Implementing And Integrating Industrial Problem Solutions

Plan Outline

This benefit administration design is to show responsive administration of advantages (and administrations gave from resources), consistence with administrative prerequisites, and to impart financing to give the required levels of administration for equipment manufacturing plant.

The advantage administration design is to be perused with the accompanying related arranging archives:

• 10 Year Plant Standby Package
• Plant Charges
• Actions for various vehicles which are to be manufactured
• Annual Plant Program

This benefit administration design covers vehicles, plant and hardware, being for the most part any mechanized self-moved or versatile thing (   El-Diraby,2017).

The organization exists to give administrations to its group. Some of these administrations are given by framework resources. There will be obtained framework resources by ‘buy’, by contract, development by board staff along with by gift of benefits built by engineers plus others to meet prolonged levels of administration.

The team that will steering the plant, their main objective is to oversee foundation resources to meet the required level of administration in the most financially savvy way for present and future management of assets in maintain the plant. The key components of foundation resource administration are:

1. Taking an existence cycle approach,
2. Developing financially savvy administration methodologies as long as possible,
3. Providing a characterized level of administration and checking execution,
4. Understanding and taking care of the requests of development through demand administration and framework venture,
5. Managing dangers related with resource disappointments,
6. Sustainable utilization of physical assets,
7. Continuous change in resource administration practices.

The objective of this advantage administration design for manufacturing plant is to:

• Document the administrations/benefit levels to be given and the expenses of giving the administration,
• Communicate the outcomes for benefit levels and hazard, where wanted subsidizing isn’t accessible, and
• Provide data to help chiefs in exchanging off administration levels, expenses and dangers to give benefits in a monetarily reasonable way.
• The vehicles, plant and hardware as resources give administrations to every one of the offices inside the City and in that capacity contribute in a roundabout way to every single key target.

Key components of the arrangement are

• Levels of administration: Specifies the administrations and levels of administration to be given by chamber.

• Future request and development: How this will affect on future administration conveyance and how this is to be met.
• Life cycle administration: How the City will deal with its current and future resources for give the required administrations. This incorporates use projections for upkeep, fuel and capital.
• Financial rundown: What stores are required to give the required administrations.
• Asset administration hones: Record keeping and PC frameworks.
• Checking and survey: How the arrangement will be observed and refreshed to guarantee it is meeting the City’s targets.

In spite of the fact that being an inward specialist organization, plant administrations gives resources that are utilized inside the group, and in a few events by the group (e.g. volunteers and group bunch individuals driving group manufacturing plant). There are along these lines three classes of administration levels (Braaksma,2011):

• Plant Levels of Service identify with how the group sees the administration regarding wellbeing, quality, amount, dependability, responsiveness, cost/proficiency and authoritative consistence, taking note of that by and large the view of the armada will be considered as a component of a more extensive administration that is being given e.g. the state of the nearby stop is incompletely influenced by the appearance and nature of yield from the cutting plant and hardware (   El-Diraby,2017).

• Customer Levels of Service identify with how the interior clients get the administration as far as security, quality, amount, dependability, responsiveness, cost/productivity and authoritative consistence.

• Supporting the client benefit levels are operational or specialized measures of execution created to guarantee that the base client levels of administration are met.

Appropriate plant format outlines are one of the essential strides amid the development of assembling businesses since material stream separation and material dealing with cost are influenced by plant format plans. On the off chance that appropriate format plans are not embraced then material taking care of cost and material stream remove turn out to be high. Subsequently, add up to assembling expense and time can be expanded as a result of poor plant format outlines. Advantages and profitability of the assembling ventures can be expanded if great plant format outlines are received.

