Auditing is one of most important activities that ensure the success of any trading or business organization. Since the success of any given organization is highly depending on the audit out, the activity should therefore be taken serious by any business organization such as the one in the case scenario. The best auditing results that an organization can depend on should be conducted with a lot audit independence and freedom. The aim of this paper is therefore to audit various audit independence threats and various measures to safeguard these threats in relation to specific case study as stated in the requirement. The paper also audits various business risks and how they can be managed by the given organization. The paper concludes with identification of some specific audit risks related to the case and some of the accounts that are directly linked to the identified business risks.
Auditor’s independence which is also referred to audit autonomy is distinguished by different researchers as the flexibility of an auditor’s mind and additionally the physical opportunity or independence (Goodwin and Yeo 2011). The Independence Standards Board (ISB) portrays audit independence as the adaptability of an auditor from those weights and distinctive components that exchange off or can limit an examiner to settle on fair auditing decisions. According to different researchers audit flexibility is contrasted with the perspective and approach of objectivity being fair-minded, sensible and honest and in addition being upright and rationally authentic.
Audit independence is depicted as the audit adaptability and nonappearance of interests that makes unacceptable threat of material inclination concerning the enduring way of budgetary elucidations. Accordingly, the audit independence will be extensively reduced in quality or utility if his central focus is demonstrating a threat of upset objectivity. In such cases the probability of an audit being false is so high than the intrigue can be sensibly recognized to affect the eventual outcome of the audit (Goodwin and Yeo 2011). As demonstrated by various audits unmistakably, the hugeness of survey audit independence does not require an auditor to be without the broad number of variables that affect the capacity to settle on honest audit choices, however essentially free from those that ascending to the level of managing the breaking point an audit.
Auditing is the focal examination of a blueprint of records, both cash related and non financial related, to guarantee that they can be depended on to the degree precision and fulfillment. An auditor on the other hand is a qualified individual who completes the audit undertaking and reports on the ‘true blue and sensible view’ of the customer substances; money related elucidations so that the clients’ budgetary revelations can depend on upon the steadiness and authenticity of the monetary articulations (Sharma and Sidhu 2011). The goal of examining monetary records by an auditor or audit team has been given by International Standards of Auditing (ISA). Audit independence of an evaluator and lead of an auditor as showed by the International Standards on Auditing ISA is addressed manage the general duties of an analyst while organizing a study of money related presentations as indicated by ISAs. In particular, it sets out the general concentrations of the autonomous auditor, and clears up the nature and level of a study anticipated that would connect with the free audit to meet the right audit on various records.
From the discussion for the situation provided, one can find and recognize five threats by the approach of perils and shields approach. As showed by this risks and insurances approach, the structures recognize five fundamental arrangements of threats which can meddle with the result of traded off outcomes as takes after (Stewart and Subramaniam 2010).
This sort of risk comes thus auditors being over-affected by the characteristics of their customers’ and also the chief’s identity subsequently winding up plainly excessively thoughtful, making it impossible to the intrigue the customer. On the other hand, auditors of a given firm because of nature may grow excessively confide in the administration portrayals consequently, inadequately thorough in their audit testing (Stewart and Subramaniam 2010). This is clear from fourth circumstance the discussion with Annette who asserts that there will be no much audit on the expense records because of recognition and trust. Having worked in the LTH books of records earlier the independence of the audit can e traded off subsequently of trust commonality.
From the discussion with Michael it is apparent that he will go about as a promoter for the father who is the leader of the money related records in the customer organization. The threat to analysts’ objectivity happening in view of auditors getting the chance to be supporters for their client’s position for this situation is subsequently high. Auditors’ independence is dependably on stake in circumstances where one of the organization money related supervisors is identified with individuals from the audit group as on account of Michael and the father who is one of the budgetary directors (Salehi, Mansoury and Azary 2009).
