The primary reasons behind the criticism of the financial accounting standards and the IFRS in the article, `Unwieldy rules useless for investors“ has various reasons behind it. The primary objectives of the financial reporting have been given as below:
Given below are the conceptual framework`s characteristics:
After these points it has been analyzed that, the article information varies and the article quotes that the characteristics which have been stated above have not been satisfied by the present reporting practices which are related to the IFRS. The article mentions that IFRS adjustments are not relevant to the scenario and not faithful to it. The given information is quite misleading for the given set of investors. Additionally, the different investors are unable to compare the information while making investment dictions.
However, the views which have been given in the article match with the view and perception that the financial reports of the corporates just tend to satisfy the objective of financial reporting which have been stated in the Conceptual Framework. The primary motives of the financial reports is to provide relevant data and information to the different users of the system with regard to the assets, liabilities and the equity of the organization (Ahmed, Neel and Wang 2013). This tends to be useful to all the stakeholders who are present.
It is the duty of the financial reports of the corporates to satisfy all the mentioned characteristics of the Financial Framework which acts as a guideline required to meet the requirements and needs of the different stakeholders who use information from the financial statements.
The public interest theory states that there exists an assumption whereby the economic markets are extremely volatile and delicate. They do not tend to operate in a manner with respect to which they are designated to operate (Brown, Preiato and Tarca 2014). The theory states that primary importance is given to the people and hence there exists a need to the performance of the economic markets by the government.
A.C.Pigou formed the theory in 1932. He stated that the regulations may be raised with respect to the economic environment assessment, when the public demands for it. The regulations act as a measure which tend to uphold the interest of the society more than the interest of the given individual. This is because it lies the duty of the regulation to secure the interests of the society.
The public interest theory makes it necessary that the regulation is passed effectively and it becomes crucial for all corporate enterprises to give detailed information about the harm which is being made upon the given environment and the society for their activities. The government needs to conduct a survey and this survey should be published online. The government then can assure that the information is accessible for people online and their queries can be cleared accordingly.
The Capture Theory states that the different workers present in the industry tend to dictate the agencies of the Government and tend to work with the motive of safeguarding the different interests of the industry. The workers in the industries can take part in jeopardizing the distribution of the resources in the given society so as to manipulate the distribution in a manner that the needs of the society are fulfilled accordingly. It is based on the nexus that government agencies and the industries are required to maintain (Teixeira 2014). The government establishes the regulating agencies at the central, local and the state levels in order to provide them the responsibility and the duty of securing the needs of the society and save it from the ill effects of the activities of the industry (Ball 2006). According to the theory, a discrepancy tends to take place when the industry workers tend to get involved with the different people working in the governmental organization.
Hence, it is the need of the hour to ensure that the regulating agencies have people who have expertise and knowledge with respect to the area in which they are operating. It often happens that certain people who have profound knowledge in a particular domain then it may happen that the workers in the government agency have been former industry employees, then they start acting as informers of the industry which then helps them to gain work. Hence, in this manner the governmental organizations get captured by the industrial workers and this acts as a discrepancy.
The given theory states that the different groups which are present in an industry tend to be formed with the motive of securing the economic interest of the industry (Nobes 2014). The industry has a presence of various groups which tend to compete with one another. Using this majority they tend to pass legislations in their favor and secure their needs (Lequiller and Blades 2014). The different economic groups act with respect to their self-interest and aim to secure their position in the market. They tend to provide various offers to the different groups and then they ask them for favors (Leuz and Wysocki 2016). These groups are quite powerful in nature and tend to act in their own interest and then they often violate the environmental and social norms which they should have to solve.
The FASB Statement No. 144 Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets , it has been stated that the different companies are not allowed to conduct the revaluation of the assets but in fact they need to consider the costs of impairment when they are conducting the valuation of the non- current assets. The non-current assets are required to undergo impairment costs. In other manner, these rules tend to hold relevance and faithfulness in the US corporate financial statements. The costs of the impairment tend to have negative impacts on the companies as it tends to increase their operating costs in the form of impairment costs. However they do not tend to have an impact on the physical net cash flow balance (Jorissen et al. 2013). The given set of rules have been formed with the benefit of providing the users of the different financial statements a better and clear image about the different activities which are ongoing. It is the primary purpose of a financial statement to provide a clear picture to the different users.
However, in the given scenario, the historical perspective is ignored in the realm of the financial statements. The depreciation of the different assets which are present are adjusted every year and the carrying value of the assets keeps changing continuously (Christensen et al. 2015). It is given in these statements that the carrying value of the different assets are required to undergo changes.
