Issues in Measuring Crime and Deviance

In this assignment I am going to look at the problems involved in defining and measuring crime. I will look at the definition of crime and deviance and how this plays a part in our society. I will also look at two different approaches to defining crime and theorists with these ideas.
Crime is defined as an act that is
considered an offence and punishable by law. Whereas, deviance is behaviour
that is classed as unacceptable, but not necessarily a crime that is
punishable. There are a variety of ways in which crime can be defined. In
today’s society it could be said refugees are seen as folk devils. They are
portrayed in this way through the media, they are seen to be outsiders and the
reason for social problems. By media portraying incidents of anti-social
behaviour it creates greater moral panic. Stanley Cohen stated, ‘its nature, is
presented in a stylised and stereotypical fashion by the mass media; the moral
barricades are manned by editors, bishops and politicians (1972. Pg.9). This
can be seen when you look at how terrorists are portrayed. We only know what
the media shows us, this can create mass panic as the view portrayed can be
one-sided. Some social or religious customs are seen as taboo. This could be
surrounding events such as death or illness. For example, Jehovah’s witnesses
don’t believe in blood transfusions. In the event one is required they would
decline it due to their religious beliefs. The main difference between crime
and deviance is that a crime is punishable by law. By committing a crime, you
are breaking the law, but by being deviant you are breaking the social norms.
The punishment for breaking the law would be that you are now in the criminal
justice system. However, the punishment you receive will vary depending on the
crime you have committed. This could be a fine, a suspended sentence, or even
prison. For committing an act classed as deviant the punishment would be from
the society, possibly even religious leaders, depending on the act committed.

Get Help With Your Essay
If you need assistance with writing your essay, our professional essay writing service is here to help!
Essay Writing Service

In the 18th century the classicism theory was developed. It was originally developed as it was felt that punishments were cruel and barbaric. Classicism believed people commit a crime based purely on free will. It doesn’t look at any reasoning as to why the crime might be committed other than this. Cesare Beccaria was the Italian father of classical criminology. His main aim was to limit the barbarity in the justice system. Beccaria’s belief was that the punishment should be certain, swiftly carried out and the severity should be significant enough to deter any future crime being committed. Beccaria believed, that a punishment may not be an act of violence, of one, or of many against a private member of society, it should be public, immediate and necessary (Newburn, pg116) Another founder of classicism is Jeremey Bentham. Bentham believed that humans make their decisions based on a pleasure pain principle. Bentham states, ‘Human behaviour is generally directed at maximising pleasure and avoiding pain’. (Newburn, pg 117). It is thought that there are four reasons to commit crime. These are excitement, sex, money or anything else held with value. Bentham’s main belief was that the punishment needs to out weight the crime, however the severity of the punishment should be proportionate to the crime. If every crime received the same punishment there would be nothing to deter from the lesser crimes. There are some criticisms to the classicalism theory. If all crimes are based on free will, what about the people with mental health issues, or a child who are not sound of mind, should they be punished in the same way as someone who has committed a crime for free will. The theory very much looks at the crime and the punishment, not the offender.
In contrast to the classicism
theory is positivism. Positivism developed in the late 19th century.
This started to challenge the classicism theory, and look at how biological,
psychological and social needs can affect reason for committing a crime. Cesare
Lombroso developed a theory that people are born criminal, He believed it was
biological. He carried out many studies that suggested that certain physical
features meant you were a criminal. Alongside physical traits he also looked at
hypersensitivity, use of criminal slang, tattoos and unemployment. ‘Lombroso believed
that criminality was inherited and that criminals could be identified by
physical defects that confirmed them as being atavistic or savage’ (Bretherick,
2015). From this study he developed his theory. This lead to developing
the idea that there are three categories to classify criminals. Firstly, he
still believed people are born criminal. This accounted for about 30% of
criminals. Secondly abnormal criminal. This included idiots, imbeciles,
alcoholics, epileptics and paranoids. This in today’s society would be
considered as mental health issues. Thirdly, occasional criminals. This
includes people committing crime in self-defence, people with a poor childhood
and people who have had social interactions with criminals. Raffaele Garofalo
agreed with Lombroso’s work. He agreed with the use of scientific methods to
finding the reason why people commit crimes. He also agrees that free will
doesn’t exist, and that there must be other factors involved in the reasoning
as to why people commit crime. Garofalo’s belief was that a criminal is born
with a deficiency, either lacking pity or probity. He categorised criminals
into four categories. Murderers where altruism is completely lacking. Violent
criminals lacking pity. Thieves who lack probity, and lascivious, sexual
offenders who are lacking moral energy and moral perception. The positivism
theory looks at every single factor that could have influenced a person to
commit a crime, and they try to find a way to reduce the punishment. A
positivism view would be to look at rehabilitating the offender rather than
punishing them (Newburn, pg. 126)
Official crime statistics are
produced by a variety of organisations. This includes the government, police,
DVLA, insurance companies and the office for national statistics. The
statistics are collected to monitor crime and punishment. By collecting the
data, it helps to highlight crime and convictions, but also any unreported
crimes. It is difficult to measure crime as the crime statistics are not always
a true reflection of crimes committed. This is due to lots of people not
reporting crimes. The police statistics only record crimes that have been
reported and the convictions made. It does not include anyone that is not
charged. The British Crime Survey is carried out by the Home Office. It is a
victim survey that looks at crimes experienced over the last 12 months. As it
is a victim study it is believed that it is a better reflection of crimes as it
records those that were not reported. The survey also looks at the public’s
perception of crime and the justice system. There are some inaccuracies in the
data provided. This is due to inaccuracies in the information people can
remember about an event and sometimes how they amplify the details. It is also
an inaccurate method to record crime as its only one per household, and only 5
crimes can be listed at once. Crime statistics are a good way to look at trends
in crime being reported and the levels of crime in each area, however it is
somewhat inaccurate and not a true reflection of everything.
The problem defining crime seems
to be in identifying if the act is actually a crime. There are some acts that
are a crime by breaking the law, however they are seen as morally acceptable
due to the circumstances. For example, stealing food to feed a hungry family.
This makes it difficult to define what is actually, a crime. From looking at
the classicism theory this supports one argument, that everyone commits a crime
based on free will, whilst the positivism theory believes is social, physical
or psychological factors that determine the reason for committing a crime. This
shifts the blame from being solely the offender to being a cause of the
environment. The difficulty in defining crime reflects on the difficulty to
measure crime. In accurate recording procedures, and victim’s uncertainty when
recalling the details lead to an inaccurate crime record. This leads to the
records being a untrue reflection of what is happening.
Bibliography
Bretherick, D. 2015. The ‘born criminal’? Lombroso and the origins of modern criminology, History extra.http://www.historyextra.com/article/feature/born-criminal-lombroso-origins-modern-criminology, date accessed 15.10.17. Cohen, S. 1972. Folk devils and moral panics, the creation of the mods and rockers, Mcgibbon & Kee Ltd. London. Newburn, T. 2007, Criminology. Willan Publishing. Devon. National crime statistics, figures on crime levels, https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/crimeandjustice, date accessed 20.09.2017Office of national crime statistics, 2015, Crime survey for England and Wales, http://www.crimesurvey.co.uk/ , Kantar. Date accessed 20.09.17.