The risk to auditors’ autonomy coming about because of a money related or other self-premium clash is one of the primary dangers coming about because of the considerable number of circumstances for the situation ponder. From circumstance one, the discussion with Chris in circumstance two of the case distinctively demonstrates the risk of self intrigue. Inside the discussion the audit independence in this circumstance resembles to be traded off thus of favors and endowments the organization will offer to different individuals from CJ examining firm (Salehi, Mansoury and Azary 2009). Keeping in mind the end goal to keep up the great association with the customer organization that is the LTH, the customer firm is pondering to take the individuals from CJ inspecting organization to a 14 day occasion to Greek Isles covering every one of the costs. In such a circumstance the organization won’t be appropriate to be the inspecting organization since the acknowledgment of endowments may prompt ill-advised examining. In such circumstances where the head of audit group has been given token, they tend to audit the organization monetary records with a great deal of self enthusiasm covering botches.
Safeguards to threats are shields or a portion of the measures which ought to be set up to guarantee that the audit is not traded off from absence of audit flexibility or audit independence. With respect to the above exchange in the case study above several audit threats have been reviled (Stewart and Subramaniam 2010). The company can therefore develop some safeguards to limit or cover the identified dangers. Threats from the subsequent discussion are more customers oriented and accompanying measures ought to be set up by the organization to limit the threats.
Confinement of CJ to offer different administrations separated from auditing duties; in the event that the administration of the CJ audit firm details limitation of the organization from offering non audit benefits, the request by the leading group of the customer organization (LTH) which requires the audit firm supervisor Geoff to give a discourse for the benefit of the organization will be invalid permitting the CJ to perform uncompromised audit without conditions (Stewart and Subramaniam 2010).
Pivot of auditors; from the circumstance three and four in the case scenario provided, both Michael and Annette are probably going to be traded off because of trust and nature and in addition by different elements. It is clear that the two have been familiar to the customer firm and are not appropriate to play out a survey on the budgetary records of a similar organization. Annette plans not to direct profound survey on the assessment money related books of records because of past audit where as Michael trusts the father who drives the monetary group. Audit revolution is hence the best protect to guarantee audit independence (Stewart and Subramaniam 2010).
The organization gives guarantee on the administrations and products bought by the client. The time of guarantee enables the client intrigue situated into organization with a great deal of upkeep costs (Kelly 2013). The work guarantee permitted on the hardware comes about with operation dangers where Mining supplies LTD (MSL) needs to pay for additional charges to the operations of the mechanics performing such systems of support. Being that a large portion of the clients are remotely found, the organization needs to cover for the long separation transportation costs for the mechanics, pay for the charging of their administrations on a day by day rate in view of the time, cover for every one of the parts supplanted and in addition the convenience and everyday costs of the workman (Gómez-Mejía 2007). Accordingly of the operations performed by the contracted mechanics the organization gets a lower benefit than the one conjectured and the audit group ought to go out on a limb into thought the dangers from operation costs while making audit arrangements.
The tern business risk alludes to the circumstance that the business might not have benefits as guessed. On account of the organization on account of study it apparent that the organization may encounter a portion of the business dangers. These sorts of business dangers ought to be considered amid audit arranging by the audit firm in charge of the inspecting of organization (Kelly 2013). Business dangers are coursed by various components running from deals volume in connection to the overarching market per unit value, the cost of contribution to connection to the cost of yield among different elements. From the audit over two components which may prompt acquiring of lower benefit than guessed incorporates transportation and operation.
At the preliminaries of creating audit plan, an audit team ought to develop an approach that permits earlier appraisal to control the dangers or various threats as which may occur in the report. An audit threat is a sort of dangers which can be distinguished at the budgetary stage levels inside a given organization (Monroe and Ng 2010). At this stage an examiner ought to in this way build up a suitable model to decide different dangers which might be likewise subsequently of different business threats as on account of Mining supplies LTD (MSL).
For this situation the particular audit threat might be conjectured thus of the business dangers experienced by Mining supplies LTD (MSL) as an association. Amid the improvement of the audit arrange as of now specified above and examiner ought to survey inalienable dangers as one of the dangers at the budgetary explanation organize (Messier and Austen 2010). The audit group or the evaluator ought to consequently relate the threat appraisal to different records adjusts and different exchange classes amid the declaration point (Taylor 2010). Innate dangers may happen thus of operation dangers and transportation threats in that the cost of support and transportation might be misquoted by the bosses, chiefs, drivers even the mechanics. The organization authorities accountable for the support may cite an incentive than the genuine cost coming about into innate dangers.
