Logistic Management And Supply Chain Network

Production and Distribution in Supply Chain

There are varieties of changes taking place with regard to the alterations have started transformations in the field of production as well as distribution of good and services. The relationship between the customer as well as the client related to the factory and logistic industrial sector is advancing towards the achievement of functional optimization. The organization opted is “THE OPERATIONS & SUPPLY CHAIN CLUB”, IIM Raipur, India.

There are several changes related to the cost reduction and increasing the production economy across the various sectors of logistics factory (Crewe, 2015). The area of the production related to mass management also works in relation to the improvement of the standard pertaining to living as well as includes logistics related to the production of automotive as well as the other electronic criteria. Several firms are doing their protection in the economic crisis during the criteria of handling the mass production in regard to the systemic manner of walking in the dynamic environment. Several Business models are working on the criteria of the wealth of nations which was launched in the year 1776 and illustrated the various merits of the specialization with regard to the manageable and winning criteria of the clients (Logistics Analysis, 2013).

The two criteria namely production as well as distribution goes hand in hand when it comes to the fulfilment of the demands of the customers and other clients in relation to the ends of the supply chain network. The coincidence is also drawn on the basis of behavior of the industries which entirely manages the production sales and other woman genius market tactics in the individualistic and holistic approach. In various sectors where the integrated vertical forms are working on the bespoke services such as the tailor making suits and other criteria Defined by the pricing as well as efficiency drawn by the market dynamics.

The delivery of the mechanisms inside the requirement of the partnership orientation with regard to the Logistic supply chain network is acting as the driver of the differentiation caused with regard to the manufacturer’s product  orientation of the goods and services which can become more specialized in the modern competent environment so as to make the working more descriptive as well as more enhanced in the Outsourcing of the Other elements that act as the fundamental and significant property for the equipment of the decision making process and relationship management in the logistics service provider (Coron, 2014).

The various processes which include the development as well as the management of the demanding criteria with relation to the several aspects in the certain it is of the management of the dynamic relationship such as the Logistic triad and the Logistic dyad. The exploration which are focusing on the relationship management between the outsourcing elements draws the explanation in the literature review in accordance provision of Logistic elements and the other Outsourcing prevention of the emergence of the assessment and the management contracts. 

The major significance is laid on the concept of the provision of the third dyadic relationship Management which is existing between the seller as well as buyer where in seller contact the Logistic manager in order to have the occasional selling and buying practices for the emergence of the other management criteria in the logistic contract framework. The noticeable fact inside the occasional emergence of the logistic provision is the relationship between the shippers as well as the other logistics service provider techniques in order to outsource the unrelated all the managerial aspect of the Literature logistics dyad (Coron, 2014).

The literature review mainly talks about the logistic contracts which cross the relationship between the contractual basis connections in regard to the other consignors or the shippers which draws the relationship between the shipper as well as the third party. This acts as the consignee giving a way to the third major role of a person as service link in the first as well as the second party.
The significant work is to demarcate the scope of the research study carried out with regard to the Logistic Framework in order to have the brief and elaborated classification wherever necessary pertaining to the topic and the methodologies that are adopted for the emergence of the academic domain. The delineation of the present study and the research work life in the criteria for the study perspective in accordance with the groupings that are being made so as to communicate the elements which can actually work inside the boundary of the discussion of delineation. The demarcation of the development Framework consisting as tools and techniques for drawing the precise perspective to help out the structure and the other related semantics for the framework of the supply chain management (Logistics Analysis, 2013).
The integrated management framework of the 3pl and IV PL began in the year 1980 with the aim to draw the companies for the provision of the valuable goods and services in regard to the allocation of freight. In addition, the evaluation of the criteria pertaining to the integration of the collection of various kinds of resources and the other capabilities with regard to the technological intervention in the Logistic Company.

Conventionally the various activities which were carried out inside the containers and the other warehouses related to the drawing of the Logistic Framework but were unable to draw the provision in accordance with the management of the transportation process and the other selection criteria of the monetary as well as fiscal Management Services (Coron, 2014).

