Managing Education And Organizational Structure: A Comparative Study

Analysis of Differences Between Managing Education As Opposed To Managing Other Forms Of Organisations

The impact of demographic and structural changes on the educational sector

Question:

What are the key differences between managing education as opposed to managing other forms of organisations? In responding to this question critically explore which ideas have been most important in challenging or confirming your conception of educational administration and leadership? What changes do you see as important in the practice of educational administration/leadership? How will you use the learning from this unit to inform your own management practices?

Education is the perennial tavern that holds the organizational keys to success. Edenius and Yakhlef (2007) have pointed out that for an institution demographic and structural changes are the most necessary attributes that makes the schools “community of learners”. The proactive approach to meet the utmost resilience helps in developing more sustainability of the corporate culture and educational traits. Although both academic and corporate factors are different in their approaches, but, the cognitive approaches to develop the fields are intensive in the approaches. With the rapid growth of the managerial ethnicity appears to be the turbulence for the organizational oriental structure. This current research work focus on the chief differences between managing education and managing of the other forms of organisation.

Academic learning style helps in the organisational development of a student, having intense variety and specification it embarks with an immense intensity and variance for the future development of the student. Marsh (2004) has stated that educational sectors are potential to develop the organisational basics for a student. Fully controlled approaches are the most integral part which helps in developing more sophistication. Mortimore and Mortimore (1998) seem to have been critical in their approaches in stating that application of durability and stability of a student within the academic circumference which renders in the development of cultural and institutional facade. Academic feasibility of a student is sophisticated to develop the career and move them with the force of the organisational attributes. The power of cultural ingenuity of an academic sector stands literally incongruous. Ambiguity in the process leads to an affluent generalization that is contained by a significant parameter (West and Ylönen, 2010). Controlling the educational circumference stands in contrast with controlling the organisational stability.

What more to be added, Strike (1999) has pointed out the academic administration although is different from the organisational administrative structure, the responsibility of it is more cohesive in comparison with the academic level Likewise the cultural stability within an organisation, tight knitted administrative culture is also significant to bring more propagation in managing the academic structure. Within an institutional environment sophistication is the most intrinsic factor that the focus is generally implied on but for an organisation it appears to be quite diversifying (West and Ylonen, 2010).

Education management is the theoretical practice of administrative contention in the educational system that entitles educational establishments. According to Kayes (2003), management is responsible of developing the orderly principle related to the classroom environment. Doctrines are the most psychological and ethical principles which engages in the development of the perception of an academic person. Inclusive education is one of the significant prospects which focuses on more deliquesce. The educational administration centers round the potential areas, therefore, no special preference centering to an area of development is needed to be given. Bush (2007) has mentioned that the main aim of educational administration is to provide better education to the students. At the same time, the educational administration is a structural and spontaneous process, targets at developing the psychological attributes of a student (Goldspink, 2007). Attaining the commercial success for an academic field is also most sophisticated approach seems to be maintained by the school management. Educational development, quality service appears to be the intrinsic demand for an academic sector which also appears to be the duty of the school administration (Edenius and Yakhlef, 2007). The administration of the school stands to be responsible for application and managing of all these aspects. The structural development is the most congenial factor which engages in an administrative cohesion. The administration of an organisation appears to be provident to entertain the demands which also coexist with the educational administrative principles.

The potential of academic learning styles in organizational development

Leadership skills in the educational sector embodies more administrative factor which engages in the development of the organisational ethics. Hoyle and Wallace (2007) have stated some of the concurrent factors in the educational sector manage the administrative ethics. The large scale of the educational changes and social attributes help in structuring the administrative perspective. Approaches of educational administrative power help in delimiting more potential abilities which engages in more convergence (Hoyle and Wallace, 2007). The role of the administrator in the educational field helps in developing the organisational ethics. Application of the theoretical factors within the academic structure helps in the organisational orientation. But it is also said it misleads the academic discipline.

Following the code of ethics by the educational administrators are in the educational field enables in developing more potentiality within the academic circumference which also provides the organisational stability as well. The empirical approach of the administrative sector is more oriental which enable in managing more intestacy (Edenius and Yakhlef, 2007). The approach of administrative organisation is literally evident which engages in deductive proposition. It is rather a conditional approach which treats the psychological development. With the organisational attributes, academic proximity is also maintained (Good et al. 2010).

