Nvidia’s Strategic Acquisition Of ARM: A Strategic Report

External Analysis

The paper provides a strategic report for Nvidia Corporate acquiring an integrated chip manufacturer, ARM. Nvidia is a UK-based business known in the gaming industry (NVIDIA Newsroom 2022). It works on the visual design of delivery parts for system on chip specifics in the gaming market. The report explores the certain significant concern of the company, including the purchasing of ARM and how it can assist the wide market industry. Except for the 3D graphics training, it would be unfeasible to utilise the visuals dispensation unit. Moreover, the primary courses of the processor will be sluggish to an unattainable crawl.

Nvidia’s strategic decision to acquire ARM will be discussed in this paper using internal and external variables that influence the operations of the business. In the first section, PESTLE and Porter’s five forces will be studied. After that, resources and competency will be studied using VRIO and the Value chain. Lastly, the SAFe strategies will be evaluated. The mentioned strategies would be accessed concerning the competitive advantage, financial performance and future market.

Political Factors: The business environment is affected by deterioration and association. The political environment of a nation can have an impact on the business environment of software companies, regardless of whether it is in its taxation laws, regulations, even BREXIT. It could be a threat to Nvidia, as nepotism and corruption could influence the political sustainability of tech companies causing them to deviate from a financially viable path. Pollution might have an influence on several corporate actions, such as visit claims, fraudulent action, contracting and authorising. In these circumstances, it would weaken the affordable progress of affiliation by disconcerting the common public, risking lawfulness and peace, and deteriorating the value structure. In the technological industry, the firm can seek modernism in the government sector, and certain of them can employ on government contracts (Shead, 2021). Moreover, the government of the nation is not worried regarding assuring the lawful growth advantage of business alliances.

Economic factors: These factors drive the hardware sector. However, it has had a difficult time evolving during BREXIT and Covid-19. The economy boosts industrialisation, and the global economic downturn, which is still reverberating in certain regions of the globe, is also a determinant in the downtrend of the PC industry (Shead 2021). There are more different variables, including labour expense, production costs, and many more, which have an influence on the PC producers’ profitability. Nevertheless, the market has been capable of pursuing a variety of opportunities for development. Fundamental knowledge of the financial landscape might also help the industry oversee the growth impact of industry and affiliation (Weiss 2022). The rapid growth rate of GDP implies that the country’s economic demand is growing. Technology and AI have resulted in increased worker productivity and GDP.

Porter’s Five Forces

Social Factors:   The norms and characteristics of society have an impact on progressive society. Realising customer spending plans, power structures, and portion designs assist technology businesses in meeting business objectives. Moreover, when it comes to innovation and improved systems, hardware and software companies must take changing customer behaviours and societal norms into account. The norms and characteristics of society have an impact on progressive society (Kindig 2021). Realising portion designs, power structures, and client spending plans assists technology businesses in meeting business objectives. Moreover, when it comes to innovation and improved systems, hardware and software companies must take societal norms and changing customer behaviours into account. Since more people began employees to work from home during the pandemic, they recognised the significance of high-quality devices. Cultural and social factors can have a large impact on PC sales and popularity. The preferences of people have shifted in last few years as a result of the rise of social media. They now choose items that make it easier for them to move around. People have started to use large-display mobile devices which can connect to and browse the internet (Dowd 2022). Computers have become a good resource for professionalism. Another socially conscious component of a corporate is the gaming industry which allows users to connect and interact. The hardware sector must encourage and acknowledge social beliefs and values in order to adapt promotional methodologies in response to atypical team environments.

Technological Factors: It is an opportunity for the Nvidia corporate. Rapid, inventive progress across the nation has broadened comprehension of mechanical attributes throughout the entire distinct cycle. The progress of information encourages creative marketing methods to work on building relationships with customers (Dowd 2022). The tech industry further uses social media marketing to enhance company effectiveness. Process innovation’s lifespan has been shortened due to the assessment of new advancements. In the chain gadget industry, innovation determines the advancement of merchandise mix, encourages outstanding organisational interactions and condenses adaptability.

