The paper will analyze the importance of one of the neoliberal city, and it will demonstrate in concerning to the San Francisco city of the United States. In other words, it will highlight the concept of neoliberalism about various theories, issues as well as themes. Neoliberalism can be defined as the value of market free competition and is often characterized for sustainable economic growth of a city or state. It is established for proving a positive economic growth of the particular city or state because neoliberalism help the government to provide a competition free environment where the marketers can easily enhance their business growth. If neoliberalism approach is developed by the major cities then it be helpful for the government to maintain a constant growth in their market which will finally give rise to standard position of the concerned city in the country. Besides this, a logical, as well as a compelling and creative argument, will also provide about the neoliberal approach. Moreover, the paper will reflect a literature review concerning the neoliberal approach in relation with the other cities of the world. Moreover, it will also provide some examples of neoliberal approach, and it will investigate according to the basic aspects as provided by the literature review of other cities concept about this neoliberal approach.
In the words of Davies, (2014), the San Francisco and other cities in the nation, represents crucial arenas for the contestation as well as expression of neoliberal practice and policy. It also represents both the distinctive logic of public as well as local interactions that produce specific outcomes following sets in particular cities. The San Francisco city of the United States has rapidly enhanced their neoliberal approach and at the end of 1970’s the social, political environment of the city was riped for the new economic model and after that neoliberalism took the helm. According to the author Lin and Zhang, (2015), the cities of the United States in the 1940’s were considered as to be the vital terrains in the contestation and rollout of neoliberalism. In other words, both neo-Gramscian and Foucauldian studies increase the understandings of this neoliberalism concept regarding government rules and regulations. The neoliberal policies become entrenched that give rise to social services and cuts the federal funding of affordable housing. The author Bose, (2015) suggested that the Foucauldian governmentality concept had been considered as an influential research approach that enhances the neoliberalism of city life. The author had suggested that both these distinctive logic of the urban and local areas had formed the main challenge for built-up studies in the past forty years.
As per the theory of Marxist, it is clear that institutionalist accounts and structuralism approaches both failed to deal with these challenges that were mainly faced by the cities of the United States during 1970’s due to neoliberalism concept. As per the author Cooksey, (2017), the neoliberal theory provides a framework that mainly captures the importance of both local as well as large-scale forces. In concern to the large-scale forces, the neoliberal theory mainly defines the structural perspective regarding federal retrenchment, market deregulation, public-private venture capitalism, and government cutbacks. On the other hand, this theory also demonstrates the political, social, economic as well as cultural complexion of the city regarding the large-scale forces. In other words, the author demonstrates that the establishment of neoliberal governmentality theory simply diagnosis the progress of government in the outright domination or correction to bio-political control or self-regulation. In the opinion of Bates, (2014), the regime theory of neoliberalism posits that informal and formal arrangement create coalitions of private and public power. The urban development and governance were understood by these peer regimes about the respective sources and blending of various individuals respectively.
The author also suggested that new approaches provide valuable understandings and insights of the urban governance, but the degree of ambiguity in concerning both local and urban context still failed in resolving the issue. As evaluated by the author Le Gales, (2016), Gramsci’s theory of the necessary state was considered to be the better understanding of the concept of neoliberal metropolitan authority. According to this theory, the governmentality, consensus, as well as the power, were organized concretely in space and time and also in resistance. Hence with the help of this theory, the author demonstrates that neoliberal urban governance mainly emphasis on treating the coercive capabilities of modalities as one of an integral part of the public power. The theory has been explained by the author through an example which simply argued that Gramsci’s theory had played the role in the monopoly of oppression and it mainly held by the independent states. According to the author Wu, (2017), the San Francisco city of the United States depicts neoliberalism as a national economic policy that shifts towards rampant privatization, the free market of fundamentalism and diminished government. With the help of quantitative examinations of capital flows, qualitative historical analysis, and case studies, scholars or researchers had concluded that neoliberalism hallmarks were generated due to uneven economic development.