Process format, item design and cell format are most regularly utilized format models in the production of plant format outlines. Process format, item design and cell format all have their highlights which can be utilized to choose how close they are from the objectives of the lean assembling framework. Here we examine criteria for design assessment which can be utilized to decide closeness of particular format display from the objectives of the lean assembling framework. Criteria for format assessment are portrayed in underneath and clarified according to the accompanying (Chilamkurti,2011):

Plant Levels of Service

From the lean assembling perspective, exertion ought to be made to limit material dealing with and transport amid assembling since they are only no esteem included exercises. Such no esteem included exercises called squanders ought to be expelled from assembling forms. In this way design format plans ought to be made in a way which limits material dealing with and transport.

Stream ought to be persistent from perspective of the lean assembling. Along these lines plant format outlines ought to be made by setting types of gear as close as conceivable keeping in mind the end goal to accomplish smooth and ceaseless stream of materials. Smooth and constant stream of materials ought not be accomplished by pointlessly putting types of gear a long way from each other.

Work in advance stock is a loss from the point of view of lean assembling. Plant format outlines ought to be made in a way which expels the need of assembling parts in clumps. Work in advance stock ought to be limited by setting types of gear as close as could be allowed and by not making middle of the road stocks.

Necessities of clients might be distinctive for various eras. So as to fulfill changed necessities of clients, plant format outlines ought to be made with the goal that both a fluctuated amount and a differed blend of items can be produced.

Multifunctional workforce can be accomplished if laborers can ready to perform multifunction by working various types of gear in the meantime. Working various types of gear at the same time can be conceivable and simple for laborers if machines are set as close as conceivable in the assembling plant.

Entire creation plant ought to be obviously unmistakable with a specific end goal to appropriately perform different regulatory exercises of the generation at the operational level. Plant design condescends ought to be to such an extent that the creation administrator ought to have an unmistakable vision of specialists and the assembling framework, when he/she strolls through the generation plant. Exertion ought to be made to make plant format outlines with the goal that entire strides of all procedures ought to be plainly obvious.

Plant Layout and Flow

In the event that types of gear in assembling plant are not legitimately orchestrated then in such cases arbitrariness of streams turns out to be high. Intricacy level of generation planning likewise turns out to be high a direct result of high irregularity of streams.

Fantastic items can be made if criticism on quality issues is quicker and surer. Quicker criticism on quality issues can be accomplished assuming most or all tasks happen in one zone and among a little group. Constant stream ought to likewise help producer to make top notch items.

• Potential perils in the work are distinguished, announced, observed.
• Remedial move is made to amend potential risks.
• Wellbeing, security and natural documentation and strategies are altogether and routinely audited.
• Examinations meet all applicable, wellbeing, security, and natural laws and controls. Reviews are finished by organization timetable and techniques.
• Reviews are reported.
• Investigation records are put away accurately.

• Preparing and accreditation on significant crisis and emergency treatment methods is finished and exceptional.
• Crisis reaction agrees to organization and administrative strategies and techniques.
• Crisis drills and occurrences are reported expeditiously as indicated by organization and administrative systems.

Distinguish risky conditions and make restorative move :

• Conditions that present a risk to wellbeing, security and the earth are recognized, revealed, and reported speedily.
• Restorative activities are recognized.
• Fitting gatherings are counseled about remedial activities.

• Restorative moves are made immediately as indicated by organization strategies.
• Progressing wellbeing concerns are followed and revealed until the point when remedial move is made.

Give security introduction to different representatives:

• Introduction covers all themes and methodology expected to encourage representative wellbeing.
• Introduction clarifies the need and procedures for representatives to raise wellbeing concerns, make inquiries, and get extra preparing.
• Introduction is recorded by organization necessities.
• Introduction meets every pertinent law, approaches, and directions. Wellbeing preparing is conveyed consistently.

