Plastic production has started from 1950s and production has been over 7 billion metric tons. There is no possibility of degradation in plastics, it will break down in micro-fragment and the majority of it is present in existence. This will be accumulating the landfill and littering the natural environments and polluting the oceans. With approximately 7 million plastic metric tons entering into the ocean every year, the scientist has predicted sea will comprise of more plastic when compared with fish by 2050. Increasing recycling, reduction in consumption and selection of non-plastic alternatives and necessary actions of the government, businesses and manufacturers can create the genuine transformation. There has been a huge influence for removing the plastic in circulation.
A recent study has been taken over on how the Australians have growing concerns over the growing number of plastic. There are no escaping plans in the modern life. In Australia, an approximately 1.5 m tons of crude oil derivatives have been consumed every year. Reducing the consumption through complete avoidance of disposable plastic containers and reusing disposable bags are regarded as essential waste-reduction possibilities. What are the roles of recycling? Despite the profligate consumption of the plastic goods, less than 300,000 tonnes have been collected for recycling every year.
The use of plastics in contemporary society has been increased; this has the environmental impacts which are associated with disposal and production. The UNEP has highlighted the eco-friendly costs of using the plastics in consumer products. These include greenhouse gas emissions, water and land pollutants, water depletion and marine debris production in the oceans (Rosano, 2015). The environmental costs have been promoting that plastics must be replaced through alternative materials, this can represent lesser environmental challenges. According to a recent study, suggests an exchange away through plastics will come at high environmental costs. The study is based on the how sustainable practices will help in reducing the environmental charges of using the plastics in consumer markets. Quantification of the environmental cost of the plastic utilized in the consumer market and compared with the conjectural scenario in which plastics has been utilized in packaging and consumer products have been replaced through the alternative materials which will provide the similar purpose (Ledwaba and Sosibo, 2017).
Mapping the environmental costs associated with alternative material and plastic use across the given value chain, consumer goods, geographic regions target interventions for improvising the sustainability where the greatest benefits are achieved. Identification of sectors which have been exposed to environmental risks, especially when the plastic has been replaced with alternatives (Budiyono, Syaichurrozi and Sumardiono, 2013). Quantification of potential environmental advantages of strategies for further improving the plastic use sustainability like effective packaging design and enhanced energy recovery systems and waste collection. The increase of low carbon emissions, use of plastic and recommendations on reducing the environmental costs of plastics has been given. The strategies have been enumerated as follows (Zaman and Lehmann, 2013)-
The aggregate environmental costs of producing the plastic material for consumer goods has been sixty billion dollars in 2015 and transportation has added further 50 billion dollars. This implies plastic manufacturing industry will be given opportunity for reducing the environmental cost of plastic through the supply chains and operations. It is estimated 32 billion dollars can be saved as environmental costs if plastic industry doubles the electricity use of lower carbon sources like hydro power, solar and wind and therefore switching to 100 percent low carbon electricity. It is estimated 7 billion dollars of environmental cost saving can be done through effective packaging designs (Cossu, 2011). This is also possible in the food and confectionary sector that will deliver the best packaging system and requires less than 25 percent less plastic. 10 billion dollars ecological cost saving can be achieved through the 20 percent enhancement in fuel efficiency which is used in transporting plastics. This is applied through the modal shift or technological change towards lower emission transport like rail. Changes made in the procurement policies with a preference of more than effective transport can aid in facilitating different improvements. Additional involvements in the study have been targeted for improved recovery and waste management can increase environmental cost saving through 41 billion dollars and 30 percent of total environmental cost in the customer goods sector (Chintagunta, Jacob and Banerjee, 2016).
This circular economy is regarded as substitute to conventional make use economic disposal model. This shows a high priority towards the extension of PLCs and extraction of maximum value through the resources which will be in usage and materials recovery at the ending of product life cycle. One of the most important principles of circular economy is enhancing the materials recovery in the oceans and this can be reprocessed and re-utilized in new products. This will increase the recycling of post-consumer plastic (Sabudak and Yildiz, 2010). The aim is to minimize the landfilling and this can give important environmental benefits. When these targets are implemented in the Australia, the environmental costs associated with plastics can be easily reduced through 7.8 billion dollars. These account for the enhanced impacts of environment and direct financial gains that are supplementary to the recovery value of recycled plastic and recovering energy. Recycling will deliver the environmental and social return and economic value of the improved materials and increased environmental advantages of increased reprocessing of products. This scenario outweighs the pollution emission costs and waste management, external costs by 3.7 times (Charpe and Rathod, 2011).
Capturing the waste plastic before this has reached the ocean can easily cut ocean costs through 2 billion dollars. Refining waste management and collection is the key for reducing the plastics capacity that will enter the streams of water every year along with it asscpiated are environmental costs. Asia, with growing and largest consumer market goods and lower rates of municipal waste has been estimated to contributing to 70 percent of the plastic quality reaching streams of water through the consumer goods. An estimate on increasing municipal waste in Asia, the annual plastic can be reduced by the 45 percent. Similar investments had been made in waste management infrastructure and this is critical in Australia, where people are facing high rising incomes but waste management system remains poor.