The current scenario of the management as well as the production of the Logistic curves in the functional Optimization inside the modern organization stores the complete distribution of the services inside the third party as well as the second party mechanism for the strengthening framework and to reason out the various smaller as well as bigger level of services for the demarcation of the increment of the level of infrastructural services and the other reductions  that are responsible for the sustainable management of the logistics. With the advent of the modern technologies and the other visibility criteria the management as well as a production sales are increasing at a very rapid rate and their particular Optimization is the major issues that is drawing the attention of the various seekers and the other shippers who literally act as the stakeholders and the other share makers in the fulfilment of the demands and in the other infrastructural services allocation.
Throughout the entire research  the major focuses laid on the concept of the  activities which are involved under the enter dependency of the wages applications of the largest  freight network probation and  the intriguing competitive pressure on the major accordion all the degree of the complexity supply chain management and the justification made inside the definition of the effective forms of the delivery of collaboration planning of 3Pl and 4 Pl. Mentzer  has that several definitions which are based on the encouraging complexity of the supply chain management (Coron, 2014).

Importance of Third Dyadic Relationship Management

If the description has to be made beyond the complexity of supply chain management and the allocation of teach industrial firms, different kinds of suppliers and buyers participate in the management of supply chain management and the other different consumerist approaches included in order to have the best demarcation of the boundaries along with the similarities and differences under the supply chain management would exist (Logistics Analysis, 2013). The other provisions lying under the levels of complexity of the origination that major lay a focus on the boundaries after logistic triads and dyads. Basically there are three levels of supply chain management inside the research of the management process which pertains to the internal chain, the dyadic relationship, the provision of external chain and the last level is the network. The criteria for the collaborative planning depends upon the stream of patients that aims at the provision  to enhance the relationship between the suppliers  and the shipper who are engaged in the activities a location of the supplier chain management and the other processes inside the marketing research firms (Logistics Analysis, 2013).

The direct supply chain has major league three players to play a greater role, supplier organization and the customers.  The second type of chain is the extended supply chain, in which the suppliers supply is carried out with the other supplier within the organization in order to demarcate the needs and requirement of customers. In the other type of supply chain that is the ultimate supply chain, there is a huge relationship between the supplies change and the other financial providers (Supply management chain, 2015). The functional optimization the certain risk strategies makes the decision as per the sustainable approach towards which collaborative planning is achieved. The criteria of the logistic management and the meeting of the customers’ requirements and the increasing demands as per the freight and logistics distribution.

Once the product enters the supply chain management Logistic flow framework,  the product delivery is the major motive for the reverse logistics and the secondary markets that are involved in the delivery services mechanism. Customer satisfaction is the another criteria that should be dealt in the overviewing of the reverse logistics flow which is the major reason for the product Estimation and the product delivery to the determined destination or the market place where the selling are the marketing network has to be established in future. The customer after receiving the product in the unpredictable manner keep in mind the products advantages and disadvantages that pertains to the understanding laid by the customer in order to use the product particularly according to the proper usage and if the product is dealt with the defective Technologies then the consumer can claim the product as the returning asset for the marketing agency where it has been established and the liberal returning policies are responsible for the returning back of the defective goods.

The process of the packaging of the product and the outdated material elimination is the major responsibility of the retailer and the other manufacturing companies that are responsible for the packaging as well as manufacturing of the new version of the products. The retailer is responsible for the making as well as building up of the new version of the products if the product packaging is outdated and the season product are handled with the delicate approach of the distributive channels and flow analysis. The two identical products that are being handled by the retail as well as the consumer is particularly engaged in the semantics of the reverse logistics flow criteria so as to make the distribution channel more clear and hurdle free.

Levels of Complexity in Supply Chain Management

The returning back of the logistics and the other materials related to the reverse logistics semantics pertains to the back delivery of the services as the backward flow of the goods as well as facilities that are majorly outdated or wear and Tear is the another reason that is responsible for the bag delivery of the various kinds of remaining products from the secondary market to the origin where it has been manufactured.

