In UK, the principal source of law includes the statutes, which are the legislations or the acts of the parliament; the common law, which are the laws which have been made through the principles which have been established in the cases over time; and the laws of the European Union, in context of the treaties and the directives issued (In Brief, 2017). The secondary sources of laws are the commentaries which are referred to and include law journals, legal encyclopaedia, textbooks, and parliamentary and non parliamentary documents (SOAS, 2017).
The laws in UK are passed by the Parliament, which are the result of the proposals made by the government. These proposals are aimed at addressing a particular issue or shaping the society. The agenda of the government is informed by the general election. Upon being a part of the government, the political parties bring the events to the attention of the minister. And based on the consideration of different factors, the laws are formed (UK Parliament, 2017).
As has been stated earlier, the common law and the statutory laws are the two sources of law in the nation. The statutory laws are originated from the Parliament, thus the government contributes in their making. An example of statutory law is the Employment Rights Act, 1996, where the act is divided into chapters, and each chapter has its own provisions. It is formed through a consultative or a green paper, followed by draft proposals or the white paper, and before becoming the act, it remains a bill, and this transition from bill to act is made through the Royal Assent (In Brief, 2017). The statutory laws are applied by the courts based on the principle of statutory interpretation.
The common laws are the cases which are used as the law owing to the judicial decision making. A judgement of the case covers its factual description, the legal position, i.e., the ratio and the decision. This ratio becomes the binding precent for such courts which are below the hierarchical level of courts of England and Wales. However, the system does have flexibility in context of the ability of overruling the judgment of a lower court, or distinguishing one case from another. Thus, on the basis of the analysis of the entire case, the common law is applied in the courts (In Brief, 2017).
The legal system of the nation is quite a comprehensive and detailed one, where every aspect of it is detailed from the formation of an act, to its amendments or its end through being repealed. The amendments or the repealing of acts is done owing to the reforms and developments in the particular area of the act or in the changed judgments. Changes are also anticipated in the present context owing to Brexit. Once the terms of the same are confirmed, the laws of the EU would no longer be applicable in UK. This would also help in giving away with the problems which are often faced in the nation due to clash between the EU norms and the norms of the nation, and in the issue of parliamentary sovereignty. A leading example of the changes reforms leading to changes in the part of the legal system of the nation, i.e., in the act was the amalgamation of the different anti-discriminatory acts of UK in a single legislation, i.e., the Equality Act, 2010 (Elliot & Quinn, 2017).
Irrespective of the jurisdiction in which the business works, there are certain similar laws which apply on the businesses and impact them in specific manner. For UK, the statutory laws relating to companies and employment, in addition to the common law in line with contract law play a crucial role. The companies in UK are incorporated, governed and even ended through winding up based on the Companies Act, 2006 and its related regulations. Where this is not followed, different consequences can be raised which relate to the company or even the ones who run the business of the company, i.e., its directors. Hence, the company laws have to be strictly followed to avoid any civil or criminal liabilities (Hannigan, 2015).
When it comes to the employment laws, the situation is similar. Businesses have to avoid any instances of discrimination on the basis of age, gender, race or any other criteria towards any employee or potential employee (Hardy & Butler, 2016; Gennard & Judge, 2005). For instance, in Kwele-Siakam v The Co-operative Group Ltd UKEAT/0039/17/LA, liabilities were raised against the company for racial discrimination based on provisions of Equality Act, 2010 (Employment Cases Update, 2017a). Nearly every business activity requires a contract to be drawn which makes it more important for the companies to properly follow the common law provisions of contract law. This means that the companies have to properly drawn out the terms of the contract, ensure the same is not breached and do not use any vitiating factors in the same, which could result in liabilities for the business (Andrews, 2015).
The work of the organizations is to be conducted on the basis of certain requirements drawn out by the government, regulatory bodies or the professional bodies. These are biding based on their jurisdiction, work being conducted, applicability and different other factors. The legislations are the acts which have to be followed by the business and these legislations are supported by their regulations which cover the detail of the requirements covered under a specific section of the legislation. For instance, Equality Act, 2010 is to be followed in context of employment law by the organizations, which is accompanied by regulations like Equality Act 2010 (Disability) Regulations, 2010 and Equality Act 2010 (Specific Duties) Regulations, 2011 (Hepple, 2014). Standards are the minimum requirements which have to be met for undertaking certain activities. For instance, UK GAAP covers the financial reporting standards which have to be followed by the organizations (Deloitte, 2017).
