Managing Global Virtual Teams In Cross Cultural Management

Discussion

The impact of culture upon the international company management techniques as well as methods is immeasurable. Researchers have frequently proven that national and individual cultures have a significant impact upon the corporate cultural system. National culture, for instance, have an direct influence on management and decision, styles of leadership, as well as human resource management techniques (Romani et.al, 2018).  Management activities like communication, motivation and organisational design are also influenced by country cultures. It is indeed important to note that different national institutions, including labour laws and training procedures and industrial norms and regulations, have a direct impact on organisational policies (for example, human resource policies). People’s actions inside companies are an execution of the ideals organised into mental programmes by culture. Organizations might have the same architecture, physical plant, or product, but at the same time, the interpretations that the accompanying human cultures assign to them can be vastly distinguished. Individual’s perceptions, conceptions, and assessments of others with whom they work are derived by the cultural expectations of leaders and workers, as well as by technology and markets. Trust between co-workers, the ability to work together as a team, and the presence of women in the workplace all depend on a company’s culture (Romani et.al, 2018). Cultural variations have a profound impact on how people live and work. Global virtual teams are becoming increasingly popular among businesses due to factors such as accelerated time to market, increased urgency in meeting client demands across time zones, and decreased operational costs. Team building trust and communication efficacy have a substantial positive link with virtual team project performance (Ritcher et.al, 2018). The following section discusses the aspect of managing global virtual teams in cross cultural management across international context.

Individuals from all over the world make up global teams, and their diverse cultural backgrounds and life experiences are often overlooked by corporations. These cultural distinctions may be apparent in the way people communicate and the contexts in which they do so. Cultural differences may include the fact that in certain countries, often, employees work up to 50 hours a week. A typical day for these workers is not eight hours long, but rather a 10- or 12-hour day in which they work remotely from home. It is possible for an employee in the United States to work more than eight hours a day and to have their mobile devices switched off when they leave the workplace in England, Germany, or France. How may these disparities in work ethic affect a multinational team? It is difficult to learn about each other’s work methods and cultures when individuals are spread out across the globe (Szkudlarek et.al, 2013).

Major Fundamentals Of Culture

Additionally, due to globalisation and today’s advanced communication technology, there is a significant increase in both the number of communication channels and information sources available (such as how many e-mails people receive and therefore are expected to read daily, how many blogs are written on a given topic and the multitude of websites that write about it). A plethora of data is constantly updated and exchanged in this global cooperation environment. Due to the 24-hour nature of modern communications and information accessibility, some team members may be asleep while the information they want is up and active in another part of the world. However, the integrity and veracity of communications that typically enhance each day may grow as a result and thereby help in managing teams effectively (Szkudlarek et.al, 2013).

Understanding a culture begins with obtaining a clear understanding of its language. There are more than 3,000 languages and more than 10,000 dialects in the world today. ” As a result, the English language is used as both a commercial language and a legal language to communicate among community members (Hao et.al, 2018. When Haier buys a new firm, for instance, it has to understand the culture of the subsidiary so that Haier can retain personnel and fulfil local needs. If Haier does its research effectively and investigates the company’s culture, it will succeed. As a result of the Japanese company’s culture of “equality, reverence to seniority, and life-long employment,” maintaining Sanyo personnel proved a difficulty for Haier when it acquired Sanyo.

Religion

Religion has the potential to sabotage a business’s ability to innovate, operate, and connect with the community. The outcome will change depending on the supremacy of the fundamental rigorous necessities. Divergences across religions are a major factor in the need for global management. Teams that include members from a variety of backgrounds might benefit from having people who can act as cultural bridges. Due to the country’s “amalgamation of many religions, particularly Hinduism, Buddhism, and Islam,” marketing in a particular nation must be culturally sensitive and will get affected (Sultana et.al, 2013).