Political, legal and economical factors are the most potential approaches for maintaining the educational administration. Antonacopoulou (2006) is of this view that in no way the educational attributes are different from that of the organisational structure being followed. With more, sophistication of the organisation and application of the conflicting nature helps in regenerating of the organisational ethics (Duignan and Hurley, 2007). The fundamental necessities help in managing the contiguous factors which determines understanding of more organisational ethics. 

In accordance with Dinham et al. (2011), leadership approach helps in stimulating more complex situation which affords in rejuvenating new approaches and mechanism. This helps in managing the innovation and application of a profound structure of organisation. Often it appears that by deviating from the organisational and administrative ethics is able to unleash the creative energies of an individual. The concept of “organisational learning” is more evident in order to creative delineation of different strategies (Kayes, 2003). Marketing mechanism is for both the organisational and the academic sector appears to be the most incredible factor which helps in developing the organisational ethics. This technique appears to be more operative in its approaches which enable in generalizing the sustainable factors. Organisational communication is the most informative attribute that helps in controlling the authoritative and administrative factors.

Ghoshal (2005) is of this view that between the culture and administration stands social and moral the networks that enthuses more flexibility. It can better be stated as a structural communication process which comes in coordination to manage the structural development. Application of social and political strategies is more conditional to manage both the organisational and academic situation.

Often it is said that the cultural bureaucracy engages in the authoritative structure. It rather is considered as moral and perennial structure of administration which basks to its ethic approach, Cultural and structural development within the organisational structure let the bureaucratic propositions to be altered intrinsically.

The significance of cultural ingenuity in academic sectors

Lynn Boscardin and Jacobson (1997) seem to have stated that maintaining the homogeneity in the educational filed is one of the most intrinsic aspect which helps in the contiguous development of the organisational ethics. Application of the different policies and maintaining the academic rules help in identifying the organisational ethics within the academic structure. Hemsley-Brown and Lowrie (2010) are of this view that application of the governmental regulations over the schools appears to be one of the most intrinsic factor which helps in generating more organisational attributes. More to be added, institutional behavior although appears to be literally significant for the academic development but with homogeneity it becomes more intrinsic and effective (Ghoshal, 2005).

So far there have been several critiques and arguments centering homogeneity. But it is needed to be mentioned that intermingling of the different administrative attribute result in developing the integrity in the academic administration sector (James, 2003). Differentiation and diversification in this approach are also the most integral part which helps in developing all the administrative ethics. Priola (2007) has stated that all of the students of an institution are needed to be provident in their approaches and the institution is to be convenient to its approaches for all the students. Furthermore, an institution can be stated as a small warehouse of an organisation. Social development is one of the most organized approaches which engage in the conditional deployment. Kim (2005) has mentioned that an institution is the place of intermingling of different culture, states, religions and other integral factors which pertains a combinatorial approach towards the development of the institutional objectives. Economic and social development appears to be one of the most sophisticated approaches of organisational development (Lynn Boscardin and Jacobson, 1997). An institution is no way different from that intuitive mobility.

Diversity, as critically mentioned by Lynn Boscardin and Jacobson (1997), is the political and legalistic combination of educational intensity which ascertains more sophistication both from the administrative and socio-political factor. It can better be stated as the low risk attribute which engages in more viability (Lynn Boscardin and Jacobson, 1997). Social effectiveness, stability and economical flexibility are the most intrinsic factors which develop in the academic development.

Kim (2005) appears to be more critical in his approach while stating that the in the current market place competition is the most potential threat that an organisation has to face severely. He also has stated that the administrative strength is the most potential factor to assess the market orientation and possible institutional perimeter can be assessed. With the growing complication of the market place and changing of the marketing necessities, the functional factors of the business are needed to be managed by the administration (Helgesen, 2008). Therefore, homogeneous approach of the administrative strategies helps drastically to manage the organisational policies.

Designing of the proper marketing policies and its administrative execution strategy is really provincial that helps in managing the structural ethics. Edenius and Yakhlef (2007) have pointed out that with time the organisational statics and strategies change; and this change more covers the fundamental deliquesce.

