The assignment focuses on the current organisational performance management system obtained by a reputed company. The assignment analysis other attributes such as communication of performance with the stakeholders, risk management, quality management along with financial performance and so on. The focus of the assignment is on Sainsbury’s, a retail company in the UK. The assignment analysis the organisational performance management used in Sainsbury’s and provides a recommendation for its improvement.
Sainsbury’s is one of the most reputed retail companies situated in London. It is a public limited company with a 16.9% share of the supermarket. John James Sainsbury founded the company in 1869 and within 1922; it became the largest grocery retailer in the country (Sainsburys.co.uk 2018). Currently, the company has over 1812 stores located all across Europe and the UK within employee strength of 162,000 (Sainsburys.co.uk 2018). As per recent reports, the company is listed on the London Stock Exchange with about 21.99% of the share of the company being held by Qatar Investment Authority. Reports also claim that Sainsbury’s is the second largest retail company in the UK behind only to Tesco (Sainsburys.co.uk 2018).
Organisational Performance Management and Performance Measurement
According to Van Dooren, Bouckaert and Halligan (2015), organisational performance management and measurement is the most important analysis that brings into focus the capabilities of a public sector enterprise. It is a systematic approach to improve the existing quality of performance in an organisation. Normally performance management is measured by the economic condition, the efficiency and the effectiveness of a particular company. In the case of Sainsbury’s the organisational performance management system takes into account the challenges and opportunities of the modern day. These include technical challenges and financial challenges (Buckingham and Goodall 2015). For Sainsbury’s the financial capability of the company is stable as it earns a net income of £471 million. This accounts for the company to be financially viable and ensure that the needs of the employees are fulfilled.
The introduction of new technology in the market poses a challenge for the company, as timely delivery of information is one of the biggest challenges that companies often face. In the case of Sainsbury’s, this is a threat as the company have its stores spread across the country. The exchange of information from one store to another need to be done in a proper manner so that customer and employee satisfaction can be upheld (Pulakos et al. 2015). Based on this analysis, it can be said that Sainsbury’s the organisational performance management and measurement system of Sainsbury’s focus on improving the technical expertise of the company. This is usually done by conducting a proper analysis of the market. The current system takes into account the environmental challenges that are faced by companies in the market.
Communicating Performance to Stakeholders
Stakeholders are the group of entities that take into the account the interests of a company (Shields et al. 2015). It can be in the form of internal as well as external that provide support for the betterment and existence of a company. The decisions of the stakeholders can affect the outcome of a business. Likewise, decisions that are taken by a business organisation also affect the outcome of the stakeholders. Normally, the stakeholders of a company include the employees, customers, suppliers and traders. The support from these groups is important as it can provide a company with the necessary requirements for success. According to Arnaboldi, Lapsley and Steccolini (2015), the support from the Government is equally important to gain the trust of the customers and evade taxes.
In the case of Sainsbury’s the major stakeholder of the company is Qatar Investment Authority. Sainsbury’s is a private sector and it is important that the Government and investors play a major role in the success of the company. As observed by Mone and London (2014) communicating with these stakeholders is done by using emails. In the modern day, this is an effective mode of communication as report details can be shared with ease. Meetings are also scheduled between the owners and the investment officers to discuss the possible changes that may be brought about for the benefit of the company. Thus, the existing form of communication performance of the company to the stakeholders is done via the modern method of communication.
Risk Management
Managing risk is one of the most important concepts that exist in the modern business world. Although Gerrish (2016) stated that without taking risks, an organisation cannot succeed in the manner that it expects, yet the risks have to be taken in a manner that provides an opportunity for mitigation. In the modern day, it is seen that the risks normally occur due to finances, technological and poor promotion. These risks are interconnected as a poor investment on technology or mode of promotion provides a disadvantage for an organisation. In the case of Sainsbury’s, one of the most important risk management that the company needs to consider is the health of the employees as well as the customers (DeNisi and Smith 2014).
This is because the expectation from a retail store normally warrants for fresh products that can be used diligently. Hence, risk management process regarding the use of such fresh products needs to be undertaken so that the company can gain back the top position in the retail market from Tesco. In the matter of investment, Sainsbury’s can be considered as safe due to the support it receives from Qatar Investment Authority. Thus, the risk management process of the company highlights a cautious approach towards treading with customers.
