The National Drug Strategic Framework In Australia Mainly Focuses To Diminish And Nipping In The Bud The Harm That Is Caused By The Intake Of Drugs Like Alcohol, tobacco, and the likely. The six sub-strategies of the drugs mentioned in this framework are alcohol, tobacco, ice, and workforce development. The Framework recognizes the national priorities of Australia concerning alcohol, tobacco, and the likely. The main purpose of this Framework is to advise the government in partnership with the service providers to tackle the harmful effects of drugs using multiple strategies (Drug Strategy in Australia, 2022). The strategies are reduction of demand, supply, and the harm from alcohol. These are the three pillars. This paper conforms to the introduction of MSIC in Sydney and its relation with this Framework and then followed it with a conclusion.
The Medically Supervised Injecting Centre (MSIC) in Sydney, Australia has proved itself as the first Supervised Injecting Facility (SIF) in the continent and the English-speaking world. It was first established in May 2001 only as a trial that was supposed to be evaluated independently. The King’s Cross area in Sydney is a ‘red-light’ area where the residents who use drugs had formerly pushed the drugs in public or in the shooting galleries which are supposedly illegal (Groves, 2018). MSIC had predominantly targeted to diminish the public health issues which had resulted from injecting drugs at a community level. When it first started its operations, within the first two years, the number of registered IDUs was 4719 and this added up to 88,324 visits to inject (Van Beek, 2003). The number of drug overdoses was 553 out of which 81% were heroin but no fatalities (Van Beek, 2003). The number of client referrals who were required further assistance were1852 out of which 44% were cases of drug dependence treatment (Van Beek, 2003). This proves the success of MSIC and its acceptance to the street-based population who were injecting the drug in this setting.
According to the Environmental Policy: Protection and Regulation, generally, a policy process has different stages which pertain to:
According to this textbook, these are stages that occur in chronological order. Firstly, the environmental groups must obtain a specific problem on the agenda which will be subject to discourse and rumination by the policymakers. Then the course of action which will suit best is jointly decided upon by the policymakers and these decisions are entirely based on the advice rendered by the specialists. The best decision is then selected relying on the advice by the specialists and then making the policy. After this, the policy is handed over to the administrators for implementation (Benson & Jordan, 2015). These are the stages of policymaking and involve different parts of the government in its process. The people who inject drugs (PWID) can inject the drugs legally in MSIC under the supervision of health professionals. In a recent study, it has been observed that the majority of the PWID have a poor level of education and thereby are not employed, have been imprisoned many times, and also have poor access to housing (Goodhew et. al., 2016). Therefore, the first stage of the policy process which pertains to the emergence of problem, in this case, pertains to the emergence of mental health problems of PWID and they suffer from mood swings, anxiety, personality, and psychotic disorders, tendency to commit suicide, high rate of trauma, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and also harms own self. The second stage pertains to agenda-setting. The entire agenda-setting of the MSIC has already been discussed in detail in the previous sections of the paper. The main agenda of the MSIC is to prevent drug overdose by letting the PWID inject the drugs legally in a supervised environment. The main purpose of the MSIC is to authorize the intake of illegal drugs under hygienic conditions of low risk. They are unlike the ‘shooting galleries’ where the PWID pay so that they can inject the drugs (Wright & Tompkins, 2004). The third stage pertains to the consideration of policy options. The Department of Health is pledged to work with services related to alcohol and drug, the people who are addicted to the consumption of alcohol and drug, and their friends and families to develop frameworks and policies that ameliorate outcomes for the PWID. The legislation issues a governing framework to build up the policies of alcohol and drug in the red-light areas which are more prone to the harmful effects of the drug intake. The service providers of alcohol and other drugs are expected to act following the Victorian legislation which includes:
The fourth stage deals with the decision-making process. The MSIC also conforms to this stage. The Victorian government has decided to extend the MSIC trial in North Richmond for 3 years more until 2023 in June. The decision was taken by the government since this policy has shown successful results and achieved the target of saving lives through a drug overdose. The policymakers along with specialists have also decided to open a second site of MSIC in Melbourne which will further aid to achieve the target (MSIC, 2020). The implementation of the MSIC had already been discussed earlier in the paper which was May 2001. The final stage is the stage of evaluation. The first evaluation report was published in 2003which covered the initial 18 months of its operation. The license for this operation was later extended and the evaluation reports of the second series were published by the government of Australia (National Centre in HIV Epidemiology and Clinical Research, 2007). Therefore, it is evident that the MSIC conforms to all the stages of a policy process.
