Practice Development In Workplace Culture

Practice Development

Discuss about the Practice Development in Workplace Culture.

The healthcare providers initiated the development of a collaborative care practice across all levels of patients and in need of all kind care. Workplace culture is determined by the environment at the workplace that at all time. The culture of a specific organization is an element that forms a conducive environment and makes the work enjoyable. Culture is not something you can see, but it’s expressed through practical manifestation at the workplace. The literature makes up for a person includes; interest, beliefs, values, expediencies, habits, upbringing and underlying assumptions. The culture of a particular organization arises when a group of workers arrives at a set of written and unspoken rules that guide them to work together. The culture of an organization is composed of the life experiences brought to the organization by each employee. The roles of the organization’s executives, founders and the managerial staffs in making decisions and strategic directions influence the organization’s culture (Nilsen, 2015).

The practice development mainly focuses on the cultural change to enhance more person- centered-care in the healthcare unit. The care unit can either be department, clinic or ward. The prevailing practice culture is sometimes complicated and challenging which can be difficult to ascertain the aspects of culture that are to be addressed for the healthcare development programs. Proper supervision and observation of workers practical activities are one of the ways of ensuring practice development. There are many ways and tools of observing the practice development but are inconsistence with values and philosophy. These tools tend to judge the quality instead of facilitating the staffs’ engagement (Fetters, 2013).

The capacity of leadership determines the workplace culture of staffs and quality care. The active development of workplace culture in healthcare systems is enhanced by clinical leadership transformation and all other leadership advances. Due to the growth of framework values and a common purpose, an internal professional leadership clinical program was established to form a leader’s community of transformation in one of the National Health Services (NHS) in England. Previously the clinical program became unsuccessful in engrossing the medical doctors. The clinical development programs were set out to help medical doctors to apply transformational leadership in their respective healthcare organization to facilitate and sustain safety, person-centered and productive workplace cultures. The practices development method includes inclusive, collaborative and participative determinants to develop personal centered culture together with strategies for clinical leadership that form the basis of the development program. It considers the use of action and ongoing education, referent to the workplace as the resources of getting knowledge, improvement, and development. Collective thinking and personal assessment of clinical leadership and collaborating in analyzing and evaluation of data resulted in the production of insights by use of action planning and reflections (Patton and McMahon, 2014).

Leadership and Cultural Change

The program assumptions were used for clinical leaders to achieve right places for work, developing, maintaining and retaining the staffs in several ways. (i) Through developing their emotional intelligence and self- awareness. (ii) By facilitating and enabling their teams to be active through the creation of the best working environment and using this environment as their learning, improvement and development areas for their skills. (iii) Being the transformational leaders as role models who inspire and engages their junior members through participation, collaborative and inclusion (Connor and Pokora,  2012).

Leadership is a crucial strategy of forming cultures that respect the patient’s safety and quality, together with staffs experiences, knowledge translation and learning effectiveness. An ethical culture that enhances the provision of high quality and safe care is attained by sharing ideas and interpretation of values as agreed to the ways of governing the organization.  It embraces compassion, care, and support and is enabled by the leadership that acknowledges one endeavor instead of effective control and commands. For adoption of a suitable culture, the administration of an organization has to be less top heavy and also flexible. The governance of an organization has to reflect themselves regarding pyramids and machines and even behave like an organic leaving system that evolves continuously and adapt to the environment due to new coming changes (Mohr et al., 2012).

The capacity of recognizing the progress of health care system and the internal linkages between all the benefactors is an essential quality of a leader to support the adaptability and the members to be creative, innovative and flourishing. In 2011, Turnbull James argued that national healthcare services require individuals who accept themselves as leaders and can see the requirements of actions and encourage others to do it, and not those who can see themselves as seniors and exceptional (Renedo et al., 2015).

From a specific study that involved 23 medical doctors leading different care services who were from all specialist that includes radiologist, anesthetists, surgeons, pathologists and physicians specialist. The study was outlining the program’s aims, underlying approach and learning outcomes that were distributed across the whole organization. The participants were chosen by the first come first choice, and they were to be underpinned by their senior managers to attend all the sessions. Out of the 23 participants 18 only completed the program (Manley et al., 2014).