Risk Statement	Risk Category	Likelihood and Consequence = Rating	Current Treatment or Control	Proposed Treatment or Control
Staff assets are not gave to benefit the armada while the quantity of advantages increments	Functioning	Unlikely and Significant = Medium	Staff workloads are variable and the general impact of expanding armada numbers is alleviated to some degree by specific outsourcing of clusters of work.	Specific outsourcing has limits, the primary obstructions being the expanded cost of work, and the movement time for things to and from region where most dealerships are found. Business cases will keep on being submitted notwithstanding examinations in this arrangement.
Hazard that the projections in this arrangement are either too low or too high, and therefore the money related and asset bases are arranged incorrectly	Economic	Possible and Significant = HIGH	Budgets are submitted on a yearly premise with no hold or future subsidizing/hedging.	The presumptions in this arrangement should be confirmed and financing put aside to meet expected increments. Expands that significantly surpass those spoke to should be organized inside the separate years’ financial plan. Reductions will bring about surplus assets being put aside that can be utilized for different purposes.
Hazard that innovation changes outpace the staff capacity to repair and keep up (or work) the armada. This incorporates the hazard that staff will most likely be unable to keep up new assets.	Operational	Unlikely and Moderate = Medium	Staff can expand their insight and aptitudes as required, however officially some electronic parts surpass nearby (Plant) capacity to analyze and repair them.	Future acquisitions should be determined or observed for innovation changes that hinder the capacity to repair and keep up the things. Institutionalizing where conceivable will empower the workshop to then source the proper equipment, programming, and preparing.
Hazard that cost and Supply of Fuel (petroleum and diesel) require a lessening of services	Functioning and Monetary	Possible and Significant = HIGH	Fuel estimating is being observed. Little advances taken to move vehicles to non-oil reliance. Fuel affectability investigation being prepared.	Complete an investigation of the plant affectability to fuel, and set up a Procedure to address and plan for vitality (fuel) deficiencies.

All things are possessed or rented by the association for plant. State Emergency Services and fire hardware is excluded in this evaluation as these benefits are overseen by Fire and Emergency Services.

10 trucks at 5 years old. Inside the following 5 years these will require substitution. To diminish the effect on capital subsidizing inside any one year, the substitutions should be spread over various years.

A huge number of extremely old trailers. In spite of the fact that support consumption isn’t huge on trailers contrasted with different classes, the quantity of more seasoned trailers makes extra work and a considerable lot of these are in extremely poor condition. In 09-10, twelve of the most seasoned trailers were focused for substitution, with the staying planned more than 10-11 and 11-12.

The couple of extremely old things in the Construction, Parks and Mowing and Miscellaneous classes are being planned for substitution in 15 years.

The high number of exceptionally old things appearing for Minor Equipment is because of an absence of a planned supplanting program joined with the requirement for old information records to be tidied up. This will be settled through 11 years (Braaksma,2011).

Manufacturing plant and gear resources are repaired and kept up to working condition under an ideal substitution strategy. As every benefit ages, the measure of work required increments, and the cost of upkeep increments. The cost of proprietorship diminishes after some time, and when these two cost components are thought about, an ideal possession lifetime can be assessed. This ideal substitution point will bring about the most reduced cost of possession and upkeep (Braaksma,2011).

Perform Emergency Drills and Join Emergency Response Teams

The benefit limit and execution, as identified with vehicles, plant and hardware, diminishes with age principally because of loss of unwavering quality in the advantage. At the end of the day, an expansion in issues and upkeep required makes the thing be less accessible and endure more breakdowns. Various key execution markers can be utilized to assess this component, however unless downtime costs are recorded particularly for the advantage, the loss of dependability and related substantial or immaterial expenses are excluded in the ideal substitution examinations (Braaksma,2011).

Singular resources are evaluated on a case by case, or class by classification premise, with remarkable things submitted for spending thought every year.

The condition profile is like the age profile. A few resources may diminish in condition all the more quickly because of the idea of the working condition and the usage level. Things encountering a high cost of activity in respect to their age are focused for before supplanting as per the ideal substitution examinations (Braaksma,2011).

The estimation of advantages as at March 2018 secured by this benefit administration design is compressed beneath. Resources are re-esteemed yearly as a major aspect of the plant rates figurings.