The revolutionary plastic study established in consumer goods division is important to investment risk; this will create essential costs towards society. If these have been internalized through the consumer pressure, future revenues as well as profitability, this can threaten the sector. The study has been undertaken for esteeming plastic with obvious focus on how plastic has been utilized in customer products and this can be made sustainable through the comparison of ecological performance of alternatives and plastic (Chihobo et al., 2016). By examining the possible strategic interventions in the plastic supply chain can provide environmental advantages. This has been based on above research, it is recommended to adopt the key actions and create a pathway towards more justifiable use of plastic in future. The strategies adopted are as follows-
The investment which has been made in collection services of wastes and enhancing the waste management and sustainable practices in the developing economies are critical for addressing plastic debris challenge in streams of water. The plastic impact on streams of water can be further reduced through different strategies that can manage the waste on land before it has reached the ocean. This expands the market for incremental economic incentive of recycled materials and prevention of waste leakage. This limits the usage of harmful plastics additive which can be leached into streams of water over the give time period. A Step change will enhance the recycling of plastic waste (post-consumer) and also the energy recovery can have the massive impact on the ecological costs associated with the utility of consumer plastic. These interventions can help to capture the lost economic cost (Meneses, 2016).
Conclusion
The plastic industry has been playing the pivotal role which drives the transition to a circular economy through likeable the recyclers for optimizing the yields and efficiency from recovery of plastic procedures. For instance- standardization of greater material and packaging of conventional types will enable the more effective separation and sorting. The adoption of revenue accounting in plastic manufacturing domain will aid the enterprises in understanding the potential exposure and environmental impacts due to increased competition or increased costs when compared with advantages of alternative materials. This is due to the stringent consumer pressure and environmental regulation for improving the environmental pressure. Furthermore, techniques will enable the enterprises to communicate and evaluate the ecological advantages which are created through investments in the process efficiency.
This product innovation is focused towards the improvisation of environmental performance. The intention behind this aim of research is helping and inform sustainable use in customer goods sector and the identification of hotspots across the environmental product life cycle. The sector needs to make the choice between alternative materials and plastic. The adoption of simplifications and assumptions can help ease in achieving this scale. Individual companies are required to perform this empirical study and detailed evaluation of scenarios has been done at the company level.
References
Arapoglou, D., Varzakas, T., Vlyssides, A. and Israilides, C. (2010). Ethanol production from potato peel waste (PPW). Waste Management, 30(10), pp.1898-1902.
Asada, C., Sasaki, C. and Nakamura, Y. (2017). High Concentration Ethanol Production from Mixed Softwood Sawdust Waste. Waste and Biomass Valorization.
Budiyono, B., Syaichurrozi, I. and Sumardiono, S. (2013). Biogas production from bioethanol waste: the effect of pH and urea addition to biogas production rate. Waste Technology, 1(1).
Charpe, T. and Rathod, V. (2011). Biodiesel production using waste frying oil. Waste Management, 31(1), pp.85-90.
Chihobo, C., Chowdhury, A., Kuipa, P. and Simbi, D. (2016). Pyrolysis characteristics and kinetics of acid tar waste from crude benzol refining: A thermogravimetry–mass spectrometry analysis. Waste Management & Research, 34(12), pp.1258-1267.
Chintagunta, A., Jacob, S. and Banerjee, R. (2016). Integrated bioethanol and biomanure production from potato waste. Waste Management, 49, pp.320-325.
Cossu, R. (2011). Waste management, energy production, healthcare: Amazing similarities. Waste Management, 31(8), pp.1671-1672.
Demir, I. (2009). Reuse of waste glass in building brick production. Waste Management & Research, 27(6), pp.572-577.
Kermanian, H., Razmpour, Z., Ramezani, O., Mahdavi, S., Rahmaninia, M. and Ashtari, H. (2013). The Influence of Refining History of Waste NSSC Paper on its Recyclability. BioResources, 8(4).
Kumar, R. and Pal, P. (2013). Turning hazardous waste into value-added products: production and characterization of struvite from ammoniacal waste with new approaches. Journal of Cleaner Production, 43, pp.59-70.
Ledwaba, P. and Sosibo, N. (2017). Cathode Ray Tube Recycling in South Africa. Recycling, 2(1), p.4.
Meneses, G. (2016). Recycling as an Object of Study for Behavioural Sciences. Advances in Recycling & Waste Management, 01(01).
Mezes, L. and Tamás, J. (2015). Feather Waste Recycling for Biogas Production. Waste and Biomass Valorization, 6(5), pp.899-911.
Rosano, M. (2015). Welcome to the New Open-Access Journal—Recycling. Recycling, 1(1), pp.1-2.
Sabudak, T. and Yildiz, M. (2010). Biodiesel production from waste frying oils and its quality control. Waste Management, 30(5), pp.799-803.
Zaman, A. and Lehmann, S. (2013). The zero waste index: a performance measurement tool for waste management systems in a ‘zero waste city’. Journal of Cleaner Production, 50, pp.123-132.
Essay Writing Service Features
Our Experience
No matter how complex your assignment is, we can find the right professional for your specific task. Contact Essay is an essay writing company that hires only the smartest minds to help you with your projects. Our expertise allows us to provide students with high-quality academic writing, editing & proofreading services.Free Features
Free revision policy
$10Free bibliography & reference
$8Free title page
$8Free formatting
$8How Our Essay Writing Service Works
First, you will need to complete an order form. It's not difficult but, in case there is anything you find not to be clear, you may always call us so that we can guide you through it. On the order form, you will need to include some basic information concerning your order: subject, topic, number of pages, etc. We also encourage our clients to upload any relevant information or sources that will help.
Complete the order formOnce we have all the information and instructions that we need, we select the most suitable writer for your assignment. While everything seems to be clear, the writer, who has complete knowledge of the subject, may need clarification from you. It is at that point that you would receive a call or email from us.
Writer’s assignmentAs soon as the writer has finished, it will be delivered both to the website and to your email address so that you will not miss it. If your deadline is close at hand, we will place a call to you to make sure that you receive the paper on time.
Completing the order and download