Vanessa and Richard have been in relationship for 40 years. Richard is a transgendered person and altered his gender to become women while being in relationship with Vanessa. Complication arises in this case when Vanessa died and Michelle was confused regarding her position in succeeding the tenancy of Vanessa from the borough. This report is aimed chiefly at understanding the two key aspects of the case. First is to understand the rent act to have a clear understanding of the right of the members of family on property of a deceased family member or spouse. Second aspect of the case is to understand the right of a transgendered person regarding their identity and family.
The Schedule 1 Para 1 of Rent act 1977 states that the living spouse of the tenant living in the same house at the time of demise of a partner is going to be considered as the statutory tenant at the death of the spouse. In this regard Michelle has a right to the property that has been occupied by Vanessa which is under Pilkington Borough Council.
Schedule 1 Para 2 (2) of the Rent act 1977 suggest that the person who is living with the tenant as husband or wife is going to be considered as partner, in case they are not married they are going to be considered as civil partner in that case as well the partner is going to have the right to succeed the original tenant.
Gender Recognition act 2004 gives the right to an adult person to legally live in the gender that they chose to acquire instead of the one assigned to them at birth. This act gives legal recognition to a person in choosing their gender which is approved by a gender recognition panel. There are certain criteria that have to be fulfilled to get the legal recognition of another gender. This involves having gender dysphoria, living for a period of 2 years as a member of another gender and having the intention to live as a member of the other gender till death. Michelle is going to be recognised as a female gendered person because of the fact that she has decided to live as a female and has been living as a woman for 10 years and till now shows the intention of living as a woman for the rest of her life. The case of College of Nursing v. D.H.S.S. [1981] A.C. 800, 822, Lord Slynn one of the members of the house of lords stated that in case of social issues it is of importance to make sure that the judges do not use their views rather make the judgement by ensuring that the importance of change is recognised on the criteria of the ‘intention of the parliament’. So in this particular case the meaning of the word ‘Family’ has been given a more expanded explanation.
The term ‘spouse’ has been defined as a husband or a wife of a person as per the oxford English dictionary. The family has been defined by the Oxford English dictionary as a unit two people along with their children. So it can be said that the traditional definition of the terms like family and spouse are limited and doesn’t define the particular case of Vanessa and Michelle. They are both same gendered and also there is no mention of them having children so it can be assumed that they didn’t had any in such circumstances they cannot be defined as a family as per the definition in the dictionary.
In the judgement that was made by Lord Slynn in Fitzpatrick v Sterling Housing Association [2001] the term ‘spouse’ has been discussed by him and stated that the term spouse need to be changed in this context because of the fact that the normal definition of spouse cannot to be extended to couple mentioned in this case because they are unable to produce children.
In the Lord Slynn in Fitzpatrick v Sterling Housing Association [2001] case the judgement by Lord Nicholls stated that the family’s importance in case legislative succession is important because the chief definition of family in this case involves some people who are related by blood, marriage or adoption and is sharing a common dwelling and hence on the demise of one person it is of great importance for the rest of the family to be protected and hence should have the right to the dwelling that has been shared by them.
Considering the above judgement in the Fitzpatrick case by Lord Nicholls Michelle can be considered more likely to be family because there has been several definition of family. The presence of children in the terminology of being qualified as family has also been evaluated. But it has been concluded by Lord Nicholls that the non existence of children is not likely to doubt the existence of spouse. So the recognition of spouse has been done even when there are no children so as per this definition Michelle is going to be considered as a spouse to Vanessa however it has been concluded to say that spouse is going to be considered as family as well.
In Beliger v Belinger [2003] UKHL 21 judgement Lord Nicholls describe transsexual people as those who do not have any physical incongruence in terms of gender. However they are mentally alienated from their bodily gender and suffer from dysphoria and not giving medical attention in this regard can cause strong psychological discomfort.
Article 8 provides Michelle the opportunity to conform or enjoy her gender assigned at birth however it doesn’t force her to conform to it. It also assures Michelle that the government should not interfere with the personal life of people unless national security, public safety, economic well being of masses is hampered or disorder, crime, health issues, loss of moral is caused.