The author Di Feliciantonio, (2016), had suggested that following concerns by the local government activity in relation with the corporatist state or capitalist and also with the theoretical concept determines the decrease of specificity of the local state. In other words, by using this approach, it was seen that in the last decades of the 20th century the grand narratives of both neo-liberalization and neoliberalism in San Francisco decreased in particular manner. This is because that in recent times the cities of the United States including San Fransisco and their indigenous governance regimes both constituted a specific set of urban conjunctures as well as formations that together represented a broad family of hybrid neoliberalism’s. In the opinion of Newell and Phillips, (2016), operations of local government in San Francisco was important to enhance their neoliberal regimes of local governance and for this proper theory as well as the systematic empirical investigation were executed by them in past decades. The author Thornton, (2017) also suggested that to improve the neoliberal aspect of this city the local government has to suffer from a variety of deficits in concerning to theoretical, normative, methodological as well as analytical approach.
The theoretical deficiencies simply include the tendency to incorporate any local practices that involve both the diverse neoliberalism and the existing neoliberalism concept. In order to involve the concepts of diverse neoliberalism and the existing neoliberalism within San Francisco the local government took serious steps. According to the local government, the neoliberalism concept will easily develop the urban areas of this city and thus it will provide a huge benefit to the people of this region. In other words, normative deficits mainly include both susceptibility to the accusation and a tendency to political fatalism respectively. Thus, the normative issue faced by the local governance of San Francisco was mainly provided limited analysis of neoliberalism and due to this, the result formed was often disconnected from the actual resistance of the neoliberalism concept. On the other hand, both methodological, as well as analytical issues, generally arise from the difficulty of identifying any potential places as well as sites where the neoliberal approach has not been applied yet. Therefore in order to diminish these issues and to make the city more expensive it is important for the city to expand these neoliberal approach in the urban politics. The neoliberalism approach will thereby help to improve the urban politics and after that it will help in introducing many strategies that enhances their business growth in a competition free environment. By this way the city will become expensive and therefore it can be said that neoliberalism provides a huge benefit to the urban region of San Francisco city. In other words, the author Bruff and Starnes, (2018), argue that the idea used by the local communities as well as the states firmly describe the neoliberal policy framework and as a result, the globalization is superficially plausible. According to this author, theoretically, the intersection of extra-local and local concept provides clarification of this neoliberal framework. As per this framework, urban politics will easily enhanced and therefore the crisis of housing affordability among the people of this region will decrease from that of the past decades. In other words, the framework integrate three different types of element by which the urban politics can quickly enhance their neoliberal approach in this city.
The three essential elements that should be considered were the primary function of the intervention of the state, the dominant ideology and the mode of interest mediation. With the help of this primary function of the local state intervention simply support the social reproduction, while that of the dominant ideology focus on civil rights rather than rights of private property. Besides this, the mode of interest meditation defines that the local state should support the democratic prospect rather than that of the corporative one. Hence these three large essential elements helped in contributing further refinements that enhanced the neoliberal approach of the urban governance in the San Francisco city of the United States. In the words of Aaron Richmond and Garmany, (2016), the three essential elements enhanced the neoliberal approach of the urban governance and it also serves as one of the useful points for the analysis of the local change in governmental policy in this city. The author Forrest, and Hirayama, (2015), also suggested that the empirical applicability of both the competing logics and deficits of the urban and local approach are now presented in the form of politics, institutional structures and also as ideological underpinnings.
Thus from this understandings, the author stated that empirical evidence mainly ranges from an ideal local state formation that was helpful in enhancing the neoliberal approach of any cities in the nation. In the opinion of Spolander, Engelbrecht and Pullen Sansfaçon, (2016), Foucauldian urban governance was considered to be a sensitive method that builds a relationship between domination as well as governmentality respectively but it trend to treat coercion as exogenous or epiphenomenal to power. On the other hand, another author Silva, (2018), argued that complex analysis was not so important to count the costs in lives as well as lies of exercising power. Besides this, the author demonstrates that part-breaking analysis of the government arts forms differences in domination that crushes the power to art from that of the political art which was considered to be reflective as per the actions of government. Apart from this, the Foucauldian urban governance as stated by Foucault’s stated that both violence, as well as consensus, does not constitute the basic nature or principle of power and it merely considered as the total structure of actions that bears all the possible actions. Therefore according to the research of Foucauldian urban governance, it is noticed that the cultivation of the entrepreneurial rationalities help in developing sharp insights into the citizen-activists and also the enrolment of officials too.