The cycle in which the order and the delivery of the services is estimated as well as tracked compares the notion of the materials as well as the other distribution services. The illustration of the supply chain management and fair distribution of Services along with the removal of these risk recovery. The trends in the third millennium talk about the effectiveness of the supplying management criteria in order to have the sustainable approach for the building of the official management activities in either time dimensions (Supply management chain, 2015).

In the study taken for the research keep in mind collaborative planning as a major criteria in order to draw multi three-dimensional aspects related to the achievement of a plant and proposals related to the systematic planning in the supply chain networking management (Logistics Analysis, 2013). The relation between the supplier and the shipper also pertains to the development and maintenance of all the issues related to logistic planning and the collaborative ventures that can help in the understanding population of all the policies and programs related to logistic planning framework. Many organizations work in accordance with the functional approaches that are included in the logistic planning up framework.

The objectives are followed based on the 4 major criteria	:Objective
	a
Price	: I1
Speed	: I2
Safety	: I3
Color	: I4
Audi	: A
BMW	: B
Ford	: C

Criteria 1-

Price	Alternative comparison
		Audi	BMW	Ford
	Price	A	B	C
Audi	A	1	0.96049	1.936813	0.39101	0.391	0.39101	0.39101
BMW	B	1.041135	1	2.016484	0.4071	0.4071	0.4071	0.4071
Ford	C	0.516312	0.495913	1	0.20189	0.2019	0.20189	0.20189
		2.557447	2.456403	4.953297	1	1	1	1
		Second Criteria

Speed	Alternative comparison
Criteria2-		Audi	BMW	Ford
	Speed	A	B	C
Audi	A	1	0.875	1.166667	0.33333	0.3333	0.33333	0.33333
BMW	B	1.142857	1	1.333333	0.38095	0.381	0.38095	0.38095
Ford	C	0.857143	0.75	1	0.28571	0.2857	0.28571	0.28571
		3	2.625	3.5	1	1	1	1
		Third Criterion

Safety	Alternative comparison
Criteria 3-
		Audi	BMW	Ford
	Safety	A	B	C
Audi	A	1	0.333333	7	0.24138	0.2308	0.41176	0.29464
BMW	B	3	1	9	0.72414	0.6923	0.52941	0.64862
Ford	C	0.142857	0.111111	1	0.03448	0.0769	0.05882	0.05674
		4.142857	1.444444	17	1	1	1	1
				Forth Criterion

Criteria 4-

	Color	Alternative comparison
			Audi	BMW	Ford
		Color	A	B	C
	Audi	A	1	0.2	3	0.15789	0.1489	0.27273	0.19319
	BMW	B	5	1	7	0.78947	0.7447	0.63636	0.72351
	Ford	C	0.333333	0.142857	1	0.05263	0.1064	0.09091	0.08331
			6.333333	1.342857	11	1	1	1	1
			Criteria Comparison

Analytical inferences and comparisons

Criteria composition

	Price	Speed	Safety	Color
Price	1	3	1	7	0.4038462	0.2692308	0.0897	0.4632	0.306514
Speed	0.333333333	1	0.142857143	7	0.1346154	0.0897436	0.0128	0.4632	0.175104
Safety	1	7	1	0.111111111	0.4038462	0.6282051	0.0897	0.0074	0.282287
Color	0.142857143	0.142857143	9	1	0.0576923	0.0128205	0.8077	0.0662	0.236095
	2.476190476	11.14285714	11.14285714	15.11111111	1	1	1	1	4