Environmental factors: Due to Nvidia’s global presence, these distinctions must be carefully considered to avoid unfavourable circumstances. It is an opportunity for Nvidia. It could benefit from investing in unhindered growths to guarantee flex credibility. Environmental changes could have an influence on company suitability. A harmful environment could raise assessment costs and force Nvidia to develop a flexible value chain. These adjustments may also have an impact on customers’ spending habits, allowing the association to reconsider its marketing strategies. It can serve as a springboard for Nvidia to acknowledge vital green methods of interacting with partners (NVIDIA Newsroom 2020). The focus of authoritative bodies on maintaining compliance with common sense is changing the course of events. Nvidia should focus on the eco-friendliness of its products over conventional motivators. Nvidia’s extreme resource utilisations obtain a negative response from the customers, social events, environmental security, and the internet.

Legal factors: Nvidia will be unable to enter another market unless it closely monitors the surrounding ecosystems and the buyer market’s authoritative development. Environmental confirmation standards have resulted in the invasion of permitted development rights and damage to different levels of the picture (Ramaswamy and Ozcan 2016). Nvidia must consider sticking with basic components while researching another market. Nvidia should pursue supervisor and safety laws, as some nations have clear standards in place to assure labour security.

Threat of New Entrant: Economic scale is difficult to accomplish in the markets in which Nvidia operates. In order to gain a cost advantage, it is portrayed as having vast capabilities. It signifies the threat of new entrants as a weaker force. There are major synergies in regards of advancing customer benefits (Leyva, et al 2018). These indicators show the industry’s concern about the sheer power of new challengers. Induction into assessment channels is critical for new entrants because it establishes distribution channels and the industry. In these elements, competitors are portrayed as a vital force in the industry. Before the organisation begins selling, the public perception systems within the organisation require that genuine necessities be rewarded. To conclude, the threat of new entrants is low.

Bargaining Power of Supplier: The suppliers of Nvidia have a different development position from clients. It signifies that suppliers issue very few orders, signifying that the power of suppliers is a weaker force. The suppliers consistently offer low transaction costs. Businesses such as Nvidia Corporation will find it easier to switch suppliers as a result of this (Leyva, et al 2018). This reduces suppliers’ bargaining power, and vendors in this sector do not resist. The suppliers do not pose a significant enough risk to drive coordination into the industry in which Nvidia Corporation operates. Nvidia Corporation is employed by a company that is a crucial customer for suppliers.

Industry Rivalry: There are few competitors in the industry in which Nvidia Corporation works. The business of Nvidia Corporation must be sustained in the future. According to favourable business advancement, because they do not own any other firms’ shares, new entrants are less likely to participate in competitive services. In the industry in which Nvidia Corporation operates, these fixed costs rise (Aithal 2017). Nvidia Corporation’s services are significantly isolated within the organisation in which it operates. Production must be supplemented. The organisation’s limits are extremely high because of the required capital and assets for operating. The limit is similarly high based on impediments and informal laws.

Bargaining Power of Buyers: Nvidia Corporation surpasses other companies by a broad margin. It makes purchasers the weaker force in this business in regards of management. The sector’s division is excellent, signifying that consumers will have difficulty locating companies that manufacture a specific product. Consumer bargaining power has grown to be a more powerful force in the industry as a result of the difficulty of trading. Consumers who buy on a regular basis are familiar with the concept (Aithal 2017).

Threat of Substitutes: There are less substitutes for the products available in the market in which Nvidia operates. Benefit acquiring ventures openly make the substitutions. This suggests that the industry in which Nvidia Corporation operates is not adequately protected (Kirchoff, Tate and Mollenkopf 2016). These components transmit the terrorisation of substitute items, a more powerful force within the industry.

Industry Attractiveness: The profitability possibilities are the Nvidia Corporation’s attractiveness, according to this Porter’s Forces analysis.

Five Forces	High/ Low
Threat of New Entrant	Low
Bargaining Power of Supplier	Low
Industry Rivalry	Moderate
Bargaining Power of Buyers	Low
Threat of Substitutes	Low

Resources for Nvidia can be of two types: tangible and intangible resources

Tangible Resources

It includes:

Physical Resources: Total resources of Nvidia totalled at $ 28.79 B in 2021, an increase from $17.32 B in the previous year which is 2020 (NVIDIA Corporation 2022). The resources for 2021 were multiples of what was documented in 2016 and 2015. Nvidia’s headquartered in Santa Clara, California, and has 57 offices spread throughout 28 nations. For a longer period, Nvidia has relied on “Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company” to manufacture the graphics chips it aim to use. The company has a significant number of items for considerable outcome possessing global arrangement and as a whole R&D existence reflects strength for the business

Human Resources: Nvidia hired a large volume of individuals in 2021; the total workforce of Nvidia was more than 18 thousand, a 37.75 per cent increase from 2020 (Kelion 2020).  The company has a highly talented, all-around equipped, and diverse labour pool that is promoted to transform the formation and diversity established to handle with exclusion and challenge multitude and uniformity in the place of work. In the same way, several employees are highly skilled. The company invests in the working population by skilled and specialist training and improves it by occupation, and mentorship, initiatives that encourage employee satisfaction, recognition, retention and so that human resources can be regarded as a source of potency for the company (Kirchoff, Tate and Mollenkopf 2016).

