Every man was signified in Oxford to be born as an Aristotelian or a Platonist. It has been seen that every individual whether man or women have two different classes which are next to the impossible. Based on this literary scholar Samuel Coleridge wrote that if an individual is either Aristotelian orPlatonist among both of these.
In this context, there are several resources that have been published in print and in online that will help an individual to deduce whether a man both is Platonist or an Aristotelian. It is the presence of multiple modern systems that have blurred the ancient system due to the presence of old tradition. The theory is underlying the habit and thinking style of an individual male and female. It is not just the personal taste that determines Platonism and Aristoteles but the individuals link with the cultural legacy left by the great philosophers. The truth that lies in the statement of Coleridge are that is the enduring tensions present in between viewpoint and the two thinkers that framed the world. The most important disparity in history is in the way to visualise the world by which Aristotle viewed it and the way to live in which Platoreferred to.
In the dialogues of Plato, he has always characterised his closest teacher named Socrates for exploring the relationship between gods and human in order to accomplish the eternal truth that benignPlato’s ideas and formation. On the contrary, Plato’s x students Aristotle, on the other hand, preferred to study the paradigm, of the world that consisted of human nature (Franklin 25). Therefore, he chose to write treatises on biology and human anatomy along with logic that related to physics and science for which he was known as the founder of science. It has been for over 2500 years Plato has spoken for theologies, poets and artiste who had been highly influenced by the medievalChristianity. In contrast to this, Aristotle spoke directly to the scientists that lived in the world of technology and the practical world (Bonazzi et al. 195).
Therefore, it is evident from the fact of Aristotle’s belief that they are tough-minded, rational and sceptical in their thoughts. However, they also manage to have sociable and dependable friends that covered a large part of Aristotle’s’ ethical beliefs (Sharples et al. 44). On the other hand, it has been seen that Platonists often tend to loners and are usually tender in their thoughts and are philanthropic in nature (Franklin 22). These kinds of people are often determined by their causes and the other individual. In this context, an Aristotelian often asks theway in which it works. A Platonist may ask the meaning of this. A Platonist may also ask” what is your ambition?” to which an Aristotelian may reply “get up and smell the tea”. This implies Aristotelians are more rational in their beliefs and practices in their thoughts (Volgsten 2017).
However, in history, the disciples of Aristotle’s consist of Roman philosopher Cicero and medieval theologise Peter Abelard and other figures such as Adam Smith and Machiavelli. On the contrary, Plato’s disciples are Saint Augustine, Michelangelo, romantics Jean Roseau, Galileo and Einstein (Bahrani 117).
These two great modern philosophises have been observed to be the polar opposites more like north pole and south pole of a magnetised bar. It will answer that will help one individual to find out whether the individual is platonic in belief or Aristotelian. If an individual prefers dog he or she may be an Aristotelian (Pasini 325). Aristotle believed that human beings were genuinely social animals that signified dogs. In this context, he described ethics in this as well as friendship. He said that people who preferred friendship from good friends are the truest friends. In certainty, no other man than dogs turns in to a Man’s best friend.
On the other hand, if an individual prefers cat they are supposed to be rated as Platonist. It is determined by the relationship between the cat and the owners that are well known as spiritual and intuitive in its form. However, in the case of dogs, one may argue that the relationship between Rex and Rover was also spiritual. It is a well-known fact that Egyptians used to worship cat almost before five thousand years ago due to the similar personality that underlies the spiritual entity. It is something that every Platonist is genuinely attracted to (Columbia 39).
Again in case of paying bills, one may prefer to pay their bills by check and the other may prefer to pay it by a person. In this context, Aristotelians are often seen to be comfortable with using updated technology and are more willing to seek to make their living in convenient and effective ways (Waterfield 170). Therefore, an individual man or woman who pays their bill through online method is the Aristotelians. Platonists on the contrary, often tend to be mischievous of transformation specifically in the case of modern technology. Specifically, a platonist tends to see the world as the best ones (Haldar 170). The individual does not prefer to fix the materials unless it is almost broken whereas the Aristotelian pays the bills online saving time and difficulties. Platonist, on the other hand, takes this as an invitation to theft of identity. Therefore, any individual who wishes to sit back and write their monthly rentals by their hand is rated as Platonist.