Hence, the impact of the United States Financial Accounting Standards Boards with respect to relevance and representational faithfulness of the different financial statements of the US corporate have been discussed accordingly (Ifac.org. 2018).
There are various reasons for which the revaluation of assets is done. The primary reason behind this is the assessment of the true value of the assets in a given point of time. The reasons for the revaluation are given as follows:
However there are various reasons for which the companies do not prefer to revalue the assets and adopt a cost model. These reasons are as follows:
Due to the above reasons, the directors of the organization are motivated not to revalue their property, plant and equipment.
In case a company chooses not to revalue its assets then there may be several consequences. The first one of these will be that the financial statements would not reflect the true and fair value of the organization. The debt equity ratio of the organization will also reflect a huger rate than the original value (Deegan 2013). Secondly, the rights issue to the shareholders will not exist. Lastly, they will not be able to reflect the correct net profit margins and the assets will be understated.
The share prices act as a reflection of the information which is available in the financial statements in cases where the capital market is inefficient. The net asset backing per share along with the decreasing value of the assets tend to have an impact on the share prices severely, however this may be offset by the perception that the profit might be higher. Hence, in scenarios where the capital marketing is inefficient, the revaluation of the assets tends to have little to no impact on the prices of the shares and hence accordingly on the wealth of the shareholders.
References
Ahmed, A.S., Neel, M. and Wang, D., 2013. Does mandatory adoption of IFRS improve accounting quality? Preliminary evidence. Contemporary Accounting Research, 30(4), pp.1344-1372.
Ball, R., 2006. International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS): pros and cons for investors. Accounting and business research, 36(sup1), pp.5-27.
Brown, P., Preiato, J. and Tarca, A., 2014. Measuring country differences in enforcement of accounting standards: An audit and enforcement proxy. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 41(1-2), pp.1-52.
Christensen, H.B., Hail, L. and Leuz, C., 2013. Mandatory IFRS reporting and changes in enforcement. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 56(2-3), pp.147-177.
Christensen, H.B., Lee, E., Walker, M. and Zeng, C., 2015. Incentives or standards: What determines accounting quality changes around IFRS adoption?. European Accounting Review, 24(1), pp.31-61.
Deegan, C., 2013. Financial accounting theory. Graw-Hill Education Australia.
Hoyle, J.B., Schaefer, T. and Doupnik, T., 2015. Advanced accounting. McGraw Hill.
Ifac.org. ,2018. Does IFRS Have a Future in the US? | IFAC. [online] Available at: https://www.ifac.org/global-knowledge-gateway/business-reporting/discussion/does-ifrs-have-future-us [Accessed 19 May 2018].
Jorissen, A., Lybaert, N., Orens, R. and Van der Tas, L., 2013. A geographic analysis of constituents’ formal participation in the process of international accounting standard setting: Do we have a level playing field?. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 32(4), pp.237-270.
Lequiller, F. and Blades, D., 2014. Understanding national accounts.
Leuz, C. and Wysocki, P.D., 2016. The economics of disclosure and financial reporting regulation: Evidence and suggestions for future research. Journal of Accounting Research, 54(2), pp.525-622.
Nobes, C., 2014. International Classification of Financial Reporting 3e. Routledge.
Scott, W.R., 2015. Financial accounting theory (Vol. 2, No. 0, p. 0). Prentice Hall.
Teixeira, A., 2014. The International Accounting Standards Board and evidence-informed standard-setting. Accounting in Europe, 11(1), pp.5-12.
Essay Writing Service Features
Our Experience
No matter how complex your assignment is, we can find the right professional for your specific task. Contact Essay is an essay writing company that hires only the smartest minds to help you with your projects. Our expertise allows us to provide students with high-quality academic writing, editing & proofreading services.
Free Features
Free revision policy
$10Free bibliography & reference
$8Free title page
$8Free formatting
$8How Our Essay Writing Service Works
First, you will need to complete an order form. It's not difficult but, in case there is anything you find not to be clear, you may always call us so that we can guide you through it. On the order form, you will need to include some basic information concerning your order: subject, topic, number of pages, etc. We also encourage our clients to upload any relevant information or sources that will help.
Complete the order form
Once we have all the information and instructions that we need, we select the most suitable writer for your assignment. While everything seems to be clear, the writer, who has complete knowledge of the subject, may need clarification from you. It is at that point that you would receive a call or email from us.
Writer’s assignment
As soon as the writer has finished, it will be delivered both to the website and to your email address so that you will not miss it. If your deadline is close at hand, we will place a call to you to make sure that you receive the paper on time.
Completing the order and download