The article sheds light on process delivery techniques, which enhances the awareness of the personnel regarding the actual workflow. This is carried out through the maintenance of log events. In most of the cases, the organizations make use of Petri nets or casual nets for delivering the business processes. The academic scholars prefer these nets, as they assist in enhancing the productivity (Redlich et al. 2014). On the contrary, business analysts encounter difficulties comprehending the importance of these nets in completion of the business activities. As a matter of specification, the focus of the article is on algorithm, which reflects the top down approach. In this proposal, the article upholds the constructs, needed for determining the noise and the non-supportive behaviour. Conglomeration of the constructs helps the personnel in seeking suitable solutions for the top down behaviour approximations. Formal descriptions of the algorithm along with the results seem beneficial in determining the constructs and behaviour adopted for delivering the business process techniques in an efficient and efficient and effective manner (Redlich et al. 2014).
In an ambience of competition, the companies and organizations need to be conscious about the process delivery techniques, which they are using. This in terms of improving the standards and quality of the business operations. Development of realistic and achievable goals improves the focus of the personnel on executing the activities according to the requirements. The main aim of Process Discovery Techniques is to gain an understanding about the actual working processes from the created logs. Typical components of the log are identification of the bottlenecks for improving the business processes. This improvement, further, enhances the productivity, providing the companies and organizations with an opportunity to enjoy competitive advantage over the contemporary brands (Redlich et al. 2014).
In the actual process of executing the business activities, the personnel realize the difference between the design time of the product specification and the time when the product specifications re discovered. Complying with the standards of business processes like BPMN and EPC are subjected to the domain of business operations. The results of the algorithms for process deliver techniques are dependent on independent representations of the Petri nets, which are discovered by the alpha algorithms. On the other hand, casual nets are discovered by Heuristic Miners.
The article projects the difficulties of a business analyst in terms of decision making. This is in terms of unfamiliarity with the representation of the process; mapping the process at the design time and process discovered at the running time. This mapping is difficult, as both the design time and process discovered are subjected to different linguistic representations (Redlich et al. 2014). The article proposes that transformation to different representation can prove effective in terms of solving the discrepancies related to the representations. One of the other problems here is mining a model for conforming to the representing the domain for the business processes. Mining a model possesses flexibility towards making the analysts aware of process for formulating the requirements for representing the results.
The article forms an exemplar in terms of reflecting the existence of different standards and models for the business processes. Mention can be made of Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN). Along with this, Yet Another Workflow Language (YAWL) is a significant model in terms of creating the log events for the operations. The article mainly focuses on a set of control flow elements, which supports the major workplace standards. These elements include start and end activities (process steps); parallel gateways (XOR split or join) among others. According to the formal definition, business process model is the combination of a set of activities, finite set of splits, finite set of joins, finite set of start and end event and connecting the path of operations (Redlich et al. 2014).
|
C = {(c1, c2) ∈ F × F | c1 6= c2 ∧ c1 ∈/ Ee ∧ c2 ∈/ Es}, – ∀a ∈ A ∪ J ∪ Es : |{(a, b) ∈ C | b ∈ F}| = 1, – ∀a ∈ A ∪ S ∪ Ee : |{(b, a) ∈ C | b ∈ F}| = 1, – ∀a ∈ J : |{(b, a) ∈ C | b ∈ F}| ≥ 2, – ∀a ∈ S : |{(a, b) ∈ C | b ∈ F}| ≥ 2, and – all elements e ∈ F in the graph (F, C) are on a path from a start event a ∈ Es to an end event b ∈ Ee. |
Figure 1: Formula of business process model
(Source: Redlich et al. 2014)
The above diagram is the summarization of the formula stated for business process model. The integrated structure is represented from the hierarchical representation of the structures, joining the entry and the exit points. Within this structure, the business process constructs occupy an important position. These constructs- Choice, Parallel among others are non-sequential and possess similarity with the process tree, which is defined according to the performance of the Petri nets or workflow nets. Information systems helps in maintaining the event logs and the transactions for each event. This article specifically deals with the features needed for discovery of the control flow (Redlich et al. 2014). Every event needs to have the reference to the identifier, who provides instance to the processes. Along with this, reference is also needed to the corresponding activities. This reference and correspondence provides the processes with an unique name.