The collaborative insights programs help to note the effect of leadership in the working environment to establish ways that will enable work to be celebratory, inclusive collaborative and participative. The collaborative learning and reflections of the data program considered the fact that only 18 participants out of the 23 were able to complete the application. There was also a variable degree of practice among the participants in the program. The relevant outcomes of the program were very essential for maintaining support for positive motivation and development. An internal ideal for growing the capacity was noted as a single feature of the participants in the program. The experiences of the participants aimed at developing and engaging the medical doctors as clinical managers to form capacity and ability of clinical and overall leadership of the organization. The culture of wellness and health are viewed as the foundations and factors that affect positive communication, measurements and outcomes in a health sector (Marsick and Watkins, 2015).

Ethical Culture and Governance

The culture, wellness, and environment are the main components of health sociological framework used in Ohio State University that guides the evidence intervention and measurements of results to attain the goal of becoming the best University regarding health in the world (Thomas and Galla, 2013). In such a model several levels have to be included in positive outcomes of the patients care, social network, culture environment and individual satisfaction. The wellness of culture measurements is vital as research findings shown support in its relationship with healthy behavioral lifestyles and the health outcomes. Several assessments were developed with the consent of health promotion to determine the perceived environment and culture by employees of an organization. However, the institutions of higher learning conduct limited research on the assessment of the situation and perceived culture. Higher learning institutions are sometimes more complicated on the workplace health promotion field as they tend to include many organization sectors that promote wellness and health but the units are functional in fragmented ways.  For instances, the school of public health in a University may be dealing with the initiative of health promotion to minimize smoking in the campus while another faculty of fitness activities for exercises conducted by the department of science. Another college or department within the University establishment of wellness programs and the other school of nutrition focuses on weight loss initiative (McCormack et al., 2013). In such a case within one institution, it may be brought some complications about who is conducting what when all the activities are not coordinated and communicated. The concept behind working environmental support is an essential notion for health promotion in workplace programs that are included in the new Perceived Wellness Culture and Environment Support Scale (PWC) (Manley et al., 2013).

The realistic synthesis of the effects of developing practice leads to the introduction of the critical strategies of developing personal-centered care through useful workplace cultures, contexts and enhancing beliefs and values by focusing on learning and practicing. The primary theoretical criteria through the international development of practice and collaboration resulted to the exploration of the basic concept. Practice development has been linked with the translation of knowledge that brought sufficient evidence which depends on blending of distinct types of evidence of a person’s local context, patient views, research and clinical experience. The knowledge translations depend on the skills, honesty contributors, forming enabling background and cultures (McCormack et al., 2013).

Collaborative Insights Programs

The principles of practice development are as follows: (i) The useful event aimed in achieving evidence-based care and person-centered care through the individual thriving and the culture of the workplace for effectiveness in healthcare situations and settings. (ii) It focused at the sub-systems level, where most healthcare is provided and experienced but needs consistency support from related macro-organizational levels. (iii) It integrate work based on learning and focus on formal and active learning systems to enable understanding of the workplace for transformation of healthcare. (iv) It pointed on evidence development from practice and the utilization of the skills acquired. (v) It encompasses creativity and cognition so as to combine heart, mind and soul energies enhancing the practitioners to be free thinkers and allow the space for human flourishing to arise. (vi)  Practice development is a reliable methodology which is useful for all healthcare teams and involves all external and internal contributors. (vii) The principal methods are used following the methodological principle of operation and contextual feature of the work program. (viii) Its interrelated with the set process and skilled facilitation which could be translated into required specific set skills as close to the interface of healthcare as possible. (ix) Practice development comprises of approaches evaluation which includes participative, inclusive and collaborative. The combination of these principles with values will ensure useful workplace cultures (Mitchell et al., 2012).

