Discuss about the Australian Treatment Of Tax Research And Development.
There are several countries that provide substantial subsidies for the innovations relating to the research and development. During the year 1985-86 Australia introduced the system of research and development as the most tax incentive in the world that provides the firms with the facilities of deducting a wide range of expenditure by 150 per cent (Woellner et al., 2016). The application of the research and development tax concession during the year 1985 took place when the policy of industry was shifting in the direction of greater integration with the international economy.
The concession along with the Research and Development programs that were introduced as the reorienting the Australian firms and changing the attitudes of the management in the direction of research and development (Barkoczy 2016). The Australian governments have introduced access of Research and Development as the support mechanism that grants soft loans with encouragement towards syndicate Research and Development concessions that have completely dominated the expenses of government during the last decade. The tax concessions that is offered is regarded very generous in terms of the Australian standards. Irrespective of the discount in the rate of concessions, Australian offers the third most generous treatment of tax of research and development among the other OECD nations.
The research and development tax incentives provides the small business with the encouragement to indulge in the Research and Development activities that would benefit Australian and giving tax offset to the small business for the eligible research and development activities (Basu 2016). The Research and Development programme was initially intended to be temporary measure which was due to be terminated on 30 June 1991. During the month of march, it was declared as the permanent measurement although a single subject but several changes over time.
The basic regularity of the Research and Development is to offer tax incentive to the small business in order to undertake greater level of research and development in Australia. The detailed objective of the Research and Development tax concessions is regarded as the wider concept which has evolved over the time period (Long, Campbell and Kelshaw 2016). The objective of the 150 per cent tax concession is promote the Australian companies to undertake more innovative and internationally competitive by growing the investment in the Research and Development. The objective of the tax concession was to enhance the conditions of the commercialisation of the new procedure and technologies through which the products are developed in Australia.
The taxation ruling of 92/2 explains that there are certain types of expenditure that are incurred in the procedure of scientific research and development based on subsection 73A (1) of the ITAA 1936 (Cao et al. 2015). The income tax deductions must be allowed under the subsection 73A (1) of the ITAA 1936 if the expenditure is not considered as allowable under any other section of the Act. Small business is allowed to claim deduction under this ruling give the payments are made to the approved scientific research institute associated to the business of the taxpayer. A small business is allowed to claim deductions given the payments are made to the approved research institutes that has undertaken the purpose of undertaking the scientific research associated to the taxpayer’s business class.
The income tax assessment act 1997 is regarded as the act of parliament of Australia. It is regarded as the main statutes in which income tax is computed. There are several sections of the act however the main considerations are the tax incentive for the Research and Development activities undertake by the small business (Dechezleprêtre et al. 2016). The taxation rulings of the 92/2 provides that there are certain types of expenditure that are incurred on the scientific research will be held deductible under the subsection 73A (1) of the ITAA 1997. Ever since the enactment of the section 73A of the ITAA 1946 taxpayers are able to put forward their claim relating to the cost that are incurred on the scientific research and development which would have not been allowed under any other provision of the Act.
The ITAA 1997 provides that there are usually two forms of deductible payments that are allowed to the business (Armstrong et al. 2015). This includes payments and the expenditure that are capital in nature. Both types of payments are can be claimed by the person that are carrying on the business for taxation purpose of producing taxable income. The ITAA 1997 provides that both the sorts of payments should be made to the approved institutes.
Overview:
Ever since the enactment of the section 73A in 1946 taxpayers are able to claim an allowable deduction for the expenses that are incurred in the scientific research and the same would have not been allowed for deductions under any other provision of the act (Castellacci and Lie 2015). For a small business to be held eligible for deductions in research and development certain criteria need to be identified, this includes that payments should be made to the approved research institutes, expenditure that are capital in nature must be associated to the business use.