Results of AHP Analytical tool

	Price	Speed	Safety	Color
	0.306513952	0.175103695	0.282286953	0.2360954
Audi	0.391014975	0.333333333	0.294637749	0.19318606	0.307002176
BMW	0.407099279	0.380952381	0.648619129	0.723506057	0.545400948
Ford	0.201885746	0.285714286	0.056743122	0.083307883	0.147596876
		0.545400948	Result

the impact of the digitalization on the various signs of model such as the third party and the fourth party models that lay a major impact on the  business environmental pertaining to the inventory relationship that can be made between the business models performing  as well as focusing on the basis of the performance advantages that can be safely extracted as the activities which seems to be in a collaborative position in the delivery of services and provision of very conservative realization and digitalization interventions. The elaborated form of approach sharing the  basic forms of information pertaining to the simple as well as the significant growth for the major business model that are working in the platform based asset management of the logistics services. The business model which are all working in the form of the framework that can be laid on the basis of the customization as well as standardization of the combination of the opportunities and the management process of the identification of all the threats prevailing in a lecturing of the existing objectives of the business organizational models which depends upon the customer satisfaction which are working according to the competitive advantages and the other criteria pertaining to the business models for the 3rd party and the fourth party models. 

After the implications of the business models that are working in integration with the realization of logistics services that would be helpful in the integration of the various model and processes as for the logistics infrastructure that can safely extract the major services pertaining to the vehicle manufacturing as well as the mobilisation of all the services that can participate in the logistic activities inside the tradition business modelling system.

The domains of the logistics services that are working as per the highly qualified consultants related to the establishment of the various bigger marketing players. The fleet management process and the beginning of the major criteria of the business model depending upon the fleet management and the services remarks the beginning of the logistics works in the major business organizational models  dad are engaged in the business management as well as making the dominant criteria for the traditional business fields in accordance with the application of the regular mode of technology  on the traditional logistics network and a conventional mode of working for the preparation of business model and year by year execution (Logistics Analysis, 2013)s. The numerous kinds of workable processes touch as the preparation of the business models and their execution involves the workable conditions ask for the business modelling implementation and the digitalization of the existing and the traditional logistic framework (Logistics Analysis, 2013).

Conclusion

There must be a setup that has to hold the major understanding of the collaborative planning under the supply chain management of the third-party logistic provider and the fourth party logistic provider in order to make understanding more comprehensive and detailed for the competitive advantages that are offered by the various advanced information systems and the other computer and sees for the concert Tennessee of the strong supply chain knowledge and the other effective acknowledging criteria in order to have the consolidation optimization of the functional approach in the achievement of the basic competitive prices to the thousands of the local competitors. The conducted research also estimated the financial budget analysis and the other  modes of uncertainties and building societies by offering several substitutes and particularly products as per the sustainable approach towards which the upper level of logistic and the lower level of the hybrid categorization  as well as the division of the understanding for the various informants to select a long time majestic logistic triads inside the collaborative planning approach of the 3Pl and the 4 Pl  service providers for the description of wider understanding of all the delivery of the goods and services.

References

Ackerman, K. B. (1996) Pitfalls in Logistics Partnerships International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, Vol. 26, pp 132.

Allan, G and Skinner, C. (1991) Handbook for Research Students in Social Sciences.

Edited by Allan, G and Skinner, C., Routledge, pp 235.

Anderson, H. (2001) A History of Reductionism versus Holistic Approaches to

Scientific Research. Endeavour, Vol. 25, No. 4, pp 153-156.

Armstrong, E. (2008) Exceeding Expectations. The Journal of Commerce, pp. 82-85.

Ayers, J. (2001) Handbook of Supply Chain Management. Boca Raton: St Lucie Press

Bagchi, P. K. and Virum, H. (1998) European Logistics Alliances: A Management

Types of Supply Chain

Model. Int. Journal of Logistics Management. Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 93-108.

Baily, P and Farmer, D. (1977) Purchasing Principles and Management, 3rd Edition,

Pitman Publishing, London, pp 201-213.

Baily, P. and Farmer, D. (1990) Purchasing Principles and Management. 6th Edition,

Pitman Publishing, London, pp 235.

Ballou, R. H. (2004) Business Logistics / Supply Chain Management: Planning, Organizing and Controlling the Supply Chain. Upper Saddle River, New

Jersey, Pearson Prentice Hall, Vol 2, pp 368.

