St. Helena Marina Development: Stakeholders, Communications, And Business Case

Task 1: Stakeholders

New developments and changes allow the community to be upgraded and adopt new behaviors those can result in the enhancement of the life living of the individuals within the society. Development of the marina near Jamestown wharf has been considered one of the best approach for attracting the tourists and promotes tourism in the Saint Helena Island. The purpose of this report is to highlight the aspects related to the stakeholders and communication management within the project considering the successful and efficient delivery of the project. A business case is also proposed considering the various deliverables of the project.

Interviewing the stakeholders via questionnaire can be regarded as the best approach for this project delivery and set of questions were distributed for identifying the problems those are expected to be faced by them after connecting with the project. Following are the results of the interview:

Name	Stakeholder	Roles Save Time On Research and Writing Hire a Pro to Write You a 100% Plagiarism-Free Paper. Get My Paper	Responsibilities	Interest	Impact
Louie Phillips	Head of the Project	Manage all the stakeholders and make better decision-making	Consider every stakeholder while decision-making	High	Very High
Aimee Curtis	Project Manager	Manage the roles and responsibilities of the stakeholders associated within the project	Every stakeholder is assigned with the duties and jobs as per their capability of project delivery	Very High	Very High
Morgan Norris	Architect	Develop the design of the entire transformation as per the need	Consider all the natural aspects and develop a sophisticated and long running model for the establishment	Medium	High
Erin Newton	Resource Manager	Manage the resources necessary for the delivery of the project	All the resources necessary for the project delivery is available throughout the project lifecycle	Medium	High
Emily Houghton	Business Analyst	Analyze the tourism market in the local and global environment	Effectively propose the results for the implementation of the changes	High	High
Charlie Nixon	Market Analyst	Analyze the internal and external markets for identifying the problems and solution	Propose a best course of action for enhancing the market condition	Medium	Medium
Georgina Doherty	Promotional Manager	Promote the new growth and development at St. Helena Marina	Promote the objective and outcomes in efficient and effective manner	High	Medium
Louie Arnold	Civil Engineers	Deliver the civil engineering and construction works	Keep the civil construction risks far away from the project	Very High	High
–	Local community	Avail the services being presented	Provide necessary suggestions and feedback	Low	High
–	UK Government	Provide loans and legal agreement to proceed with the project	Provide enough funds and all the necessary legal allowance	High	High

Issues raised in the development of this project can be listed as:

Stakeholder issues: assigning stakeholders with proper skills and knowledge related to the same sector can be an issue while executing the project as in manner to adhere maximum efficiency from the jobs of the stakeholders, it is necessary to assign the roles and responsibilities as per their capabilities.

Communication issues: proper communication needs to be established considering the discussion on the ongoing project, related issues, and solution for the successful delivery of the project. it is an obvious factor to look the project from different perspectives so an effective communication management plan is necessary for the development and growth of a successful project.

Political issues: This is a very big project and hence, needs various construction and modifications for which outsourcing becomes the crucial factor for the successful deployment of the project. The project needs to be politically clear in manner to assure not any further obstacle in the growth and development of the project.

Environmental issues: The entire project will need to be completed on an island and hence, the logistics is a genuine problem that should be eliminated before the project execution starts and manage the exchange of the resources throughout the project lifecycle.

The purpose of this task is to summarize the current situation of the island and propose a planned and effective business case that can reflect the aspects of the proposed project. the delivery of the project should be an effective and efficient follow of the activities that can be helpful in b ringing out maximum profit for the UK government.

The proposed project will be establishing a marina that will have all types of the fantasy that is always loveable by the tourist while thinking of visiting an island. It will provide a sophisticated model for the logistics and transport in manner to be connected with the outside world. Berthing facilities will be enhanced through increasing the berth capacities. There will be establishment of the bars, restaurants, parking, residential apartments, online taxi services and many more.

Government will be funding the entire growth and production of the project. Further attempts can be made to get more funds through promoting the private companies through offering advertisement in the exchange of the financial help.

In-scope objectives of the project are:

To provide better tourism experience to the tourists
To deliver the project in successful and efficient manner
To establish a transport network for increasing the traffic of the tourists
To attract the tourists through providing attractive facilities

Out-scope objectives are:

Promotion related objectives are out of scope
Conflict management is also out of the scope

Increase the tourists engagement with the island
Enhance the overall revenue of the UK treasury
Enhance the livelihood of the local community of the island
Provide better and enhanced facilities and services to the consumers

Proper and effective communication
Resource management
Transporting
Legal agreements
Total cost
Experienced manager or leader

Brainstorming, regular meetings, discussing weekly report, regular meetings, and other medium of interactions will be utilized for the delivery of the stakeholder management.

