Does MMR vaccination increase risk of Autism? |
Source of information |
Type of information |
Centre of Disease control and prevention (cdc.gov) |
MMR vaccine Safety |
vk.ovg.ox.ac.uk |
MMR Vaccine |
www.immunize.org |
MMR and Autism |
www.immunise.health.gov.au/ |
National Immunization Program |
UTS Library |
Peer reviewed Journals |
Google Scholar |
Peer reviewed Journals |
Keyword |
Search term for Boolean ‘or” |
1 MMR Vaccine |
MMR Immunization |
2 Autism |
|
3 Vaccine Safety |
Immunization Safety |
4 Immunization Safety |
Vaccine Safety |
5 Vaccine and Autism |
Immunization and Autism Spectrum Disorder |
Additional search strategy can include the keywords “vaccination and autism”; AUTISM and MMR Vaccination” and “risks of MMR Vaccination”.
Full reference: |
Taylor, L.E., Swerdfeger, A.L. and Eslick, G.D., 2014. Vaccines are not associated with autism: an evidence-based meta-analysis of case-control and cohort studies. Vaccine, 32(29), pp.3623-3629. Access via https://ac-els-cdn-com.access.library.unisa.edu.au/S0264410X14006367/1-s2.0-S0264410X14006367-main.pdf?_tid=0faa94de-0985-11e8-a381-00000aab0f01&acdnat=1517732953_c2e06dba46682bf164edc03782248b99 |
Search strategy |
Search was done using the following keywords: Vaccine, Vaccination, Immunisation, Autism, Autism spectrum disorder, Thimerosal and Mercury. |
Inclusion/exclusion criteria |
Inclusion Criteria: Retrospective and prospective cohort studies that studies the relation between vaccination and autism spectrum disorder; studies that looked at MMR vaccination or cumulative mercury (Hg) or cumulative thimerosal dosage Exclusion Criteria: Studies that involved participants selected solely from Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) in the United States; |
Issue (what was being studied) |
The author studied the possibility of a link between vaccination in early childhood and the development of Autism. |
Context (study setting) |
The authors analysed scientific literature on the topic through Systematic Reviews and Meta Analysis (PRISMA) to summarize available evidence from case control and cohort studies on the topic. |
Outcome (main findings) |
· The cohort data showed no relation between vaccination and autism. · No relation between Autism and MMR vaccination was found · No relation between Autism and thimerosal or Mercury doses · Components of MMR, mercury or themerosal are not related to the development of ASD. |
Full reference |
Jefferson, T., Price, D., Demicheli, V., Bianco, E. and European Research Program for Improved Vaccine Safety Surveillance (EUSAFEVAC) Project, 2003. Unintended events following immunization with MMR: a systematic review. Vaccine, 21(25-26), pp.3954-3960. Access via ScienceDirect Journals (Available from 1995 volume: 13) |
Search strategy |
Keywords were not outlined by the authors. The authors used a specialized search strategy guided by an information specialist and tried to identify all studies between 1969 to 2003, that had prospective or retrospective studies on healthy individuals till the age of 15 years. Search was done on: Cochrane Control Register of Controlled Trials; Cochrane Database of Systematic Review; NHS Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects; MEDLINE and Biological Abstracts from 1985 and EMBASE and the Science Citation Index from 1974. |
Inclusion/exclusion criteria |
Inclusion criteria: Studies done or published between 1969-2003 on healthy individuals upto the age of 15 years in comparative prospective or retrospective studies; Randomised control trials and clinical trials on vaccines for case control, case-crossover, cohort, ecological, time series and case only design studies. Exclusion criteria: Studies that did not meet the inclusion criteria were excluded. |
Issue (what was being studied) |
The authors studied the evidences for unintended effects (beneficial or harmful) related with MMR vaccination, and how the information can be applicable in the safety evaluation of vaccination. |
Context (study setting) |
The Authors carried out a systematic review of literature |
Outcome (main findings) |
MMR vaccination was found to be related to different types of outcomes: · Lower incidence of upper respiratory tract iunfection · Higher risk of irritability · Possible association with benign thrombocytopenic purpura (TP), parotitis, joint and limb complaints and aseptic meningitis · Relation with Crohn’s disease, Autism and Ulcerative colitis is unlikely · Adverse effect of MMR vaccination cannot be separated from its role in the prevention of target diseases. |
Table 3: Experimental quantitative studies
Full reference: |
Prymula, R., Bergsaker, M.R., Esposito, S., Gothefors, L., Man, S., Snegova, N., Štefkovi?ova, M., Usonis, V., Wysocki, J., Douha, M. and Vassilev, V., 2014. Protection against varicella with two doses of combined measles-mumps-rubella-varicella vaccine versus one dose of monovalent varicella vaccine: a multicentre, observer-blind, randomised, controlled trial. The Lancet, 383(9925), pp.1313-1324. Full text available via Elsevier ScienceDirect (Available from 07/01/1995 volume: 345 issue: 8941) |
Study Design (e.g.: cohort, RCT,) |
The authors performed randomised controlled trials on healthy children between 12 to 22 months. |
Population (how many participants, age, gender, disease, etc) |
Number of participants: 5803 Nationalities: Czech Republic, Greece, Italy, Lithuania, Norway, Poland, Romania, Russia, Slovakia and Sweden Age: 12-22 months Gender: Both male and Female Disease: None |
Intervention (what was being implemented) |
