The issue is to check that whether there is a valid contract between Joe and Annie?
For a valid contract, there must be an offer and acceptance. For an offer, this is necessary that the same must be properly communicated to the offeree. Parties to the contract can choose any mode of offer and acceptance. In those cases where parties do communication via particular mode, then such mode will be considered as a valid one. For an acceptance, this is required that the same must be made within the time mentioned in the offer itself. If no time is mentioned by an offeror under an offer, the offeree can accept the same within a reasonable time period. Further, an acceptance must be communicated to the offeror.
In some of the cases, offeree asks for further information from the offeror in order to take a wise and reasonable decision. It was held in the case of Harvey v Facey that such information cannot be treated as a counteroffer until unless puts some additional conditions and therefore such information does not cancel the original offer.
When an offeree gives his/her acceptance via post then postal rules will be applicable. It was held in the case of Adams v Lindsell that under postal rules, an acceptance will be treated as complete as soon as offeree drops the confirmation letter to the mailbox.
An offer can be revoked at any time before the acceptance takes place. It was held in the case of
Dickinson v Dodds that an offeror can revoke or withdraw the offer before offeree accepts the same. However, when an acceptance takes place, then a valid contract will be developed between the parties and thereafter the offeror will not be able to revoke the offer.
In the given case, on 12th February 2018 Joe has received the mail regarding quotation of 75 single core CPUs from Annie. In the said mail, Annie has offered 75 single core CPUs for $4000 to Joe. This was an offer of the case and the of communication that parties chosen were e-mail, which was a valid one. In reply to this mail, Joe was required to accept the offer in the manner mentioned in the mail. It was stated in the mail that if Joe wants to accept the offer, he need to take print out of the form and send the same via post after signing. Further, it was also mentioned that the quotation is open for the next 7 days. It means Joe could accept this offer by 18th February. Joe at the first did not accept the offer but requested Annie to keep open the offer till next 14 days and also asked for some further information. The information he asked was a quotation related query regarding 75 quad-core CPUs. This was not a counter offer and therefore the first offer was still validly opened for Joe with the original terms and conditions
On 16 February 2018, Annie sent another mail to Joe stating quotation of 75 quad-core CPUs. The quotations were not suitable for Joe and therefore he decided to go ahead with an original offer without considering additional information provided by Annie. As it was mentioned in the mail that acceptance needs to be given within 7 days via post, Joe has posted the acceptance letter to Annie on 17th February. Applying the provisions of postal rules, acceptance will be treated as valid and complete as on 17th February.
Annie could withdraw the offer before acceptance was made by Joe i.e. before 17th February but she did not do the same. Therefore, a valid contract was there between Joe and Annie.
Conclusion (a)
Annie has made an offer that Joe accepted within the prescribed time, hence a valid offer and acceptance was there. In addition to this, consideration was also there and both the parties have the intention to create a legal relationship with each other. As all the necessary elements existed in the transaction, this is to conclude that a valid contract has developed between Joe and Annie in respect to the sale of 75 Single core CPUs for consideration of $4000.
Another issue involved in the case is to check that whether Joe can seek any remedies under Contract Law or not?
Under Contract Law, a contract can be discharged in many ways such as by performance, by agreement, by frustration, and by the breach. Where one party does not perform the obligation as required under the contract, then such a situation is termed as a breach of contract. If a party perform one or more obligation under the contract but does not perform according to the required manner then also it will be treated as a breach of the contract. Breach of a valid contract makes the guilty party liable and another party of the case (innocent party) can initiate an action against the liable party. It was held in the case Hochster v De la Tour that where one party show his/her intention to not to perform the obligation under the contract, then the other party would not be required to wait till the actual breach. In such a situation the innocent party can initiate an action against the first party on the basis of his/her non-intention to perform obligation set under the contract. This situation is known as an Anticipatory breach and the innocent party can ask for the performance of the contract except in those cases where the personal skill of the defendant is required.
In the studied case, there was a valid contract between Joe and Annie. Annie has denied delivering 75 Single core CPUs to Joe as on 18th February 2018. Her conduct cannot be treated as a revocation of the offer as by sending acceptance letter on 17th February, Joe has accepted the offer made by Annie. A valid contract has developed between both of them as on 17th February 2018. Now, as Annie has denied providing 75 Single core CPUs to Joe, this can be stated that she has breached the contract. Joe can initiate an action against her.
