With the growth of technology, Artificial Intelligence has a major impact on the lives of an individual. It is pervasive in daily life and is set to expand to the new levels of potential, replacing the human decision-making and actions. The concern is about the approach of technology and how the production of the grief bots leads to the memorization of dead people. The grief bots capture the instances of dead people, as well. (Raicu, 2018). The case study is related to deal with using ICT where the information is about the communication theory to manage grief. The ICT Professionalism is at stake where the report will discuss about the different factors and theories like deontology, virtue, contract and utilitarianism that have been taken into consideration.
The approach is based on the technology growth affects the way as to how one respond to the death and mourning of dead people. The people are seen to be grieving after the death of their loved ones, when they check their social accounts.
The utilitarian approach is considered to be one of the feasible approach to manage for a better outcome at research to wider population and creating lesser harm. The aspects are related to consider about the proper distributions of the equal rights and then over equal amount to respective individuals. The concern of grief bots are mainly to provide the memorization feelings and their absence in the family. (Cody, Adams & Beling, 2018). The concept of the griefbot is considered to be taken for providing the emotional support mainly to a person in the family or that is for providing the support towards different multiple bodies.
Favoring Utilitarian approach, the technology is seen to be subjective to being concerned for the single person along with focusing on how the individuals are being treated as equal. This requires a proper emotional support which is considered to hold a major priority over the one that requires the lesser support. With growing technology, it is seen that the choice of memory produced for the dead is mainly towards the belongings which are taken towards the maximization of the happiness factors that concerns to affect the community. Favoring the criticism, the approach is generally subjected to procure the non-recognition over human rights that have the major influence on the positive vibes that are coming from the society.
Considering the technological aspects, the utilitarian theory highlights about ineffectiveness to procure the technology of the grief bots which is devoid of the future actions along with the human preferences. It also tend to procure the technology to be separated of the preferences, regarding the support, emotionally and the people’s involvement in it.
The theory notes down the actions which are evaluated within them apart from being considered over any other consequences that are being produced. The concept of actions are related to moral and immoral standards which are independent of the different factors. The theory is considered for the grief bots who are seen to be producing certain support, emotionally with the data that is collected and then it is implanted in software. The theory of the grief bot is mainly related to provide support but could lead to the negative prospects as well (Savaux et al., 2015).
This theory is approachable as it will help in maintaining fairness and honest apart from the other consequences. In utilitarianism it is only related to the positive outcomes which are irrespective of the good and the bad scenarios. Here, the deontological theory is implied for producing the outcomes which are irrespective of the fairness situations. The theory highlights about building ethics and how different rules are applied for making decisions. The formulation is based on departing from deontology which works on the moral rules that are capable of universalisation.
Here, the people are acting incredibly immorally from the Kantian perspective and are falling for the grief bots. The project is about the interactivity and how the collection of data has led to create a major program for the imitation of father (Ayob, Teasdale & Fagan, 2016). Kant theory works with condition of priori where the understanding is also for the perpetual, social and the international competencies. Hence, on the critical sense, the theory is considered important for the grief bot to provide a complete emotional support for the situations which is really being required to.
The virtue theory reflects the mind and character of an individual which helps in favouring the different perspectives of grief bot. It is mainly through the virtue theory that there are different individuals who are falling to use this technology. It is able to provide the information in the form of emotional support and help the people, when they need someone to talk to in the lonely time. They are best as they hear and respond to the people. The technology is about producing the forms with handling the dead people (Kahane, Everett, Earp, Farias, & Savulescu, 2015). The consideration is about the cultures and traits which are needed to produce the emotional support, favouring the dead.
With cultural acceptance, there are evaluations set through holding the different users. The contents are related to work and take into consideration about how the society can work wit being for or against the provisions. The principles are set for the grief bots where the sustainability factor is for the favourability along with un-favourable scenarios. The factors are depending upon the different forms which are seen against the utilitarian and the deontological concepts, and the virtue theory is considered to be the perception for the grief boat for producing more and better values rather than just producing the positive or the negative satisfaction.