The lifecycle administration design subtle elements how the City intends to oversee and work the advantages at the concurred levels of administration (characterized in area 3) while enhancing life cycle costs.

Routine Maintenance Plan

Routine upkeep is the standard work that is important to keep resources working because of wear and tear and planned overhauling.

Overhauling is led to maker’s necessities.

All upkeep work is overseen through a mechanized support administration framework (CMMS). CMMS exercises incorporate account work plans, recording work finished, disappointment records, booking and detailing what was done to build up a support history and enhance upkeep and administration conveyance execution (Braaksma,2011).

The cost of upkeep and repair work is enlisted in a money related framework against every benefit. Expenses are recorded against plant cost codes for every benefit, with the present cost codes being used:

• 2 fleet Labor

• 3 Materials and Services

• 4 Fuel

• 5 Registrations

• 6 Insurance Claim Costs

• 10 Hire or Lease

Cost codes accessible however not being used because of framework shortcomings include:

• 7 Commission plus Decommission Costs

• 8 Tires

• 9 Operator Labor

• 11 Insurance Premium

Identify Hazardous Conditions and Take Corrective Action

The cost codes and partner detailing capacities empower some investigation to be led on life cycle cost of plant.

Every support movement is recorded as a different activity in the CMMS, with blame codes relegated utilizing the accompanying kinds:

• R&M Due to Design Fault

• R&M Due to Driver

• R&M Due to Lack of Daily Maintenance

• R&M Due to Operational Work

• R&M Due to Wear and Tear or Age

• Crash 1 Insurance Claim

• Crash 2 Under Excess

• Warranty Claim

• Rework by Workshop

• Callout – Breakdown or Service

Because of confinements with the manufacturing plant policies, restricted revealing is accessible on the time taken and the quantity of employments inside each blame sort. Due to having no reconciliation with the activity costs, there is no office to break down the reason for high cost employments or plant.

Arranged upkeep work is 80% of aggregate support by the quantity of occupations. In a perfect world this esteem would be accounted for by dollar esteem, however the CMMS and fund frameworks are not connected. As demonstrated in the key execution pointers in the segment “Wanted Levels of Service”, the perfect target is to surpass half arranged work. Despite the fact that this is right now being accomplished, it ought to be noticed that the impromptu occupations are all the more regularly of a high consumption and take any longer than the booked and arranged employments (Braaksma,2011).

Support work is organized based on inward, undocumented principles. While there is no exact request of need because of the shifting needs of the diverse client gatherings, on a general approach the accompanying things are managed as a higher need:

• Servicing

• Road sweepers

• Graffitti trailers

• Construction plant

• Community Busses

Models and determinations

Support work is done as per the producer’s prerequisites. Alterations to plant are done as per the pertinent Australian Standard.

Support consumption patterns for the present armada are appeared in the Figure 4. Use is assessed by vehicle class, gathering and sort contingent upon the measure of variety expected inside the separate levels. Some upkeep expectations depend on the gathering normal, while others are expanded step by step utilizing verifiable records to extend future use.

Resources requiring substitution are distinguished from ideal life examinations and current support consumption. By and large every thing is customized as per ideal life cycle examinations, therefore guaranteeing the most minimal life cost is accomplished. There is however some adaptability as noted underneath.

Provide Safety Training to Employees

Things with high use, high upkeep cost, broad down time, and that are basic to the arrangement of the administration are positioned as Urgent.

Things with low usage, low support cost, wicked good time, that are not basic to the arrangement of the administration or where the administration conveys a lower need are positioned as Medium. They are customized at their ideal substitution point and will normally have an extensive variety of possession life, inside which the thing can be supplanted without bringing about a cost punishment.

Things at ten years old or more seasoned are focused for substitution to avert out of date quality, and are positioned High.

Things that fall between these extents with changing properties are positioned suitably. This empowers a few things to be conceded to adjust the subsidizing necessities every year.

