Virtucon has been developing an online stud farm management system for Globex. Globex has been a client of Virtucon for a long time and Virtucon will develop a system which will perform all the activities done manually by the organization. The measurable organizational value will determine the priority of the organization and based on the identified factor the project will be developed. The desirable impact of the project will be identified using this value.
Area |
Area of Impact |
Rank (1 to 5) |
Customer |
· Increase in customer satisfaction · Providing consumers with access at every touch point |
1 |
Financial |
· Decrease in the processing time · Reduction in cost · Enhancement in the profit margin |
5 |
Operational |
· Increase in operational efficiency · Develop zero error system |
2 |
Social |
· Improving the goodwill and reputation of the organization |
3 |
Strategy |
· Gaining Competitive advantage · Increasing the retention rate · Providing better service to the consumers · Maintaining optimum scalability |
4 |
The above table shows the value given to each of the factors which determine the importance and desirable impact on the perspective of Globex. Al the above mentioned factors are crucial to the success of this project but the most important factor is customer. The online system not only help in processing the data faster but facilitate in developing a system that will provide the consumer better consumer support.
The area of impact that has been ranked 1 is customer. Therefore, in reference to the project Globex wants to improve the quality of their service by providing service at every possible touch points. Moreover, this will also enable the organization provide service at a faster rate. The organization will also aim to increase their consumer base based superior service quality.
Global has a maximum budget of $75,000 and a time span of 150 days so the project has to be completed within the allocated time an budget for the maintaining the sustainability of the Globex.
The project scope will consist of requirements, deliverables, designs and goals (Kerzner & Kerzner, 2017). The project scope of the current project are as follows:
Out of Scope
The out of scope deliverables will consist of factors that were outside the current scope of the project. The out of scope deliverables of the current project will consist of factors such as breeder notifications and help system (Schwalbe, 2015). These two factors will not be not included in the current project as the client does not needs such specifics at current moment.
The assumptions of the current project are as follows:
The constraints of the current project are as follows:
The scope management plan will consist of project scope statement, project deliverables, stakeholder analysis, work break down structure and project control elements (Harrison & Lock, 2017).
Project scope statement
The project scope will consist of requirements, deliverables, designs and goals. The project scope of the current project are as follows:
Project deliverables
Task Name |
Duration |
Start |
Finish |
Cost |
Online Stud management system |
120 days |
Mon 14-05-18 |
Fri 26-10-18 |
$62,148.00 |
1.0 Project initiation |
7 days |
Mon 14-05-18 |
Tue 22-05-18 |
$1,480.00 |
2.0 Project planning |
11 days |
Wed 23-05-18 |
Wed 06-06-18 |
$4,440.00 |
3.0 Implementing Breeding features |
19 days |
Thu 07-06-18 |
Tue 03-07-18 |
$14,272.00 |
3.1 Develop superior interface |
5 days |
Thu 07-06-18 |
Wed 13-06-18 |
$6,560.00 |
3.2 Develop database |
14 days |
Thu 14-06-18 |
Tue 03-07-18 |
$7,712.00 |
4.0 Implementing financial features |
33 days |
Wed 04-07-18 |
Fri 17-08-18 |
$19,456.00 |
5.0 Implementing Mobile Features |
26 days |
Mon 20-08-18 |
Mon 24-09-18 |
$17,812.00 |
6.0 Monitor and control phase |
21 days |
Tue 25-09-18 |
Tue 23-10-18 |
$4,088.00 |
7.0 closure |
3 days |
Wed 24-10-18 |
Fri 26-10-18 |
$600.00 |
Task Name |
Online Stud management system |
1.0 Project initiation |
1.1 Identify the breeding features |
1.2 Identify the financial features |
1.3 Identify Mobile Features |
1.4 Discuss with the stakeholders and finalise the software requirements |
