Ir As Western Centric Disciplines Cultural Studies Essay Free Essay Example

In order to measure whether International Relations, the survey of relationships between states and assorted organisations on a planetary graduated table, is a Western-centric subject, this essay will get down with look intoing yesteryear every bit good as modern-day IR, concentrating on power constructions, historical developments, representations and its claim to be ‘universal ‘ . The Western initiation of many theories, and the usage of discourse and English in the field of IR? , explain the laterality of the ‘core ‘ ( Western ) states.

The subsequent subdivisions will review the Western-dominant survey ( privileged subject of IR ) utilizing a post-colonial position, followed by an account of this new school of idea. Furthermore this paper will mention to Edward Said, an of import academic popular for his term of ‘Orientalism ‘ . Finally this essay will look at the U.S. led War in Iraq to turn out some ‘Western-centric ‘ and post-colonial key points.

The survey of IR is frequently referred to as a scholarly subject, country of the West – a ‘not so international ‘ if non ‘hegemonic subject ‘ ( Bilgin, 2008, p.

5 ) . Historically, IR has been limited to a few hypotheses in the nucleus states, nevertheless is displayed as cosmopolitan cognition ( Tickner, 2003, p.306 ) . Throughout history the West has imposed itself on the remainder of the universe, marginalising and hushing assorted point of views ( De Sousa Santos, 2009, p.104 ) . Scholars such as V & A ; aacute ; squez, claim that IR ‘s theory-building roots in the realist paradigm, due to its initiation in the West ( in Tickner, 2003, p.295, 297 ) . IR remains chiefly the analysis of power battles, war and peace with provinces as histrions.

The ‘ghost of pragmatism past ‘ manifests itself in the impression of ‘global order and political pattern ‘ ( Tickner, 2003, p.298 ) . Events such as the Bush Administration ‘s war philosophy and the ‘War on Terror ‘ confirm realist premises about warfare ‘s nature and power political relations ( Tickner, 2003, p.310 ) . President Bush announced in June 2005 ‘…we fight today because terrorists want to assail our state and kill our citizens… We will support our freedom…There is merely one class of action against them: to get the better of them abroad before they attack us at place ‘ ( Gill, 2005 ) . In the same twelvemonth, Bush declared: ‘We will non rest until triumph is America ‘s and our freedom is unafraid ‘ ( Loven, 2005 ) . These are realist statements of sovereignty and self-denial: provinces are driven by security and the ‘pursuit of the ‘national involvement ” , which remains critical in contemporary political relations ( Steans, et al. , 2010, p.54, 57 ) . In different footings, the construct of political pragmatism creates a discourse that sustains the usage of international power and regulation ( Ashley in Tickner, 2003, p.300 ) .

Furthermore there is a noteworthy duality between the representations of the West and East, concentrating on their differences, making a ”Western ‘ hegemony of the non-European, peripheral universe ‘ by ‘universalized ‘ cognition ( Said in Moore-Gilbert, Staton and Maley, 1997, p.138 ; Nair, 2002, p.16 ) . The usage of English as the appropriate linguistic communication of IR, divides U.S. and Europe, which are active spouses in puting chief research dockets, from bookmans in other parts of the universe. IR has focused on the ‘interaction between members of the academic community ‘ , instead than on the outside universe itself, therefore has no right worldview ( Tickner, 2003, p.300, 301 ) . The subject ‘s chief professional organisation, the International Studies Association ( ISA ) , should back up cognition of planetary subjects and ‘intellectual exchange between bookmans from distinguishable parts of the universe ‘ . Controversially, IR ignored the representation of ‘non-Western ‘ states, labelling them as ‘others ‘ through discourse and claimed that conventional IR linguistic communication is transnational, hence gives ‘authority to talk for and about others ‘ ( Nair, 2002, p.16 ) . Nevertheless the ‘others ‘ were unseeable and undistinguished ; discourse is rooted, roots in nucleus labels, such as ‘the West ‘ and ‘the others ‘ piece, and these categorizations are displayed as binary antonyms ( Nair, 2002, p.16, Jackson, 2007, p.401 ) .

False and uncomplete utilizations of country surveies and the deficient figure of faculty members from the ‘non-West ‘ , failed to turn the societal scientific disciplines into a complete and ‘universal ‘ survey ( Bilgin, 2008, p.11, 12 ) . The privilege of specific cognition is IR ‘s premiss of the Western universe, disregarding the fact that race, history and gender play a decisive function in the creative activity of states and individuality, ( Nair, 2002, p.20 ; Tickner, 2003, p.300 ) . This leads to the outgrowth of a new type of literature, sing IR otherwise, in order to broaden and transform it into a widely distributed analysis ( Tickner, 2003, p.296, 297 ) . Slemon explains that the school, theory? of post-colonialism focal points on diverse factors and criticizes exclusionary signifiers of Western logical thinking and domination, from assorted civilizations ‘ point of views ( in Ashcroft, Griffiths and Tiffin, 2006, p.51 ; Quayson, 2000, p.3 ; Young, 2001, p.66 ) . Post-colonialism is a cultural analysis which ‘has been concerned with the amplification of theoretical constructions that contest the old Western ways of seeing things ‘ ( Young, 2003, p.5 ) . Post-colonists emphasiss that colonial history still persists and influences modern twenty-four hours universe political relations and Western civilization is intertwined with imperialism and domination over the non-Western universe ( Said in Smith and Owens, p.188 ) . Scholars rejected the ‘universal ‘ cognition as non being equal ; admiting that the selected figure of IR faculty members comes chiefly from states of the nucleus, non integrating multiple positions into the analysis ( Tickner, 2003, p. 296 ) . This survey aims to dispute the Western manner of discourse, the culturalized academic cognition and analyses a wider scope of IR ( Quayson, 2000, p.2: Young, 2001, p.4 ) .