According to the author Stilwell, (2014), most of the studies related to neoliberalism shows governmentality in concerning to their work. An example of this as stated by the author was, the World’s Bank Kecamatan Development Programme that held in Indonesia shows that with their excellent governance attitude the collaboration between the community institutions and local state was strengthened. Hence it is clear that the archetypal neoliberal governmentality provides a massive beneficiary to the government and this enhances the neoliberal approach of this San Francisco city of the United States. As per the author Schmidt, (2015), the implications of neoliberal governmentality was nurtured through various schemes such as the Single Regeneration Budget, Local strategic Partnerships as well as the New deal for communities. The author also stated that with the help of these schemes the local network of the government in the city was very much strong than that of the previous decades. Therefore it is clear that San Francisco was considered to be one of the neoliberal city because it helps their government to run their estate without facing any sorts of difficulty smoothly. Apart from this, the author demonstrates that the state of the neoliberal approach in this city can only be defined by the meta-governance theory.
The meta-governance theory explores the reorganization as well as rescaling in concerning to the post-Fordist spatiotemporal fixes. Along with this, the Foucauldian ontology with the help of strategic approach the rule of sovereign authority should be diminished. In other words, the theory does not claim about the fact that coercion is redundant nether it provides the sufficient analytical data, and it only provides the decline procedure of both coercive power as well as the sovereign authority respectively. In the words of Tomlinson, (2017), the concept of neoliberalism indicates that entrepreneurial cities were unique, depending on the culture, political organization and resources available in the particular city. For this reason, the Government delegated the responsibility for providing local facilities as well as services to this city of the United States. Due to this delegation, the local government authorities build up in this city with the formation of six divisional boards in the government sector. The author also demonstrates that these new local authorities face various challenges or issues to raise the proper as well as adequate funds and they also failed to provide the basic infrastructure for developing the towns in this city. Hence it is necessary for this city to develop into as one of the best neoliberal city so that the local government will easily help the people in this city to develop as one of the biggest city regarding infrastructure in the country of the United States.
As evaluated by the author Scott and Storper, (2015), political tension arose within many of the towns as well as cities in the United States, and it mainly occurs between the infrastructure and the landholders of rural side those who live in the surrounding countryside and also with the town dwellers those who wanted public facilities. Therefore it can be said that the neoliberal approach in the urban environment of this San Francisco city provides positive benefits to these urban people. Thus in between this context, it became difficult for the local governments to handle all sorts of issues that occurs in most of the cities of the United States. However, the neoliberal concept is said to be working in the urban region of most of the cities of United States. Hence with these tensions, both the costs as well as the provisions of local services and growth of management raises a debate over the scope and role of local government in this city of San Francisco. Therefore it is necessary for the government to enhance their neoliberal approach in the whole United States and it will enhance the effectiveness of San Francisco city and will make it as one of the strongest city in the nation which thereby help them to overcome their legislative issues easily. As per the author Randolph and Tice, (2017), due to the various problems generated in this city of the United States, it became important for the city to become an important terrain of struggle for the neoliberal hegemony.
The author suggested that with the help of meta-governance theory the local government of the United States become implement this neoliberal approach in their governmental policy. Hence to develop this four important tools of meta-governance it should be necessary for the local government to care about some criteria such as institutional design, network participation, policy and resource framing, and network facilitation. Thus with the help of these four tools, the local government of this San Francisco city can easily maintain the hierarchical authority, but in this case, coercion is epiphenomenal. On the other hand, another author Beer et al., (2016), argued that neoliberalism not only helps to substitute the hegemony but also reinforce as well as create the conditions for developing it, and hence it considers to be an important aspect in the government building approach of a city. In other words, it is seen that local democratic politics become also consider as the cornerstone of all local political activities as well as corporatist formations respectively that generally help the government in developing the neoliberal regime in the city. Apart from this, it is also noticed that the local government of San Fransisco mainly enhances their relationship with that of their State government in concerning to working environment so that it helps them to increase their infrastructure facilities.
