Explain Microeconomics Analysis?
In a Euclidean space, the study of the powerful system called as theories of Equilibrium. Critical objects related to these are belongs to the stable system of the equilibrium and the study of such theories provides an answers to the various questions related with stability, number of equilibrium, existence and noticing the space of parameter example: Evolutionary Games. Besides all its impact, the formation and existence of the theories has increases the scope and use of the subject “Math”. In addition, the studies of the statistics are useful to solve the issues of number of equilibriums and its existence that uses the variety of the topology of algebra. In the middle of century 20’s, the approach of geometry follows for the two theories of social study. It involves the variety of games theory and the equilibrium theory in general. The main concept of the economics is allocation of various effective resources that relates with the theory of the general equilibrium (Balasko,1978). A market consists of agents and every agent having endowments in their starting stage and relate with the binary preferences over the commodities. They only involves in performing trade to satisfy the demand of the commodities. In return they earn price and use it on availing the commodities those satisfy their needs. At the time of given prices, starting endowments finds out the budget of the agents, that remains constraint. The equilibrium of the market is an involvement of the starting endowments that will enhance the preferences of the various agents as per the limited budget available (Lemke and Howson, 1964.).
The origin of the general equilibrium theory was found in the 19th century when the base of an economic theory such as neo classic found by Walras. The major consideration of this is the allocation of commodities and resources effectively. There are two categories of commodities such as agent’s desires to get the commodities and they are scarcely available. As per the preferences of the individuals and their starting endowments with which they want to do trading and agents generates the demand of the consumption of commodities in bundles. Demand of the commodity and its scarcity leads to set the charges of the exchange of commodities. These rates of exchange of commodities expresses in the theory of price (Bénassy, 1986).
At the available prices, starting endowments are available in the terms of the money that tries to find the wealth of the agents. Relate to their wealth, each agent wants to enhance their preferences within the constraint of budget. A pair of prices of commodities and endowments depleted i.e. total endowments equals to the total demand of agent known as Walrasian equilibrium. Effective use of all resources considers as the no waste and try allocate them to enhance the utilities of the individuals is the major concern of the Walras equilibrium.After one century later, it was assumed that both the formulations are important especially formation of the preferable relations (McKenzie, 1959). The walrasian equilibrium is the concept of the literature and results in a competitive result in the form of paradigm of allocation of resources.
In this preliminary of history, follow by the model of the exchange economies called as no production with the complete markets defined by the Arrow and Debreu in 1954 (AD). This model was successfully summaries and established. Exchange economics are relate with the commodities as K< ∞ and with defined set of agents refer as N (Arrow and Debreu,1954).
A vector x n ∈Rk represents the consumption of the “n” agent and the negative quantities are term as representation of debts. A vector ω n ∈ R k denotes the starting endowment of an agent “n”. The space of endowments is Ω = (R k) N. In the games, consumption of individuals in bundles may belong to the dimensional spaces at lower level. However, agents may be interested in consuming the different commodities in bundles (Codenotti, Saberiy, Varadarajanz and Ye, 2005). The space of consumption is embedding systematically in the Euclidean space for the sake of simplicity. A preference of every agent represents by the binary relation ≤ n over R k. This relation known as preordering linear that is transitive, reflexive and total continuing, strict and monotonic convex. It is assumes that any such preference represents by only continuous and strict concave function in utility i.e. u n: R k → R.
Walras formed the concept of equilibrium and he discarded from the existed issues. He still has to give an idea of interaction about the prices of the commodities in the market. He brought the mechanism that was a game among the players of the market and plays against the auctioneer. Such players called as fictitious players having the sense of invisibility hand of the market (Demichelis and Germano,2001). It is clear through the details of the mechanism of tatonnement and found in UZ. Roughly WEE is the set of points of the system that is stable and dynamic shows as P=Z(P). Let all the prices of the commodities get normal to the K-1a nd considers all the below mechanism.
The auctioneer announce the vector of price, Every agent announce f n (p,p·ω n )−∑ω n;
Also, announce the vector of new price γ(p) where;
(Source: David Echeverry Beneficiario,2007)
The above formulates the existence of the problem and provides the solution for γ(p)= p uses the theorem of fixed point through browser and gives a benefit to normal the prices of the commodities to the compact space (Border, 1985). The stable points of the powerful system being specifically equilibrium of walras (γ(p) = p if and only if Ë™ γ(p) = 0), it leads and shows equilibrium. It is clear from the above that the mechanism totally depends on the neutral demand combined an agent or no such agent available in the market. A mechanism explains the work of the market that is yet to give.