At the level of exchange class assurance and in addition the record level, the dangers might be seen in the payable records. Since the business dangers recognized generally identify with the payable records, the inspector ought to along these lines be self-assured that the payable records at the budgetary proclamation levels are probably going to be helpless to misrepresentations and misquote (Taylor 2010). This s obvious in that the majority of the payable records require changes with a higher level of estimations as a large portion of the operations identifying with upkeep are continuers. Other record which is probably going to influence by the audit threat incorporates the benefits accounts which might be accordingly of botch and loss of advantages amid the reason for support by the mechanics contractual workers. In conclusion inspectors ought to distinctly audit payable records as they are inclined to misquote amid support.
Conclusion
Even though it is evident that total audit independence can be created various safeguard measures can be put in place to limit various audit threats. From the discussion above, various factors leading to audit independence threats have been highlighted. These threats can be controlled with the application of various safeguards. In order to maintain clean audit the audit firm management must ensure the independence of auditors to be involved in the auditing process. In relation to inherent risk the audit firm and auditors should audit all the payable accounts in relation to various business risks within the organization. It therefore important for the audit firm to confirm their independence as well that of the audit team members for perfect audits.
References
Goodwin, J. and Yeo, T.Y., 2011. Two factors affecting internal audit independence and objectivity: Evidence from Singapore. International Journal of Auditing, 5(2), pp.107-125.
Sharma, D.S. and Sidhu, J., 2011. Professionalism vs Commercialism: The Association Between Non?Audit Services (NAS) and Audit Independence. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 28(5?6), pp.563-594.
Stewart, J. and Subramaniam, N., 2010. Internal audit independence and objectivity: emerging research opportunities. Managerial auditing journal, 25(4), pp.328-360.
Salehi, M., Mansoury, A. and Azary, Z., 2009. Audit independence and expectation gap: Empirical evidences from Iran. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 1(1), p.165.
Gómez-Mejía, L.R., Haynes, K.T., Núñez-Nickel, M., Jacobson, K.J. and Moyano-Fuentes, J., 2007. Socioemotional wealth and business risks in family-controlled firms: Evidence from Spanish olive oil mills. Administrative science quarterly, 52(1), pp.106-137.
Kelly, P., 2013. Growing up as risky business? Risks, surveillance and the institutionalized mistrust of youth. Journal of youth studies, 6(2), pp.165-180.
Taylor, M.H., 2010. The effects of industry specialization on auditors’ inherent risk assessments and confidence judgements. Contemporary Accounting Research, 17(4), pp.693-712.
Monroe, G. and Ng, J., 2010. An examination of order effects in auditors’ inherent risk assessments. Accounting & Finance, 40(2), pp.153-167.
Messier Jr, W.F. and Austen, L.A., 2010. Inherent risk and control risk assessments: Evidence on the effect of pervasive and specific risk factors. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 19(2), pp.119-131.
Essay Writing Service Features
Our Experience
No matter how complex your assignment is, we can find the right professional for your specific task. Contact Essay is an essay writing company that hires only the smartest minds to help you with your projects. Our expertise allows us to provide students with high-quality academic writing, editing & proofreading services.
Free Features
Free revision policy
$10Free bibliography & reference
$8Free title page
$8Free formatting
$8How Our Essay Writing Service Works
First, you will need to complete an order form. It's not difficult but, in case there is anything you find not to be clear, you may always call us so that we can guide you through it. On the order form, you will need to include some basic information concerning your order: subject, topic, number of pages, etc. We also encourage our clients to upload any relevant information or sources that will help.
Complete the order form
Once we have all the information and instructions that we need, we select the most suitable writer for your assignment. While everything seems to be clear, the writer, who has complete knowledge of the subject, may need clarification from you. It is at that point that you would receive a call or email from us.
Writer’s assignment
As soon as the writer has finished, it will be delivered both to the website and to your email address so that you will not miss it. If your deadline is close at hand, we will place a call to you to make sure that you receive the paper on time.
Completing the order and download