The principle of Collaboration, Inclusion, and Participation (CIP) facilitated the implementation and identification of allocated values and beliefs to the stakeholders. These principles promoted the learning from and in practice concerning a general or a specific issue using creative imagination, expressing, related method and actively learning how to make self-awareness and motivates the application of these shared values. The CIP principles also allow for systemic change using several multiple sources. The shared purpose occurs when the team of individuals adheres to one belief system with a single goal or vision (Huxham and Vangen, 2013).

The shared objective is a robust strategy for cooperating groups of stakeholders in collaborative initiatives, enhancing every individual to perform creatively towards similar direction while embracing the agreed values for example provision of shared decision – making and encouraging people to have a heart of care. The shared purpose enhanced non-collaborative working, barriers, silos and incompatible agendas to be overcome and challenged (Stiggelbout et al., 2012). The clarification of the use led to compatibility on the way that purposes can be attained and what it means for working directions and priorities.  One of the primary activity of practice development at work and as one of its fundamental principles is developing the shared purpose. The range of approaches that are used to achieve the values clarification of the policy through the use of college, dance, poetry, and visualization. The complex intervention of practice development integrates the system development practice together with the support of practitioners and the change of culture to sustain specific outcomes. A purpose that is shared attributes to a productive work culture due to the shared values. Since the concept of the 1980s, the practice improvement focused on gaining of evidence-informed care and personal- centered care, even though recent refinements endorsed the flourishing human idea and implemented the worksite cultures to make each flourish (McCormack and McCance, 2016).

Culture, Wellness, and Environment

The principle of (CIP) develops the ownership of direction, change and also self- empowerment. The agreed beliefs and values to be achieved and methods of working which gives support of reference that enhances self-direction, the comfort of decided values, behaviors and mutual challenge. Involving all the staffs in decision making accords value to them and allows engagement, multiple perspectives, joint responsibility, differences recognition, and acknowledgment. Embedded beliefs and shared values together with behavioral patterns into worksite culture through the social systems that minimize the irresistible on specific individuals (Dewing et al., 2014).

 The cooperative working environment among the employees includes; open communication, involvement, high support, high challenge, collaboration and participation with other stakeholders, teamwork and leadership development. Such working environment makes the staffs and the overall workforce satisfied.  The effective care is an evidence development used to show the lifelong learning, holistic safety and positive attitude towards change (Golden and Earp, 2012). The personal- centered culture is expected to be consistently implicated as social norms. The methods for identification of cultural characteristics include the use of non-participants and participants care and relationships.  At the executive level, the leadership and change of artistic skills are needed to sustain and implement the shared purpose across and within all the staffs and sectors of the organization.  There is a need to address the organization cultural problems such duplication of effort, invisibility impact, silo working and lack of shared purpose. It is essential to enhance workers creativity and leadership to develop the working sites where everybody has to flourish and where the staffs and service users can consistently contribute to the evaluation and person-centered experience. For the formation of the reflective framework of adequate care, and safety culture will support trust among the working groups. The groups that have to collaborate to ensure a good perception of an organization include; clinical leaders, advanced practitioners, nurse specialist, practice development facilitators, nurse practitioners, clinical nurse specialist and consultant midwives/ nurses (Antoinette, 2012).

The primary purpose of establishment of a cultural framework through practice development involves personal centeredness to enable working in a person-centered manner with the other workers and with compassionate care. Person-centeredness allows a health practitioner to have the courage to communicate and listen to the patients’ needs. The shared framework provides safe care to the patient and improves by reviewing safety practice. For effective care, evaluation and research are very crucial in providing safe care to the patient and maintenance of personal effectiveness and encouraging others to be effective. The workplace culture effectiveness is determined by performance in a working team, self-awareness, and development of productive relationships. The active worksite culture involves active learning in practice and transformation of care services. Improving, growth and innovation result in compassionate person-centered care safety and adequate care (Carlström and Ekma, 2012).