Conclusion (b)
To conclude the issue involved in the case, this can be stated that Joe can sue to Annie for the performance of the contract as she has breached the conditions of a valid contract by saying no to provide 75 Single core CPUs. Joe can also ask for the damages if any would occur him cause
Whether Florence will be succeeding in any claim against Joe or not.
For a valid contract, it is necessary that all the required elements must be there. Offer and acceptance are two basic elements of a contract. In addition to the existence of these two factors, the validity of the same is also necessary. An acceptance must be free from any unfair terms such as misrepresentation, fraud, and unconscionable conduct.
Unconscionable conduct: – This is a state of a contract where one party (offeror) holds a superior bargaining power over another person (offeree) and use such power to seek the acceptance of such other person (offeree). The factor of unconscionable conduct exists in those situations where the other person has some disadvantages such as poverty, illiteracy, drunkenness, lack of education and so on and other person takes unfair advantages of such disadvantages. It is a situation where this is to assume that a reasonable person would not have entered into such a contract. The fact, that in a contract whether the acceptance is affected by Unconscionable conduct or not can be determined by reviewing the position of offeror and offeree. If an offeror remains in a capacity of bargaining power and offeree contains some special disadvantage, then this will be assumed that consent given in the case is not an independent one and offeree has made such consent because of the influence of offeror. It was held in the case of Blomley v Ryan that a person cannot ask for the performance of the contract if an element of unconscionable conduct exists there.
A contract, where acceptance is not independent or the same is affected by the unconscionable conduct of another party, cannot be held enforceable.
Exclusion Clause: – This term is also counted as an unfair term under Contract law. This is a situation where one party of the case escapes or limits his/her liability under a contract by stating a statement. Such a statement is known as an exclusion clause in a contract. It was given in the decision of the case of L’Estrange v Graucub that regardless of the fact that a party has read out such clause or not, an exclusion clause will be valid and applicable if the same is mentioned under a contract and other party signs the contract.
Invalidity of Exclusion Clause:- An exclusion clause work well in a valid contract. However, in that situation where a party seeks the consent of another party by Unconscionable conduct, an exclusion clause will not be held valid as the same limits the right of the victim person i.e. offeree.
In the given case, Joe has decided to go for an option of ‘door knowing’ to seek some new employment. One day he knocked on the door of Florence Nightingale, who was a 70-year-old lady. She owed a computer. Joe offered free checking of the computer to Florence. He checked her computer and said that there are many viruses in her computer and she should change the same. He further asked the uses of a computer for Florence. Florence replied that she needs to send some email and to do video calls with grandchildren. This was the only utility of computer for her. Joe has offered a sale of a computer for $2000 to Florence. Florence became ready to purchase the same as she had a very few computer literacies. Later on, it has come into light that the computer sold by Joe had no applications and operating systems. Here in the case, joy done an unconscionable conduct as in actual computer had no viruses. Joe took benefit of less knowledge of Florence and was liable towards her. Further, the features of the provided computer were not fulfilling the purpose of Florence.
Exclusion Clause and validity: – Although to escape his liability, Joe has made an exclusion clause under the contract, which Florence has accepted by signing the same. However, the clause will not be held a valid one as acceptance itself was not valid.
Conclusion (a)
As Florence had very less knowledge about computers, Joy has taken unfair benefit of her condition and conducted unconscionably. The acceptance provided by Florence will not be treated as valid. Further, the exclusion clause stated under contract will also be held invalid as the acceptance was not an independent one and intention of the exclusion clause was related to the unconscionable conduct of Joe. Therefore, Florence seems to be held successful in her claim against Joe.
What remedies are available with Florence?
In the cases of unconscionable contract, a contract becomes voidable at the end of the innocent party. Where an offeror takes the acceptance of offeree by influencing him/her, then in the lack of independent consent, the contract becomes voidable. In such a scenario, an innocent party can rescind the contract and ask for the damages.
