Discuss About The Quantitative Methods In Business Research.
Plagiarism constitutes as conduct in which a particular copyright material or idea which has been produced by someone else is used by an individual without mentioning the source and thus indicating the material as self. For the following reasons, it is required that one must avoid plagiarism.
The requirement of the in-text referencing arises for highlighting those ideas or content that have been taken from someone else and also provide credit to the original creator. Even though a bibliography at the end may acknowledge the various sources, but the in-text referencing allows the reader to be made aware of the specific material used for producing specific texts. Also, the verification of the text is also aided since the examiner or user can actually verify whether the given source does highlight what is mentioned in the text. Besides, in text referencing also provides option to the examiner or user to study about a particular aspect in detail by referring to the source.
I) As per Done (2018, p.7), the experience of studying in a university is comparable to attending a smorgasbord restaurant.
ii) “To have a good experience at a smorgasbord restaurant, you need to get out of your chair.” (Done, 2018. p.7)
Daff, L., De Lange, P. and Jackling, B. (2012) A Comparison of Generic Skills and Emotional Intelligence in Accounting Education, Issues in Accounting Education, 27(3), pp.627-64
An appropriate exploratory question based on the given scenario is as follows.
“What are the main issues or problem that the workers encounter on account of new time keeping system introduction?”
“What is the impact of the time spent by workers on the model on the warranty claims amount?”
“Does the warranty claims encountered for the two models (i.e. Deluxe and Standard) highlight any significant difference?”
In research, deductive approach indicates the approach where the starting reasoning is more general and then it moves to specific conclusions being drawn. Therefore, premises are used for deriving the conclusions. The use of this approach is quite common for testing of existing theories. Also, deductive approach is often used with quantitative research i.e. where there is data that can be utilised for testing the hypothesis that are derived from an underlying theory. Also, there is a close association between positivism and deductive approach considering the tendency to carry out experiments for drawing conclusions (Eriksson and Kovalainen, 2015, p. 69-70).
Inducti approach refers to a methodology where the specific acts as the starting point of the reasoning which then is used to derive a more general conclusion. Hence, this approach is more suitable for theory producing rather than testing the same. As a result, the inductive approach is usually associated with qualitative research which is inclined towards being exploratory and not descriptive in nature. Inductive approach is closely related to constructivism which aims to understand the derivation of meanings based on human experiences. In this, the main objective is to build theory and not to test the same. This approach has gained immense popularity in the social sciences since deductive approach based scientific experiments is not of much use in such subjects (Flick, 2015, p. 83-86).
The question design is not appropriate given the scenario as a mechanism to highlight the relative frequency for the highlighted reasons for visiting library is missing. The various options also lack prudent designing thus leading to duplication. This is quite apparent from the two choices one dealing with books borrowing and other with books returning. If one of the above happens, then it is logical to conclude that the other happens, and hence it makes sense to club these two into one choice. Considering that for the given survey, a respondent may highlight majority of the boxes, the relative importance of the reasons remained uncaptured. Hence, the relative importance needs to be brought out for the reasons by allowing the respondent to provide ranks in decreasing frequency to only those options which are valid.
Independent Variable – This is the variable which does not depend on other variables. As a result in various experiments, there is alteration of independent variable and the effect on the dependent variable is captured. As a result, the independent variable tends to act as the reason for bringing about change in the dependent variable (Hillier, 2016, p. 37).
Dependent Variable – This refers to the variable which tends to be driven by independent variable. For experiments, this variable is used to measure the outcome when the independent variable changes. Hence, this highlights the variable which the researcher tends to measure in the experiments (Flick, 2015, p. 68).
Control Variable – This refers to the variable that remains constant in the experiment so as to allow the researcher to analyse the dependent and independent variable relationship. Since variations in the control variable can impact the experimental results, hence this variable is held unchanged so that any effect in the dependent variable is only due to independent variable related changes. Hence, the control variable during the experiment is not of primary interest considering it is not altered (Hastie, Tibshirani and Friedman, 2011, p. 65).
Gender and ethics education/training (absence or presence) are the two independent variable deployed in the models. However, one model also uses another independent variable that highlights the association interaction effect between gender and ethics education (Wang and Calvano, 2015).
For the models used, there are only two dependent variables that are highlighted below (Wang and Calvano, 2015).
H1 has indeed been written in the form of a directional hypothesis. This is apparent from the fact that the hypothesis predicts the same which is being backed by the literature cited i.e. moral judgement instances tend to be higher for females in comparison with males (Flick, 2015, p. 109).