The contractual theory is about working on the different legal standards and agreements where the consideration is about handling the uncertain conditions. The factors are seen to be focusing on the consideration of grief bots which are subjective to the different agreements that are followed with management of the technology (Boutilier, Caragiannis, Haber, Lu, Procaccia, & Sheffet, 2015). The theory highlights about the legal agreements which needs to be taken for consideration, without any sort of the requirements. The grief bots have been not applicable for the individuals who tend to seek for its usage.
The legal terms are defined with the approaches that are based on working with handling and storing the misinformation or the misleading information from the different prospects. The grief bot could be related to the breach of the theory where the problems are taken into consideration about the grief bot to the exact needy. The different unpleasant activities are against the use of the technology which are favouring about the theoretical aspects. Hence, it is seen that apart from this theory, there are different perspectives which are being provided from the need one with the criteria set for the concern of the societal standards (Caragiannis, Nath, Procaccia, & Shah, 2017). The concern is for handling the management of the contract theory where there is a need to handle the theory that is reviving the memory from the dead person with inculcating it over the person with negative emotional disabilities. It has also led to the negative aspects for the contract theory breach.
Conclusion
The above-mentioned content clearly highlight about the conclusions which are to be derived. The theoretical aspects are related to the utilitarian and the deontology, virtue and the contract theory. The assessment is based on how one makes the use of the technology with grief bots working on the alignment procedures (Kahane, 2015). There are approaches which are mainly for catering to the positive outcomes and then procuring over the standards set for the wider applicants. Hence, there are different factors which are seen to be conferring to grief bot usages which is seen to be mainly preferable over the theory of deontology rather than applying the utilitarian approach. The concern is about how the virtue theory works and deals with the societal culture that is set through properly using the contract theory technology as well. The theory is seen to be imperative with the incapability for non-procurement standards of the cultural aspects. The contract theory is considered to have a major acceptance towards working on the requirements which are completely different from the ones that are being used and leads to the producing of the false and the misguiding information (Lee & Gino, 2015).
References
Ayob, N., Teasdale, S., & Fagan, K. (2016). How social innovation ‘came to be’: Tracing the evolution of a contested concept. Journal of Social Policy, 45(4), 635-653.
Boutilier, C., Caragiannis, I., Haber, S., Lu, T., Procaccia, A. D., & Sheffet, O. (2015). Optimal social choice functions: A utilitarian view. Artificial Intelligence, 227, 190-213.
Caragiannis, I., Nath, S., Procaccia, A. D., & Shah, N. (2017). Subset selection via implicit utilitarian voting. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 58, 123-152.
Cody, T., Adams, S., & Beling, P. A. (2018, April). A utilitarian approach to adversarial learning in credit card fraud detection. In Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS), 2018 (pp. 237-242). IEEE.
Kahane, G. (2015). Sidetracked by trolleys: Why sacrificial moral dilemmas tell us little (or nothing) about utilitarian judgment. Social neuroscience, 10(5), 551-560.
Kahane, G., Everett, J. A., Earp, B. D., Farias, M., & Savulescu, J. (2015). ‘Utilitarian’judgments in sacrificial moral dilemmas do not reflect impartial concern for the greater good. Cognition, 134, 193-209.
Lee, J. J., & Gino, F. (2015). Poker-faced morality: Concealing emotions leads to utilitarian decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 126, 49-64.
Raicu I., (2018)., AI, Death, and Mourning Reference at: <https://www.scu.edu/ethics/focus-areas/internet-ethics/resources/ai-death-and-mourning/>
Savaux, J., Vion, J., Piechowiak, S., Mandiau, R., Matsui, T., Hirayama, K., … & Silaghi, M. (2015). Utilitarian Approach to Privacy in Distributed Constraint Optimization Problems.
With the growth of technology, Artificial Intelligence has a major impact on the lives of an individual. It is pervasive in daily life and is set to expand to the new levels of potential, replacing the human decision-making and actions. The concern is about the approach of technology and how the production of the grief bots leads to the memorization of dead people. The grief bots capture the instances of dead people, as well. (Raicu, 2018). The case study is related to deal with using ICT where the information is about the communication theory to manage grief. The ICT Professionalism is at stake where the report will discuss about the different factors and theories like deontology, virtue, contract and utilitarianism that have been taken into consideration.