Education

Education has a significant role in our lives since it conveys important values, views, and talents to future generations, especially children. The civilizations and methods are passed on from father to son in a step-by-step manner. Educating ourselves makes us more adaptable to the content on our complaint. It gives us a new perspective on life that is intriguing. Educated people are living proof of human progress and civilization. It aids in the development of our talents and abilities (Ramsey and Lorenz, 2016). Teaching helps us grow into competent adults who are capable of preparing for our futures and enticing the precise choices that will be made for us. The predominant business language in South Africa is English, whereas the core business language in China is Chinese. There are several accents in these two cultures, and human resource managers should pay attention to them. Due to their potential to obstruct or distort a person’s comprehension of numerous concepts, they should be avoided.

Religion

Six aspects are included in the Hofstede model of culture. Independent inclinations for one set of circumstances over another define cultural aspects and separate countries (rather than people). A society’s less powerful individuals accept as well as anticipate that power is allocated unequally in this dimension. The primary question here is how a society deals with inequities amongst its members (Duden et.al, 2019). No additional reason is required by those living in communities having high levels of Power Distance for the set hierarchical order in which everyone has a position. Due to this, a society’s low index of Power Distance, individuals attempts to equalise power distribution as well as demand reason for unequal distributions of power.

Individualism, the more extreme kind of this tendency, is characterised by a penchant for a loosely woven foundation or structure of society within which people are expected to look out solely towards their own interests and with regard to that of immediate relatives. As a counterbalance to individualism, the aspect of collectivism favours a close-knit social structure within which individuals may rely upon the support of family members or members of a particular ingroup in exchange for unconditional allegiance. On this level, the way in which people define their self-image is influenced by the way society sees itself (Mockaitis et.al, 2012).

Masculinity, at the same time, is associated with a desire in society for success as well as monetary rewards. Society as a whole has become increasingly competitive in the last several decades. Defending the vulnerable and emphasising collaboration, humility, as well as compassion, Femininity is the antithesis of Masculinity. It is becoming increasingly commonplace for people to work together for the greater good. The extent to which a society’s members are uncomfortable about ambiguity as well as uncertainty is observed in the Uncertainty Avoidance dimension. To what level should we attempt to influence the future uptake or should we simply allow it to unfold as it will? (Favaretto et.al, 2016).

A country with a high level of uncertainty avoidance index has a rigorous set of beliefs and behaviours, thereby, is intolerant of anyone who do not adhere to these beliefs and values. Weak uncertainty avoidance index’s cultures have a more flexible approach toward principles, favouring practise over theory (Beugelsdijk and Welzel, 2018). In order to meet the problems of the present and the future, every civilization is required to keep some ties to its own history. These two existential aims are prioritised in various ways by different societies. Societies that do poorly in this area, for example, are more likely to adhere to long-established customs and values while harbouring a wary eye toward societal change. A more realistic approach is taken by those whose culture has a high score: they emphasise saving and hard work in contemporary schooling as a method to get ready for the future. (Short-term) normative and (long-term) pragmatic are terms used to describe this dimension in the business setting (Favaretto et.al, 2016).

Education

Most research on the influence of cultural variations on businesses have revealed that national cultures have a major effect on leadership style, communications, enthusiasm, organisational design, people’s expectations of job design, and incentives. It is true that national and organisational cultures differ in those differences between countries tend to be concentrated in values, while organisational differences tend to be concentrated in practises, but they are mutually dependent in that cultural dimensions influence organisational cultures in both a direct and an indirect manner (Dimitrov, 2018). Individual traits like self-esteem, operational effectiveness, mental wellbeing, and quality of life are directly influenced by national cultural identity, which is regarded vital. This is how the global virtual teams are highly affected due to this.

When working with individuals from different cultures, the Trompenaars model of cultural dimensions (also depicted as 7 dimensions of culture) might assist companies to do so more efficiently.

Teams are getting more diverse as business becomes more international. In context of Universalism vs. Particularism, those who live in universalism-based societies believe that all situations should be treated equally, regardless of who is involved. The regulations are more important than the connection in this situation. The United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, as well as Australia are examples of universalist civilizations. Relationships are more essential than regulations in cultures based on particularism. When it comes to family, close friends, and other significant individuals, the rules can be bent. The merits of each case must be considered individually. Latin America, Korea, China, and Russia are examples of specific cultures (Carolina, 2019).