Model by Arrow and Devreu formulated there only where the commodities space is in finite numbers or in infinite dimension. It is clear through the model that how the various techniques are involved in giving the solution of the model having finite dimensions can extend towards the infinite dimension (Echeverry, Geometr´ ıa,2005). Let the details about this are describe with the help of a manifold by Euclidean. A different manifold X with a n dimension is the subset of the Euclidean space that is diffeomorphic at local level represents as Rn. The derivative of such parametrisation another name of diffeomorphic around the point x∈X states the transformation in linear form whose image reflects like a tangent plane as x, T x (X) (Kehoe, 1995).
It is describes by taking an example of theorem: assume X and Y are the manifolds with the dimensions of K and L where K>L; Let F= X->Y be as submersion with X. So, existed parametrisations x =φ(x 1 ,…,x k ) and f(x)=ψ(x 1 ,…,x l ) around x and f(x) such that f(x 1 ,…,x k )=(x 1 ,…,x l ). Else, in another way, f is same to the submersion canonically (x 1 ,…,x l ,…,x k ) 7→ (x 1 ,…,x l ).
It says that x is a single point of f if f is not the submersion at local level in x and y ∈Y is a regular value of f it is not the reflection of the f as singular point (Debreu, 1970).
The manifold of equilibrium is diffeomorphic to Ω=R k(]N), it shows one of the theorem proves the structure. The endowments space is R k(]N) that states WEE is diffeomorphic to the endowment space (Giraud, 2003.).
A below theorem shows the degree of topology and the number of equilibrium. If a regular ω exist then a isomorphism of finite dimension is dπ (p,ω) represents as an invertible matrix. A degree of a browser defined as –
deg (π,ω) = ∑ sign |dπ (p,ω) |
(p,ω)∈π −1 (ω)
It is constant connected with different components of WEE. Thus, it is defined deg C (f) connected over components as the domain C
Theorem: Let X and Y are the manifolds having identical dimensions but without boundaries. With it at the same time, X get connect and let f= X-> Y work as proper function. If deg X (f) ≠ 0; it follows f is surjective. X is connect and defines the deg X (f). Being a proper function, it defines ∑ sign |d f x | for a given Y. Now, if f is not consider as surjective then y∈Y exist, such as f −1 (y)= / 0 and ∑ x∈f −1 (y) sign |d f x | = 0. It proves that the vector of the price is connects with the pareto optimum which is found unique and different. It is connect with the restrictions of π to T as a bijection and diffeomorphism (Ghosal & Polemarchakis, 1994). With the conditions of the demand functions, it proves that pareto optima are the allocations of equilibrium at regular level. Hence, the outcome is deg P (π) = 1. The pareto optimum founds unique and yields that d ω (π) is consider as 1 or minus 1 at ω ∈ P. It all depends on the chosen coordinates for the manifold. Regarding this, a positive orientation can always be chose to give the guarantee of degree C (π) =1; where c is the component that connects with P though, p not use here but proves as a component of WEE. It leaves to enhance the result of the complete manifold (Guillemin and Pollack, 2000).
A given finite number of players refer as N and there are strategies involve a set of S n of k n ∈ N and players refer as n ∈ N chosen from this. All strategies are of different size. So, we will take every size of strategy in our consideration embedded in R k where k = max {k n | n ∈ N}. a profile of each strategy is connected with the vector RN whose manages to pay the payout to every player. Thus, it defines the game normally as parameterized through its structure of payout represents as Γ = R S for S = ∏ n∈N Sn. To continue the random strategy or play a different strategy with a equal distribution. This strategy will consider as n for a player to be a vector σ n ∈ Σn:= ∆(R k), the simplicity of the distributional probability i.e. over R k. A pure strategy Sn for player n can recognize to a unit of vector (Hurwicz, 2011). A profile of strategy is a component i.e. σ = (σ 1 ,…,σ N )∈Σ:= (∆(R k )) N. All profits of mixed strategies are pays off with a hull S in shape of convex. However, they try not to span the hull in the shape of convex, since no players connect themselves with the mixed strategies. Therefore, they cannot reach all combinations in the form of convex. Thus, a subset of finite number of dimension of Euclidean space is Γ. In a game of non-cooperation, players try to find out their own actions but do not want to affect the other players. They only want to solve the optimization issues because solutions are the main concept of the game theory that is Nash Equilibrium (Kohlberg and Mertens,2001. ).