1.5 Make changes if necessary |
1.6 Document the requirements |
1.7 Deploy the final document for approval |
1.8 Milestone 1: Project Initiation completed |
2.0 Project planning |
2.1 Identify the software and hardware requirements for breeding features |
2.2 Identify the software and hardware requirements for financial features |
2.3 Identify the software and hardware requirements for mobile features |
2.4 Document the technical requirements |
2.5 Sent for approval |
2.6 Milestone 2: Technical requirements developed |
3.0 Implementing Breeding features |
3.1 Develop superior interface |
3.1.1 Include entry of horse breeding procedures and vet examination results |
3.2 Develop database |
3.2.1 Include database of Mare and Stallion owners, with full stallion booking history |
3.2.2 Include Person/Company name and contact details of breeder |
3.2.3 Include provisions for entering type of business |
3.2.4 Include provisions for booking for “Broodmare” and/or “Stallion” |
3.2.5 Include provisions for booking DNA test for parentage |
3.2.6 Include provisions for obtaining certification of paternity |
3.2.7 Include provisions for booking for micro-chipping and other identification process |
3.2.8 Include provisions for obtaining foal identification card and colour description |
3.2.9 Include provisions for obtaining public liability insurance details |
3.2.10 Include provisions for checking the breed registry |
3.3 Milestone 3: Breeding features incorporated |
4.0 Implementing financial features |
4.1 Develop general ledger and marketing database |
4.2 install feature for Stallion bookings contract management |
4.3 install features for monitoring location status of horses |
4.4 include features for entering Vet and Farrier charges |
4.5 install features of tracking of cost |
4.6 install features for entering discounted rates, external costs, GST and ownership charges |
4.7 Milestone 4: Financial features implemented |
5.0 Implementing Mobile Features |
5.1 install quick and easy recording of procedures to horses out of the office |
5.2 install features for reviewing of breeding and vet history for any horse |
5.3 Install features for sending advices to the owners |
5.4 including customization for corporate branding |
5.5 Milestone 5: Mobile features implementation completed |
6.0 Monitor and control phase |
6.1 Monitor the developed features |
6.2 Identify the shortcomings |
6.3 Make the changes |
6.4 Milestone 6: Monitor and control completed |
7.0 closure |
7.1 Start running of the new online stud management software |
7.2 Milestone 7: project closed |
Name |
Start |
Finish |
Cost |
Remaining Work |
Project Owner |
Thu 17-05-18 |
Thu 17-05-18 |
$0.00 |
8 hrs |
Project Sponsor |
Thu 17-05-18 |
Thu 17-05-18 |
$0.00 |
8 hrs |
Project Manager |
Mon 14-05-18 |
Fri 26-10-18 |
$3,000.00 |
120 hrs |
Team Manager |
Mon 14-05-18 |
Wed 25-07-18 |
$2,640.00 |
176 hrs |
Team Member 1 |
Thu 07-06-18 |
Mon 24-09-18 |
$4,800.00 |
480 hrs |
Team member 2 |
Thu 07-06-18 |
Mon 24-09-18 |
$4,800.00 |
480 hrs |
Team member 3 |
Thu 07-06-18 |
Mon 24-09-18 |
$4,800.00 |
480 hrs |
Team member 4 |
Thu 07-06-18 |
Mon 24-09-18 |
$4,800.00 |
480 hrs |
Software Engineer |
Wed 23-05-18 |
Tue 23-10-18 |
$11,712.00 |
976 hrs |
Software Developer |
Wed 23-05-18 |
Tue 23-10-18 |
$10,752.00 |
896 hrs |
Testing Engineer |
Tue 25-09-18 |
Fri 12-10-18 |
$1,344.00 |
112 hrs |
The technology requirements in order to support the team are as follows:
Hardware |
Laptops, desktops, hard drives, RAM, printers, LAN, HUBSPOT, LAN wires, SCSI RAID DISK ARRAY with 200 GB of space |
Software |
Back up servers, SQL Servers, .NET framework |
Network |
Supported operating software for operating the SQL server |
The majority of the employees will be offsite employees as it will facilitate in reducing the cost of operation of the project. However, both offsite and onsite employees are required for continuous interaction with the client (Walker, 2015). The onsite employees will be able to guide the offline employees to perform in a better way. Globex wishes to develop the online system in house so on site employees are needed to deliver the product on time.