With regard to the aspect of Individualism v Communitarism, individualistic societies believe that what happens to an individual in life is a direct result of their actions. Decision-makers in these societies are empowered to make their own decisions without consulting others. It is up to them to ensure that they are happy and fulfilled in every aspect of life. Countries with strong individualism include Canada, the United Kingdom, the United States, as well as Australia. Further, in case of neutral v affective, individuals in a neutral society are more likely to keep their feelings to themselves. Despite the fact that emotions are perceived by the individual, they remain under control. By the looks of them, these folks appear calm and collected. The Netherlands, Germany, and the United Kingdom are instances of neutral cultures. Even in the workplace, people with an emotional culture tend to express their feelings (Matijevi? et.al, 2015). Individuals in an emotional society are expected to openly express their feelings. Cultures such as those found in Italy, Spain, as well as Latin America are all examples of this kind. From the point of view of specific v diffuse, individuals in a certain society prefer to segregate their personal and professional lives. People tend to consider their personal and professional lives as intertwined in a diffuse society. In these societies, strong interpersonal connections are seen as a key to achieving goals. As a result, in these cultures, co-workers spend more time socialising outside of the workplace. These cultures are more respectful of age, status, and background than other cultures, making them more pleasant to be around. There are a number of countries that have cultures that are widely dispersed (Carolina, 2019).

Hofstede

Thereafter, in consideration to the achievement v ascription, Knowledge or talent may be used as a means of gaining prestige in an accomplishment culture. The knowledge and abilities which are reflected in a person’s job title are earned. Decisions can be challenged by anybody who has a reasonable case. U.S. and U.K. examples of culture of success include Germany and Scandinavia.

When one live in an ascription culture, the social standing is mostly determined by their personal characteristics. Only a person in a position of power over another may overturn a decision. Japan, Italy, as well as France are all good instances of societies that use ascriptions extensively. In case of Synchronous vs. sequential time, as time passes, it becomes increasingly essential in a sequential time culture. It is preferable for projects to be broken down into phases for the sake of efficiency. Because every second counts, it is crucial that each step be completed on time. Within these cultures, being late for a meeting is considered disrespectful. The United States, the United Kingdom, and Germany are illustrations of sequential time cultures. People who live in a synchronous time culture regard the past, present, and future as intertwined. When it comes to doing many tasks at the same time, time is interchangeable. Flexible plans and timelines are a result of this. This helps to explain why being on time is not as critical. Many civilizations, such as Japan and India, follow the synchronisation of their time (Matijevi? et.al, 2015).

With regard to the concept of Internal vs external direction, individuals who live in an environment characterised by a strong sense of self-direction are more likely to have a positive outlook on the future. The focus is on the individual, the group, and the organisation as a whole. These cultures place a high value on winning, and so aggressive personalities are common. This type of culture is prevalent in the U.S. and the United Kingdom as well as Australia. People with an external direction culture feel that they must collaborate with their surroundings in order to attain their objectives. Maintaining a great friendship is more essential in many cultures than winning. To attain their aims, they place a lot of importance on the external environment, such as relationships. China, Russia, and Saudi Arabia are all examples of civilizations that have a strong emphasis on external influences (McSweeney, 2016).

Therefore, this is how Trompenaar’s model affect cultural across different nations and thereby the management of operations, concept of motivation, and most importantly the global virtual teams.

Individuals from a variety of ethnic backgrounds make up a multicultural team. It is indeed worth noting that they grew up in different countries, which likely influenced their development of cultural norms, behaviour patterns, and languages (Lippert and Dulewics, 2017). Virtual multicultural teams imply that members often do not have the advantage of face-to-face interaction and communication when they are referred to be such because of the term “virtual.” Most people rely on computer-aided collaborative learning and work tools including e-mail, discussion boards, and group meetings. These are the most widely utilised and least expensive of these technologies. Due to the present level of technology, multicultural or multinational virtual teams can function successfully technologically irrespective of their worldwide dispersion, according to the current state (Jimenez et.al, 2017).