· Two doses of MMRV (MMRV group) or · One dose of MMR and two doses of monovalent varricella (MMR+V group) · Two doses of MMR (MMR group- control) |
Comparison (was the intervention being compared to another strategy, e.g. placebo?) |
The trial was randomised in three groups in the ratio of 3:3:1, where the control group was included in the ratio of 1. This control group (MMR) was then compared with the other two groups studied: MMRV and MMR+V. |
Outcome (main findings) |
Optimum protection from all types of varicella disease can be ensured with a two dose varicella vaccine on a short course. · Efficacy of one dose vaccine was estimated to be 88.8 to 94.4% · Efficacy of two dose vaccine was estimated to be 98.3% |
Table 4: Qualitative study
Full reference |
Guillaume, L.R. and Bath, P.A., 2004. The impact of health scares on parents’ information needs and preferred information sources: a case study of the MMR vaccine scare. Health Informatics Journal, 10(1), pp.5-22. Full text available via SAGE (Available from 1999 volume: 5 issue: 1) |
Study Design (ie: cohort) |
The authors conducted a qualitative study, using interviews and a port-positivist methodology. An inductive approach of data analysis was incorporated for the analysis of data based on which observations or theories were developed. The selected cohort comprised of 17 participants who were parents of children below 5 years of age, selected from community based child care organisations. |
Population (how many participants, age, gender, disease, etc) |
Number of participants: 17 Age: Variable Gender: 16 females and 1 male Disease: None |
Issue (what was being studied) |
The authors tried to study the scare regarding MMR vaccine and its impact on the parents of young children and their need for proper information regarding the vaccines. |
Context (study setting) |
The study performed a qualitative analysis using semi structured interviews with the participants in Schiffeild, UK. The paents were selected from community based child care organisations. |
Outcome (main findings) |
· Increased need of information by the parents because of the vaccine scare · Lack of trust on traditional sources of information · Trustworthiness of an information source is considered as an important factor by the parents · Large scale quantitative study is required for further understanding of the vaccine scare among parents. · Mistrust of the parents on the government and information provided by them · A common feeling among parents that the relevant information might be biased |
The studies above provide significant information regarding the concerns about immunization safety and the assumed relation between vaccination and autism. Several studies refuted the links between vaccinations (with MMR) with autism spectrum disorders. Taylor et al., (2014) pointed out that there was no significant relation between vaccination and autism, and neither are any of the components of MMR, thimerosal or mercury doses are linked to the incidence of Autism Spectrum Disorder. This can be a significant knowledge for the parents, as it can help to refute the notion about the possibility of autism being caused due to these vaccinations.
Studies by Jefferson et al., (2003), also supported the same findings, that autism and vaccination were not related. Their studies also found no relation between vaccination and Crohn’s disease, thereby refuting the notion of autism or any other mental health condition being created due to vaccination. However, the study did show certain risks for irritable syndrome and benign thrombocytopenic purpura (TP). Such an aspect is very crucial, as it can help the parent to understand the possible adverse effects of the vaccination and being able to differentiate real risks from the perceived ones.
Guillaume and Bath (2004) studied the vaccine scare of the parents of children, due to which they were reluctant to immunize their children. The study showed a lack of trust on traditional and government based sources of information, due to which it was difficult to believe the information provided by them. The media firestorm that initiated due to the publication by Andrew Wakefeild in 1998 that showed the incidence of autism in 8 patients after being administered MMR vaccination as the main contributor of the fear of vaccination (Offit, 2015). Even though the original paper was retracted by Lancet (the publisher), the widespread fear still exists among the parents. Studies by Jain et al., (2015) also provided a compelling evidence by studying the incidence of autism due to vaccination among children with older siblings already diagnosed with autism (thereby placing the selected children in a high risk group for autism spectrum disorders) and found no correlation between vaccination and the risk of developing autism. Furthermore, mercury exposure due to preservative thimerosal does not have a causal relationship with autism in children (Schultz, 2010). Any relation between thimerosal and autism were refuted by other studies as well (Nelson & Bauman, 2003). Even the number and timing of the vaccination did not show any correlation with the development of Autism. Due to the initial scare caused by the studies that incorrectly hypothesized a relation between vaccination and autism, it was harder to convince them, as it lead to them developing a critical mindset about the validity of traditional sources of information (Offit, 2015). Moreover, Immunize.org lists more than 25 peer reviewed articles, all of which refutes the connection between MMR vaccination and Autism.