In the given case, Joe used his position negatively over Florence. He took unfair advantage of less knowledge of Florence. He was aware of the actual needs and expectations of Florence still he sold a computer without an operating system. Further, the exclusion clause is also not a valid one because of unconscionable conduct. The contract developed between Joe and Florence is voidable in the part of Florence.
Conclusion (b)
Florence could deny performing her obligation under the contract but as she has already made the payment, now she can sue Joe to take her money back and treat the contract, as the same has never been developed. In addition to this, she can also claim for the damages.
Books/Journals
Amanda C. Brock and Rafi Azim-Khan, E-Business: The Practical Guide to the Laws (Spiramus Press Ltd, 2008)
Cases
Adams v Lindsell (1818) 106 ER 250
Blomley v Ryan (1956) 99 CLR 362
Dickinson v Dodds (1876) 2 Ch D 463
Harvey v Facey [1893] AC 552
Hochster v De la Tour (1853) 2 E & B 678
L’Estrange v F Graucob Ltd [1934] 2 KB 394
Other Resources
E-Law Resources, Discharge of a contract (2018) < https://e-lawresources.co.uk/Discharge-of-a-contract.php>.
Elliott May Lawyers, Unconscionable Conduct: Can a Lender Protect Itself? (2018) < https://www.elliottmay.com.au/unconscionable-conduct/>.
Legal Match, What is an Unconscionable Contract? (2018) < https://www.legalmatch.com/law-library/article/what-is-an-unconscionable-contract.html>.
Lexis Nexis, Contracts—termination and contractual claims and remedies—overview (2018) < https://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/lexispsl/bankingandfinance/document/391289/5FKM-GJ81-F185-X1CM-00000-00/Contracts_termination_and_contractual_claims_and_remedies_overview#>.
O. Ray Whittington, Wiley CPA Exam Review Fast Track Study Guide (2018) < https://books.google.co.in/books?id=xv8PukDlepsC&dq=For+a+valid+contract,+there+must+be+an+offer+and+acceptance&source=gbs_navlinks_s>.
Peter J. Roberts, Deceit and the enforceability of Exclusion Clauses (15 December 2014) < https://www.lawsonlundell.com/Commercial-Litigation-and-Dispute-Resolution-Blog/deceit-and-the-enforceability-of-exclusion-clauses>.
Upcounsel, What Makes a Contract Voidable? (2018) <https://www.upcounsel.com/what-makes-a-contract-voidable>
Memo
Date |
15th September 2018 |
To |
Junior Lawyer |
From |
Belinda Klein |
CC |
|
Subject |
New Client – Joseph Brunetti [LEX:10735 |
Dear,
This Memorandum of Advice is prepared and presented in order to provide a reasonable advice to Joseph Brunetti in respect to his Business structure.
Current Position of Client and his concern
At present, the client is carrying on his business as a sole proprietorship concern. In the past years, he has installed computers in local schools under few of the contracts. Now, he wants to expand his business by providing 24/7 IT support services. However, the issue that he is facing is lack of capital. The new plan i.e. providing technical support services, demands an initial capital worth $600000. These funds are required to purchase a warehouse and fleet of vehicles for his new business ideas. In the form of Liquid assets Joseph only has $120000 that is available $20000 in the case and $100000 in equity. In addition to this, Joseph also owns a house but the valuation of the same is not clear. In addition to lack of fund, Joseph also has some other concerns such as fear to lose control over business, his desire to minimize overall tax liability and to seek protection from poor management. The given memo is focused on different business structures, that the client can opt and at the end of this memorandum, an advice is also mentioned for the client, however, the ultimate decision will be of the client.
Options available to Client apart from sole proprietorship concern is Partnership Concern and Proprietorship Company.
Memo
Advantages and disadvantages of this format of business are discussed further in the memo considering the concerns of Mr. Joseph.
Partnership Firm: Under this form of business, profit of the firm partner divides among the partners, therefore the same becomes incomes of the partners and firm itself do not need to pay any tax on the profits. This is an advantage of this business structure that it prevents from double taxation system.
Proprietorship Company: A company needs to pay tax on profits. Being the promoter and director of the company, the client will have to pay tax on the profits. Further, as Mr. Joseph also has some funds, this is to assume that he will invest the same in the company and become shareholder thereof. In such a situation, he would also require to pay income tax on the profit income that he will earn from the company.