Cross-cultural communication, and consequently collaboration across virtual teams, carries a considerable level of risk. Conflicts of values or practises in the workplace can have negative, positive, or neutral effects on a person’s ability to perform their job effectively. For example, cultural differences were cited as a reason why American businesses were unable to implement management-by-objectives (a popular paradigm for management in the 1960s). An illustration highlighting cultural and perceptual disparities that exist between Turkish and Western managers can be refereed for understanding concept better (Killingsworth et.al, 2016).

Because Turkish business leaders had lower levels of individualism, but higher levels of power distance index aversion than their German-American counterparts, he found that when they formed a strategic partnership, disagreements emerged.

These are the challenges which virtual teams might face across cultural management-

Communication Issue

Communication, linguistics, information technology, and other contextual variables, as well as conflict, all have a significant influence on multicultural collaboration, as documented in a large body of study literature, and conflicts in multicultural teams are frequently the consequence of one or more of the aforementioned factors.  cultural differences make it incredibly difficult for people from different cultural backgrounds (virtual teams) to communicate effectively with one another. It is difficult to communicate effectively in cross cultural management because of the lack of pronunciations as well as extra linguistic components like gestures, anxiousness, and pitch which can be used for assertion and comparing in vocal language, as well as the utter lack of non-verbal nonverbal interactions such as expressions, gestures, and body language, which are “widely praised in face-to-face conversations.” When it comes to cross-cultural situations, “the implications of cultural variances on person’s thoughts and dispositions have been receiving attention: impact – individual’s ideas and feelings – and motivation play crucial roles.” Because everyone has their own unique method of expressing themselves, it is critical to get an appreciation for the diverse ways and values that people adhere to across the world (Klitmoller and Lauring, 2013).

Language Issue

Working in a multicultural group can present a variety of issues, the most common of which is a lack of fluency in one or more languages. A common language must be developed for the team if each member speaks a distinct dialect. In contrast to the universality of language, every culture’s understanding of location, time, body language, and other nonverbal cues varies widely.

The cultural differences in levels of language impact the link between human abilities and supporting technology, leading in a divergence of behavioural skills and variations in the efficiency of interaction (Killingsworth et.al, 2016). Language is a significant factor in multicultural teams’ ability to work together effectively, particularly in the workplace. Using English as a second language and lack of active listening throughout cross-cultural digital communication causes a number of issues, involving the use of native language meetings and courteous ways of assertion, ways of making remark back to previous messages, manners and etiquette rules, as well as the point of view of symbolic importance, which is disclosed as one of the most major challenges of cross-cultural discussion. For instance, non-native speakers may easily mistake innocuous messages (idioms, sayings, etc.) for aggressive ones (Dudin et.al, 2019).

Media Prospect

Individuals in multicultural organisations may have a hard time understanding how to utilise new media in accordance with their prevailing social media norms when new media is introduced.  Rather than changing user behaviour to the medium’s specific qualities or limits, users may modify the means to communicate to match their requirements in certain settings. Chat channels should be discouraged if the group members are not socially connected. This results in a wide range of cultural and social influences on media consumption.

Technical aspects of media can potentially be a problem, in addition to the problems outlined above. Individuals’ access to various media platforms is constrained by the group’s ability to perform specified tasks using those media platforms (Killingsworth et.al, 2016).

Various Dimensions Of Culture

Individualism vs. collectivism, as well as power distance, were all evaluated to see how they related to Hofstede’s three criteria of cross-cultural management. Digital communication is used less frequently by nations with high levels of uncertainty (fear of unknown conditions or risk avoidance) since they are not as adept at lowering the uncertainty as face-to-face and other major global virtual platforms (Morgan et.al, 2014). However, the theories of Hofstede and Trompenaars may be applied to build a specialised approach to human resource management that focuses on one or more cultures. National cultural distinctions highlighted by Trompenaars and Hampden-Turner are also helpful in assessing the elements that inspire various personnel. The most essential cultural factor here is the internal direction vs the exterior direction. While researchers commonly credit this dimension to firms and their position in the market, they emphasise that it may also describe whether a person depends on inner drive to finish tasks or requires strict external control.