Travel Requirements |
· The organization will hire cheap workers and bring some of them on to the onsite location so flight expenses and accommodation expenses will have to be taken into account in this scenario. |
Training Requirements |
· The organization will have to provide training to the inexperience skilled employees so that they can be made to fit in such working environments. |
Task Name |
Duration |
Start |
Finish |
1.8 Milestone 1: Project Initiation completed |
0 days |
Tue 22-05-18 |
Tue 22-05-18 |
2.6 Milestone 2: Technical requirements developed |
0 days |
Wed 06-06-18 |
Wed 06-06-18 |
3.3 Milestone 3: Breeding features incorporated |
0 days |
Tue 03-07-18 |
Tue 03-07-18 |
4.7 Milestone 4: Financial features implemented |
0 days |
Fri 17-08-18 |
Fri 17-08-18 |
5.5 Milestone 5: Mobile features implementation completed |
0 days |
Mon 24-09-18 |
Mon 24-09-18 |
6.4 Milestone 6: Monitor and control completed |
0 days |
Tue 23-10-18 |
Tue 23-10-18 |
7.2 Milestone 7: project closed |
0 days |
Fri 26-10-18 |
Fri 26-10-18 |
Task Name |
Duration |
Start |
Finish |
Cost |
Online Stud management system |
120 days |
Mon 14-05-18 |
Fri 26-10-18 |
$62,148.00 |
1.0 Project initiation |
7 days |
Mon 14-05-18 |
Tue 22-05-18 |
$1,480.00 |
1.1 Identify the breeding features |
1 day |
Mon 14-05-18 |
Mon 14-05-18 |
$320.00 |
1.2 Identify the financial features |
1 day |
Tue 15-05-18 |
Tue 15-05-18 |
$200.00 |
1.3 Identify Mobile Features |
1 day |
Wed 16-05-18 |
Wed 16-05-18 |
$200.00 |
1.4 Discuss with the stakeholders and finalise the software requirements |
1 day |
Thu 17-05-18 |
Thu 17-05-18 |
$320.00 |
1.5 Make changes if necessary |
1 day |
Fri 18-05-18 |
Fri 18-05-18 |
$120.00 |
1.6 Document the requirements |
1 day |
Mon 21-05-18 |
Mon 21-05-18 |
$120.00 |
1.7 Deploy the final document for approval |
1 day |
Tue 22-05-18 |
Tue 22-05-18 |
$200.00 |
1.8 Milestone 1: Project Initiation completed |
0 days |
Tue 22-05-18 |
Tue 22-05-18 |
$0.00 |
2.0 Project planning |
11 days |
Wed 23-05-18 |
Wed 06-06-18 |
$4,440.00 |
2.1 Identify the software and hardware requirements for breeding features |
7 days |
Wed 23-05-18 |
Thu 31-05-18 |
$1,344.00 |
2.2 Identify the software and hardware requirements for financial features |
7 days |
Wed 23-05-18 |
Thu 31-05-18 |
$1,344.00 |
2.3 Identify the software and hardware requirements for mobile features |
7 days |
Wed 23-05-18 |
Thu 31-05-18 |
$1,344.00 |
2.4 Document the technical requirements |
3 days |
Fri 01-06-18 |
Tue 05-06-18 |
$288.00 |
2.5 Sent for approval |
1 day |
Wed 06-06-18 |
Wed 06-06-18 |
$120.00 |
2.6 Milestone 2: Technical requirements developed |
0 days |
Wed 06-06-18 |
Wed 06-06-18 |
$0.00 |
3.0 Implementing Breeding features |
19 days |
Thu 07-06-18 |
Tue 03-07-18 |
$14,272.00 |
3.1 Develop superior interface |
5 days |
Thu 07-06-18 |
Wed 13-06-18 |
$6,560.00 |
3.1.1 Include entry of horse breeding procedures and vet examination results |
5 days |
Thu 07-06-18 |
Wed 13-06-18 |
$2,560.00 |
3.2 Develop database |
14 days |
Thu 14-06-18 |
Tue 03-07-18 |
$7,712.00 |
3.2.1 Include database of Mare and Stallion owners, with full stallion booking history |
3 days |
Thu 14-06-18 |
Mon 18-06-18 |
$288.00 |
3.2.2 Include Person/Company name and contact details of breeder |
4 days |
Thu 14-06-18 |
Tue 19-06-18 |
$384.00 |
3.2.3 Include provisions for entering type of business |
3 days |
Thu 14-06-18 |
Mon 18-06-18 |
$288.00 |