There are various forms of conducting business in the nation and the two key forms include sole trader and Limited Liability Company (LLC). A transformation from sole trader to LLC requires some key points to be taken under consideration. Within the nation, the two business forms have differences in national insurance, and tax bands and rates. When it comes to the limited companies, the National Insurance of both employer and employee becomes payable on the salaries and bonuses of the directors. The national insurance charge is high in comparison to the one paid by a sole trader, where for 2017-18, Class 2 national insurance contributions are paid at £2.85 for each week and for Class 4 the contributions on profits are paid over £8,164 (MadeSimple, 2017).
When it comes to the taxation issues, there is considerable change in between sole trader and companies. A sole trader has personal allowances of £11,500, which shows that this much sum can be earned before any income tax is paid. For 2017-18, the taxation remains 20%, 40% and additional 45% based on income limits of £33,500, between £33,501 and £150,000, and over £150,000. When it comes to the companies, the rates are different and the losses can be carried forward which cannot be done in sole trader, and these can be set against future profits or against the profits of previous years. For sole trader, these have to be set off for the same tax year only (MadeSimple, 2017).
Higher tax liabilities and national insurance burden should only be undertaken where Andrew is sure of good returns in business. Where Andrew decides to go out of UK for setting up this company, the tax rates and the insurance scheme would change again. Thus, there is quite a difference between sole trader and LLC when it comes to national insurance and tax purpose and it is advised to Andrew to keep these points in mind before incorporating the business as LLC.
A director in UK has the entitlement to get the pay which they have under the drawn contract. So, where a contract is formed between the company and the director to give certain service where the director would be paid certain salary or other benefit, they become entitled to such pay. This can be approved through an ordinary resolution (Company Law Club, 2017). In this context, it is a standard to disclose the remuneration of the directors before the company as this would help in setting clarity in the mind of the different stakeholders regarding the standards followed, particularly for the employees. Where the company struggles to survive, different measures like restricting can be adopted to better the situation of the company and when all these fail, the company has to be wound up.
Thus, it is advised to Thomas that he would be entitled to the pay which is covered under his service agreement and to disclose the same to maintain the faith of the employees. Also, Thomas should make constant efforts to ensure that the company does not lead to its winding up.
The Equality Act, 2010 makes it unlawful to discriminate on the basis of the sex/ gender of the person (Sargeant, 2013). This is in addition to the Equal Treatment Directive 2006/54/EC which continues to apply in UK for now, where equal opportunity has to be given to both males and females for employment and occupation opportunities (Official Journal of the European Union, 2006). Where this is not done, the employer can be held liable for discrimination. Rajaratnan v Care UK Clinical Services Ltd UKEAT/0435/14/DA saw the appeal of indirect sex discrimination being upheld with costs (Employment Cases Update, 2017b).
Where an employee is dismissed from employment owing to the need of the employer to reduce their workforce, it is referred to as redundancy. When an employee is made redundant, they are required to be given redundancy pay, a notice period, consultation with employer, options of moving to another job and time period for finding an alternative job. Where this is not done, a claim for unfair dismissal can be made by the employee (UK Government, 2017a).
The Data Protection Act, 1998 puts an obligation on the employees to keep the personal data of the employees safe and secure (UK Government, 2017b). The same has to be used in a limited, fair, lawful manner where adequacy and relevancy is applied. The personal information of an employee cannot be held longer than is absolute necessary (UK Government, 2017c). After ten years of dismissal of Paul, this information should not have been held by the company and yet they held it. To make the matters worse, they leaked this information, which contravened the Data Protection Act.
Thus, for hiring Paul instead of his wife on the basis of man being stronger than woman, TMT would be liable. Also, for not giving the Paul the option to exercise his rights in context of notice period and redundancy pay, he can sue the company for unfair dismissal. Lastly, Paul can also bring actions against the company for breach of the Data Protection Act, where his personal information was not only held in unlawful manner but the same was also leaked.