Financial Resources: Nvidia reported a profit of $2.796 B and $10.918 B in revenue in 2020. In January 2021, the market capitalisation was valued at $328.7 B. In the second quarter of 2020, Nvidia revealed a deal of $3.87 B, a half-year rise from the same period in 2019 (NVIDIA Corporation 2022). The flood of deals raised curiosity in PC advancement. As per the organisation’s financial head, the effects of the Covid-19 would most likely reflect this development in substantial business labour market trends, with a greater emphasis on innovation, including Nvidia, which empowers virtual join and remote work effort. It could be supposed that the firm is financial driven that can be regarded as a source of potency for the company

Intangible resources

Intangible resources include:

Brand Reputation: Nvidia has accomplished the leading spot with the best general status as well as is the sole organization with a perfect rank. Nvidia steadfastly conformed to its stellar reputation that was founded on straightforward and direct correspondences and was well supported for its administrations and items. Nvidia produces parts and products, which are aimed to enhance PC models in gaming and other media by utilising AI (dos Santos, et al. 2017). During the epidemics, the company benefited greatly from enhanced gaming interest, and digital money excavators also has procured Nvidia’s cards for their arrangements. The association’s standing is regarded as a competitive advantage.

Patents and Intellectual Property: Nvidia does not signify that the resources on the site are appropriate or available for use in several acknowledgements and places them in zones where their service is prohibited and illegal. The company might not use or trade the resources in infringement of US trade laws and regulations. Any incident concerning the resources will be governed by the major interior regulation of the State of California. Nvidia thus concur that all arguments occurring from this contract would be depending on the preferential ward of an incident in California’s federal and state courts (Lustig, Sahasrabuddhe and Giroux 2019). As a result, the two players concur with the limited and individual scope and establishment of these courts. The linked places are not influenced heavily by Nvidia, and ARM is not accountable for the substance of any linked site or any link contained in a linked site. Nvidia keep direct autonomy to terminate any linkage or linking initiative at any time (Reuters 2022). Nvidia does not encourage the companies or products to which it is linked and reserves the right to make this clear on its website.

Value Chain Analysis

It is critical for Nvidia to combine its advantages with respect to services in which it forms the alerts or unique assets. Value chain analysis can help Nvidia distinguish its services and persuade areas to increase a considerable competitive edge. Traditional systems offer the benefit and value needed to form strong propositions (Chitkara et al. 2020).

Support Activities	Firm Infrastructure		M A R G I N
Strategic Management, planning, dealing with legal matters, accounting, financing, quality management
Human Resources
Moral ethics, human rights, employee relations, performance management
Technology Development
Product Design, customer service, data analytics, automation software
Procumbent
Raw material, machinery, supplies, equipment
Primary Activities	Inbound Logistics	Operations	Outbound Logistics	Marketing and sales	Service
Distributing raw materials,  storing, retrieving	Testing, Assembling, packing, Machining.	Transporting, order processing, Scheduling, warehousing, handling	Building relations, quoting price, channel selection, Sales force, pricing, advertising	Payment teams, post and pre services

Table 1: Value Chain Analysis of Nvidia

(Source: Author)

VIRO Analysis

Resources	Value	Rare	Inimitable	Organisational Support	Competitive edge
Financial Resources	Yes	Yes	No	Yes	Sustained competitive advantage
Product portfolio	Yes	No	Yes	Yes	Competitive parity
Intellectual property and Patents	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Temporary competitive advantage
E	Yes	Yes	No	No	Sustained competitive advantage
Supply chain	Yes	Yes	No	Yes	Unused competitive advantage

Table 2: VIRO Analysis of Nvidia

(Source: Author)

Evaluation

The SAFe is utilised to analyse Nvidia’s business strategy for acquiring Arm.