Partnership Firm: In this form of business, one can raise capital from partners. As the client has limited funds, he can get the same from his friends by entering with them into this business form.
Proprietorship Company: A company can issue the shares and collect the capital for the company. However, in the case of Pty Ltd. (Proprietorship Company) capital cannot be raised from the public but the promoter of the company can issue the shares to his friends and relatives in consideration of capital for his business.
Partnership Firm: Partnership deed defines rights and liabilities of the partners, and one can keep more right with him/her by stating the same in partnership deed, however consent of all the partners are necessary for this.
Proprietorship Company: Board takes a day to day business decision of the company but there are some business transactions, that requires prior approval of shareholders. As in this situation, a major shareholder of the company will be the other people who can take and approve wrong decisions; therefore there is a possibility that business can become a victim of poor decisions.
Memo
Partnership Firm: Partnership firm is a small business structure in comparison to corporations. Employees get more benefits in a corporation in comparison to a partnership firm; hence this option is not eligible to fulfill the expectation of the client.
Proprietorship Company: Company is a strong format of Business. Many commercial laws apply to a company that provides additional benefits to employees. This is the reason that this form of business proves successful to attract and keep the suitable and right employees.
Partnership Firm: Although a client can ensure such control on a day to day business activities, however on all the partners, agency law will be applicable and there is a possibility that other partners can develop a contract on behalf of the business without bringing the same into the knowledge of the client.
Proprietorship Company: In a company, the board of directors takes a decision on behalf of the company. In such a scenario, Joseph can become director of the company and therefore will be able to look after the day to day affairs of the company.
Advice
In conclusion, this is to advise that the client should choose the option of Proprietorship Company. He has his house as an asset and the same will remain secure in the case of a company as personal assets cannot be held liable for the debts of the business. In a partnership form of business, there is a possibility that he can lose is assets in addition to equity. Further, poor management can be control in a company as a proposal of agenda is a thing to do on the part of management but not the shareholders. Shareholders only approve those agendas.
Memo
Cases
Lee v Lee’s Air Farming Ltd [1960] UKPC 33
Books/Journals
Carol Padgett, Corporate Governance: Theory and Practice (Macmillan International Higher Education, 2011)
CCH Australia Limited, Australian Master Accountants Guide (CCH Australia Limited, 2009).
Other Sources
Austrlian Governmnet, Partnership (2018) < https://www.business.gov.au/planning/business-structures-and-types/business-structures/partnership>.
Entrepreneur, Business Structure Basics (2018) < https://www.entrepreneur.com/article/75118>.
Jenny Kassan, Raise Capital on Your Own Terms: How to Fund Your Business without Selling Your Soul (Berrett-Koehler Publishers, 2017)
Jim Roy, Employment in small companies vs large companies: What’s the difference? (2018) < https://www.michaelpage.com.au/advice/career-advice/career-progression/employment-small-companies-vs-large-companies-what-s>.
Net Lawman, Choosing a legal structure for your business: Partnership (2018) < https://www.netlawman.com.au/ia/partnerships-ins-and-outs-australia>.
Essay Writing Service Features
Our Experience
No matter how complex your assignment is, we can find the right professional for your specific task. Contact Essay is an essay writing company that hires only the smartest minds to help you with your projects. Our expertise allows us to provide students with high-quality academic writing, editing & proofreading services.Free Features
Free revision policy
$10Free bibliography & reference
$8Free title page
$8Free formatting
$8How Our Essay Writing Service Works
First, you will need to complete an order form. It's not difficult but, in case there is anything you find not to be clear, you may always call us so that we can guide you through it. On the order form, you will need to include some basic information concerning your order: subject, topic, number of pages, etc. We also encourage our clients to upload any relevant information or sources that will help.
Complete the order formOnce we have all the information and instructions that we need, we select the most suitable writer for your assignment. While everything seems to be clear, the writer, who has complete knowledge of the subject, may need clarification from you. It is at that point that you would receive a call or email from us.
Writer’s assignmentAs soon as the writer has finished, it will be delivered both to the website and to your email address so that you will not miss it. If your deadline is close at hand, we will place a call to you to make sure that you receive the paper on time.
Completing the order and download