The above given scenario is possible as it is evident from the theoretical governing of virtue and vice, which states as following (Van Hooft 2014):
John Adair’s action centred leadership model is referenced in many training programmes. Adair says that leaders have three core areas of responsibility:
Action Centred Leadership requires that you find the right balance between the task, team and individual.
The above-cited model helps understand the usefulness of the power of leadership as it governs the task achievement at any cost. The model does not allow any backups from any kind of critical situations, which in the given scenario was the case with Mr. Edward.
Legitimate Power is related to the position or status of the person in the organisation. The person believes that they have the right to make demands on others and expect them to be compliant. Legitimate power gives the leader/manager power over their direct reports. The more senior a person is and/or the more people they may have in their team the positional power the person perceives that they have. All managers have some degree of positional power.
The purchasing problem of the company can very well be solved with the help of the Just in Time (JIT) strategy, which helps effectively manage the purchasing by allocating the requirements at the time when it is needed the most. This helps save time as well because the purchasing then happens to be in control. Following is the theoretical concepts behind JIT (Tayur, Ganeshan and Magazine 2012):
“What does ‘Just in Time – JIT’ mean: Just in time (JIT) is an inventory strategy companies employ to increase efficiency and decrease waste by receiving goods only as they are needed in the production process, thereby reducing inventory costs. This method requires producers to forecast demand accurately. This inventory supply system represents a shift away from the older just-in-case strategy, in which producers carried large inventories in case higher demand had to be met”.
Participative decision-making (PDM) is the extent to which employers allow or encourage employees to share or participate in organizational decision-making (Probst, 2005). According to Cotton et al. (1988), the format of PDM could be formal or informal. In addition, the degree of participation could range from zero to 100% in different participative management (PM) stages (Cotton et al. 1988; Black & Gregersen 1997; Brenda, 2001).
PDM is one of many ways in which an organization can make decisions. The leader must think of the best possible style that will allow the organization to achieve the best results. According to psychologist Abraham Maslow, workers need to feel a sense of belonging to an organization (see Maslow’s hierarchy of needs). This guide towards a conclusion that management should take advices from every single stakeholder as no one knows who can supply with the best of the decision (Saaty and Peniwati 2013).
This very well illustrate the facts that Mr. Edward should go for forming team members to make efficient decisions.
Some leadership theories are extremely effective in incepting the true management skills in its bearer. The vision of Mr. Edward can be efficiently handled if its managers are trained and developed under the supervision of some of the following leadership theories:
Trait theories argue that effective leaders share a number of common personality characteristics, or “traits.” Trait theories help us identify traits and qualities (for example, integrity, empathy, assertiveness, good decision-making skills, and likability) that are helpful when leading others. However, none of these traits, or any specific combination of them, will guarantee success as a leader. Traits are external behaviours that emerge from the things going on within our minds. Nevertheless, these internal beliefs and processes are important for effective leadership (Northouse 2012).
Behavioural theories focus on how leaders behave. In the 1930s, Kurt Lewin developed a framework based on a leader’s behaviour. He argued that there are three types of leaders (Day and Antonakis 2012):
Having our needs met is great motivation for loyalty and continued productivity. We all consider work a place to get our physical needs met: work for money to exchange for shelter, food, etc. However, leaders may utilize the rest of the pyramid to inspire their teams.
Encourage a sense of safety and security in your team by letting them know you appreciate their efforts. If they make mistakes, consider it a learning experience and help or encourage them to correct errors and try again. By doing this, you avoid a worker feeling insecure and wondering if she may be fired, which will decrease her motivation and productivity.
Work is not a social event, but people who work together may be at best friendly and kind, and at the very least courteous and civil. If you are managing a team of workers, know that your behaviour will likely be mirrored, and you may promote appropriate treatment of each other by simply being nice to people.
You cannot build workers’ self-esteem by berating them, or complimenting everything they do. The key is to offer both praise and constructive criticism. If they do something poorly, explain how they may do it better. For self-actualization, consider how workers see their jobs. Chip Conley saved his hotels using Maslow’s pyramid. He wants all of his employees, from managers to housekeepers to have a voice (Petri and Govern 2012).
References
Broad, C.D., 2014. Five types of ethical theory (Vol. 2). Routledge.
Day, D.V. and Antonakis, J., 2012. Leadership: Past, present, and future. The nature of leadership, 2.
Northouse, P.G., 2012. Leadership: Theory and practice. Sage.
Petri, H.L. and Govern, J.M., 2012. Motivation: Theory, research, and application. Cengage Learning.
Saaty, T.L. and Peniwati, K., 2013. Group decision making: drawing out and reconciling differences. RWS publications.
Tayur, S., Ganeshan, R. and Magazine, M. eds., 2012. Quantitative models for supply chain management (Vol. 17). Springer Science & Business Media.
Van Hooft, S., 2014. Understanding virtue ethics. Routledge.
Essay Writing Service Features
Our Experience
No matter how complex your assignment is, we can find the right professional for your specific task. Contact Essay is an essay writing company that hires only the smartest minds to help you with your projects. Our expertise allows us to provide students with high-quality academic writing, editing & proofreading services.Free Features
Free revision policy
$10Free bibliography & reference
$8Free title page
$8Free formatting
$8How Our Essay Writing Service Works
First, you will need to complete an order form. It's not difficult but, in case there is anything you find not to be clear, you may always call us so that we can guide you through it. On the order form, you will need to include some basic information concerning your order: subject, topic, number of pages, etc. We also encourage our clients to upload any relevant information or sources that will help.
Complete the order formOnce we have all the information and instructions that we need, we select the most suitable writer for your assignment. While everything seems to be clear, the writer, who has complete knowledge of the subject, may need clarification from you. It is at that point that you would receive a call or email from us.
Writer’s assignmentAs soon as the writer has finished, it will be delivered both to the website and to your email address so that you will not miss it. If your deadline is close at hand, we will place a call to you to make sure that you receive the paper on time.
Completing the order and download