The policy response of MSIC has been successful in achieving its target of reduction of harm and possible deaths due to drug overdoses. Many findings reiterate this fact and are listed as follows:
According to the theory proposed by Grindle and Thomas (1991), policy-making has three phases namely the agenda phase, the decision phase, and finally the implementation phase. A decision should be taken at each phase of the model which can be either for the policy or against it. For example, at the agenda phase, the decision pertaining to the policy or against it may pertain to the fact of putting the policy on the agenda or not. Similarly, in the decision phase, the policy reform may or may not conform to the agenda. And finally, in the implementation phase, the policy may be successful or a failure (Policy Models, 2022). Therefore, the policy response of MSIC in the agenda phase had put the policy on the agenda form, and in the decision phase, it was decided to form MSIC as a policy response to the National Drug Strategy and finally, in the implementation phase, the policy response of MSIC was successful.
(Policy Models, 2022)
Conclusion
The MSIC has always shown success in its policy implementation although at first, it does seem like a confronting prospect. It has successfully reduced the harmful effects caused to society from the intake of alcohol and drugs. The MSIC primarily helps the people who are in dire addiction to drugs and genuinely need assistance and are dependent for the assistance. The MSIC also reduces the harm in communities that are caused by the intake of drugs and also provides reassurance to the department of health care and most importantly, saves lives. Therefore, it can be well concluded that MSIC was a successful policy response to the National Drug Strategy.
References
Adelle, C., Jordan, A., & Turnpenny, J. (2012). Policy making. In Environmental Policy in the EU (pp. 235-252). Routledge.
Benson, D., & Jordan, A. (2015). Environmental policy: Protection and regulation. In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (pp. 778-783). Elsevier.
Drug Strategy in Australia. (2022). Drug Strategy in Australia – Alcohol and Other Drugs Knowledge Centre. Alcohol and Other Drugs Knowledge Centre. Retrieved 19 March 2022, from
https://aodknowledgecentre.ecu.edu.au/key-resources/drug-strategy-in-australia/.
Goodhew, M., Salmon, A. M., Marel, C., Mills, K. L., & Jauncey, M. (2016). Mental health among clients of the Sydney Medically Supervised Injecting Centre (MSIC). Harm reduction journal, 13(1), 1-5.
Groves, A. (2018). ‘Worth the test?’Pragmatism, pill testing and drug policy in Australia. Harm reduction journal, 15(1), 1-13. Doi: 10.1186/s12954-018-0216-z
Legislation. (2022). Legislation governing alcohol and other drug treatment. Health.vic.gov.au. Retrieved 19 March 2022, from https://www.health.vic.gov.au/aod-policy-research-legislation/legislation-governing-alcohol-and-other-drug-treatment.
MSIC. (2020). Medically supervised injecting centres saves lives. Adf.org.au. Retrieved 19 March 2022, from
https://adf.org.au/insights/medically-supervised-injecting-centres/.
National Centre in HIV Epidemiology and Clinical Research. (2007). Sydney Medically Supervised Injecting Centre Evaluation Report No. 4: evaluation of service operation and overdose?related events.
Policy Models. (2022). Policy Models | Policy NL. Policynl.ca. Retrieved 21 March 2022, from
https://www.policynl.ca/policydevelopment/pages/policymodels.html#:~:text=Kingdon%20(1984)%20suggests%20that%20policy,for%20a%20policy%20to%20emerge.
Stephanie B. & Jason G. (2014). Rapid Response Service. Rapid Response: What is the effectiveness of supervised injection services? Toronto, ON: Ontario HIV Treatment Network.
Van Beek, I. (2003). The Sydney medically supervised injecting centre: a clinical model. Journal of Drug Issues, 33(3), 625-638. https://doi.org/10.1177/002204260303300305
Wright, N. M., & Tompkins, C. N. (2004). Supervised injecting centres. Bmj, 328(7431), 100-102. doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7431.100
Essay Writing Service Features
Our Experience
No matter how complex your assignment is, we can find the right professional for your specific task. Contact Essay is an essay writing company that hires only the smartest minds to help you with your projects. Our expertise allows us to provide students with high-quality academic writing, editing & proofreading services.
Free Features
Free revision policy
$10Free bibliography & reference
$8Free title page
$8Free formatting
$8How Our Essay Writing Service Works
First, you will need to complete an order form. It's not difficult but, in case there is anything you find not to be clear, you may always call us so that we can guide you through it. On the order form, you will need to include some basic information concerning your order: subject, topic, number of pages, etc. We also encourage our clients to upload any relevant information or sources that will help.
Complete the order form
Once we have all the information and instructions that we need, we select the most suitable writer for your assignment. While everything seems to be clear, the writer, who has complete knowledge of the subject, may need clarification from you. It is at that point that you would receive a call or email from us.
Writer’s assignment
As soon as the writer has finished, it will be delivered both to the website and to your email address so that you will not miss it. If your deadline is close at hand, we will place a call to you to make sure that you receive the paper on time.
Completing the order and download