The approach is based on the technology growth affects the way as to how one respond to the death and mourning of dead people. The people are seen to be grieving after the death of their loved ones, when they check their social accounts.
The utilitarian approach is considered to be one of the feasible approach to manage for a better outcome at research to wider population and creating lesser harm. The aspects are related to consider about the proper distributions of the equal rights and then over equal amount to respective individuals. The concern of grief bots are mainly to provide the memorization feelings and their absence in the family. (Cody, Adams & Beling, 2018). The concept of the griefbot is considered to be taken for providing the emotional support mainly to a person in the family or that is for providing the support towards different multiple bodies.
Favoring Utilitarian approach, the technology is seen to be subjective to being concerned for the single person along with focusing on how the individuals are being treated as equal. This requires a proper emotional support which is considered to hold a major priority over the one that requires the lesser support. With growing technology, it is seen that the choice of memory produced for the dead is mainly towards the belongings which are taken towards the maximization of the happiness factors that concerns to affect the community. Favoring the criticism, the approach is generally subjected to procure the non-recognition over human rights that have the major influence on the positive vibes that are coming from the society.
Considering the technological aspects, the utilitarian theory highlights about ineffectiveness to procure the technology of the grief bots which is devoid of the future actions along with the human preferences. It also tend to procure the technology to be separated of the preferences, regarding the support, emotionally and the people’s involvement in it.
The theory notes down the actions which are evaluated within them apart from being considered over any other consequences that are being produced. The concept of actions are related to moral and immoral standards which are independent of the different factors. The theory is considered for the grief bots who are seen to be producing certain support, emotionally with the data that is collected and then it is implanted in software. The theory of the grief bot is mainly related to provide support but could lead to the negative prospects as well (Savaux et al., 2015).
This theory is approachable as it will help in maintaining fairness and honest apart from the other consequences. In utilitarianism it is only related to the positive outcomes which are irrespective of the good and the bad scenarios. Here, the deontological theory is implied for producing the outcomes which are irrespective of the fairness situations. The theory highlights about building ethics and how different rules are applied for making decisions. The formulation is based on departing from deontology which works on the moral rules that are capable of universalisation.
Here, the people are acting incredibly immorally from the Kantian perspective and are falling for the grief bots. The project is about the interactivity and how the collection of data has led to create a major program for the imitation of father (Ayob, Teasdale & Fagan, 2016). Kant theory works with condition of priori where the understanding is also for the perpetual, social and the international competencies. Hence, on the critical sense, the theory is considered important for the grief bot to provide a complete emotional support for the situations which is really being required to.
The virtue theory reflects the mind and character of an individual which helps in favouring the different perspectives of grief bot. It is mainly through the virtue theory that there are different individuals who are falling to use this technology. It is able to provide the information in the form of emotional support and help the people, when they need someone to talk to in the lonely time. They are best as they hear and respond to the people. The technology is about producing the forms with handling the dead people (Kahane, Everett, Earp, Farias, & Savulescu, 2015). The consideration is about the cultures and traits which are needed to produce the emotional support, favouring the dead.
With cultural acceptance, there are evaluations set through holding the different users. The contents are related to work and take into consideration about how the society can work wit being for or against the provisions. The principles are set for the grief bots where the sustainability factor is for the favourability along with un-favourable scenarios. The factors are depending upon the different forms which are seen against the utilitarian and the deontological concepts, and the virtue theory is considered to be the perception for the grief boat for producing more and better values rather than just producing the positive or the negative satisfaction.
The contractual theory is about working on the different legal standards and agreements where the consideration is about handling the uncertain conditions. The factors are seen to be focusing on the consideration of grief bots which are subjective to the different agreements that are followed with management of the technology (Boutilier, Caragiannis, Haber, Lu, Procaccia, & Sheffet, 2015). The theory highlights about the legal agreements which needs to be taken for consideration, without any sort of the requirements. The grief bots have been not applicable for the individuals who tend to seek for its usage.