Imperialism constructed national individualities of post-colonial states, in resistance to the West ( Nair, 2002, p.2 ; Young, 2001, p.8 ) . Post-colonialism enterprises to make rights for excluded or misrepresented groups to stand for themselves in political, cultural and rational spheres ( Said in Moore-Gilbert, Staton and Maley, 1997, p.129 ) . Additionally, it represents different civilizations and societies, considers their history and focuses on the relationship of power and cognition between, of mostly ignored states in IR on a planetary graduated table, sing its. the survey ‘s state-centric position ( Said in Moore-Gilbert, Staton and Maley, 1997, p.130 ; Smith and Owens, 2008, p.188 ) . Post-colonialists recognize that the standards for specifying ‘authoritative cognition of the universe ‘ are legion, and assorted experiences of planetary political relations need consideration ( Tickner, 2003, p.302 ) . The dominant Western cognition frequently dismisses and naturalizes gendered, cultural, cultural differences, anti-colonial battles and ignores the significance of assorted experiences and cognition from typical communities ( Young, 2001, p.8, 10 ; Nair, 2002, p.2 ) . Overall, the purpose of post-colonialism is the effort to rectify the instability of cognition, power and significance in the universe ( Quayson, 2000, p.12 ) . It attempts to sabotage assorted dominations, whether they are economic, spiritual or cultural and to declare shared signifiers of cultural and political individuality ( Young, 2001, p.11 ) . Hence it supersedes the binary resistances of West vs. non-West, making a new type of analysis of plural objects, ( Said in Moore-Gilbert, Staton and Maley, 1997, p. 139, p.142 ) .

Post-colonialism leads to Edward Said and his survey of ‘Orientalism ‘ , which criticizes the Western ‘s ideological guess about the Orient ( Moore- Gilbert, Staton and Maley, 1997, p.131 ) . The Orient was a production of Western imaginativeness ; described as a topographic point full of love affair and alien people ( Said, 2003, p.1 ; Quayson, 2000, p.4 ) . Said explains ‘Orientalism ‘ , as the counter-image of Occidentalism and the hegemonic manner of stand foring ‘the East ‘ and its people ( Smith and Owens, 2008, p.188 ; De Sousa Santos, 2009, p.105 ) . The Orient AIDSs to specify the West, continuing complementary thoughts, personality and cognition, by using the term ‘otherness ‘ ( Said, 2003, p.1 ; Quayson, 2000, p.4 ) . The nexus between cognition and power appears as the ground and justification to rank non-Western peoples as ‘others ‘ , while leting economical and military laterality of the West ( Quayson, 2000, p.5 ; Smith and Owens, 2008, p.188 ) . The East remained the soundless ‘other ‘ and ne’er arose as Europe ‘s middleman ( Said in Moore-Gilbert, Staton, and Maley, 1997, p.131 ) . Aforesaid presents the West as a power which endeavoured to rule of the remainder of the universe ; nowadays it tries, seeks to enforce its political relations onto the Middle East, making a ‘Occident ‘ vs. ‘Orient ‘ outlook ( Moore-Gilbert, Staton and Maley, 1997, p.126, 131 ) .

Since ancient history, the ill will towards Islam by the Christian West has gone manus in manus and still seems to be indoctrinated in certain people ‘s heads ( Said in Moore-Gilbert, Staton and Maley, 1997, p.136 ) . People ‘s positions on seeing Islam as a nuisance instead than a civilization are reinforced ; the U.S. creates the impression of terrorist act by projecting images of Muslims neglecting at self-representing and self-understanding themselves in Islam ( Said in Moore-Gilbert, Staton and Maley, 1997, p.134, 135 ) .

The non-existence of exchange between Islam ‘s position and foreigner ‘s, is due to deceit and ignorance on both sides ( Said in Moore-Gilbert, Staton and Maley, 1997, p.134 ) . Menace is constructed through linguistic communication which gives ‘the perceptual experience that the aggressors are cold killing machines who can non be deterred or reasoned with ‘ ( Jackson, 2007, p.424 ) . The US attempts, purposes, efforts continuing the Western-dominated international order, utilizing discourse as a justifiable response to terrorist Acts of the Apostless ( Jackson, 2007, p.422 ) . The ‘West ‘ characterized itself as being under menace by Islamic terrorist forces ( Bilgin, 2008, p.19 ) . Bush, for illustration, described the terrorists, as ‘…men, with blind hatred and armed with deadly arms who are capable of any atrociousness ‘ ( 2005 ) . ‘Peaceful attempts to demilitarize the Iraq government have failed once more and once more because we are non covering with peaceable work forces ( Bush, BBC, 2003 ) . In amount, this image of Muslims is constructed by the production of unevenly distributed information, media and cognition, chiefly located in the ‘metropolitan West ‘ ( Said in Moore-Gilbert, Staton and Maley, 1997, p.137 ) .

This paper concludes that IR remains partly a Western-centric subject, due to the nucleus of academe, the usage of English in the country of survey and the impression of the ‘others ‘ . Realism still drives provinces ; an statement proved by the U.S. led war in Iraq, protecting themselves from terrorist menaces. Post-colonialist bookmans demand the Western dominate field of IR to present new attacks and histrions, marginalized in the past due to imperialism and domination of the West. Furthermore they focus on gendered, racial and cultural differences, trying to broaden IR ‘s docket. International political relations should embrace the interaction of provinces and other planetary participants, along with local cultural and societal constructions in order to go genuinely cosmopolitan.

Word count: 1653