidley, T., Cowling, M., Ismayilov, A. and Noe-Nygaard, J., 2014, October. Observation and Monitoring well: in situ window to assess recovery efficiency. In SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. Society of Petroleum Engineers.

Yeh, T.H., Jimenez, E., Van Essen, G., Chen, C., Jin, L., Girardi, A., Gelderblom, P., Horesh, L. and Conn, A.R., 2014, October. Reservoir uncertainty quantification using probabilistic history matching workflow. In SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. Society of Petroleum Engineers.

Zhou, D., Yan, M. and Calvin, W.M., 2012, January. Optimization of a Mature CO2 Flood-from Continuous Injection to WAG. In SPE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium. Society of Petroleum Engineers.