Suitability

To deal with the different strategies of Nvidia, the TOWS matrix will be evaluated (Kirchoff, Tate and Mollenkopf 2016).

TOWS Matrix	EXTERNAL FACTORS
Opportunities	Threats
· Investment opportunity · Eco-friendly products and services · Elevated social media users · Ecommerce	· Substitute products · Rivalry · Exchange Rate · New entrant · Government regulation
I N T E R N A L   F A C T O R S	Strengths	Strength/ Opportunities	Strength/  Threats
· International sales · Presence in social media · Labor forces · Financial positions · Low cost · Distribution channels	· Revenue increase · Product development · Social media use · Marketing	· Innovative teams · Financial stand · Distribution Networks
Weakness	Weakness/ Opportunities	Weakness/ Threats
· Liquidity problem · Employee turnover rate · Research and development spending · Rental charges	· Increase Payrolls · Finance Ownership	· Offering Incentives · Increase Research and development spending

Table 3: Tows Matrix of Nvidia

(Source: Author)

The information technology industry is one of the fastest growing industries. The continuous development of new solutions exposes them to unverifiable technologies. Cyber risks, labour shortages, artificial intelligence, and other issues should be monitored by the tech sector. Computer security is becoming more common, potentially exposing more companies due to their vulnerability to hacker attacks. By 2021, cybercrime is supposed to induce a $6 trillion annual net loss. IT professionals are focusing on breaking across any attack that has been initiated in place to avert and prevent this threat (Nascimento and Véstias 2019). Besides that, the industry is replacing outdated equipment that is less reliable and more susceptible to cyber-attacks.

Mendleow’s Matrix

	Low	Level of Interest	High
Low	A.  Minimal effort	B. Keep informed
Power				Customers Competitors ARM employees Suppliers
C. Keep satisfied	D. Key players
High		Federal Trade Commission ARM Shareholders Nvidia’s shareholders ARM management Nvidia’s management

Table 4: Mandleow’s Matrix of Nvidia

(Source: Author)

Nvidia’s $40 B acquisition of Arm Ltd might create more innovative work opportunities in the UK than the corporation becoming a distinct public entity. In any situation, Nvidia has the most steady income development potential of all its main competitors who were not interested in acquiring ARM. The stated acquisition of ARM by Nvidia was reviewed by the “United States Federal Agency”, and the transaction was approved (Nellis and Shepardson 2021).

Nvidia would pay $12 B cash and $21.5 B of its common stock to SoftBank under the condition of the contract. Nvidia shares would be approved at the cost of $44.3 M, resulting in the firm increasing its bonds and fiscal differentiating aspect. In addition, if Arm meets specific financial achievement aims, SoftBank could eventually gain $5 B in common stock or cash under an earn-out contract (Nvidia Newsroom, 2020). Nvidia will prioritise acquiring skilled ARM employees as prospective employees, and thus the ARM’s workforce would be provided with the chance to operate for Nvidia (Arrivabene 2022). Nvidia would then make an effort to recruit and keep top innovators and technologists. Nvidia will gain a lot from a worldwide, skilled team, which will also be acquired with the acquisition of ARM personnel. The acquisition will benefit both groups of people, with a particular emphasis on research and development. Nvidia may grow the adaptability and productivity of its framework whereas pushing Arm designs to the highest benchmarks and acquiring the company the most competitive edge.

References 

Aithal, P.S., 2017. A critical study on Various Frameworks used to analyse International Business and its Environment. International Journal of Applied Engineering and Management Letters (IJAEML), 1(2), pp.78-97.

Arrivabene, A., 2022. Nvidia: Business Fundamentals (NASDAQ:NVDA). [online] SeekingAlpha. Available at: <https://seekingalpha.com/article/4026648-nvidia-business-fundamentals> [Accessed 19 March 2022].

Chitkara, H., 2020. Why the US and China will reach an agreement on Nvidia’s Arm acquisition. [online] Business Insider. Available at: <https://www.businessinsider.com/us-china-will-come-to-terms-on-nvidia-arm-deal-2020-10?r=US&IR=T> [Accessed 19 March 2022].

dos Santos, F.F., Draghetti, L., Weigel, L., Carro, L., Navaux, P. and Rech, P., 2017, June. Evaluation and mitigation of soft-errors in neural network-based object detection in three GPU architectures. In 2017 47th Annual IEEE/IFIP International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks Workshops (DSN-W) (pp. 169-176). IEEE.