The processes in a single events are captured in a trace, which are represented by pairs (t and a). Here, t stands for trace and a stands for the activity). As two traces are considered to independent of each other, the interesting point here is the order of the activities within the trace. Based on the above aspects, one of the other definition of a business process model can be as follows:
Figure: Second formula for business process model
(Source: Redlich et al. 2014)
Traces consisting only of activity orders are known as simple traces. The logs, which consist of simple traces are called simple event logs. One of the examples of the simple event logs for the business process can be as follows:
Figure: Example of simple event log
(Source: Redlich et al. 2014)
Process discovery relates with the act of extracting the business model from he created logs without the consideration of a-priori information. Process discovery is the main term, which includes unleashing all the angles from which the business operations can be executed. However, the article focuses on discovery of control flow perspective. BPMN and EPC helps the personnel in creating the design-time models. Here the focus is on interoperability, which improves the public relations with the stakeholders. Here, the propositions of Van der Aalst can be linked. This is because mapping the process helps in preparing the reports. Sending the reports on the workflow process and models to the stakeholders enhances their awareness about the business dynamics (Aalst 2016).
Extraction of process model through the process discovery techniques aligns with the time management, which is needed in terms of completing the processes. Evaluation of the proposed plans and processes well in advance helps the personnel in maintaining the sequence between the project related activities. According to the arguments of Batoulis et al. (2015), extracting the business models through the techniques of BPMN helps the personnel in undertaking logical decisions for executing the project related activities. This is in terms of devoting quality time to the consideration of the prospective sources through which the revenue and the profit can be enhanced. As a matter of specification, evaluation of the process delivery techniques helps the personnel in deciding which methods would be effective for enhancing the efficiency within the business activities.
Actual run-time is important for extracting the business processes through the discovery techniques. The personnel lack the understanding about the standards of the business model prior to the extraction. As a result of this, they conform to the use of the Petri nets and casual nets for extracting the business process models. This relates with the logical decision-making, which enhances the personality of the personnel in terms of the enhancing the productivity (Leemans, Fahland and Aalst 2015). The research journals consist of the evidences related to the existence of algorithms for discovering the efficient techniques related to the delivering the processes. These researches also project the strengths and weakness of the algorithms, enabling the personnel in undertaking logical decisions towards delivering the processes in an efficient and effective manner.
Footprint of the logs forms the base for construction of the business processes. The authors of the researches agree to the representation of the footprint through direct neighbour matrix, which consists of the information about the interconnectedness between the activities. Some of the algorithms deal with the process of discovering blocked structured processes, which have certain specific characteristics. Most of the genetic process delivery restricts the space for exploring the unknown domains of the process delivery techniques (Redlich et al. 2014). In absence of space, time becomes a constraint, even if plans have been constructed well in advance. This results in the creation of research trees, which can be considered beneficial in terms of projecting the conceptual framework for the process delivery techniques.
One of the weakness of the algorithms is that they prove ineffective in terms of determining the outcomes of the process delivery techniques. Along with this, these does not guarantee suitable run times for the personnel in terms of seeking effective business models. One of the other approaches in this context is the Inductive Miner, where top down approach is followed for untangling the blocked structures of Petri nets. Usage of the original algorithm assists the personnel in evaluating the constraints within the relationships and the constructs. One of the striking facts about Inductive Miner (IM) is that it acquires extension due to its deals with noise (Redlich et al. 2014). One of the other options is creation of the lock structured processes from the logs. This results in the discovery of arbitrary Petri nets, which have undergone transformations.
There are different approaches to dealing with the business process models, which consists of noise and logs, not conforming to the target process language. These are:
Correlation and the significant process models simplifies the model, which supports the main behaviour needed for discovering the process delivery techniques. Mention can be made of the Heuristics Miner, where project mapping is done for the causal net. This net is them transformed for providing the clients and the customers an enhanced understanding of the representations regarding the process delivery techniques. Relation between the activities is not the base for footprints used in the Heuristic Miner (HM) (Redlich et al. 2014). However, relative relation values are important in terms of excavating the correlation between the activities of process delivering. Indulging in alliances helps in simplifying the process of extracting the business model for extracting the process delivery techniques.