Such findings can help to raise the awareness of the parents about the most relevant findings on this topic and also help to develop trust on the source of information. The parents can be made aware of the various studies that found no relation between vaccination and autism, even among children considered at high risk. Moreover, it is important to clarify the initial mistake that lead to the incorrect assumption of vaccine to be causally related to autism. It is also important that the fears of the parents be properly addressed regarding vaccination. An effective strategy to convince the parents to vaccinate their children with MMR is to make them understand the burden of diseases like Measles, which can be prevented with MMR vaccination. Mindset of individuals about vaccination can also be changed by displaying pictures that portray the adverse health complications related to these diseases (Nyhan et al., 2014; Sciencemag.org, 2018). It is also important that the physicians are able to identify parents who have decieded not to vaccinate their children and those who are undecisive about it. It can be inferred that convincing the undecisive parents might be easier than undecisive parents (Sciencemag.org, 2018).
Several parents additionally had negative views on the pharmaceutical industry due to which their trust on vaccines are limited. Lewandowsky et al., (2013) also proposed that a free market ideology is a strong predictor of antivaccine sentiments, and many people oppose vaccination on the grounds that it infringes upon the rights of the patient. A shockingly high correlation exists between vaccine rejection and conspiratorial thinking. All of which further reduces their trust on the healthcare systems (Sciencemag.org, 2018).
During the discussion with parents or pregnant women regarding the vaccination of the children, the following aspects can be focused on:
References:
DeStefano, F., Price, C. S., & Weintraub, E. S. (2014). Increasing Exposure to Antibody-Stimulating Proteins and Polysaccharides in Vaccines Is Not Associated with Risk of Autism. Pediatria Polska, 89(5), T31-T38.Immunize.org (2018). MMR Vaccine Does Not Cause Autism Examine the evidence!. [online] Immunize.org. Available at: https://www.immunize.org/catg.d/p4026.pdf [Accessed 27 Mar. 2018]
Guillaume, L. R., & Bath, P. A. (2004). The impact of health scares on parents’ information needs and preferred information sources: a case study of the MMR vaccine scare. Health Informatics Journal, 10(1), 5-22.
Jain, A., Marshall, J., Buikema, A., Bancroft, T., Kelly, J. P., & Newschaffer, C. J. (2015). Autism occurrence by MMR vaccine status among US children with older siblings with and without autism. Jama, 313(15), 1534-1540..
Jefferson, T., Price, D., Demicheli, V., Bianco, E., & European Research Program for Improved Vaccine Safety Surveillance (EUSAFEVAC) Project. (2003). Unintended events following immunization with MMR: a systematic review. Vaccine, 21(25-26), 3954-3960.
Lewandowsky, S., Gignac, G. E., & Oberauer, K. (2013). The role of conspiracist ideation and worldviews in predicting rejection of science. PloS one, 8(10), e75637.
Nelson, K. B., & Bauman, M. L. (2003). Thimerosal and autism?. Pediatrics, 111(3), 674-679.
Nyhan, B., Reifler, J., Richey, S., & Freed, G. L. (2014). Effective messages in vaccine promotion: a randomized trial. Pediatrics, 133(4), e835-e842.
Offit, P. A. (2015). Vaccines and autism in primate model. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(40), 12236-12237.
Prymula, R., Bergsaker, M. R., Esposito, S., Gothefors, L., Man, S., Snegova, N., … & Vassilev, V. (2014). Protection against varicella with two doses of combined measles-mumps-rubella-varicella vaccine versus one dose of monovalent varicella vaccine: a multicentre, observer-blind, randomised, controlled trial. The Lancet, 383(9925), 1313-1324.
Sciencemag.org (2018). Can skeptical parents be persuaded to vaccinate?. [online] Science | AAAS. Available at: https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2017/04/can-skeptical-parents-be-persuaded-vaccinate [Accessed 27 Mar. 2018].
Taylor, L. E., Swerdfeger, A. L., & Eslick, G. D. (2014). Vaccines are not associated with autism: an evidence-based meta-analysis of case-control and cohort studies. Vaccine, 32(29), 3623-3629.
Essay Writing Service Features
Our Experience
No matter how complex your assignment is, we can find the right professional for your specific task. Contact Essay is an essay writing company that hires only the smartest minds to help you with your projects. Our expertise allows us to provide students with high-quality academic writing, editing & proofreading services.Free Features
Free revision policy
$10Free bibliography & reference
$8Free title page
$8Free formatting
$8How Our Essay Writing Service Works
First, you will need to complete an order form. It's not difficult but, in case there is anything you find not to be clear, you may always call us so that we can guide you through it. On the order form, you will need to include some basic information concerning your order: subject, topic, number of pages, etc. We also encourage our clients to upload any relevant information or sources that will help.
Complete the order formOnce we have all the information and instructions that we need, we select the most suitable writer for your assignment. While everything seems to be clear, the writer, who has complete knowledge of the subject, may need clarification from you. It is at that point that you would receive a call or email from us.
Writer’s assignmentAs soon as the writer has finished, it will be delivered both to the website and to your email address so that you will not miss it. If your deadline is close at hand, we will place a call to you to make sure that you receive the paper on time.
Completing the order and download