About that activity, the local government of this city do not get so much support from the State Government and hence it creates problem to the local government to maintain their infrastructure facility in comparing to the other cities in the United States. In the opinion of Shevellar, Johnson and Lyons, (2015), one of the major features of building the city as the ‘’the neoliberal city” was that the attacks from politics of small government of the local council can be diminished if the local governance make this city as one of the neoliberal city in the country. Apart from this, the author stated that neoliberalism was considered to be a distinctive package in concerning to ideological values, dispositions, the primacy of business interests in accomplishing growth, emphasis on the importance of economic growth and also the interventions of creating the major reasons for enhancing the economic growth. Hence this neoliberal package can easily underpin the disposition as well as the outlook of the local government of the city of San Francisco. From the study, it is seen that over the last 40 to 50 years the entrepreneurial spirit of this city has increased from the previous decades and hence it can easily bring the success of this neoliberal ideology in this city of the United States. In the words of Sigler and Martinus, (2017), the local state plays a significant role in regulating the excess present in the market, and thereby it helps in providing a degree of predictability and certainty and all of these help in transforming a city into one of the neoliberal city in the country.
Besides this, the author suggested that according to the “Westminster Model,” the local government of the United States mainly follows a different trajectory in comparison to the local government of other countries. Due to this reason, the scope of local US Government had been more concerning both pragmatic as well as regional approach. Hence, it can be said that the US government was capable of providing basic infrastructure for developing their settlements and also regulating the new development, but some problems remained in providing all the facilities. Therefore, it is important for the city of San Francisco of the United States to be one of the best neoliberal city of this country so that they do not face any problem in providing basic infrastructures as well as to develop new regulations for the people. As stated by the author Forrest and Hirayama, (2015), neo-liberty, on the other hand, has been accomplished by various degrees of struggles as well as painful approaches and for developing a city into a proper neoliberal investigation was necessary because it considered being the analysis of urban politics in concerning its place. Therefore, from this analysis of the city of San Fransisco, the importance of being a neoliberal city is clear.
Conclusion
The essay concludes that neoliberal approach is considered as to be an important aspect of the local government of the city of San Francisco in the United States that helps the city to develop their infrastructure facilities without facing any problem by the State government. Thus, from this literature review it is clear that the neoliberal approach provides positive impact on the urban region of this city. In order to define the importance of this neoliberal approach various theories, as well as examples, are provided that can easily explain the significance of this approach. Besides this, it is seen that being a neoliberal city, San Francisco faces some problem, and thus they wanted to develop their policy as well as regulation in concern to the local government. With the help of this improvement, the local government of this city can enable to provide good infrastructure settlements and develop new techniques without facing any problem and proper help from the State government. Therefore, from this paper, a clear view regarding the importance of being “the neoliberal city” has been generated.
References
Aaron Richmond, M., and Garmany, J., 2016. ‘Post?Third?World City’or the Neoliberal ‘City of Exception’? Rio de Janeiro in the Olympic Era. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 40(3), pp.621-639.
Bates, J., 2014. The strategic importance of information policy for the contemporary neoliberal state: The case of Open Government Data in the United Kingdom. Government Information Quarterly, 31(3), pp.388-395.
Beer, A., Bentley, R., Baker, E., Mason, K., Mallett, S., Kavanagh, A. and LaMontagne, T., 2016. Neoliberalism, economic restructuring and policy change: Precarious housing and precarious employment in Australia. Urban studies, 53(8), pp.1542-1558.
Bose, S., 2015. Universities and the redevelopment politics of the neoliberal city. Urban Studies, 52(14), pp.2616-2632.
Bruff, I. and Starnes, K., 2018. Framing the neoliberal canon: resisting the market myth via literary inquiry. Globalizations, pp.1-15.
Cooksey, R.R., 2017. The Treasure Island development project: a case study in neoliberal urban development(Doctoral dissertation, San Francisco State University).
Davies, J., 2014. Rethinking urban power and the local state: Hegemony, domination, and resistance in neoliberal cities. Urban Studies, 51(15), pp.3215-3232.