Barney, J. (1991) Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage”, Journal of

Management, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 99-120

Barratt, M (2004), Understanding the Meaning of Collaboration in the Supply Chain,

Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, Vol. 9, No. 1 pp. 30-42

Barratt, M. A. and Green, M. (2001) the Cultural Shift: the Need for a Collaborative

Culture. Conference Proceedings of Supply Chain Knowledge, Cranfield School of Management, November, pp 458.

Bask, A. H. (2001) Relationships among TPL providers and members of supply chains – a strategic perspective. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing,Volume 16, No. 6, pp. 470-486

Bask, A. H., Tinnila, M. and Rajahonka, M. (2008) Matching Service Strategies and Business Models. Proceedings from NOFOMA 2008, pp. 53-6

Becher, A. (1998) Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Cultures of Disciplines. The Society for Research into Higher Education and the Open University Press, Milton Keynes, pp 158.

Beier, F. J. (1989) Transportation Contracts and the Experience Effect: A Framework for Future Research. Journal of Business Logistics, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 73-89

Bennett, R. (1991). What is Management Research? In Smith, N. C. and Dainty, P. (editors), The Management Research Handbook, London, Routledge, pp. 67- 77

Berglund, M., van Laarhoven, P., Sharman, G. and Wandel, S. (1999) Third-Party Logistics: Is There a Future? International Journal of Logistics Management, Vol. 10, No. l,p p . 59-70

Berry, D., Towill, D. T., and Wadsley, N. (1994) Supply Chain Management in the Electronics Products Industry. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, Vol. 24, No. 10, pp20-32

Biglan, A. (1973a) The Characteristics of Subject Matter in different Academic Areas,

Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 57, No. 3, pp. 195-203

Biglan, A. (1973b) Relationships between Subject Matter Characteristics and the

Structure and Output of University Departments, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 57, No. 3, pp. 204-213

Blumberg, B., Cooper, D. R. and Schindler, P. S. (2005) Business Research Methods. Maidenhead, UK, McGraw-Hill, Vol 8.  pp 587.

Cox, A. (1996) Relational Competence and Strategic Procurement Management.

European Journal of Purchasing and Supply Mgt. Vol. 2, No, 1, pp. 57-70

Coyle, J.J. Bardi, E.J. and Langley, C.J. 2013. The Management of Business Logistics.

7th ed. Mason OH: South-Western Thompson Learning Publishing Company, pp 789.

Cresswell, J. (1994) Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Method

Approaches (2nd edn.) Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage. Pp 125-128.

Crewe, L. and Davenport, E. (1992) The Puppet Show: Changing Buyer-Seller

Relationships within Clothing Retailing, in Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, NS17, 183-97

Croom, S. and Saunders, M. J. (1995) Supply Chain Competitive Criteria: A Conceptual View of the Interaction, Inter-dependence and Integration of Supply Chains. Proceedings of the Fourth IPSERA Conference, Service Sector and Manufacturing Procurement, 11 pp.

Reverse Logistics Flow

Croom, S., Romano, P. and Giannakis, M. (2000) Supply Chain Management: An

Analytical Framework for Critical Literature Review. European Journal of

Purchasing and Supply Management, Vol. 6, pp. 67-83

Daily Telegraph (2008) Food and Drinks Firms Share Trucks, June 18th 2008

Daugherty, P. J., Sabath, R. E., Roger, D. S. (1992) Competitive Advantage through

Customer Responsiveness. Logistics and Transportation Review, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp. 252-271

Davis, S. M. (1987) Future Perfect. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.