The role of administration and leadership skills in both education and organizational stability

Within an institution, as pointed out by Goldspink (2007), an administration has to face different problems which engage an organisation to face different situational attributes. The administration of an educational sector is really intrinsic which engages in more deployment of the conditional factors. While working on the predominant challenges, a school administration has to face some of the severe problems like infrastructure problems, political and social problems, economical problems, marketing challenges and others. Often it appears that the infrastructure of the school is not so much provident in nature which is letting the students face poignant problems. It is the administration of the school responsible of solving the all the problems (Meyer, 2002). Apart from that financial crunch may seem to be another problem that a school may have to face. The administration has to find out the solutions that help the school to be intrinsic in the approaches. In terms of using human resource, facilities, equipments, it may seem to be intrinsic. Administration is responsible in managing the learning attributes. The administration often has to face the political problems such community problem, strategical problems and others. Sattar (2012) has mentioned that marketing of a school also appears to be one of the most intrinsic factors. Often it appears in competition with other institutions, lagging of a school behind creates major problems in marketing as well (Gajic, 2011). The stereotype approach of the organisation also helps in the denouncement of the organisational ethics. In order to follow the organisational strategies, application of the situational denouncement appears to be one of the most administrative challenges to be faced. To gain the competitive advantages of the market place, the academic sector has also adapted the business policies (Sattar, 2012). What is more, application of the philosophical and psychological attributes also help in developing the organisational structure. From the theoretical perspective, the administration appears to be responsible of developing a stereotype structure which helps in the resolving the problems currently faced by the organisations. Management appears to be one of the most contiguous part which helps in managing all the sophisticated aspects.

Bush (2007) is of this view that the most indigenous problem with the administration of a school is that to choose the proficient faculty section. As giving education is the main thing for a school, assembly of the sophisticated teachers and expert ones is very much essential. What is more, with the population growth educational standards is also needed to grow up. But often, as observed critically by Goldspink (2007), it appears that in lieu of appointing sophisticated teachers, the administration runs the schools with the casual ones. This becomes an impediment for the psychological development of the students. Often the social transience seems to be the most intrinsic factor of development. The management and the administration of the school are responsible of eliminating these problems. Even with the poignant policies taken by the management, problems also seem to be started. Meyer (2002) seems to have mentioned that internal deficiencies are the most integral part that sustains the development of the academic sectors. With the psychology of the students, the administration is needed to bring changes in their decisions as well. Mismanagement casts a poignant approach on the development.

The impact of political, legal, and economic factors in maintaining educational administration

Shared value approach is the most intrinsic factor that helps in the administrative development. In respect of different management development, administrative growth appears to be one of the most intrinsic facts of development. Hemsley-Brown and Lowrie (2010) have mentioned that as communities seems to be united with the shared values, from the business perspective and organisational stabilities, administrative development also appears to be one of the integral part of development. With the marketing strategy development in the organisational sections also appears to be an important factor (Priola, 2007). With shared values, exchange of the ideas appears to be one of the most important trait helps in defending the challenges.

Meyer (2002) has pointed out that maintain the educational goal appears to be the main motive of an institutional organisation. The administration is needed to follow the destined approaches. Changes in the strategies with the demand and necessities are the most intrinsic propaganda that helps in the development of the organisational strategies. The academic orientation appears to be the most prominent fact which is needed to be managed properly. What is more, administration of the schools, as argued by Edenius and Yakhlef (2007), is responsible of taking decision as needed. More to be added, conditional development of the academic structure seems helping in managing the organisational structure.

Leadership practices are also the most contiguous factors which help in managing the structural development of the academic sector. In the academic sector appointing the efficient teachers seems to be the most integral part of development (Edenius and Yakhlef, 2007). Under the leadership structure conditional development is the most provident factor which attains conditional teaching propaganda (Bush, 2007). By providing proper training to the students they can be developed to an utmost level of integrity. Recruiting of the proficient teachers is also an intrinsic factor of development for an academic sector. A faculty is expected to perform its duty properly. At the same time, administration is needed to be sharp in their approaches in monitoring over these teachers (Strike, 1999). Supervising the ethical and psychological development of the students is also an important factor that the administration needs to supervise.

Decision making process by the application of the administrative data helps in the superior development of the academic sector (Mortimore and Mortimore, 1998). Designing of the long term planning appears to be one of the most intrinsic factor which helps in developing the academic growth. It is the administration to decide how to divide the resources among the different factors. Determining the market orientation and targeting to a sophisticated goal engages an organisation to be developed in the market place.

Managing the academic process, managing the external factors is also important which helps in the development of the organisational strategy. It appears to be an intrinsic fact which helps in the development of the organisational collegiality. Targeting to the development of the organisational strategies helps in developing the functional strategies as well. It seems to be the degree that has been nourished intrinsically and needs to be developing with intense sophistication.

My management practices help me delimiting my ideas which help literally in maintaining the organisational practices. My experience in this approach is really sophisticated which helps me in developing my ideas. Proper decision making process for the organisational development helps in developing the organisational strategy. More to be added, strategical approaches that I have gathered so far is that management based practice is helpful for managing the academic strategies. I have learnt that the role of the administration the organisational perspective is the most vital not for the internal management but the external as well. The sound management practice in this approach helps in developing the organisational and academic practices which is literally sophisticated. The management ideas that do I possess help me developing my ideas and also render me more places to apply them in the practical field as well.