Things are supplanted to meet present and expected future practical need. As a rule substitutes are indicated like-for-like, as the practical needs don’t altogether change. A basic procedure guarantees that substitutions meet prerequisites:

• A detail is readied in view of the present equal make and model of plant

• This is introduced to the customer(s) with reasonable options

• Managers, Coordinators and staff are counseled to contrast current particulars and the past things and to guarantee useful necessities are met

The detail is corrected to suit, and the thing is obtained following the buying systems and subject to spending financing.

Future Assets Acquisition Plan

Resources are procured as per typical systems, utilizing a similar determination process as noted in the area “Future Replacement Expenditure”.

When resources are procured, they are enrolled in the accompanying Ten Year Plant Replacement Program in light of ideal substitution terms. By and large plant things are expected to require substitution when they achieve their ideal life, as the administration will proceed.

Measures and details for new resources and for update/development of existing resources are the same as those for restoration. 

As all items are programmed for replacement according to optimum replacement terms, there are no items that represent critical risks. High maintenance and high utilization items create the greatest problems for both operation and maintenance, and this in turn is reflected in the optimum replacement terms.

Risk Review of Life Cycle Management

Risk Statement	Risk Category	Likelihood and Consequence = Rating	Current Treatment or Control	Proposed Treatment or Control
Street sweepers: If the three units are not supplanted at arranged circumstances, there is a hazard that every one of the three can achieve seniority and experience high cost disappointments and downtime at the same time.	Operative	Unlikely and Moderate = Medium		Stage the substitutions of the street sweepers to guarantee a two year hole amongst ages, and in this way control downtime and cost of support. Guarantee that the there units together have surplus working limit that empowers any one unit to finish crafted by another when it is under repair.
Ride-on cutters: Risk that they are acquired at a typical time and bring about high upkeep and downtime at over the same period	Working	Unlikely and Moderate = Medium	Nine trimmers are being bought in 09-10 due to not being supplanted in a proper recurrence already. Save decks are on arrange. Restricted extra limit inside current numbers.	Stage the substitutions. Guarantee save working limit so at least one units can finish crafted by others. Buy save decks and reel units to diminish the pivot time for repairs.
Danger of having units of an interesting configuration, under centre use with restricted substitution procure choices. Any breakdown of units that are one of a kind can affect on activities and raise costs.	Working	Unlikely and Moderate = Medium	A number of armada things are single in both make, model, and configuration, albeit some of these can be substitution employed easily.	Manage substitutions and operational needs to decrease or dispense with single and extraordinary arrangement things. Guarantee save working limit so the unit(s) can be substituted if vital.
Danger of having units with high working interest however no extra limit, center use with constrained substitution contract choices: Any breakdown of units regardless of whether numerous are accessible can affect on activities and raise costs if the operational group can’t substitute the items	Operational	Unlikely and Moderate = Medium	This is the present status over a scope of benefit categories.	Manage armada numbers inside each configuration of advantage for guarantee save working limit is accessible.
Vitality Plan: Risk of robbery of fuel from Operations focus bowsers	Financial	Possible and Insignificant = Low	The encased area, near the workshop implies the region is much of the time inside perspective of numerous individuals. Staff need to initiate fuel apportioning through a committed fuel key.	Current framework is satisfactory.
Support Plan: Risk of adjusting not finished adequately	Operational	Unlikely and Moderate = Medium	Servicing program gone through CMMS. Checked on fortnightly. New things have plans entered when purchased.	Maintain dynamic checks, especially abnormal things that are not reliably utilized with significant things and might be missed. Keep up and enhance CMMS.
Upkeep Plan: Risk of advantages being obtained and wellbeing characteristics not perceived by staff, prompting damage to staff or the public	Health	Likely and Moderate = HIGH	Verbal acceptance given to administrators and mechanics who are available on conveyance, manuals provided.	Comprehensive framework required to cover each progression in securing, enlistment and continuous activity of all vehicles, plant and gear.
Support Plan: Risk of proceeding with specialized issues with plant cost focuses anticipates sufficient finding of cost increases.	Financial	Possible and Minor = Medium	Request submitted for this issue to be settled, however no need offered by the supplier.	Request need determination.
Support Plan: Risk of proceeding with powerlessness to examine high cost occupations by blame code, anticipates satisfactory examination of expenses and practices.	Financial	Possible and Minor = Medium	Costs detailed autonomously and chronicled investigations in light of yearly costs.	New CMMS to incorporate coordination so expenses can be perceived against the benefit, however still no activity cost record. Introduce for future spending thought.
Vitality Plan: Risk of burglary of fuel from BP	Financial	Possible and Insignificant = Low	BP fuel cards restrict open doors for robbery as either the individual has to know the PIN or they have to sidestep the clerk’s beware of what is being fuelled. The present framework is sufficient, however the full armada fuel cards are expected for recharging in October 2010, so the card subtle elements could be refreshed.	Vitality Plan: Risk of burglary of fuel from BP
Support Plan: Risk of client disappointment and disarray in arranging work through an absence of reported upkeep prioritization system	Operational	Possible and Moderate = Medium	Verbal	Maintenance prioritization tenets to be recorded as a major aspect of the JIG procedure, at that point introduced to client gatherings.
Vitality Plan: Fire, wellbeing and ecological perils from the BP stations.	Health	Rare and Severe = Medium	BP stations have standard formats and gear with an abnormal state of signage and controls.	Monitor.