Davis, T. (1993) Effective Supply Chain Management, Sloan Management Review, Summer 1993, pp. 35-46

Day, G. S. (1994). The Capabilities of Market Driven Organizations. Journal of Marketing, Vol. 58, No. 2, pp. 1-20

Day, G. S. (1995) Advantageous Alliances. Journal of Academy of Management Science. Vol. 23, No. 4, pp. 297-300

Day, G. S. and Wensley, R. (1988). Assessing Advantage: A Framework for

Diagnosing Competitive Superiority”. Journal of Marketing, Vol. 52, No. 2, pp 1-20

Den Hartog, D. (2003) Trusting Others in Organisations: Leaders, Management and

Co-Workers, pp: 125-146, in the Trust Process in Organisations, Nooteboom  Six, F. (Eds), Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd. Cheltenham – Glos. UK

Dey, I. (1993) Qualitative Data Analysis: A User Friendly Guide for Social Scientists, Routledge, London

Dillman, D. A. (2000) Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method (2nd

edition), New York, Wiley

Disney, S. M. and Towill, D. R. (2003) Bullwhip Reduction in Supply Chains: The Impact of VMI International Journal of Operations and Production

Management Vol. 23, No. 6, pp. 625-651

Domberger, S. (1998) The Contracting Organisation: A Strategic Guide to

Outsourcing. Oxford University Press, UK

Drucker, P. (1965) Physical Distribution: The Frontier of Modem Management.

Address to the National Council of Physical Distribution Management, 6th April, pp 789.

Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989a) Agency Theory: an Assessment and Review”. Academy of

Management Review, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 57-74

Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989b) Building Theories from Case Study Research. Academy of Management Review, Vol. 14, No. 4 pp. 532-50

Ellram, L. M. (1990) The Supplier Selection Decision in Strategic Partnerships.

Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management 26, no. 4 pp. 8-14

Ellram, L. M. (1991a) Supply Chain Management: The Industrial Organisation

Perspective. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 13-22

Ellram, L. M. (1991b), A Managerial Guide for the Development and Implementation of Purchasing Partnerships, International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, Volume 27, Number 2, pp. 2-8

Ellram, L. M. (1995) Partnering Pitfalls and Success Factors International Journal of

Purchasing and Materials Management, Vol. 31, No. 3

Ellram, L. M. (1996) The Use of Case Study Method in Logistics Research. Journal of

Business Logistics, Vol. 17, No. 2, pp. 93-138

Ellram, L. M. and Cooper, M. C. (1990) Supply Chain Management, Partnerships and the Shipper-Third party Relationship. The International Journal of Logistics

Management, Vol. 1, No. 2 pp. 1-10

Embleton, P. and Wright, P. (1998) A Practical Guide to Successful Outsourcing.

Empowerment in Organisations, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 94-106

Erlandson, D. A., Harris, E. L. Skjipper, B. L. and Allen, S. D. (2003) Doing

Naturalistic Inquiry, A Guide to Methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage

Evans, B. Mason, R. Zokaei, K. and Hines, P. (2007) Supply Chain Management: A

Convenience Factory. Proceedings of 12th Annual Logistics Research

Network Conference, University of Hill, UK, September 2007, pp. 233-239

Fabbe-Costes, N. Jahre, M. and Roussat, C. (2008) Supply Chain Integration: The

Role of Logistics Service Providers. Proceedings of Norfoma, 2008, pp. 173- 189

Farmer, D. H. (1976) Voluntary Collaboration vs. “Disloyalty” to Suppliers. Journalof Purchasing and Materials Management Vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 3-8.

Fawcett, S. E. and Clinton, S. R. (1996), Enhancing Logistics Performance to Improve the Competitiveness of Manufacturing Organizations, Production and Inventory Management Journal Vol. 37, No. 1 pp. 40-46.

Fawcett, S. E. and Mangan, G. M. (2002). The Rhetoric and Reality of Supply Chain

Integration, International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, Vol. 32, No. 5, pp.339-361.

Forrester, J. W. (1958) Industrial Dynamics: A Major Breakthrough for Decision

Makers. Harvard Business Review, Vol. 38, July-August, pp. 37-66.

Fuller, J. B. O’Conor, J. and Rawlinson, R. (1993) Tailored Logistics: The Next

Advantage. Harvard Business Review. May-June pp.87-98.

Gentry, J. J. (1996) The Role of Carriers in Buyer-Supplier Strategic Partnerships: A

Supply Chain Management Approach. Journal of Business Logistics, Vol. 17,

No. 2, pp 35-55.