Section 73A allows a small business to claim deductions relating to the given the plant is used for scientific research. Subsection 73A (1) explains that during the year of income a small business can claim deductions relating to gaining or generating assessable income (Shen et al. 2016). However, it is worth mentioning that the payments should be made to the approve research institute for the scientific research associated to the business. A small business can claim deductions given the business has incurred research and development from the approved research institute and the purpose of the undertaking by the taxpayer was associated to the class of business in which the business belonged (Bankman et al. 2017). Payments that are related to the approved research institutes for own business of the taxpayer are held deductible under the subparagraph of 73A (1) (a)(i). These payments would be usually regarded as contractual and the payments are most likely relating to the particular working of the taxpayer’s business.
The research and development tax offers small business with the tax offset so that are encouraged to indulge more in the research and development activities (Murphy and Higgins 2016). A 43.5% refundable tax offset is provided to the eligible Research and Development entities with an aggregate turnover of less than $20 million per year. Additionally, the small business are provided with the 38.5% of non-refundable tax offset with the unused amount can be offset or may be carried forward for future use. The Research and Development activities makes sure that the in spite of the repeal this provisions can still be applicable for things that are done by the small business.
The tax concessions provide the small business with the concessional deductions for all forms of the eligible Research and Development expenses at a rate of 125 per cent (Schmalbeck, Zelenak and Lawsky 2015). The effectiveness of the tax incentive is that small business would be able to deduct present expenditure by at least 125 per cent of the total cost in the year in which the business incurs it. The current costs that comprises of are wages, salaries and other forms of labour costs that are directly associated with the research and development activities and have contracted with the approved Research and Development agencies.
The effectiveness of the tax incentive includes that the small business is provided with the opportunity of claiming depreciation for the equipment that are used in the research and development for more than three years (McDaniel, 2017). These deductions can be claimed at a rate which is equal to the 125 per cent of the deductions that would be applicable for the small business. Small business that are willing to undertake the Research and Development would be able to claim deductions given they are registered with the approved agencies.
Unlike majority of the special tax provisions there prevails a strong and economic rationale for the Research and Development tax credit. Expenditure related to research accounts for the knowledge of the firm and economy (Braun 2018). This results in new innovations such as changes in the products or procedure that results in better and economical goods and service. The successful innovations result in increase in economic growth and productivity. Higher productivity is associated to the standards of living. Therefore, increase in the innovations for small business results in increase in the productivity as well as results in higher income for the business.
The effectiveness of the tax incentive is that majority of firms would be able to make investment in the Research and Development until they derive from the research that are equivalent to the cost of performing the research (Wilson 2015). Ideally, small business would make investment in such activities until the total benefits is attained to themselves as well as the society equivalent to the cost of investment.
The major purpose of the tax reformation is to encourage the economic growth by reducing the effective tax rate for the investment (Burke 2016). There are some respondents that have stated their qualified comments regarding the rebate cap with the acknowledgment relating to the wider political landscape and understanding the budgetary constraints which the government is presently working in. Several small business respondents have stated that they the present research and development tax incentive requires reformations. The government is required to show their commitment towards policy stability for the research and development tax incentive in order to generate greater impact. Small business requires government certainty.
The biotechnology industry possesses large number of peculiarities such as higher costs of developing products, hazardous nature of clinical trials and long development pipelines certain require the government policy stability (Braun 2018). If the government desires to prioritise the innovations, then it should build a strong biotechnology industry. The government should commit itself to the research and development tax incentive policy by guarantee stability to the program. The research and development tax incentive is regarded as the most important aspect of reformation. This is because it evidently represents the amount of research the small business does in Australia and that it results in higher social welfare for the economy.
Concerning the future direction the government has bought forward a refundable research and development tax offset which will be capped at $4 million on yearly basis which is most likely to be applied on the small amount of claimants. Any form of claims that is beyond the $ million would be carried in the future years in the form of non-refundable offset to future years. The benefit obtained from the refundable offset would be fixed at a rate of 13.5% which would be linked with the company tax rate.
The government would also introduce the research and Development premium having a wide range of benefits for those claimants that possess higher intensive of research and development with greater rate of non-refundable offsets. With this change the government looks forward to reward the claimants that spends more on the Research and Development.
The government has announced new budgets that creates an effect on the research and Development tax incentives. The budget is anticipated save government $2.4 billion. The government is placing its focus on the tax incentive rather than placing its focus on the future of Research and Development.