Both individualistic and collectivistic cultures are affected by cross cultural management ‘s influence on normative influence. However, in individualistic societies cross cultural management substitutes face-to-face and voice interaction, and thereby decreases the overpowering effect of cross-cultural management. “As diplomats, they may benefit from their wide range of abilities.” Multicultural leaders are generally viewed as culturally neutral since they may not be burdened by the “burdens” of any one culture. They are adept at handling a wide range of scenarios, which gives them an edge in their dealings with co-workers (Crisp and Jarvenpaa, 2013).

Conflict Related Issues Within Virtual Teams

There are two types of possible conflicts which are usual in multicultural team’s while decision making process are cognitive and affective conflict, “An emotional conflict is an issue that occurs when teammates are unable to communicate effectively with one other. It is possible that despite the fact that people working closely together might cause communication problems, these issues are unconnected to the team’s objectives or activities. Affective conflicts can be caused by interpersonal conflict, different communication styles, perceptions of intensity, or personal preference based upon previous bad experiences.” Cognitive conflict occurs when two or more people have opposing views on the same issue. Cognitive tension may arise for a man who feels that the best approach in maintaining touch is to be honest, but who keeps a close colleague in the dark about the truth (Lilian, 2014). Preconceptions play an important role in emotional conflict because they oversimplify things, are difficult to adapt to new situations, and are amplified when social disputes develop between groups. In international teams, cultural differences might lead to more conflict. Because of the wide range of cultural backgrounds represented on the team, members’ views and expectations about topics like communication and interaction patterns may differ from those of the other representatives.

The recommendations can be inculcated in the form of accepting other culture, motivation of personnel through various strategies, and collaborating effectively across cross cultural management practices. Cultural differences might make it challenging to teach values and attitudes to a multicultural cross cultural management team. In order to participate in a cross-cultural dialogue, “more intense, culturally meaningful, relationship-building tactics leveraging bigger channels of contact” are needed. If one wants to lessen the negative consequences of working with people from other ethnic backgrounds, whether they are in the same firm or in a different nation, there is need to get to know their culture better and be exposed to a multitude of distinct cultures.

Ethnic collaboration also requires a strong sense of purpose. One’s own culture’s motivations may not inspire someone from a different culture. Group learning is recommended in most societies rather than working on a project on own, for example. Social engagement may be based on rules and responsibilities rather than on the desire for pleasure and enjoyment in collectivist cultures.” Recognizing these differences is crucial when working with people from different cultural backgrounds. One of the most challenging components of establishing a collaborative atmosphere is ensuring that people are motivated to work together.   Within virtual cross-cultural setting, aiding the multicultural team’s leader, administrator or trainer is a challenging role, according to several researchers in the field. Among the most significant challenges they mention include: creating facilitator assumptions, motivating participation, addressing interpersonal and intergroup tensions, and uncovering issues. When communicating with people from other cultures, it might be difficult to convey the idea that what one is saying matters. Moderators and instructors who lead ethnic teams in educational endeavours and programmes need to do their homework. In American English, for example, keywords and phrases are often found near the beginning of a paragraph. There has to be an awareness of the issue among international students, according to Wilson. There should be tasks to teach and enhance important mental processing talents if the topic justifies them. organisers.

Conclusion

One of the most exciting and effective ways to educate people how to collaborate is via the use of information communication platforms, which connect teams all over the world. Cooperative learning is challenging when group members come from different nations with different cultures, histories, and political ideologies.   A growing number of businesses have begun to deploy virtual teams in order to take full advantage of the talent that can be found across a wide range of geographic regions.   Besides team-related characteristics like trust, communication effectiveness, and cohesiveness, the study shows that companies also create a suitable atmosphere for boosting the comfort as well as motivation level of individuals working in virtual team projects. Among the most interesting and successful methods to educate people how to cooperate is via the use of information and communication technology. When members of a team originate from various countries with distinct cultures, histories, and socio-political ideas, working together can be difficult. 

References

Beugelsdijk, S. and Welzel, C., 2018. Dimensions and dynamics of national culture: Synthesizing Hofstede with Inglehart. Journal of cross-cultural psychology, 49(10), pp.1469-1505.