3.2.4 Include provisions for booking for “Broodmare” and/or “Stallion” |
4 days |
Thu 14-06-18 |
Tue 19-06-18 |
$384.00 |
3.2.5 Include provisions for booking DNA test for parentage |
8 days |
Thu 14-06-18 |
Mon 25-06-18 |
$768.00 |
3.2.6 Include provisions for obtaining certification of paternity |
6 days |
Thu 14-06-18 |
Thu 21-06-18 |
$576.00 |
3.2.7 Include provisions for booking for micro-chipping and other identification process |
6 days |
Thu 14-06-18 |
Thu 21-06-18 |
$576.00 |
3.2.8 Include provisions for obtaining foal identification card and colour description |
4 days |
Thu 14-06-18 |
Tue 19-06-18 |
$384.00 |
3.2.9 Include provisions for obtaining public liability insurance details |
5 days |
Thu 14-06-18 |
Wed 20-06-18 |
$480.00 |
3.2.10 Include provisions for checking the breed registry |
14 days |
Thu 14-06-18 |
Tue 03-07-18 |
$3,584.00 |
3.3 Milestone 3: Breeding features incorporated |
0 days |
Tue 03-07-18 |
Tue 03-07-18 |
$0.00 |
4.0 Implementing financial features |
33 days |
Wed 04-07-18 |
Fri 17-08-18 |
$19,456.00 |
4.1 Develop general ledger and marketing database |
4 days |
Wed 04-07-18 |
Mon 09-07-18 |
$1,248.00 |
4.2 install feature for Stallion bookings contract management |
10 days |
Wed 04-07-18 |
Tue 17-07-18 |
$3,160.00 |
4.3 install features for monitoring location status of horses |
2 days |
Wed 04-07-18 |
Thu 05-07-18 |
$624.00 |
4.4 include features for entering Vet and Farrier charges |
12 days |
Wed 18-07-18 |
Thu 02-08-18 |
$3,792.00 |
4.5 install features of tracking of cost |
4 days |
Fri 03-08-18 |
Wed 08-08-18 |
$2,048.00 |
4.6 install features for entering discounted rates, external costs, GST and ownership charges |
7 days |
Thu 09-08-18 |
Fri 17-08-18 |
$3,584.00 |
4.7 Milestone 4: Financial features implemented |
0 days |
Fri 17-08-18 |
Fri 17-08-18 |
$0.00 |
5.0 Implementing Mobile Features |
26 days |
Mon 20-08-18 |
Mon 24-09-18 |
$17,812.00 |
5.1 install quick and easy recording of procedures to horses out of the office |
4 days |
Mon 20-08-18 |
Thu 23-08-18 |
$2,048.00 |
5.2 install features for reviewing of breeding and vet history for any horse |
6 days |
Fri 24-08-18 |
Fri 31-08-18 |
$3,072.00 |
5.3 Install features for sending advices to the owners |
7 days |
Mon 03-09-18 |
Tue 11-09-18 |
$3,584.00 |
5.4 including customization for corporate branding |
9 days |
Wed 12-09-18 |
Mon 24-09-18 |
$4,608.00 |
5.5 Milestone 5: Mobile features implementation completed |
0 days |
Mon 24-09-18 |
Mon 24-09-18 |
$0.00 |
6.0 Monitor and control phase |
21 days |
Tue 25-09-18 |
Tue 23-10-18 |
$4,088.00 |
6.1 Monitor the developed features |
7 days |
Tue 25-09-18 |
Wed 03-10-18 |
$2,072.00 |
6.2 Identify the shortcomings |
7 days |
Thu 04-10-18 |
Fri 12-10-18 |
$672.00 |
6.3 Make the changes |
7 days |
Mon 15-10-18 |
Tue 23-10-18 |
$1,344.00 |
6.4 Milestone 6: Monitor and control completed |
0 days |
Tue 23-10-18 |
Tue 23-10-18 |
$0.00 |
7.0 closure |
3 days |
Wed 24-10-18 |
Fri 26-10-18 |
$600.00 |
7.1 Start running of the new online stud management software |
3 days |
Wed 24-10-18 |
Fri 26-10-18 |
$600.00 |
7.2 Milestone 7: project closed |
0 days |
Fri 26-10-18 |
Fri 26-10-18 |
$0.00 |
Assumptions
The assumptions of the current project are as follows:
Risk ID |
Description |
Probability |
Impact |
Rate |
Assigned To |
Response Strategy |
Threat or Opportunity |
Upto 99% |
5 – for high 3 – for medium 1-for low 1- |
Probability * Impact |