As known as the founder of logic, Aristotelians prefer sequential systems and observe the regular lists as the way to make clear priorities. Platonists seem to prefer their priorities and they believe that till the time end that will be hoping for a big picture fall in the right place (Te Velde 736). They often value the expected and spontaneous things rather than following schedules. Therefore, if one individual does not follow any time schedules they fall under the score of Platonists. Basketball and football are both built around the clocks. In physics, Aristotle has as mentioned about the facts of motion and transformation as the outcome of the clock in sports. Platonists, on the contrary, observed changes in a different way as an evitable system of disruption and end. The fact that lies here are that the most essential things in the world are often eternal and the time has nothing to add on it. Therefore, Platonists do not really bother about a baseball game that goes on an entire day. Unlike Aristotelians they do not take any pressure of time, Aristotelian prefers car racing as it is associated with technology over the first over the line of competitiveness(Tugby 1150).
However, when an individual is asked whether one wants to be the rock star and a movie star, Aristotelians are seen to be visual. In this context, Aristotle’s poetics have exceptionally illustrated the necessity of theatre and drama to signify all the work of arts (McConnell 188). For Aristotelians, all the work of the artist are a mere illusion and driven by the spectator. Plato, on the contrary, observed the core importance of melody towards human being like an expression of eternity in life. In the Republic, Aristotle has even termed various kinds of music for the different status of the society. Therefore, if an individual preferred to become a rock star that individual will be known as Platonist. To the contrary, if the individual prefers to be a movie star that individual scores to be an Aristotelian (Skidmore-Hess et al. 19).
Apart from this Aristotelians often prefers to choose a sequential process with a little number of surprises. Therefore, if the individual studies directions before time, that individual will be known as Aristotelian. But if one prefers to help others find their direction that is unnecessary they will be known as Platonist. Environmentalism is a huge issue for current Platonist personality (Cooper 122). Therefore, if an individual prefers to drive a car that reduces the emission of greenhouse gas and reliability on fossil fuels one can score as Platonist. On the contrary, if one wants to have a pickup and is less interested in the environment or the individual has a car that fulfils his needs is Aristotelian. In this case, their obligations run towards relationships and family belongings. This is because Aristotelians staystacked towards ethics in maintaining relationships.
Again if a man or a woman has a Jesus’ fist fixed to the car they are more likely to be score as Platonist. It is a well-known fact that Christianity is the traditional home of Platonist spirituality and ethical beliefs of doctrines. In support of this belief if one owns Darwin’s fish they are more likely to be Aristotelian. As stated by (Mouzala 123), Darwin’s theory of origination is the integration of Aristoteles viewpoint of biology and science that signified a strong sense of materialism and offered a challenge towards Plato’sideas of man. Plato’s beliefsshowed that man is a representation of spiritual absolutism like Darwin’s fish.
Moreover, voting and election are crucial for Aristotelian thoughts of politics and self-governance that is usually based on the principle of the ruling. Plato in this issue contrasted that thought as he was deeply doubtful about the ideas of normal politics of democracy specifically in the home country of Athens. He had preconceived belief that politicians were mostly interested in creating their own nests and they usually spent their valuable time diverting the voters from that was essential for the cultivation of respect and virtue(McConnell 188). Therefore, it is evident that if the individual believes that voting is a civic duty, irrespective of the one that is running the election has a belief that all the propaganda are counted as a vote. Therefore true believers of value within a normal process of democracy are usually Aristotelian.
On the contrary, most of the political candidates and people who have special interest those that think that votewill not change anything or the system. Thenthese kinds of people are modern Platonist. Again while eating Pizza if one eats the crust of bread then the individual is a believer of Aristotle. This implies that the individual has successfullylearned the science of delayed gratification and those prefer the process of value. On the contrary, if an individual prefers to eat the tip they belong to the group of Platonist (Tugby 1152). This is because Platonistis well aware of the fact that it is essential to be spontaneous and they enjoy the normal pleasures of liveliness without worrying about the future. However, Plato was not a hedonist; rather they can also act as a thinker to set philosophical conversation at the wine bar.
Conclusion
Therefore, it can be concluded that Aristotelians are a practical individual just like the necessary building blocks of the society as well as cultural beliefs. Plato, on the other hand, is more apprehensive towards the kind of inside enlightenment and sense of serenity that Plato wanted for all their disciplines. However, Aristotle has always contrasted with Plato’sbeliefs about pragmatic poetry. Plato’s thoughts of dual reality into a world of ideas and the world of senses have created a disparity between two different worlds. In this context, theworld of ideas has eternalpatterns of thoughts that consist of spiritual and abstract in their form and the world is believed to be the replication of it. The poet Aristotle has always believed in the appearance of imitation in front of him.