The working time regulations provide that a person cannot be made to work for over 48 hours in a week on average. An employee cannot be forced to work overtime where the contract does not provide the same. Even when working overtime is covered in the employment contract, an employee cannot be forced to work for over 48 hours based on the work time regulations. Only when the employee signs the written “opt-out” agreement can the employee be forced to work overtime (NI Direct, 2017).
In the given case, no such “opt-out” agreement had been signed and so, Michael cannot be forced to work overtime as the employment contract never mentioned this clause. This would allow him to leave the present job and join another. Thus, it is advised to MPP Ltd to get the other employees to sign the “opt-out” agreement and refrain from making a case against Michael for not serving the notice period.
References
Andrews, N. (2015). Contract Law (2nd ed.). UK: Cambridge University Press
Company Law Club. (2017). Are directors entitled to be paid?. Retrieved from: https://www.companylawclub.co.uk/are-directors-entitled-to-be-paid
Deloitte. (2017). UK GAAP. Retrieved from: https://www.iasplus.com/en-gb/standards/uk-gaap
Elliot, C., & Quinn, F. (2017). English Legal System. London: Pearson Education Limited.
Employment Cases Update. (2017a). Kwele-Siakam v The Co-operative Group Ltd UKEAT/0039/17/LA. Retrieved from: https://www.employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/site.aspx?i=ed35968
Employment Cases Update. (2017b). Rajaratnan v Care UK Clinical Services Ltd UKEAT/0435/14/DA. Retrieved from: https://www.employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/site.aspx?i=ed27674
Gennard, J., & Judge, G. (2005). Employee Relations (4th ed.). London: Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development.
Hannigan, B. (2015). Company law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hardy, S., & Butler, M. (2016). European Employment Laws: A comparative guide (3rd ed.). London: Spiramus.
Hepple, B. (2014). Equality: The Legal Framework. West Sussex: Bloomsbury Publishing.
In Brief. (2017). English Law: An introduction. Retrieved from: https://www.inbrief.co.uk/legal-system/english-law/
MadeSimple. (2017). Sole Trader Vs Limited Company: Advantages and Disadvantages. Retrieved from: https://www.companiesmadesimple.com/sole-trader-v-limited-company.html
NI Direct. (2017). Overtime. Retrieved from: https://www.nidirect.gov.uk/articles/overtime
Official Journal of the European Union. (2006). Directive 2006/54/EC Of The European Parliament And Of The Council. Retrieved from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2006:204:0023:0036:en:PDF
Sargeant, M. (2013). Discrimination and the Law. Oxon: Routledge.
SOAS. (2017). Sources of UK Law. Retrieved from: https://www.soas.ac.uk/library/subjects/law/research/file70249.pdf
UK Government. (2017a). Redundancy: your rights. Retrieved from: https://www.gov.uk/redundant-your-rights
UK Government. (2017b). Personal data an employer can keep about an employee. Retrieved from: https://www.gov.uk/personal-data-my-employer-can-keep-about-me
UK Government. (2017c). Data protection. Retrieved from: https://www.gov.uk/data-protection
UK Parliament. (2017). How laws are made. Retrieved from: https://www.parliament.uk/education/about-your-parliament/how-laws-are-made/
Essay Writing Service Features
Our Experience
No matter how complex your assignment is, we can find the right professional for your specific task. Contact Essay is an essay writing company that hires only the smartest minds to help you with your projects. Our expertise allows us to provide students with high-quality academic writing, editing & proofreading services.
Free Features
Free revision policy
$10Free bibliography & reference
$8Free title page
$8Free formatting
$8How Our Essay Writing Service Works
First, you will need to complete an order form. It's not difficult but, in case there is anything you find not to be clear, you may always call us so that we can guide you through it. On the order form, you will need to include some basic information concerning your order: subject, topic, number of pages, etc. We also encourage our clients to upload any relevant information or sources that will help.
Complete the order form
Once we have all the information and instructions that we need, we select the most suitable writer for your assignment. While everything seems to be clear, the writer, who has complete knowledge of the subject, may need clarification from you. It is at that point that you would receive a call or email from us.
Writer’s assignment
As soon as the writer has finished, it will be delivered both to the website and to your email address so that you will not miss it. If your deadline is close at hand, we will place a call to you to make sure that you receive the paper on time.
Completing the order and download