Let π defines as the constraint given to the natural projects Π: Γ×Σ→Γ to NE. The structure of the set of equilibrium describes clearly with the help of a theorem.
NE is a homeomorphic to Γ shows with the help of below diagram.
This theorem shows and proves that NE and Γ are indifferent topologies those are undistinguishable. It is because of the homeomorphic called as bijection. Here, the theory states the equilibrium’s existence (Koray, 2000.). The result of the latter proves by John Nash in 1950. Use the theorem of the fixed point as a continuous function for defining the correspondence reply. It is proved that Γ n is a set of S n ×S−n pay off matrices as G s,tn which shall be as
It decomposes the game into a residual and the sum part as zero. It defines as a pure strategy s n ∈ S n
The above value is continuously on E that shows the continuity of the function describes by
It finally shows that Z is invertible and it continues as inverse. Lets define this, v n = min {α ∈ R : ∑ s∈Sn (z ns −α) + ≤ 1} as a equilibrium payoff of player 1. Since the number of finite number of strategies and the function of payoff represents by the function in a linear form. This theorem shows all possibilities to set the dimensional spaces in finite numbers and depends heavily on the structure in the form of linear to payoff. An extension of the theorem uses to pay off the non-linear functions and will shows below (Myerson, 1999).
The constraint type of framework has been considered for the set of strategy to define the combinations of the convex of finite number of points as Γ. S ⊂ R n is given such as ≠S ≤ n, mappings like S->R represent by the function in a linear form as Rn. . The time when restriction like polyhedral impose on strategies the only connect with the functions performs to payoff in the linear forms. Structure known as Polyhedral is essential assumption as a proof of the theorem’s structure (Predtetchinski ,2006.). A huge class of functions relate with payoffs consider as a topology of space such as complexity gain by the functions. A set of strategies are not called as polyhedral. It is consider as compact and convex set as X n ⊂ R k instead of ≠S n <∞. Now, a set of continuous and concave functions of player perform differently as Γ n as own strategy.
It is assumed that this equation Γ = ∏ n∈N Γ n relate with the open technology in compact form as C1. It is find out by the sets like {u n ∈ Γ n | u n (x) ∈ E and du n (x n ,n −n ) ∈ E’ ∀x ∈C}
For open sets is E ⊆ R, E’ ⊆ R and closed one is as C ⊆ R k
The graphs represents the correspondence of the Nash is the set of point as NE. Points involves are (g,σ)∈Γ×X; where,
σ is a game’s equilibrium of Nash.
It describes the different and unique concepts of the topology with the help of the theorem. Let a compress manifold show as M ⊆ R m and a soft field of vector represents as W on M with an inaccessible zero. It shows by all the points available at the boundary or an outward. The sum ∑ι indices at zero level of W equal to the Euler (Gale, 1955).
ξ(M) =m∑i=0 (−1) i rank H i (M),
where; Hi (M) as ith group of homology of M. This result in the unique topology in the depth, though it is not reach towards the index concept. It is describe in the same way like mapping to the fields of vector. The statement mentioned below help in establishing the relation in between it and the degree of a browser as defined above in a same way.
Lemma: Index of w at a same level zero as x ∈ M is 1 or -1 as per the determinant of dw x in the form of negative and positive.
After hundred years of general theory of equilibrium, Theory of game was developed. Then in a competitive situation, examination had done of a rationale choice through the theory of general equilibrium. The need arouse for initiating an analysis to the framework goes out of the boundary of a structure of prices and commodities. All major contributions are made by the concepts of Von Neumann, Cournot, Borel and Morgenstern like strategy and its independence with expectation of maximization (Svensson, 2003.). Reformulation of Von Neumann in the form of games plays normally and his existence of result describes about the theory of game as study in present times. He shows all the scope of this element for analyzing the cooperative situation in the structure of the games such as non-co-operative. The path of this games theory runs normal helps in taking decisions rationally by the distance maintain from the set of the game theory in general.