Aristotle does not visualise imitation as a part of the impairment that Plato objected to poetry to be irrational and insufficient.Aristoteles always believed in the representation of superior emotion that is necessary for the individual offering opportunity for the purifying secretion of unhealthy feelings rather than demotivating their growth. In this context, it will noteworthy to say that the outcome was seen in the case of an inherent flaw of the tragic hero viewers relatively less likeable to take such action of effort in an act of pride. Therefore, it can be said that Aristotle is more inclined towards a concrete belief that is more practical in the application of reality. On the other hand, Plato is more diverted towards the belief of abstract and intellectual honouring of real life happenings. Plato, therefore, is a believer of firm morality who thinks that imitation has the ability to perpetuate the immoral behaviour. He thinks that imitation may take people away from the truth that may exploit the society. Therefore, it will be easier to deduce that every man and women have a part of Aristotle and Plato in them that prefers to dream and the other prefers to think rationally.
Reference list
Bahrani, Morteza. “Three Different Readings of al-Farabi’s Political Philosophy.” The International Journal of Humanities21.1 (2015): 117-142.
Bonazzi, Mauro, and George Boys-Stones. “Pierluigi Donini: Commentary and Tradition. Aristotelianism, Platonism, and Post-Hellenistic Philosophy.” Aestimatio: Critical Reviews in the History of Science 9 (2015): 195-201.
Cooper, Stephen A. “The Platonist Christianity of Marius Victorinus.” Religions 7.10 (2016): 122.
Franklin, James. “Uninstantiated Properties and Semi-Platonist Aristotelianism.” The Review of Metaphysics 69.1 (2015): 25-45.
Franklin, James. An Aristotelian Realist Philosophy of Mathematics: Mathematics as the science of quantity and structure. Springer, 2014.
Columbia, David. “The language of science and the science of language: Chomsky’s Cartesianism.” diacritics 43.1 (2015): 38-62.
Haldar, Piyel. “The tongue and the eye: eloquence and office in renaissance emblems.” Genealogies of Legal Vision. Routledge, 2015. 170-196.
McConnell, Sean. “Troels Engberg-Pedersen,(ed.), From Stoicism to Platonism: The Development of Philosophy, 100 BCE-100 CE. Reviewed by.” Philosophy in Review 37.5/6 (2017): 188-191.
Mouzala, Melina G. “Aristotle’s Criticism of the Platonic Forms as Causes in De Generatione et Corruptione II 9. A Reading Based on Philoponus’ Exegesis.” Peitho. Examine Antiqua 1 (7) (2016): 123-148.
Pasini, Enrico. “Leibniz’s Concept of Unity and its Aristotelian Origins.” (2016): 325-332.
Sharples, Robert W., and Teun Tieleman. “Alexander Aphrodisiensis, De anima libri mantissa: A New Edition of the Greek Text with Introduction and Commentary.” Aestimatio: Critical Reviews in the History of Science 7 (2015): 43-44.
Skidmore-Hess, Daniel, Jasmine Ellison, and Chase Sherrod. “Policy Point-Counterpoint: Is Democracy the Best Form of Governance? Aristotelian vs. Platonic Thought.” International Social Science Review 92.2 (2017): 19.
te Velde, Rudi. “Aquinas’s Aristotelian Science of Metaphysics and its Revised Platonism.” Nova et Vetera 13.3 (2015): 743-764.
Tugby, Matthew. “Universals, laws, and governance.” Philosophical Studies 173.5 (2016): 1147-1163.
Volgsten, Ulrik. “Work, form and phonogram. On the significance of the concept of communication for the modern Western concept of music.” International Review of the Aesthetics and Sociology of Music (2015): 207-232.
Waterfield, Robin. “From Plato to Platonism. By Lloyd P. Gerson. Pp. xi, 345, Cornell University Press, 2013, $59.95/£ 34.95.” The Heythrop Journal 57.1 (2016): 170-171.
Essay Writing Service Features
Our Experience
No matter how complex your assignment is, we can find the right professional for your specific task. Contact Essay is an essay writing company that hires only the smartest minds to help you with your projects. Our expertise allows us to provide students with high-quality academic writing, editing & proofreading services.
Free Features
Free revision policy
$10Free bibliography & reference
$8Free title page
$8Free formatting
$8How Our Essay Writing Service Works
First, you will need to complete an order form. It's not difficult but, in case there is anything you find not to be clear, you may always call us so that we can guide you through it. On the order form, you will need to include some basic information concerning your order: subject, topic, number of pages, etc. We also encourage our clients to upload any relevant information or sources that will help.
Complete the order form
Once we have all the information and instructions that we need, we select the most suitable writer for your assignment. While everything seems to be clear, the writer, who has complete knowledge of the subject, may need clarification from you. It is at that point that you would receive a call or email from us.
Writer’s assignment
As soon as the writer has finished, it will be delivered both to the website and to your email address so that you will not miss it. If your deadline is close at hand, we will place a call to you to make sure that you receive the paper on time.
Completing the order and download