Conclusion:
An adverse response relating to the results of the research and development tax incentive may result in several small Australian businesses to become less competitive and attract less investment from the external sources. The small business may struggle to gain sufficient funding from the business relating to the research and development and may move more slowly in the direct of product development with few number of firms conducting lesser amount of research and development activates.
The tax incentive forms the integral part of the Australian policy of innovation and it is regarded as the vital policy that makes the economy of Australia an attractive investment centre. If the government is serious in boosting innovations in the small business, then it would take the heed of the small business industry concerns with more policy stability for uninterrupted economic expansion.
Reference List:
Armstrong, C.S., Blouin, J.L., Jagolinzer, A.D. and Larcker, D.F., 2015. Corporate governance, incentives, and tax avoidance. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 60(1), pp.1-17.
Bankman, J., Shaviro, D.N., Stark, K.J. and Kleinbard, E.D., 2017. Federal Income Taxation. Wolters Kluwer Law & Business.
Barkoczy, S., 2016. Foundations of taxation law 2016. OUP Catalogue.
Basu, S., 2016. Global perspectives on e-commerce taxation law. Routledge.
Braun, D., 2018. Fiscal policies in federal states. Routledge.
Burke, K., 2016. Federal income taxation of partners and partnerships in a nutshell. West Academic.
Cao, L., Hosking, A., Kouparitsas, M., Mullaly, D., Rimmer, X., Shi, Q., Stark, W. and Wende, S., 2015. Understanding the economy-wide efficiency and incidence of major Australian taxes. Canberra: Treasury working paper, 2001.
Castellacci, F. and Lie, C.M., 2015. Do the effects of R&D tax credits vary across industries? A meta-regression analysis. Research Policy, 44(4), pp.819-832.
Dechezleprêtre, A., Einiö, E., Martin, R., Nguyen, K.T. and Van Reenen, J., 2016. Do tax incentives for research increase firm innovation? An RD design for R&D (No. w22405). National Bureau of Economic Research.
Long, B., Campbell, J. and Kelshaw, C., 2016. The justice lens on taxation policy in Australia. St Mark’s Review, (235), p.94.
McDaniel, P., 2017. Federal Income Taxation. Foundation Press.
Murphy, K.E. and Higgins, M., 2016. Concepts in Federal Taxation 2017. Cengage Learning.
Schmalbeck, R., Zelenak, L. and Lawsky, S.B., 2015. Federal Income Taxation. Wolters Kluwer Law & Business.
Shen, L., He, B., Jiao, L., Song, X. and Zhang, X., 2016. Research on the development of main policy instruments for improving building energy-efficiency. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, pp.1789-1803.
Wilson, J.D., 2015. 11. Tax competition in a federal setting. Handbook of Multilevel Finance, p.264.
Woellner, R., Barkoczy, S., Murphy, S., Evans, C. and Pinto, D., 2016. Australian Taxation Law 2016. OUP Catalogue.
Essay Writing Service Features
Our Experience
No matter how complex your assignment is, we can find the right professional for your specific task. Contact Essay is an essay writing company that hires only the smartest minds to help you with your projects. Our expertise allows us to provide students with high-quality academic writing, editing & proofreading services.
Free Features
Free revision policy
$10Free bibliography & reference
$8Free title page
$8Free formatting
$8How Our Essay Writing Service Works
First, you will need to complete an order form. It's not difficult but, in case there is anything you find not to be clear, you may always call us so that we can guide you through it. On the order form, you will need to include some basic information concerning your order: subject, topic, number of pages, etc. We also encourage our clients to upload any relevant information or sources that will help.
Complete the order form
Once we have all the information and instructions that we need, we select the most suitable writer for your assignment. While everything seems to be clear, the writer, who has complete knowledge of the subject, may need clarification from you. It is at that point that you would receive a call or email from us.
Writer’s assignment
As soon as the writer has finished, it will be delivered both to the website and to your email address so that you will not miss it. If your deadline is close at hand, we will place a call to you to make sure that you receive the paper on time.
Completing the order and download