Should be a role not a name |
Mitigate or Accept or Transfer or Prevent Describe it as well |
|||
External |
Problem in delivery of the hardware |
0.2 |
3 |
0.6 |
Project manager |
The project manager will have to develop an effective communication with the suppliers to avoid such risk |
This will act a threat to the project as it will cause a delay |
External |
Unanticipated errors |
0.1 |
2 |
0.2 |
Project manager |
The project manager will constantly think about all the possible risk factors to avoid such risks |
This would be threat to the project as the team will not be prepared for it. |
Internal |
Approval issues of the interfaces |
0.4 |
3 |
0.6 |
Project stakeholders |
This can be avoided by developing the internal communication plan for the project |
This will be threat as it will affect the timeline of the project. |
Internal |
Scope creep |
0.3 |
3 |
0.9 |
Technical team |
The project team will have to monitor the deviation in the deliverables ta all stages to avoid the changes in the project. |
This will be a threat to quality of the project output. |
Verification Activity |
When? |
Testing the project implementation |
October,2018 |
Code review |
October,2018 |
Validation Activity |
When? |
Requirement based testing |
October, 2018 |
In this article, the authors have highlighted a new evaluation model for the investment projects for all the development agencies that are prevailing in Turkey. It has been considered in this study that such an evaluation model is required for transferring of the public resources to the project. Here, the authors have identified that it is very vital to take into consideration certain criteria for the evaluation of investment projects. The paper has provided a huge facilities for the decision makers in terms of project evaluation. With the same, in order to perceive the proposed evaluation model in better way, an application with the real case data has been executed in the Middle Black Sea Development Agency in Turkey.
In this study, the authors have designed a Decision Making Support System and a Municipal Infrastructure Projects Management on the basis of exploring the requirement of the business of the municipal infrastructures projects management in the city of Jinan. The study consists of a scheme of the comprehensive system architecture model along with functional design and data organisation. The study has also used the ESRI’s platform of ComGIS and a large variety of the thematic model components through which the authors have realised the visualisation prudently in the management of the projects of municipal infrastructure. Furthermore, the paper has also elaborated on a projects evaluation model and spatial analysis that makes the decision-making and management of the municipal infrastructure projects much accurate, efficient and scientific.
This study has presented a holistic framework for the process of project evaluation. It is all about developing an evaluation framework model that is ex-post. It is attained by the process of going through several different definitions of the measures of the project failure and success and then signifying them with respect to the entire life cycle of the project through taking into consideration every process groups in the project. The authors have made this study with an aim that it would provide the readers with the knowledge of evaluating projects in holistic way.