This section contains the financial requirements resulting from all the information presented in the previous sections of this asset management plan.  The financial projections will be improved as further information becomes available on desired levels of service and current and projected future asset performance.

Risk Review of Future Demand

The financial projections are shown below for renewal of current expenditure and expenditure due to demand and growth. The operating expenditure has been further segregated to fuel and maintenance due to the different impacts.  

There is one key marker for monetary supportability that has been considered in the examination of the administrations gave by this advantage class, this being the long haul life cycle costs. For this classification of benefit, the long haul design, being a ten year design, is adequately long to cover most resource substitutions and life cycles subsequently a more drawn out term appraisal isn’t required.

Life cycle expenses (or entire of life costs) are the normal costs that are required to support the administration levels over the anticipated resource life. Life cycle costs incorporate upkeep and resource utilization (devaluation cost) . The yearly normal life cycle cost for the current administrations canvassed in this advantage administration design is $1.90 million.

Life cycle expenses can be contrasted with life cycle use to give a marker of manageability in benefit arrangement. Life cycle consumption incorporates support and capital recharging use. Life cycle use will change contingent upon the planning of advantage restorations. The life cycle use toward the beginning of the arrangement is $2.26 million.

A hole between life cycle expenses and life cycle use gives a sign with respect to whether exhibit purchasers are paying their offer of the advantages they are devouring every year. The motivation behind this Fleet resource administration design is to distinguish levels of administration that the group needs and can bear the cost of and build up the important long haul monetary plans to give the administration in an economical way.

The life cycle hole for administrations secured by this benefit administration design is a normal $545,000 per annum. The life cycle supportability list is 0.93.

The explanation behind this hole is that inward clients are charged the present level of devaluation as a misfortune in estimation of the thing over the life of the thing. This could be viewed as a reimbursement of capital. Clients are not required to finance a higher rate that would oblige cost increments. The hole between deterioration gathered through charges and the expansion in cost of new things should in this way be secured through autonomous subsidizing.

As a store save isn’t built up, by and by the full capital assets must be sourced from the city finance every year.

In the case of less Budget, anticipated consumption recognized in the segment Life Cycle Management Plan is to be supported from the plant’s working and capital spending plans.