WBS	Task Name	Duration	Start	Finish
1	St. Helena Marina Development	781 days	Wed 5/23/18	Wed 5/19/21
1.1	Phase 1: Project Initiation	130 days	Wed 5/23/18	Tue 11/20/18
1.1.6	Milestone 1: Approval for the project	0 days	Tue 11/20/18	Tue 11/20/18
1.2	Phase 2: Project Planning	127 days	Wed 11/21/18	Thu 5/16/19
1.2.9	Milestone 2: project planning Completed	0 days	Thu 5/16/19	Thu 5/16/19
1.3	Phase 3: Project Execution	357 days	Fri 5/17/19	Mon 9/28/20
1.3.9	Milestone 3: Project Execution completed	0 days	Mon 9/28/20	Mon 9/28/20
1.4	Phase 4: Monitoring and Auditing	110 days	Tue 9/29/20	Mon 3/1/21
1.4.6	Milestone 4: completed	0 days	Mon 3/1/21	Mon 3/1/21
1.5	Phase 5: Project Closure	57 days	Tue 3/2/21	Wed 5/19/21
1.5.6	Milestone 5 completed	0 days	Wed 5/19/21	Wed 5/19/21

WBS	Task Name	Duration	Start	Finish
1	St. Helena Marina Development	781 days	Wed 5/23/18	Wed 5/19/21
1.1	Phase 1: Project Initiation	130 days	Wed 5/23/18	Tue 11/20/18
1.1.1	Analyzing the current problem	15 days	Wed 5/23/18	Tue 6/12/18
1.1.2	Proposing solution	25 days	Wed 6/13/18	Tue 7/17/18
1.1.3	Identifying the feasibility of the proposed solution	20 days	Wed 7/18/18	Tue 8/14/18
1.1.4	Proposing the Proposal of the project	25 days	Wed 8/15/18	Tue 9/18/18
1.1.5	loan approval from the UK government	45 days	Wed 9/19/18	Tue 11/20/18
1.1.6	Milestone 1: Approval for the project	0 days	Tue 11/20/18	Tue 11/20/18
1.2	Phase 2: Project Planning	127 days	Wed 11/21/18	Thu 5/16/19
1.2.1	Enlisting the requirements	25 days	Wed 11/21/18	Tue 12/25/18
1.2.2	Identifying the resources	30 days	Wed 12/26/18	Tue 2/5/19
1.2.3	Preparing work Breakdown Structure	10 days	Wed 2/6/19	Tue 2/19/19
1.2.4	Assigning Architect	7 days	Wed 2/20/19	Thu 2/28/19
1.2.5	Identifying key stakeholders	15 days	Fri 3/1/19	Thu 3/21/19
1.2.6	Developing the schedule	15 days	Fri 3/22/19	Thu 4/11/19
1.2.7	Assigning Stakeholders role and responsibility	10 days	Fri 4/12/19	Thu 4/25/19
1.2.8	Estimating the budget of the project	15 days	Fri 4/26/19	Thu 5/16/19
1.2.9	Milestone 2: project planning Completed	0 days	Thu 5/16/19	Thu 5/16/19
1.3	Phase 3: Project Execution	357 days	Fri 5/17/19	Mon 9/28/20
1.3.1	Design of the Marina Complex	60 days	Fri 5/17/19	Thu 8/8/19
1.3.2	Propose the design for approval	7 days	Fri 8/9/19	Mon 8/19/19
1.3.3	Implement the Mooring Facilities	60 days	Tue 8/20/19	Mon 11/11/19
1.3.4	Establishing the berthing facilities	70 days	Tue 11/12/19	Mon 2/17/20
1.3.5	Develop permanent birthing facilities	65 days	Tue 2/18/20	Mon 5/18/20
1.3.6	Establishing sheltered Marina complex	40 days	Tue 5/19/20	Mon 7/13/20
1.3.7	Implementing government facilities	30 days	Tue 7/14/20	Mon 8/24/20
1.3.8	Arrangements for service, fuel and repairing facilities	25 days	Tue 8/25/20	Mon 9/28/20
1.3.9	Milestone 3: Project Execution completed	0 days	Mon 9/28/20	Mon 9/28/20
1.4	Phase 4: Monitoring and Auditing	110 days	Tue 9/29/20	Mon 3/1/21
1.4.1	evaluating every activity	15 days	Tue 9/29/20	Mon 10/19/20
1.4.2	Project Evaluation checklist	20 days	Tue 10/20/20	Mon 11/16/20
1.4.3	Identifying modifications	30 days	Tue 11/17/20	Mon 12/28/20
1.4.4	Implementing changes	20 days	Tue 12/29/20	Mon 1/25/21
1.4.5	Reviewing the project activities	25 days	Tue 1/26/21	Mon 3/1/21
1.4.6	Milestone 4: completed	0 days	Mon 3/1/21	Mon 3/1/21
1.5	Phase 5: Project Closure	57 days	Tue 3/2/21	Wed 5/19/21
1.5.1	Project Documentation	15 days	Tue 3/2/21	Mon 3/22/21
1.5.2	Stakeholder sign off	7 days	Tue 3/23/21	Wed 3/31/21
1.5.3	Stakeholder releasing from contract	10 days	Thu 4/1/21	Wed 4/14/21
1.5.4	resource releasing	10 days	Thu 4/15/21	Wed 4/28/21
1.5.5	Lessons learned documentation	15 days	Thu 4/29/21	Wed 5/19/21
1.5.6	Milestone 5 completed	0 days	Wed 5/19/21	Wed 5/19/21