As per the case of Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza [2004] UKHL judgement it can be said that the terminology of same sex couples as member of family rather than a spouse has some disadvantages which is seen in this particular case. The rent that is to be paid under this judgement is at par the market rent which is more than the fair rent that have been paid by the deceased member during his presence. The security of the tenant is also reduced in case of the acceptance of this clause. Thus the succession right of a heterosexual couples and a homosexual couple is different and can be considered as discriminatory.
The underlying social policy in this case is the fact that the couple who have shared the home and lives of each other together should be entitled to the above mentioned benefits.
The chances of cohabiting transsexual couples are also going to be considered with similar advantage because of the fact that there have been many cases that has accepted the standing regarding the rights of the transsexual people. At the same time there are also rulings that tend to recognise the right of the same gendered people. In this case both the legislation is likely to be implemented by the tribunal. So the doctrine of stare decisis will force the tribunal to accept the case of transsexual couples as well.
Conclusion
In conclusion it can be said that Michelle has met the criteria of being a transsexual as she has been living as a women for a period of 10 years. At the same time she also fulfils the criteria of succession as she was the person who was living with Vanessa during her last days in the house as civil couples. So considering both the conditions it can be stated that Michelle is likely to be considered as a couple to Vanessa and is going to succeed her as a tenant in the housing.
(Legislation.gov.uk, 2018) <https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2004/7/pdfs/ukpga_20040007_en.pdf> accessed 30 October 2018
‘Family | Definition Of Family In English By Oxford Dictionaries’ (Oxford Dictionaries | English, 2018) <https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/family> accessed 30 October 2018
‘Gender Recognition Act 2004 – Explanatory Notes’ (Legislation.gov.uk, 2018) <https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2004/7/notes/division/2> accessed 30 October 2018
‘House Of Lords – Bellinger (FC) (Appellant) V. Bellinger’ (Publications.parliament.uk, 2018) <https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200203/ldjudgmt/jd030410/bellin-1.htm> accessed 30 October 2018
‘House Of Lords – Fitzpatrick (A. P.) V. Sterling Housing Association Ltd.’ (Publications.parliament.uk, 2018) <https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld199899/ldjudgmt/jd991028/fitz03.htm> accessed 30 October 2018
‘House Of Lords – Ghaidan (Appellant) V. Godin-Mendoza (FC) (Respondent)’ (Publications.parliament.uk, 2018) <https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200304/ldjudgmt/jd040621/gha-1.htm> accessed 30 October 2018
‘Human Rights Act 1998’ (Legislation.gov.uk, 2018) <https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1998/42/schedule/1/part/I/chapter/7> accessed 30 October 2018
Magnus S, The Rent Act 1977 (1978)
Rayson JP Mallender, The Civil Partnership Act 2004 (Cambridge University Press 2005)
‘Rent Act 1977’ (Legislation.gov.uk, 2018) <https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1977/42/schedule/1> accessed 30 October 2018
Essay Writing Service Features
Our Experience
No matter how complex your assignment is, we can find the right professional for your specific task. Contact Essay is an essay writing company that hires only the smartest minds to help you with your projects. Our expertise allows us to provide students with high-quality academic writing, editing & proofreading services.
Free Features
Free revision policy
$10Free bibliography & reference
$8Free title page
$8Free formatting
$8How Our Essay Writing Service Works
First, you will need to complete an order form. It's not difficult but, in case there is anything you find not to be clear, you may always call us so that we can guide you through it. On the order form, you will need to include some basic information concerning your order: subject, topic, number of pages, etc. We also encourage our clients to upload any relevant information or sources that will help.
Complete the order form
Once we have all the information and instructions that we need, we select the most suitable writer for your assignment. While everything seems to be clear, the writer, who has complete knowledge of the subject, may need clarification from you. It is at that point that you would receive a call or email from us.
Writer’s assignment
As soon as the writer has finished, it will be delivered both to the website and to your email address so that you will not miss it. If your deadline is close at hand, we will place a call to you to make sure that you receive the paper on time.
Completing the order and download