Accomplishing the financing for Renewals will require:

• The foundation of a fuel hold store to counterbalance the normal emotional increment in fuel costs throughout the following decade;

• The yearly administration of spending plan to adjust to the changing repair and upkeep consumptions and substitution capital.

Accomplishing the financing for Growth and Demand will require:

• Forward getting ready for give subsidizes and working consumption spending plans to happen in synchronization for group transport administrations;

• Defined forward arrangement for expanding Parks and Reserves support plant and hardware, with proper measures of capital and working put aside for every future year;

References

 El-Diraby, T. E., Kinawy, S., & Piryonesi, S. M. (2017). A Comprehensive Review of Approaches Used by Ontario Municipalities to Develop Road Asset Management Plans (No. 17-00281)

 MIMOSA (2011), Machinery Information Management Open Systems Alliance, www.mimosa.org.

 Kans M. and Ingwald A. (2008) “Common database for cost-effective improvement of maintenance performance”. International Journal of production economics; 113, pp. 734-747.

 Campos J, (2009), “Development in the application of ICT in condition monitoring and maintenance”. Computers in industry; 60, pp. 1-20.

Braaksma A.J.J, Klingenberg W. and van Exel P, (2011), “A review of the use of asset information standards for collaboration in the process industry”. Computers in industry; 62, pp. 337-350.

Kiritsis D., (2011), “Closed-loop PLM for intelligent products in the era of the internet of things”. Computer-Aided Design; 43, pp. 479-501.

Emmanoulidis C., Jantunen E. and MacIntyre J,( 2006), “Flexible software for condition monitoring, incorporating novelty detection and diagnostics”. Computers in industry; 57, pp. 516-527.

 Niu G. and Yang B., 2010, “Intelligent condition monitoring and prognostics system based on data-fusion strategy”. Experts Systems with Applications; 37, pp.8831-8840.

Heng A., Tan A., Mathew J., Monthomery N, Banjevic D. and Jardine A., (2009),“Intelligent condition-based prediction of machinery reliability”. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing; 23, pp. 1600-1614.

Heng A., Zhang S., Tan A. and Mathew J., (2009), “Rotating machinery prognostics: State of the art, challenges and opportunities”. Mehcanical Systems and Signal Processing; 23, pp. 724-739.

Niu G., Yang B. and Pecht M, (2010)“Development of an optimized condition-based maintenance system by data fusion and reliability-centered maintenance”. Reliability Engineering and System Safety; 95, pp. 786-796.

Safari E. and Sadjadi S., (2011) “A hybrid method for flowshops scheduling with condition-based maintenance constraint and machines breakdown”. Expert Systems with Applications; 38, pp. 2020-2029.

Jardine A., Lin D. and Banjevic D.,  (2006)“A review on machinery diagnostics and prognostics implementing condition-based maintenance”. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing; 20, pp. 1483-1510.90

Carr M.J. and Wang W., (2011) “An approximate algorithm for prognostic modelling using condition monitoring information”. European Journal of Operation Research, 211, pp. 90-96.

Rachuri S., Subrahmanian E., Bouras A., Fenves S., Foufou S. and Sriram S., (2008) “Information sharing and exchange in the context of product lifecycle management: Role of standards”. Computer-Aided Design;, 40, pp. 789-800.

 Muller A., Márquez A. and Iung B., (2008) “On the concept of e-maintenance: Review and current research”. Reliability Engineering and System Safety; 93, pp.1165-1187.

Catrinu M.D. and Nordgard D.E., (2011)  “Integrating risk analysis and multi-criteria decision support under uncertainty in electricity distribution system asset management”. Reliability Engineering and System Safety; 96, pp. 663-670.

 Andersen J., Crainic T. and Christiansen M., 2009 “Service network design with asset management: Formulations and comparative analyses”. Transportation Research Part C; 17, pp. 197-207.

Vo C, Chilamkurti N., Loke S. and Torabi T., 2011 “RADIO-MAMA: An RFID based business process framework for asset management”. Journal of Network and Computer Applications; 34, pp. 990-997.

