Take Home Questions: include footnote, bibliography and cover sheet
Judicial review provides a method where people affected by government action can raise a claim in court against the action or stipulated law. In history judicial review was the prevention of the encroachment of the rights.
List the main features of a “review on the merits” such as a merits review application to the Administrative Appeals Tribunal?
Merit review is about facts and looking at the analysis of the facts and lawfulness of the previous decision. In summary, merit review is about;
Judicial review focuses on checking the powers and whether the decision maker followed the stipulated legal procedure. Review of merits looks at the errors made when making the decision.
In judicial review, the decision can be set aside, but there is no room for substituting that decision. Under review of merits, the decision can be set aside, and remake it to provide right decision.
A decision on judicial review is binding even to other courts while that or a merit review is deemed to apply only to that case and the parties.
The common law grounds for a judicial review are those in the doctrine of ultra vires. The scope of the doctrine of ultra vires deals with areas where the government bodies or its officials;
The common law applies the doctrine locus standi or of standing in the determination whether the applicant is the right person to bring the claim. This doctrine mostly looks at the administrative remedy in which the person is seeking. In ADJRA, the application has to follow the rules set in s 13. The advantage of ADJRA is that it is more flexible on the powers of the Court while deciding on the review. The flexibility allows the court to tailor the remedies and offer a simplified review process
Yes, Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 – Schedule 1 provides legislatives and decisions that are not subject to judicial review.
The rules of procedural fairness are set to ensure that cases are decided upon a fair decision-making procedure. These rules prevent the government from undertaking arbitrary actions that affect people. The rules ensure administrators and other government officials take consideration of justice and integrity while making decisions that affect people. In the case of Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v WZARH, the court stated that administrative decision-makers have a duty to provide procedural fairness to all persons that would be affected by the decision.
Locate a case on judicial bias, reference it and give a detailed analysis.
Ane example of a case in Judicial bias was the case of Johnson v Johnson. The parties were a husband and a wife since November 1979, and a dissolution of the marriage happened in 1996. Upon dissolution, a dispute in the financial arrangements were brought before the judge, Anderson J. The court held that a division should be made with the wife taking 40% of the asset pool. The dispute that went to appeal on a matter of bias regarded Anderson J comments that he was going to search for the truth by looking at the independent people and their independent documents. When this matter went to appeal, the court of appeal ruled that there was no bias on the Anderson J comments.
The doctrine of standing or locus standi denotes with a person’s right to bring proceedings to the court of a tribunal. These principles require that every person bringing the proceedings should be the appropriate person who has been affected by the administrative power in which he/she seeks remedy against. The different requirements for standing are;
List the remedies available in a judicial review of administrative decisions?
The remedies in judicial review from an administrative decision are;
The court may suspend or order a stay the related proceedings or an interlocutory order on the decision or action that the government officials had commenced. These powers are granted to the Court under the section 23 of the Federal Court of Australia Act.
The judicial review act under part 3 provides that the court can provide other remedies such as;
Under s 16 of ADJR Act and in on a matter of Commonwealth decision making, the Federal Court can also issue such orders stated above.
Give a detailed case analysis of Associated Prov. Pic Houses Ltd v Wednesbury [1948] 1 KB 223.
The issue regarded a prohibition by the defendant under a licence granted to the plaintiff that no child under the age of 15 years, either by themselves or accompanied by adults could enter the cinema on Sundays. The plaintiff sought orders from the Court to declare the restriction by the defendant as unreasonable. However, the Court ruled that it could not interfere with the orders or limits since the only grounds for intervening were where the decision makers went over the legal powers conferred to them.
References
Asimow, Michael and Jeffrey S Lubbers, ‘THE MERITS OF “MERITS REVIEW”: A COMPARATIVE… – Google Scholar’ <https://heinonline.org/hol-cgi-bin/get_pdf.cgi?handle=hein.journals/windyrbaj28§ion=18>
Victoria University, ‘Research the Application of Administrative Law VU21647 Advanced Diploma of Legal Practice 22276VIC Enterprise Programs Unit Study Guide 2017’
Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1901
Johnson v Johnson [2000] HCA 48
Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v WZARH [2015] HCA 40
Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977
Administrative Law Act 1978
Constitution Act 1975
Federal Court of Australia Act 1976
Judicial Review Act 1991
Judiciary Act 1903
Attorney-General’s Department, Overview of the Commonwealth System of Admin Review (2018) <https://www.arc.ag.gov.au/Aboutus/Pages/OverviewoftheCommonwealthSystemofAdminReview.aspx#a5>
Australian Government, The Scope of Judicial Review Discussion Paper, 2003 (2003) <https://www.arc.ag.gov.au/Publications/Reports/Pages/Downloads/TheScopeofJudicialReviewDiscussionPaper2003.aspx>
Commonwealth of Australia, 83 Clarence Street, Judicial Review (2016) <https://www.aat.gov.au/about-the-aat/engagement/speeches-and-papers/the-honourable-justice-garry-downes-am-former-pre/judicial-review>
Legal Commission of South Australia, Judicial Review (2018) <https://www.lawhandbook.sa.gov.au/ch09s01s05.php>
Essay Writing Service Features
Our Experience
No matter how complex your assignment is, we can find the right professional for your specific task. Contact Essay is an essay writing company that hires only the smartest minds to help you with your projects. Our expertise allows us to provide students with high-quality academic writing, editing & proofreading services.
Free Features
Free revision policy
$10Free bibliography & reference
$8Free title page
$8Free formatting
$8How Our Essay Writing Service Works
First, you will need to complete an order form. It's not difficult but, in case there is anything you find not to be clear, you may always call us so that we can guide you through it. On the order form, you will need to include some basic information concerning your order: subject, topic, number of pages, etc. We also encourage our clients to upload any relevant information or sources that will help.
Complete the order form
Once we have all the information and instructions that we need, we select the most suitable writer for your assignment. While everything seems to be clear, the writer, who has complete knowledge of the subject, may need clarification from you. It is at that point that you would receive a call or email from us.
Writer’s assignment
As soon as the writer has finished, it will be delivered both to the website and to your email address so that you will not miss it. If your deadline is close at hand, we will place a call to you to make sure that you receive the paper on time.
Completing the order and download