H2 is expressed in alternate form which is apparent from the fact that the hypothesis which captured the researcher’s prediction is true and represents that ethical training to undergraduate students allow them to make more moral judgements in situations where ethical dilemmas are involved (Wang and Calvano, 2015).
In H3, the interaction word refers to the fact that the simultaneous acting of the two independent variables in the form of gender and ethics training tends to produce results which deviate from the total sum of the above mentioned two variables. Therefore, it becomes obvious that an interaction effect is involved which has been taken into account (Wang and Calvano, 2015).
The treatment and control groups have been used for elimination of the extraneous variable impact so that the effect of the selected treatment can be measured. For the given situation, there are multiple sources besides ethics training that can impact the moral judgement. Thus, the use of control group acts as a reliable reference point for objectively determining the impact of ethics training (Wang and Calvano, 2015).
The participant testing is carried out after the treatment only in case of “post-test only design”. For the study under consideration, control group and treatment group are used. Ethics training is provided only to the treatment group and the intervention impact is then measured by comparing with the control group so as to reveal the ethics training impact on moral judgement.
A potential problem that arises from the experiment stretching over several weeks is that the control group and treatment group participants would not remain isolated and interactions between these groups may have adverse impact on the validity. Further, over time, it is also a concern that equivalence of the two groups may not remain and hence adversely impact validity. Additionally, there could be potential drop outs leads to further non-equivalence between the groups and leading to adverse impact on validity.
There is impact of gender on ethical decision making considering that on average females took more ethical decisions in situations involving ethical dilemmas in comparison to males. The result is supported by the literature available which highlights that females tend to have greater empathy in comparison with males. For non-business decision, the ethics training role has been rather insignificant. However, for business decisions, the results indicate that higher incidence of ethical decision making is exhibited by males having ethics training while for the females, there is a decrease in ethical decision making after receiving the ethics training (Wang and Calvano, 2015).
Meta-analysis is helpful in presenting the results of various studies in a combined form. The need for meta-analysis emerges as different studies on the same topic may lead to different interpretations of similar observations. Thus, based on the underlying consistency in the findings, it makes sense to combine the research data obtained from a host of studies which may highlight the significance or insignificance of a given treatment. This tends to improve the study validity owing to existence of a strong support from relevant empirical studies on the topic of research (Hair et. al. 2015, p.148-15)
References
Eriksson, P. and Kovalainen, A. (2015) Quantitative methods in business research. 3rd ed. London: Sage Publications.
Flick, U. (2015) Introducing research methodology: A beginner’s guide to doing a research project. 4th ed. New York: Sage Publications.
Hair, J. F., Wolfinbarger, M., Money, A. H., Samouel, P., and Page, M. J. (2015) Essentials of business research methods. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge.
Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R. and Friedman, J. (2011) The Elements of Statistical Learning. 4th ed. New York: Springer Publications.
Hillier, F. (2016) Introduction to Operations Research 6th ed. New York: McGraw Hill Publications.
Wang, L.C. and Calvano, L. (2015) Is Business Ethics Education Effective? An Analysis of Gender, Personal Ethical Perspectives, and Moral Judgment, Journal of Business Ethics, 126(4), pp.591-60
Essay Writing Service Features
Our Experience
No matter how complex your assignment is, we can find the right professional for your specific task. Contact Essay is an essay writing company that hires only the smartest minds to help you with your projects. Our expertise allows us to provide students with high-quality academic writing, editing & proofreading services.
Free Features
Free revision policy
$10Free bibliography & reference
$8Free title page
$8Free formatting
$8How Our Essay Writing Service Works
First, you will need to complete an order form. It's not difficult but, in case there is anything you find not to be clear, you may always call us so that we can guide you through it. On the order form, you will need to include some basic information concerning your order: subject, topic, number of pages, etc. We also encourage our clients to upload any relevant information or sources that will help.
Complete the order form
Once we have all the information and instructions that we need, we select the most suitable writer for your assignment. While everything seems to be clear, the writer, who has complete knowledge of the subject, may need clarification from you. It is at that point that you would receive a call or email from us.
Writer’s assignment
As soon as the writer has finished, it will be delivered both to the website and to your email address so that you will not miss it. If your deadline is close at hand, we will place a call to you to make sure that you receive the paper on time.
Completing the order and download