Di Feliciantonio, C., 2016. Subjectification in times of indebtedness and neoliberal/austerity urbanism. Antipode, 48(5), pp.1206-1227.
Forrest, R. and Hirayama, Y., 2015. The financialization of the social project: Embedded liberalism, neoliberalism, and home ownership. Urban Studies, 52(2), pp.233-244.
Forrest, R. and Hirayama, Y., 2015. The financialization of the social project: Embedded liberalism, neoliberalism, and home ownership. Urban Studies, 52(2), pp.233-244.
Le Gales, P., 2016. Neoliberalism and urban change: Stretching a good idea too far?. Territory, Politics, Governance, 4(2), pp.154-172.
Lin, G.C. and Zhang, A.Y., 2015. Emerging spaces of neoliberal urbanism in China: Land commodification, municipal finance and local economic growth in prefecture-level cities. Urban studies, 52(15), pp.2774-2798.
Newell, P. and Phillips, J., 2016. Neoliberal energy transitions in the South: Kenyan experiences. Geoforum, 74, pp.39-48.
Randolph, B. and Tice, A., 2017. Relocating disadvantage in five Australian cities: socio-spatial polarisation under neo-liberalism. Urban policy and research, 35(2), pp.103-121.
Schmidt, J., 2015. Intuitively neoliberal? Towards a critical understanding of resilience governance. European journal of international relations, 21(2), pp.402-426.
Scott, A.J. and Storper, M., 2015. The nature of cities: the scope and limits of urban theory. International journal of urban and regional research, 39(1), pp.1-15.
Shevellar, L., Johnson, L. and Lyons, K., 2015. Re-imagining the practices of town, social and community planning in Australia: opportunities for planning in neoliberal policy settings. Australian Planner, 52(4), pp.266-276.
Sigler, T.J. and Martinus, K., 2017. Extending beyond ‘world cities’ in World City Network (WCN) research: Urban positionality and economic linkages through the Australia-based corporate network. Environment and Planning A, 49(12), pp.2916-2937.
Silva, P., 2018. Neoliberalism, democratization, and the rise of technocrats. In The Changing Role of the State in Latin America (pp. 75-92). Routledge.
Spolander, G., Engelbrecht, L. and Pullen Sansfaçon, A., 2016. Social work and macro-economic neoliberalism: beyond the social justice rhetoric. European Journal of Social Work, 19(5), pp.634-649.
Stilwell, F., 2014. Neoliberalism in the city: economic theory, class interests, and political practices. Housing, Theory and Society, 31(1), pp.42-47.
Thornton, A., 2017. “The Lucky country”? A critical exploration of community gardens and city–community relations in Australian cities. Local Environment, 22(8), pp.969-985.
Tomlinson, R., 2017. An argument for metropolitan government in Australia. Cities, 63, pp.149-153.
Wu, F., 2017. State entrepreneurialism in urban China: A critique of the neoliberal city. In Debating the neoliberal city(pp. 163-183). Routledge.
Essay Writing Service Features
Our Experience
No matter how complex your assignment is, we can find the right professional for your specific task. Contact Essay is an essay writing company that hires only the smartest minds to help you with your projects. Our expertise allows us to provide students with high-quality academic writing, editing & proofreading services.
Free Features
Free revision policy
$10Free bibliography & reference
$8Free title page
$8Free formatting
$8How Our Essay Writing Service Works
First, you will need to complete an order form. It's not difficult but, in case there is anything you find not to be clear, you may always call us so that we can guide you through it. On the order form, you will need to include some basic information concerning your order: subject, topic, number of pages, etc. We also encourage our clients to upload any relevant information or sources that will help.
Complete the order form
Once we have all the information and instructions that we need, we select the most suitable writer for your assignment. While everything seems to be clear, the writer, who has complete knowledge of the subject, may need clarification from you. It is at that point that you would receive a call or email from us.
Writer’s assignment
As soon as the writer has finished, it will be delivered both to the website and to your email address so that you will not miss it. If your deadline is close at hand, we will place a call to you to make sure that you receive the paper on time.
Completing the order and download