Carolina, ?., 2019.Dimensions Of National Culture–Cross-Cultural Theories. Studies in Business & Economics, 14(3).

Crisp, C.B. and Jarvenpaa, S.L., 2013. Swift trust in global virtual teams. Journal of personnel psychology.

Dimitrov, K., 2018. Geert Hofstede et al’s set of national cultural dimensions-popularity and criticisms. arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.02621.

Dudin, M.N., Pogrebinskaya, E.A., Sidorenko, V.N., Sukhova, E.I., Zubenko, N.Y. and Shishalova, J.S., 2019. Cross-cultural management in the system of harmonization of interests in the multi-confessional educational environment. European Journal of Science and Theology, 15(3), pp.191-199.

Favaretto, R.M., Dihl, L., Barreto, R. and Musse, S.R., 2016, September. Using group behaviors to detect hofstede cultural dimensions. In 2016 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP) (pp. 2936-2940). IEEE.

Hao, Y., Farooq, Q. and Sun, Y., 2018. Development of theoretical framework and measures for the role of social media in realizing corporate social responsibility through native and non?native communication modes: Moderating effects of cross?cultural management. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(4), pp.704-711.

Jimenez, A., Boehe, D.M., Taras, V. and Caprar, D.V., 2017. Working across boundaries: Current and future perspectives on global virtual teams. Journal of International Management, 23(4), pp.341-349.

Killingsworth, B., Xue, Y. and Liu, Y., 2016. Factors influencing knowledge sharing among global virtual teams. Team Performance Management.

Klitmøller, A. and Lauring, J., 2013. When global virtual teams share knowledge: Media richness, cultural difference and language commonality. Journal of world Business, 48(3), pp.398-406.

Lilian, S.C., 2014. Virtual teams: Opportunities and challenges for e-leaders. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 110, pp.1251-1261.

Lippert, H. and Dulewicz, V., 2017. A profile of high-performing global virtual teams. Team Performance Management: An International Journal.

Matijevi?, S., Vrdoljak Raguž, I. and Filipov??, D., 2015, October. The role of national culture in contemporary business environment. In DIEM: Dubrovnik International Economic Meeting (Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 457-469). Sveu?ilište u Dubrovniku.

McSweeney, B., 2016. Hall, hofstede, huntington, trompenaars, GLOBE: Common foundations, common flaws. In Transculturalism and Business in the BRIC States (pp. 39-84). Routledge

Mockaitis, A.I., Rose, E.L. and Zettinig, P., 2012. The power of individual cultural values in global virtual teams. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 12(2), pp.193-210.

Morgan, L., Paucar-Caceres, A. and Wright, G., 2014. Leading effective global virtual teams: The consequences of methods of communication. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 27(6), pp.607-624.

Ramsey, J.R. and Lorenz, M.P., 2016. Exploring the impact of cross-cultural management education on cultural intelligence, student satisfaction, and commitment. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 15(1), pp.79-99.

Richter, N.F., Hauff, S., Schlaegel, C., Gudergan, S., Ringle, C.M. and Gunkel, M., 2016. Using cultural archetypes in cross-cultural management studies. Journal of International Management, 22(1), pp.63-83.

Romani, L., Barmeyer, C., Primecz, H. and Pilhofer, K., 2018. Cross-cultural management studies: state of the field in the four research paradigms. International Studies of Management & Organization, 48(3), pp.247-263.

Romani, L., Mahadevan, J. and Primecz, H., 2018. Critical cross-cultural management: Outline and emerging contributions. International Studies of Management & Organization, 48(4), pp.403-418.

Sultana, M., Rashid, M., Mohiuddin, M. and Mazumder, M., 2013. Cross-cultural management and organizational performance: A content analysis perspective. Cross-Cultural Management and Organizational Performance: A Content Analysis Perspective, pp.133-146.

Szkudlarek, B., McNett, J., Romani, L. and Lane, H., 2013. The past, present, and future of cross-cultural management education: the educators’ perspective. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 12(3), pp.477-493.