Quality Management and Improvement
According to DeNisi and Murphy (2017), to gain the trust and loyalty of the customers, it is necessary to improve and manage the quality of products and services offered by a company. The satisfaction of the customers is attained by providing them with the best quality of products that exist in the market. In the case of retail stores, the quality is important as the customers expect a fresh and good quality of edible products from the stores. To maintain their position as the second best retail store in the UK and to improve upon it, it is necessary that Sainsbury improve the quality of products. However, currently, the company adopts Total Quality Management process to maintain the quality of the products (Kopri? 2016). It is seen that the investment by the Qatar Investment Authority is based on the good quality of products manufactured and served by the company. Hence, it is necessary for Sainsbury’s to make improvements to the quality of products of the company.
Financial Performance
To succeed in the international market it is necessary for companies to develop a financial stability. The financial stability needs to be maintained keeping in mind the nature of the business and the fluctuation in the economy of the country. As stated by Van Dooren and Van de Walle (2016) the financial performance of a company is mainly analysed by the improvements it makes in the technological as well as the infrastructure. The revenue and the net income of a company define the stability of the company. In the case of Sainsbury’s the company enjoys a healthy £471 million net income. This indicates that the current financial performance of the company is high and it provides an opportunity for Sainsbury’s to conduct experiments related to developing its resources. As stated by Kroll and Moynihan (2015) the financial performance of Sainsbury’s is dictated by the stakeholders that invest for the improvement of the company.
Customer and Client Perspectives
Ljungholm (2015) stated that satisfying customers and changing the perceptions of the clients are two of the most important aspects that need to be taken into consideration by every organisation. Customers and client constitute the stakeholders of a company and it is necessary for managers to formulate a plan that can help in understanding the manner in which satisfaction of the customers can be obtained. In the case of Sainsbury’s the company need to ensure that the perspectives of the client regarding the products of the company are changed and satisfaction of the customers are attained by using proper means of manufacture and services. Currently, the company follows up with its customers via their websites and provides them with an opportunity to interact with the customers on a daily basis. This ensures that regular feedback is obtained and the perceptions of the customers regarding the company are analysed (George et al. 2016).
People Perspectives
According to Ülgen and Forslund (2015), one of the elements of the marketing mix is people. People normally constitute the target market of a company and the satisfaction of the target market is important for the success of a company. Perceptions of people vary due to various reasons. One such reason is the loyalty of the people. Most people tend to remain loyal to the brand or company that they prefer. This sometimes provides negative feedback for other companies thereby, ruining the possibility of creating a reputation in the market. For Sainsbury’s, it is important for the company to ensure that the people of the country do not maintain a bad perception of the company. Currently, the company indulges in maintaining communication with the people by conducting regular communication with the customers. With a large number of stores spread across the country, this becomes convenient for the company as it provides Sainsbury’s with an ability to become a diverse organisation.
Implementation Issues
As stated by According to Van Dooren, Bouckaert and Halligan (2015) formulating strategies can help organisations prepare for future outcomes that may play occur due to factors related to the environment. However, implementing the strategies poses a challenge for most companies as it becomes difficult to mitigate the issues that exist while implementing. In the case of Sainsbury’s the political condition of UK may pose a serious threat to the implementation of new strategies formulated by the company. Buckingham and Goodall (2015) observed that Sainsbury’s does not have to worry about the financial capability that may play a significant role for the implementation plan for other companies due to the external support in investments that the company receives. However, changes in the organisation may be opposed by the employees due to the fear of change in the cultural and work style of the organisation. Along with this, the political factor of the UK sets certain rules that require permission from the Government while indulging in trade activities with other countries.
Based on the analysis of the current organisational performance management of Sainsbury’s, it can be said that the company needs to improve its method of communicating with the customers. Regular feedback needs to be obtained from the customers to identify the change in tastes of the target market. In order to maintain the loyalty of the customers, it is important the Sainsbury’s maintain the quality of the products. Adoption of total quality management may help the company to succeed, however, benchmarking can be considered as the best way in which Sainsbury’s can improve its quality. Sainsbury’s can benchmark the products and service qualities offered in Tesco and elevate it by applying innovative tactics. The implementation of the strategies needs to be done in a manner that provides Sainsbury’s with a competitive advantage. The resistance of the employees regarding the changes can be mitigated by applying the required changes in a systematic manner. With the investments made by the company by Qatar Investment Authority, Sainsbury’s can implement the recommended changes in the organisations without disrupting the support provided by the stakeholders.
Conclusion
Thus, it can be concluded that Sainsbury’s need to maintain a proper quality of products and services to maintain the loyalty of the customers. The current organisational performance management system of the organisation can help the company to maintain its second position in the market. However, to reach the pinnacle of the UK market, implementation of the recommended changes is required so that it can reach the customers and become the leader among retail stores in the UK.
Arnaboldi, M., Lapsley, I. and Steccolini, I., 2015. Performance management in the public sector: The ultimate challenge. Financial Accountability & Management, 31(1), pp.1-22.