Dowd, K., 2022. Nvidia’s Arm Acquisition Is The Latest Chip Mega-Deal To Crumble. [online] Forbes. Available at: <https://www.forbes.com/sites/kevindowd/2022/02/08/nvidias-arm-acquisition-is-the-latest-chip-mega-deal-to-crumble/?sh=34074c02687c> [Accessed 18 March 2022].

Kelion, L., 2020. ARM: UK-based chip designer sold to US firm Nvidia. [online] BBC News. Available at: <https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-54142567> [Accessed 18 March 2022].

Kindig, B., 2021. Why The Nvidia-Arm Acquisition Should Be Approved. [online] Forbes. Available at: <https://www.forbes.com/sites/bethkindig/2021/03/11/why-the-nvidia-arm-acquisition-should-be-approved/?sh=5ee8750345b2> [Accessed 20 March 2022].

Kirchoff, J.F., Tate, W.L. and Mollenkopf, D.A., 2016. The impact of strategic organisational orientations on green supply chain management and firm performance. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management.

Leyva, M., Hechavarria, J., Batista, N., Alarcon, J.A. And Gomez, o., 2018. A framework for PEST analysis based on fuzzy decision maps. Revista espacios, 39(16).

Lustig, D., Sahasrabuddhe, S. and Giroux, O., 2019, April. A formal analysis of the NVIDIA PTX memory consistency model. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems (pp. 257-270).

Nascimento, J.M. and Véstias, M., 2019, October. Hyperspectral compressive sensing: a comparison of embedded GPU and ARM implementations. In Emerging Imaging and Sensing Technologies for Security and Defence IV (Vol. 11163, p. 111630H). International Society for Optics and Photonics.

Nellis, S. and Shepardson, D., 2021. Nvidia-Arm deal, worth over $80 billion, faced threat of US FTC lawsuit. [online] The Economic Times. Available at: <https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/tech/tech-bytes/nvidia-arm-deal-worth-over-80-billion-faced-threat-of-us-ftc-lawsuit/articleshow/88065039.cms> [Accessed 18 March 2022].

NVIDIA Corporation, 2022. NVIDIA Corporation – Home. [online] Investor.nvidia.com. Available at: <https://investor.nvidia.com/Home/default.aspx> [Accessed 20 March 2022].

NVIDIA Newsroom, N., 2020. NVIDIA to Acquire Arm for $40 Billion, Creating World’s Premier Computing Company for the Age of AI. [online] NVIDIA Newsroom Newsroom. Available at: <https://nvidianews.nvidia.com/news/nvidia-to-acquire-arm-for-40-billion-creating-worlds-premier-computing-company-for-the-age-of-ai> [Accessed 17 March 2022].

NVIDIA Newsroom, N., 2022. NVIDIA and SoftBank Group Announce Termination of NVIDIA’s Acquisition of Arm Limited. [online] NVIDIA Newsroom Newsroom. Available at: <https://nvidianews.nvidia.com/news/nvidia-and-softbank-group-announce-termination-of-nvidias-acquisition-of-arm-limited#:~:text=NVIDIA%20and%20SBG%20had%20announced,%2C%20on%20September%2013%2C%202020.> [Accessed 19 March 2022].

Ramaswamy, V. and Ozcan, K., 2016. Brand value co-creation in a digitalised world: An integrative framework and research implications. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 33(1), pp.93-106.

Reuters, 2022. ANALYSIS-Nvidia acquisition of Arm throws company into tech spat between US and China. [online] Reuters. Available at: <https://www.reuters.com/article/arm-holdings-ma-nvidia-china-idUSL4N2GB1JG> [Accessed 20 March 2022].

Shead, S., 2021. Arm CEO expects regulators to ‘take a good look’ at the Nvidia deal. [online] CNBC.com. Available at: <https://www.cnbc.com/2020/12/02/arm-ceo-simon-segars-expects-regulators-to-look-closely-at-nvidia-deal.html> [Accessed 15 March 2022].

Weiss, T., 2022. Nvidia Defends Arm Acquisition Deal: a ‘Once-in-a-Generation Opportunity’. [online] HPC Wire. Available at: <https://www.hpcwire.com/2022/01/13/nvidia-defends-proposed-40b-arm-acquisition/> [Accessed 19 March 2022].