Schneider J., Gaul A.J., Neumann C., Hogräfer J., WellBow W., Schwan M. and Schnettler A., (2006) “Asset management techniques”. Electrical Power and Energy Systems; 28, pp. 643–654.

Gustavsen B. and Rolfseng L., (2005) “Asset management of wood pole utility structures”. Electrical Power and Energy Systems; 27, pp. 641–646.

Sharma M., Ammons J. and Hartman J., 2007 “Asset management with reverse product flows and environmental considerations”. Computers & Operations Research;, 34, pp. 464–486.

Mitchell J. and H. Bond T., 2018 “Equipment Lifecycle management condition base maintenance and more!”. https://tecem.com.br/site/downloads/artigos/sisappr.pdf

Condition Based Operations for Manufacturing (2006). OpenO&M. For Manufacturing Joint Working Group..

Laszkiewicz M., 2011, “Plant floor optimization: asset management in the new economy” https://www.isa.org/fmo/newsweb/pdf/plantfloor.pdf

Salim M.D. and Timmerman A., 2008 “Software to Simulate and Optimize Asset Management in Construction and Manufacturing”. The journal of technology studies., 77, pp. 10-18

March C.,  2017, “The Five Biggest Risks to Effective Asset Management” https://www.lce.com/The_Five_Biggest_Risks_to_Effective_Asset_Management_367-item.html.

Smith C.D., Tvernier K., Zhao J. and McGrail A.J., 2000 ,“A Novel Approach to the Condition Assessment of HV Plant incorporating On-Line, Remote Access Acoustic Emission and Electromagnetic Partial Discharge Sensing”, Proc. of 1^st International Conference on Insulation Condition Monitoring of Electrical Plant,  Wuhan China

Ben-Menachem M., 2008 ,“Towards management of software as assets: A literature review with additional sources”. Information and software technology;, 50,pp. 241-258

Humphrey C., Tollefson T. and J. 2010, “Digital asset management”. Facial plastic surgery clinics of North America;, 18, pp. 335-340

 Lau H.C.W. and Dwight R.A., (2011), “A fuzzy-based decision support model for engineering asset condition monitoring – a case study of examination of water pipelines”. Expert systems with applications;, 18, pp. 1-31

Osterweil L., Brown J.R. and Stucki L., 2010“ASSET: a lifecycle verification and visibility system”.

“Life Cycle Costing Guideline”, Total Asset Management, 2004. https://www.treasury.nsw.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0005/5099/life_cycle_cos tings.pdf.

Total Asset Management,2017, retrieved from https://www.gamc.nsw.gov.au/tam/

Toomey G., Freitas I., Oliveira V., “ AES’ Approach to a Proactive Maintenance

Programme to Meet the Plant’s Business Goals – Putting It All Together”, May Las

Banerjhi R., 2006 “A world class approach to asset management”, https://www.allianceindia.co.in/newsite/whitepapers/An%20Approach%20to%20 WCAM%20Ver%201.4.pdf

Joubert A., “Predictive maintenance”, 2016 https://vut.netd.ac.za/bitstream/10352/96/9/09%20Joubert,%20A.%20Chapter%2 08.pdf /

Podolosky J., 2004, “Predictive maintenance as part of an overall asset optimization strategy”, Process products. “ABB solutions for asset management, 2017, The competitive advantage for every industry”,www05.abb.com/global/scot/…/broch_assetmgmt_3bus094559_en_hi. pdf. /

Mathew, Avin and Zhang, Sheng and Ma, Lin and Earle, Tom and Hargreaves, 2006 “Reducing maintenance cost through effective prediction analysis and process integration.”, Advances in vibration engineering 5,  2, pp. 87-96

 “ISMI Consensus Preventive and Predictive Maintenance Vision”, 2007, https://www.sematech.org/docubase/document/4819ceng.pdf /