The legal terms are defined with the approaches that are based on working with handling and storing the misinformation or the misleading information from the different prospects. The grief bot could be related to the breach of the theory where the problems are taken into consideration about the grief bot to the exact needy. The different unpleasant activities are against the use of the technology which are favouring about the theoretical aspects. Hence, it is seen that apart from this theory, there are different perspectives which are being provided from the need one with the criteria set for the concern of the societal standards (Caragiannis, Nath, Procaccia, & Shah, 2017). The concern is for handling the management of the contract theory where there is a need to handle the theory that is reviving the memory from the dead person with inculcating it over the person with negative emotional disabilities. It has also led to the negative aspects for the contract theory breach.
Conclusion
The above-mentioned content clearly highlight about the conclusions which are to be derived. The theoretical aspects are related to the utilitarian and the deontology, virtue and the contract theory. The assessment is based on how one makes the use of the technology with grief bots working on the alignment procedures (Kahane, 2015). There are approaches which are mainly for catering to the positive outcomes and then procuring over the standards set for the wider applicants. Hence, there are different factors which are seen to be conferring to grief bot usages which is seen to be mainly preferable over the theory of deontology rather than applying the utilitarian approach. The concern is about how the virtue theory works and deals with the societal culture that is set through properly using the contract theory technology as well. The theory is seen to be imperative with the incapability for non-procurement standards of the cultural aspects. The contract theory is considered to have a major acceptance towards working on the requirements which are completely different from the ones that are being used and leads to the producing of the false and the misguiding information (Lee & Gino, 2015).
References
Ayob, N., Teasdale, S., & Fagan, K. (2016). How social innovation ‘came to be’: Tracing the evolution of a contested concept. Journal of Social Policy, 45(4), 635-653.
Boutilier, C., Caragiannis, I., Haber, S., Lu, T., Procaccia, A. D., & Sheffet, O. (2015). Optimal social choice functions: A utilitarian view. Artificial Intelligence, 227, 190-213.
Caragiannis, I., Nath, S., Procaccia, A. D., & Shah, N. (2017). Subset selection via implicit utilitarian voting. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 58, 123-152.
Cody, T., Adams, S., & Beling, P. A. (2018, April). A utilitarian approach to adversarial learning in credit card fraud detection. In Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS), 2018 (pp. 237-242). IEEE.
Kahane, G. (2015). Sidetracked by trolleys: Why sacrificial moral dilemmas tell us little (or nothing) about utilitarian judgment. Social neuroscience, 10(5), 551-560.
Kahane, G., Everett, J. A., Earp, B. D., Farias, M., & Savulescu, J. (2015). ‘Utilitarian’judgments in sacrificial moral dilemmas do not reflect impartial concern for the greater good. Cognition, 134, 193-209.
Lee, J. J., & Gino, F. (2015). Poker-faced morality: Concealing emotions leads to utilitarian decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 126, 49-64.
Raicu I., (2018)., AI, Death, and Mourning Reference at: <https://www.scu.edu/ethics/focus-areas/internet-ethics/resources/ai-death-and-mourning/>
Savaux, J., Vion, J., Piechowiak, S., Mandiau, R., Matsui, T., Hirayama, K., … & Silaghi, M. (2015). Utilitarian Approach to Privacy in Distributed Constraint Optimization Problems.
Essay Writing Service Features
Our Experience
No matter how complex your assignment is, we can find the right professional for your specific task. Contact Essay is an essay writing company that hires only the smartest minds to help you with your projects. Our expertise allows us to provide students with high-quality academic writing, editing & proofreading services.
Free Features
Free revision policy
$10Free bibliography & reference
$8Free title page
$8Free formatting
$8How Our Essay Writing Service Works
First, you will need to complete an order form. It's not difficult but, in case there is anything you find not to be clear, you may always call us so that we can guide you through it. On the order form, you will need to include some basic information concerning your order: subject, topic, number of pages, etc. We also encourage our clients to upload any relevant information or sources that will help.
Complete the order form
Once we have all the information and instructions that we need, we select the most suitable writer for your assignment. While everything seems to be clear, the writer, who has complete knowledge of the subject, may need clarification from you. It is at that point that you would receive a call or email from us.
Writer’s assignment
As soon as the writer has finished, it will be delivered both to the website and to your email address so that you will not miss it. If your deadline is close at hand, we will place a call to you to make sure that you receive the paper on time.
Completing the order and download