A relationship builds up in between an effective allocation and the optimum strategy describe with the proper understanding of it and had been arrived by the equilibrium of the Nash and the market. The mechanism of the market seen through mapping of actions taken from trade to price of the commodities where, mapping is consider as a institute that makes the new relations. The main question arises that how the mechanism of the market implement like a equilibrium of the game of a connected market (Nash, 1950). Sometimes, it shows all negative outcomes of certain allocations by following the non-cooperative games. Later, all the results are aim with the conditions available at limited game mechanism so that the outcome of the Nash is effective. However, a general effective allocation is strategic response. There is less effective equilibrium of Nash. Example the presence of Nash equilibrium is in form of generic.
There are two main approaches for the games of strategic market-
The aim of giving the mechanism of such market is without the availability of a auctioneer. Suppose, commodity relate with K and the previous one is use as the regular numeraire. Every commodity trade as j=1,…,k−1 that shows it against the money at the post trading jth. A strategy of the player involves a pair of (q n j ,b n j ) ∈ R 2 + shows the player as n and offer him a commodity as j and does bidding for the unit of the commodity (Shapley & Shubik, 1972.). The strategies followed in this area use as the signals. The credit impose on such signals shows the normal constraints at the time of offer the commodity as q n ≤ ω n. it is consider as a initial endowment for the n player and refer as ∑j=1k-1 bnj ≤ ωkn at the time of bid. Player name as n with the set of his strategy is –
With the purpose of post working in the trade, the supply of money available at the time of post trading as jth ahs the equality in the prices of the commodities by j times as the aggregate supply of the commodities. It shows the price of the commodity as j stated by-
By sum up all the assumptions x/0=0. All the player’s allocation at final level is-
So, the final balance of the available money is-
This model emphasis the auctioneer to turn into k trade like post administrators. However, most of the limitations are there with this model and in the market, where the object for exchanging are same as there is no natural numeraire Uzawa, 2010). If a post for trading is consider for doing the trade of commodity i against the another commodity j. so the liberal post of trading as i and j may lead to inconsistent type of price as p ij p ji 6 not equals to 1.
Behavior of taking prices is the main assumption for the effective equilibrium of Nash in the framework of a general equilibrium. When the agent influences the strategies increases the prices of the commodity taken into the main consideration (Todd, 1970). A space of uniform agents will enhance the expected results. It is consider as the property of a price of an individual commodity having the power to bring necessary changes results in slowing down the number or strength of agents. This type of corresponds shows the core of an economy.
A game involves atleast two players parametrised through the A and B matrices for paying off the players. These payoffs represents as I and II respectively. I follow different and various strategies and II has many, these matrices have different dimensions n X m. It notices that Nash equilibrium computed same as computing the LCP1. It represents as non- negative w not equal to 0 and non-negative is Z.
Such that –
Hw+z = 1;
w T z = 0,
where;
The concept of the equilibrium of Nash changes the thoughts of the individuals for economics. It is not only the outcomes those are openly used and developed in such shape where the interaction procedure is constructed or modeled and understands the behavior of humans. In relation with a economic theory considering the general equilibrium with an interest in forming the prices of the commodities (Debreu, 1951). A theory of general equilibrium mentions the points of a system that is powerful and does not describe the mechanism establishing the different prices. It shows the multiplicity of the prices and a theory of a game seems to give an answer describing that how hands those are not visible works with the refinement of the Walras equilibrium. A different approach is followed in both the case. In the mapping of a constant zero, a natural projection with a degree at topology helps in studying and understanding the presence of equilibrium (Minelli & Polemarchakis, 1995).
Arrow. KJ and Debreu. G,1954. “Existence of an equilibrium for a competitive economy”. Econometrica. Vol. 22. pp. 265-290.
Balasko. Y,1978. “Economic equilibrium and catastrophe theory:an introduction”. Econometrica, Vol. 46, No. 3. May .
Bénassy. JP, 1986. “On Competitive Market Mechanisms”. Economet-rica, Vol. 54, No. 1, pp. 95-108. Jan.
Border.K, 1985. “Fixed points theorems with applications to Economics and Game theory”. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.
Codenotti. B, Saberiy. A, Varadarajanz. K and Ye. Y, 2005. “Leon-tief Economies Encode Nonzero Sum Two-Player Games. Elec-tronic Colloquium on Computational Complexity, Report No.5.
Debreu. G, 1951. “The coefficient of resource utilization”. Econometrica. 19. 273–292.