Blut, M., Frennea, C.M., Mittal, V. and Mothersbaugh, D.L., 2015. How procedural, financial and relational switching costs affect customer satisfaction, repurchase intentions, and repurchase behavior: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 32(2), pp.226-229.
Brooks, R., 2015. Financial management: core concepts. Pearson.
Buckingham, M. and Goodall, A., 2015. Reinventing performance management. Harvard Business Review, 93(4), pp.40-50.
Dale, B., 2015. Total quality management. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
DeNisi, A. and Smith, C.E., 2014. Performance appraisal, performance management, and firm-level performance: A review, a proposed model, and new directions for future research. The Academy of Management Annals, 8(1), pp.127-179.
DeNisi, A.S. and Murphy, K.R., 2017. Performance appraisal and performance management: 100 years of progress?. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(3), p.421.
George, R.A., Siti-Nabiha, A.K., Jalaludin, D. and Abdalla, Y.A., 2016. Barriers to and enablers of sustainability integration in the performance management systems. Journal of cleaner production, 136, pp.197-212.
Gerrish, E., 2016. The Impact of Performance Management on Performance in Public Organizations: A Meta?Analysis. Public Administration Review, 76(1), pp.48-66.
Glendon, A.I., Clarke, S. and McKenna, E., 2016. Human safety and risk management. Crc Press.
Goetsch, D.L. and Davis, S.B., 2014. Quality management for organizational excellence. Upper Saddle River, NJ: pearson.
Kopri?, I., 2016. Evaluation, new legal framework and the imporatnce of performance management in local and regional self-government and in state and public administration.
Kroll, A. and Moynihan, D.P., 2015. Does training matter? Evidence from performance management reforms. Public Administration Review, 75(3), pp.411-420.
Ljungholm, D.P., 2015. The Practice of Performance Management in Public Sector Organizations. Geopolitics, History and International Relations, 7(2), p.190.
McNeil, A.J., Frey, R. and Embrechts, P., 2015. Quantitative risk management: Concepts, techniques and tools. Princeton university press.
Mone, E.M. and London, M., 2014. Employee engagement through effective performance management: A practical guide for managers. Routledge.
Orel, F.D. and Kara, A., 2014. Supermarket self-checkout service quality, customer satisfaction, and loyalty: Empirical evidence from an emerging market. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 21(2), pp.118-129.
Pulakos, E.D., Hanson, R.M., Arad, S. and Moye, N., 2015. Performance management can be fixed: An on-the-job experiential learning approach for complex behavior change. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 8(1), pp.51-76.
Sainsburys.co.uk. 2018. Sainsbury’s. [online] Available at: https://www.sainsburys.co.uk/ [Accessed 24 Feb. 2018].
Shields, J., Brown, M., Kaine, S., Dolle-Samuel, C., North-Samardzic, A., McLean, P., Johns, R., O’Leary, P., Robinson, J. and Plimmer, G., 2015. Managing Employee Performance & Reward: Concepts, Practices, Strategies. Cambridge University Press.
Titman, S., Keown, A.J. and Martin, J.D., 2017. Financial management: Principles and applications. Pearson.
Ülgen, V.S. and Forslund, H., 2015. Logistics performance management in textiles supply chains: best-practice and barriers. International journal of productivity and performance management, 64(1), pp.52-75.
Van Dooren, W. and Van de Walle, S. eds., 2016. Performance information in the public sector: How it is used. Springer.
Van Dooren, W., Bouckaert, G. and Halligan, J., 2015. Performance management in the public sector. Routledge.
Essay Writing Service Features
Our Experience
No matter how complex your assignment is, we can find the right professional for your specific task. Contact Essay is an essay writing company that hires only the smartest minds to help you with your projects. Our expertise allows us to provide students with high-quality academic writing, editing & proofreading services.
Free Features
Free revision policy
$10Free bibliography & reference
$8Free title page
$8Free formatting
$8How Our Essay Writing Service Works
First, you will need to complete an order form. It's not difficult but, in case there is anything you find not to be clear, you may always call us so that we can guide you through it. On the order form, you will need to include some basic information concerning your order: subject, topic, number of pages, etc. We also encourage our clients to upload any relevant information or sources that will help.
Complete the order form
Once we have all the information and instructions that we need, we select the most suitable writer for your assignment. While everything seems to be clear, the writer, who has complete knowledge of the subject, may need clarification from you. It is at that point that you would receive a call or email from us.
Writer’s assignment
As soon as the writer has finished, it will be delivered both to the website and to your email address so that you will not miss it. If your deadline is close at hand, we will place a call to you to make sure that you receive the paper on time.
Completing the order and download