WBS	Task Name	Duration	Resource Names	Cost
1	St. Helena Marina Development	781 days		$2,121,760.00
1.1	Phase 1: Project Initiation	130 days		$207,600.00
1.1.1	Analyzing the current problem	15 days	Business Analyst, Market Analyst, Project Manager	$19,800.00
1.1.2	Proposing solution	25 days	Business Analyst, Market Analyst, Project Manager, Architect, Civil Engineers	$53,000.00
1.1.3	Identifying the feasibility of the proposed solution	20 days	Business Analyst, Market Analyst, Project Manager, Architect, Civil Engineers	$42,400.00
1.1.4	Proposing the Proposal of the project	25 days	Business Analyst, Market Analyst, Project Manager	$33,000.00
1.1.5	loan approval from the UK government	45 days	Business Analyst, Market Analyst, Project Manager	$59,400.00
1.1.6	Milestone 1: Approval for the project	0 days		$0.00
1.2	Phase 2: Project Planning	127 days		$337,280.00
1.2.1	Enlisting the requirements	25 days	Architect, Business Analyst, Civil Engineers, Market Analyst, Project Manager, Resource Manager, Resources[1], Promotional Manager	$174,000.00
1.2.2	Identifying the resources	30 days	Architect, Civil Engineers, Project Manager, Resource Manager	$55,200.00
1.2.3	Preparing work Breakdown Structure	10 days	Architect, Civil Engineers, Project Manager, Resource Manager	$18,400.00
1.2.4	Assigning Architect	7 days	Architect, Civil Engineers, Project Manager, Resource Manager	$12,880.00
1.2.5	Identifying key stakeholders	15 days	Architect, Civil Engineers, Project Manager, Resource Manager	$27,600.00
1.2.6	Developing the schedule	15 days	Architect, Civil Engineers, Project Manager, Resource Manager	$27,600.00
1.2.7	Assigning Stakeholders role and responsibility	10 days	Project Manager	$6,000.00
1.2.8	Estimating the budget of the project	15 days	Project Manager, Resource Manager	$15,600.00
1.2.9	Milestone 2: project planning Completed	0 days		$0.00
1.3	Phase 3: Project Execution	357 days		$1,248,000.00
1.3.1	Design of the Marina Complex	60 days	Architect, Civil Engineers, Resources[1]	$148,000.00
1.3.2	Propose the design for approval	7 days	Architect, Civil Engineers, Resources[1]	$105,600.00
1.3.3	Implement the Mooring Facilities	60 days	Architect, Civil Engineers, Resources[1], Human Labor, Promotional Manager	$181,600.00
1.3.4	Establishing the berthing facilities	70 days	Architect, Civil Engineers, Resources[1], Human Labor, Promotional Manager	$195,200.00
1.3.5	Develop permanent birthing facilities	65 days	Architect, Civil Engineers, Resources[1], Human Labor, Promotional Manager	$188,400.00
1.3.6	Establishing sheltered Marina complex	40 days	Architect, Civil Engineers, Resources[1], Human Labor, Promotional Manager	$154,400.00
1.3.7	Implementing government facilities	30 days	Architect, Civil Engineers, Resources[1], Human Labor, Promotional Manager	$140,800.00
1.3.8	Arrangements for service, fuel and repairing facilities	25 days	Architect, Civil Engineers, Resources[1], Human Labor, Promotional Manager	$134,000.00
1.3.9	Milestone 3: Project Execution completed	0 days		$0.00
1.4	Phase 4: Monitoring and Auditing	110 days		$269,600.00
1.4.1	evaluating every activity	15 days	Business Analyst, Market Analyst, Project Manager, Resource Manager	$26,400.00
1.4.2	Project Evaluation checklist	20 days	Architect, Business Analyst, Civil Engineers, Market Analyst, Project Manager, Resource Manager	$51,200.00
1.4.3	Identifying modifications	30 days	Architect, Business Analyst, Civil Engineers, Market Analyst, Project Manager, Resource Manager	$76,800.00
1.4.4	Implementing changes	20 days	Architect, Business Analyst, Civil Engineers, Market Analyst, Project Manager, Resource Manager	$51,200.00
1.4.5	Reviewing the project activities	25 days	Architect, Business Analyst, Civil Engineers, Market Analyst, Project Manager, Resource Manager	$64,000.00
1.4.6	Milestone 4: completed	0 days		$0.00
1.5	Phase 5: Project Closure	57 days		$59,280.00
1.5.1	Project Documentation	15 days	Project Manager, Resource Manager	$15,600.00
1.5.2	Stakeholder sign off	7 days	Project Manager, Resource Manager	$7,280.00
1.5.3	Stakeholder releasing from contract	10 days	Project Manager, Resource Manager	$10,400.00
1.5.4	resource releasing	10 days	Project Manager, Resource Manager	$10,400.00
1.5.5	Lessons learned documentation	15 days	Project Manager, Resource Manager	$15,600.00
1.5.6	Milestone 5 completed	0 days		$0.00