When I had joined my high school, I was literally unaware of these administrative factors, but as the days passed by the educational management practices started casting its light on me. The leadership qualities are the most effective factors that I have learnt is intensely helpful for the development of my innate qualities. I have joined in an education firm as an administrator which leads me to understand more management approaches. Application of diplomacy and administrative attributes are the most essential factors that helped me in developing my management skills needs to be applied within the organisational circumference. The management knowledge that I have gathered from here are the specific approaches which helps me to instigate my management attributes. The strategical approaches are really intrinsic which rendrs me developing my working capability at the same time.

7.0 Conclusion:

Throughout this very research work the researcher has mentioned the different approaches of management practices applied in the organisational sector and academic sector as well. The researcher has also narrated the approaches which help in deploying the organisational strategies. Coming to the end, it is needed to be mentioned that application of the ideas of management helps in developing the organisational strategies. The academic approaches are very much integral part which engages in managing the integral factors of development in the academic sector. Despite being an organisation at the same time, the organisational perspectives are needed to be followed.

References:

Antonacopoulou, E. (2006). The Relationship between Individual and Organizational Learning: New Evidence from Managerial Learning Practices. Management Learning, 37(4), pp.455-473.

Bush, T. (2007). Editorial: Implementing Educational Reform–The Role of School and System Leaders. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 35(3), pp.323-325.

Dinham, S., Anderson, M., Caldwell, B. and Weldon, P. (2011). Breakthroughs in school leadership development in Australia. School Leadership & Management, 31(2), pp.139-154.

Duignan, P. and Hurley, J. (2007). School leadership standards: developments in Australia.Teaching Australia.

Edenius, M. and Yakhlef, A. (2007). Space, Vision and Organizational Learning: The Interplay of Incorporating and Inscribing Practices. Management Learning, 38(2), pp.193-210.

Gajic, J. (2011). Measurement of student satisfaction in higher education. Marketing, 42(1), pp.71-80.

Ghoshal, S. (2005). Bad Management Theories Are Destroying Good Management Practices. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(1), pp.75-91.

Goldspink, C. (2007). Rethinking Educational Reform: A Loosely Coupled and Complex Systems Perspective. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 35(1), pp.27-50.

Good, T., Wiley, C. And Sabers, D. (2010). Accountability and Educational Reform: A Critical Analysis of Four Perspectives and Considerations for Enhancing Reform Efforts. Educational Psychologist, 45(2), pp.138-148.

Helgesen, O. (2008). Marketing for Higher Education: A Relationship Marketing Approach. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 18(1), pp.50-78.

Hemsley-Brown, J. and Lowrie, A. (2010). Higher education marketing. Intl Jnl Public Sec Management, 23(2).

Hoyle, E. and Wallace, M. (2007). Educational Reform: An Ironic Perspective. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 35(1), pp.9-25.

James, C. (2003). Designing Learning Organizations. Organizational Dynamics, 32(1), pp.46-61.

Kayes, D. (2003). Proximal Team Learning:. Organizational Dynamics, 32(1), pp.80-92.

Kim, P. (2005). Introduction: challenges and opportunities for democracy, administration and law. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 71(1), pp.99-108.

Lynn Boscardin, M. and Jacobson, S. (1997). The inclusive school. Journal of Educational Admin, 35(5), pp.466-476.

Marsh, D. (2004). School Principals as Standards-Based Educational Leaders: Looking across Policy Contexts. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 32(4), pp.387-404.

Meyer, H. (2002). The new managerialism in education management: corporatization or organizational learning?. Journal of Educational Admin, 40(6), pp.534-551.

Mortimore, P. and Mortimore, J. (1998). The Political and the Professional in Education: An unnecessary conflict?. J. of Educ. for Teaching, 24(3), pp.205-219.

Priola, V. (2007). Being female doing gender. Narratives of women in education management.Gender and Education, 19(1), pp.21-40.

Sattar, S. (2012). Exploring Knowledge Management Practices. IJLD, 2(1).

Strike, K. (1999). Can Schools be Communities? The Tension between Shared Values and Inclusion. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35(1), pp.46-70.

West, A. and Ylonen, A. (2010). Marketâ€Âoriented school reform in England and Finland: school choice, finance and governance. Educational Studies, 36(1), pp.1-12.