Debreu. G, 1970. “Economies with a finite set of equilibria”. Econometrica. 38. 387–392
Demichelis. S and Germano. F,2001 .“On the Indices of Zeros of Nash Fields”. Journal of Economic Theory, Vol. 94, pp. 192-217.
Echeverry. D, Geometr´ ıa,2005. “de la variedad de equilibrio: de laseconom´ ıas finitas a las infinitas”. Bogotá: Uniandes.
Gale. D, 1955. “The Law of supply and demand”. Mathematics Scandinavica,3.155-169
Giraud. G, 2003. “Strategic market games: an introduction”. Journal of Mathematical Economics 39 355-375.
Ghosal. S & Polemarchakis. HM, 1994. “Exchange and optimality”. Discussion Paper no. 9472. CORE. Universite´ Catholique de Louvain. Belgium.
Guillemin.V and Pollack. A, 2000. “Differential topology”. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall. c1974.
Hurwicz. L, 2011. “On Allocations Attainable through Nash Equili-bria”. Journal of Economic Theory, 21: 140-165.
Kehoe .T, 1995. “The Existence, stability and the uniqueness of Economic Equilibria”. Presented at the school celebration at Yale.
Kohlberg. E and Mertens. JF,2001. “On the Strategic Stability of Equilibria”. Econometrica, Vol. 54. No. 5. pp. 1003-1037.
Koray. S, 2000. “Self-selective social functions verify Arrow and Gibbard-Satterthwaite theorems”. Econometrica, 68: 981-996.
Lemke.CE and Howson. JT, 1964. “Equilibrium points of Bitmatrix Games”. SIAM j.Appl.Math. 12, 413-423.
McKenzie. L, 1954. “Equilibrium in Graham’s model” . Econometrica. 22, 147–161.
McKenzie. L, 1959. “On the existence of general equilibrium for a competitive market”. Econometrica. 27. 54–71
Minelli. E & Polemarchakis. HM, 1995. “Information at a competitive equilibrium”. Discussion Paper No. 9584, CORE. Universite´ Catholique de Louvain. Louvain la Neuve. Belgium.
Myerson. R, 1999. “Nash equilibrium and the history of economic theory”. Journal of Economic Literature, 36: 1067-1082.
Nash. J, 1950. “Equilibrium points in n-person games”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA). 36, 48–49.
Pigou. AC, 1947. “A Study in Public Finance”. London: Macmillan.
Predtetchinski. A,2006. “A General Structure Theorem for the Nash Equilibrium Correspondence”. Maastricht University Research Memoranda. 010. Feb.
Shapley. L & Shubik. M, 1972. “Trade using one commodity as means of payment”. Journal of Political Economy. 85. 937–968
Svensson. LG, 2003. “Nash Implementation of Competitive Equilibria in a Model with Indivisible commodities”. Econometrica. Vol. 59, No. 3, pp. 869-877. May.
Todd. M, 1970. “A Note on computing Equillibria in Economics with Activity analysis Models of Production”. Journal of Mathematical economics, 6. 135-144.
Uzawa. H, 2010. “Walras’ Tâtonnement in the Theory of Exchange”.The Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 27. No. 3. pp. 182-194.June.
Walras. L, 1950. “Ele´ments d’Economie Politique Pure”. Paris: Pichon et DurandAuzias.
Essay Writing Service Features
Our Experience
No matter how complex your assignment is, we can find the right professional for your specific task. Contact Essay is an essay writing company that hires only the smartest minds to help you with your projects. Our expertise allows us to provide students with high-quality academic writing, editing & proofreading services.
Free Features
Free revision policy
$10Free bibliography & reference
$8Free title page
$8Free formatting
$8How Our Essay Writing Service Works
First, you will need to complete an order form. It's not difficult but, in case there is anything you find not to be clear, you may always call us so that we can guide you through it. On the order form, you will need to include some basic information concerning your order: subject, topic, number of pages, etc. We also encourage our clients to upload any relevant information or sources that will help.
Complete the order form
Once we have all the information and instructions that we need, we select the most suitable writer for your assignment. While everything seems to be clear, the writer, who has complete knowledge of the subject, may need clarification from you. It is at that point that you would receive a call or email from us.
Writer’s assignment
As soon as the writer has finished, it will be delivered both to the website and to your email address so that you will not miss it. If your deadline is close at hand, we will place a call to you to make sure that you receive the paper on time.
Completing the order and download