Through the use of Construct Competition Miner, the personnel get the motivation for developing different discovery algorithms. These algorithmic representations is a support for the BP constructs in terms of establishing the relationship between each other. This is derived from the challenging conventions regarding the noisy logs, which often encounter conflicting behaviours. One of the typical components of Construct Competitive Miner is the Footprint, which is multiplied during the actual process of discovering the delivery techniques (Redlich et al. 2014). At the initial stage, the footprint of the activities is essential in terms of carrying out the activities according to the identified and the specified requirements. The nature of operation in the algorithm is divide and conquer, which gives rise to new subsets. For example:
for A = {a, b, c, d, e} : (a, b, c, d, e) → ((a, b, c),(d, e)) → (((a),(b, c)),((d),(e))) → (((a),((b),(c))),((d),(e)))4 nine different footprints for sets {a, b, c, d, e}, {a, b, c}, {d, e}, {b, c}, {a}, {b}, {c}, {d}, {e} need to be created.
Focusing on the global relations between the activities, acts as an expansion for the project delivery techniques. The following can be one of the examples of business process with two nested parallel constructs:
Figure 1: Example business process with parallel nested constructs
(Source: Redlich et al. 2014)
Consideration of the footprints between the activity sets {a,b,c,d and e} and {f,g and h} reflect the sequential representation of the choice constructs. This is because all the value set are null in the matrix. The personnel possess the liberty to make additions in the matrix sets. The workings of CM bears resemblance to the processes identified in the Decision and Sequence Constructs. Constraints for the constructs requires the appear before values for bringing the value of the process delivering techniques to 0. In order to deal with the noises in an efficient and effective manner, CCM considers the following definition:
Fig: Definition of CCM for dealing with the noise
(Source: Redlich et al. 2014)
Though the consideration of competitive algorithm, the personnel intend to fulfil the goal of excavate the best combination of sequence, loop and Choice. One of the effective solutions is creation and compilation of the splits within the process delivering techniques. Projection of the splits helps the personnel in undertaking logical decisions for delivering the processes through efficient and effective techniques. Apart from this, projecting the possible splits is assistance in terms of establishing comparative study, which proves effective in extracting the best possible business models. In a competitive algorithm, the competition is denoted by “Ch”. For this, the log would be Am = A = {a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h}. The algorithmic function would therefore be a follows:
Figure: Competitive algorithm: Traversing to the best split-up
(Source: Redlich et al. 2014)
Additional BP constructs can enter into this chain through three simple modifications in the algorithms:
Conclusion
The article emerges successful in projecting the essential techniques needed for delivering the business processes. Consideration of time and space are essential in term of projecting the possible splits, which may arise in the processes. Modification in the algorithms is assistance for the personnel in terms of extracting the appropriate business models for enhancing the productivity.
References
Batoulis, K., Meyer, A., Bazhenova, E., Decker, G. and Weske, M., 2015, June. Extracting decision logic from process models. In International conference on advanced information systems engineering (pp. 349-366). Springer, Cham.
Leemans, S.J., Fahland, D. and van der Aalst, W.M., 2015, August. Using life cycle information in process discovery. In International Conference on Business Process Management(pp. 204-217). Springer, Cham.
Redlich, D., Molka, T., Gilani, W., Blair, G. and Rashid, A., 2014, September. Constructs competition miner: process control-flow discovery of BP-domain constructs. In International Conference on Business Process Management(pp. 134-150). Springer, Cham.
Van der Aalst, W., 2016. Process discovery: An introduction. In Process Mining (pp. 163-194). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
Essay Writing Service Features
Our Experience
No matter how complex your assignment is, we can find the right professional for your specific task. Contact Essay is an essay writing company that hires only the smartest minds to help you with your projects. Our expertise allows us to provide students with high-quality academic writing, editing & proofreading services.
Free Features
Free revision policy
$10Free bibliography & reference
$8Free title page
$8Free formatting
$8How Our Essay Writing Service Works
First, you will need to complete an order form. It's not difficult but, in case there is anything you find not to be clear, you may always call us so that we can guide you through it. On the order form, you will need to include some basic information concerning your order: subject, topic, number of pages, etc. We also encourage our clients to upload any relevant information or sources that will help.
Complete the order form
Once we have all the information and instructions that we need, we select the most suitable writer for your assignment. While everything seems to be clear, the writer, who has complete knowledge of the subject, may need clarification from you. It is at that point that you would receive a call or email from us.
Writer’s assignment
As soon as the writer has finished, it will be delivered both to the website and to your email address so that you will not miss it. If your deadline is close at hand, we will place a call to you to make sure that you receive the paper on time.
Completing the order and download