The framework of cultural in the workplace through practice development enables nurses’ specialist collaboration, development framework, a career structure, evaluating and sustaining care to person-centered care to the patient services and pathways. To dominate the number, contribution and range of organization roles, providing recommendations for education commissioning and implementation. The commission for practice development made recommendations for the framework rollout to the development of the integration between the team members for the strategy of practice development. The frame practice transformation enables the identification of specific skills needed by clinical leaders of the particular framework to make a conducive culture that sustains and provides person-centered, quality and safe care and innovation of patient services and enhancing change in the system.

Reference

Antoinette Bargagliotti, L., 2012. Work engagement in nursing: a concept analysis. Journal of advanced nursing, 68(6), pp.1414-1428.

Carlström, E.D., and Ekman, I., 2012. Organisational culture and change: implementing person-centered care. Journal of health organization and management, 26(2), pp.175-191.

Connor, M. and Pokora, J., 2012. Coaching and mentoring at work: Developing active practice: Developing effective method. McGraw-Hill Education (UK).

Dewing, J., McCormack, B., and Kitchen, A., 2014. Practice Development workbook for nursing, health and social care teams. John Wiley & Sons.

Fetters, M.D., Curry, L.A. and Creswell, J.W., 2013. Achieving integration in mixed methods designs—principles and practices. Health services research, 48(6pt2), pp.2134-2156.

Golden, S.D. and Earp, J.A.L., 2012. Social-ecological approaches to individuals and their contexts: twenty years of health education & behavior health promotion interventions. Health Education & Behavior, 39(3), pp.364-372.

Huxham, C. and Vangen, S., 2013. Managing to collaborate: The theory and practice of collaborative advantage. Routledge.

Manley, K., McCormack, B. and Wilson, V. eds., 2013. International practice development in nursing and healthcare. John Wiley & Sons.

Manley, K., O’Keefe, H., Jackson, C., Pearce, J., and Smith, S., 2014. A shared purpose framework to deliver person-centered, safe and effective care: organizational transformation using practice development methodology. International Practice Development Journal, 4(1).

Marsick, V. and Watkins, K., 2015. Informal and incidental learning in the workplace (Routledge Revivals). Routledge.

McCormack, B. and McCance, T. eds., 2016. Person-centered practice in nursing and health care: Theory and practice. John Wiley & Sons.

McCormack, B., Manley, K. and Kitchen, A. eds., 2013. Practice development in nursing and healthcare. John Wiley & Sons.

McCormack, B., Rycroft-Malone, J., DeCorby, K., Hutchinson, A.M., Bucknall, T., Kent, B., Schultz, A., Snelgrove-Clarke, E., Stetler, C., Titler, M. and Wallin, L., 2013. A realist review of interventions and strategies to promote evidence-informed healthcare: a focus on change agency. Implementation Science, 8(1), p.107.

Patton, W. and McMahon, M., 2014. Career development and systems theory: Connecting theory and practice (Vol. 2). Springer.

Stiggelbout, A.M., Van der Weijden, T., De Wit, M.P., Frosch, D., Légaré, F., Montori, V.M., Trevena, L. and Elwyn, G., 2012. Shared decision making: putting patients at the center of healthcare. BMJ, 344, p.e256.

Thomas, L. and Galla, C., 2013. Building a culture of safety through team training and engagement. BMJ Qual Saf, 22(5), pp.425-434.

Mitchell, P., Wynia, M., Golden, R., McNellis, B., Okun, S., Webb, C.E., Rohrbach, V. and Von Kohorn, I., 2012. Core principles & values of effective team-based health care. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine.

Mohr, D.C., Young, G.J. and Burgess Jr, J.F., 2012. Employee turnover and operational performance: The moderating effect of group?oriented organizational culture. Human Resource Management Journal, 22(2), pp.216-233.

Nilsen, P., 2015. Making sense of implementation theories, models, and frameworks. Implementation Science, 10(1), p.53.

Renedo, A., Marston, C.A., Spyridonidis, D. and Barlow, J., 2015. Patient and Public Involvement in Healthcare Quality Improvement: How organizations can help patients and professionals to collaborate. Public Management Review, 17(1), pp.17-34.