PDM Project Planning Deliverables Review Checklist
Project Plan Review Checklist |
|
Project Name |
|
Reviewer Name |
|
Review Date |
ID |
Yes/No/NA |
Items to be considered |
PM Column (Y/N/NA) |
Overall Project Plan Questions |
|
||
1. |
Have all required sections been addressed in the Project Plan? |
||
2. |
Deliverables Identified? |
||
3. |
QC Reviews identified? |
||
Project Scope Questions |
|
||
4. |
Scope clearly defined? |
||
5. |
Scope consistent with Initial Scope in Project Charter? |
||
6. |
Project Approach defined? |
||
7. |
Are the baseline requirements numbered or easily identifiable for use in a requirements traceability matrix (RTM)? |
||
8. |
Project Assumptions addressed? |
||
9. |
Project Constraints addressed? |
||
10. |
Risk Identified? |
||
Management Plan Questions |
|
||
Project Organization Questions |
|
||
11. |
Does the project organization have representation for management, functional office and business unit/section? |
||
12. |
If the project needs District participation, are there District people in the project organization? |
||
13. |
Are roles defined? |
||
Estimate/Schedule/Resource Questions |
|
||
14. |
Baseline Estimate established? Estimate method defined? |
||
15. |
Baseline Schedule established? Match major milestone date with Project Charter and work breakdown structure (if applicable) |
||
16. |
Project > 600hours? Work Breakdown Structure included? |
||
Change Management Questions |
|
||
17. |
Change Management process defined? |
||
18. |
Project Change Control Team (CCT) members identified? |
||
19. |
Frequency of CCT meetings defined? |
||
20. |
Have a change Log? |
||
Issue Management Questions |
|
||
21. |
Issue management process defined? |
||
22. |
Issue escalation process identified? |
||
23. |
Have Issue Log? |
||
Risk Management Plan Questions |
|
||
24. |
Risk Management process defined? |
||
25. |
Project Risk Review Team (PRRT) members identified? |
||
26. |
Frequency of PRRT meetings defined? |
||
27. |
Risk Register Initiated? |
||
28. |
Risk Response Strategy established for each identified risk |
||
29. |
Has the Risk Tolerance Threshold been established for the project? |
||
30. |
Is there a Risk Item form or equivalent present, for each risk identified that has a risk severity rating >= the project risk tolerance threshold? |
||
Quality Management Plan Questions |
|
||
31. |
Quality Management Process defined? |
||
32. |
QC Reviews identified for deliverables established/addressed in project plan? |
||
Communication Management Plan Questions |
|
||
33. |
Communication plan established |
||
34. |
Status reports addressed (frequency, audience) |
||
35. |
Project Distribution groups identified |
||
Configuration Management Plan Questions |
|
||
36. |
Application documents that will be controlled identified? (Requirements, System Design, etc) |
||
37. |
Project Documents that will be controlled identified (Project Charter, Project Plan, etc) |
||
Project Closeout Questions |
|
||
38. |
Does project have close out plan? |
||
39. |
If project is delivering an application, does the project have a transition to maintenance plan? |
References and Bibliography
Binder, J. (2016). Global project management: communication, collaboration and management across borders. Routledge.
Conforto, E. C., & Amaral, D. C. (2016). Agile project management and stage-gate model—A hybrid framework for technology-based companies. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 40, 1-14.
Conforto, E. C., Salum, F., Amaral, D. C., da Silva, S. L., & de Almeida, L. F. M. (2014). Can agile project management be adopted by industries other than software development?. Project Management Journal, 45(3), 21-34.
Dybå, T., Dingsøyr, T., & Moe, N. B. (2014). Agile project management. In Software project management in a changing world (pp. 277-300). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
Harrison, F., & Lock, D. (2017). Advanced project management: a structured approach. Routledge.
Verzuh, E. (2015). The fast forward MBA in project management. John Wiley & Sons.
Kerzner, H., & Kerzner, H. R. (2017). Project management: a systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling. John Wiley & Sons.
Moran, A. (2015). Agile project management. In Managing Agile (pp. 71-101). Springer, Cham.
Schwalbe, K. (2015). Information technology project management. Cengage Learning.
Essay Writing Service Features
Our Experience
No matter how complex your assignment is, we can find the right professional for your specific task. Contact Essay is an essay writing company that hires only the smartest minds to help you with your projects. Our expertise allows us to provide students with high-quality academic writing, editing & proofreading services.Free Features
Free revision policy
$10Free bibliography & reference
$8Free title page
$8Free formatting
$8How Our Essay Writing Service Works
First, you will need to complete an order form. It's not difficult but, in case there is anything you find not to be clear, you may always call us so that we can guide you through it. On the order form, you will need to include some basic information concerning your order: subject, topic, number of pages, etc. We also encourage our clients to upload any relevant information or sources that will help.
Complete the order formOnce we have all the information and instructions that we need, we select the most suitable writer for your assignment. While everything seems to be clear, the writer, who has complete knowledge of the subject, may need clarification from you. It is at that point that you would receive a call or email from us.
Writer’s assignmentAs soon as the writer has finished, it will be delivered both to the website and to your email address so that you will not miss it. If your deadline is close at hand, we will place a call to you to make sure that you receive the paper on time.
Completing the order and download