Increase in the budget
Increase in the schedule
Resource lagging or jumping
Transporting
Communication gap
Not meeting the project constraints

The project will be delivered within the expected time and budget and all the proposals will be approved by the stakeholders. Waterfall methodology will be utilized and hence, the next activity will be dependent on the completion of the previous activities. Quality evaluation, and project evaluation have not been considered for this business case.

Regular meeting in every week will be executed considering the presence of every necessary stakeholder in manner to measures and identify the growth and development of the project.

The project manager should follow the budget and schedule as proposed in the above report considering the proper and effective delivery of the project in far efficient and effective manner.

Following the case study, I get to know that establishing such big project needs an experienced and educated manager that can deliver the project activities through utilizing the knowledge and ideas related to the project management. I also identified that no matter what big picture we consider for the delivery of the project, it can always be extended for the better and effective consideration of the scope and project delivery. While identifying the business case I get to know that researching about the project, its impact, and other aspects are very crucial and vital for the consideration of the delivery of the project. I understand that cost and schedule are the crucial constraints those should be considered while delivering any single activity throughout the project.

Ahern, T., Leavy, B., & Byrne, P. J. (2014). Complex project management as complex problem solving: A distributed knowledge management perspective. International Journal of Project Management, 32(8), 1371-1381.

Beringer, C., Jonas, D., & Kock, A. (2013). Behavior of internal stakeholders in project portfolio management and its impact on success. International Journal of Project Management, 31(6), 830-846.

Bresnen, M. (2016). Institutional development, divergence and change in the discipline of project management. International journal of project management, 34(2), 328-338.

Burke, R. (2013). Project management: planning and control techniques. New Jersey, USA.

Hornstein, H. A. (2015). The integration of project management and organizational change management is now a necessity. International Journal of Project Management, 33(2), 291-298.

Joslin, R., & Müller, R. (2015). Relationships between a project management methodology and project success in different project governance contexts. International Journal of Project Management, 33(6), 1377-1392.

Kaiser, M. G., El Arbi, F., & Ahlemann, F. (2015). Successful project portfolio management beyond project selection techniques: Understanding the role of structural alignment. International Journal of Project Management, 33(1), 126-139.

Kerzner, H. (2013). Project management: a systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling. John Wiley & Sons.

Leach, L. P. (2014). Critical chain project management. Artech House.

Lock, M. D. (2014). The essentials of project management. Ashgate Publishing, Ltd..

Martinsuo, M. (2013). Project portfolio management in practice and in context. International Journal of Project Management, 31(6), 794-803.

Mir, F. A., & Pinnington, A. H. (2014). Exploring the value of project management: linking project management performance and project success. International Journal of Project Management, 32(2), 202-217.

Reiss, G. (2013). Project management demystified: Today’s tools and techniques. Routledge.

Svejvig, P., & Andersen, P. (2015). Rethinking project management: A structured literature review with a critical look at the brave new world. International Journal of Project Management, 33(2), 278-290.

Teller, J., & Kock, A. (2013). An empirical investigation on how portfolio risk management influences project portfolio success. International Journal of Project Management, 31(6), 817-829.

Todorovi?, M. L., Petrovi?, D. ?., Mihi?, M. M., Obradovi?, V. L., & Bushuyev, S. D. (2015). Project success analysis framework: A knowledge-based approach in project management. International Journal of Project Management, 33(4), 772-783.

Too, E. G., & Weaver, P. (2014). The management of project management: A conceptual framework for project governance. International Journal of Project Management, 32(8), 1382-1394.

Turner, J. R. (2014). The handbook of project-based management (Vol. 92). New York, NY: McGraw-hill.

Turn in your highest-quality paper
Get a qualified writer to help you with

“ St. Helena Marina Development: Stakeholders, Communications, And Business Case ”

Get high-quality paper

NEW! AI matching with writer