Answer:
The XYZ clinic is based in north side of Melbourne. The clinic does not have patient appointment booking system. The clinic only use walk-in to clinic system that means first arrived will be seen first. This leads patients to wait longer to see their desire doctor. The patients are constantly complaining about poor communication infrastructure. Because of this, the clinic has dropped its reputation in market. The purpose of the project is to create and implement patient management and appointment booking system to resolve the issue. This system will help doctors in their work as well as view their patient medical progress and also help patient to book their appointment with their desire doctor. The doctors can manage their booking slots and patients can book empty slot of appointment with their desire doctor using this online system. The system has huge database to manage multiple doctors various dates and times and store each patient’s medical history. The system allows users log in for users to view all patient’s records as needed.
The main aim of this project is to create online patient appointment booking system and manage patient’s medical records. The objective that has been determined for the project are presented as below:
The main purpose of this project is to develop and implement an online system for Patient appointment booking for XYZ clinic so that the patients do not have to wait in long queues for their desired specialist. The scope of this project is implementation of the online patient appointment booking system however it is not confined to that only as it will also provide benefits to the business of XYZ clinic.
The deliverables for this particular project are presented as below:
The stakeholders that are associated with this particular project on implementation of Patient appointment booking system are listed as below:
Stakeholder |
Roles |
CEO (Chief Executive Officer) |
Owner of the organization or planning head of the XYZ clinic |
Steering Committee |
Management committee formed for execution of the project |
Project Manager |
Planning, managing and organizing the project |
Analyst |
Checking of software modules and designed codes |
Developer |
Designing of codes for software |
Tester |
Testing of developed codes |
Trainer |
Training of staffs on the new system |
Technical communicator |
Preparation of the technical documents |
Deployment team |
Installation and deployment of the system |
The responsibility matrix
Task |
Steering Committee |
Project Manager |
Analyst |
Developer |
Tester |
Trainer |
Technical communicator |
Deployment team |
Project Initiation and planning |
R |
R |
I |
I |
I |
I |
C |
C |
Requirements Analysis |
C, I |
R |
R |
C |
I |
I |
I |
C |
Design |
I |
I |
C |
R, A |
I |
I |
C |
R |
Development |
I |
I |
C |
R,A |
I |
I |
R,A |
C |
Testing |
I |
I |
A |
C |
R,A |
I |
I |
I |
Training |
R |
R |
C |
I |
C |
R,A |
R |
I |
Documentation |
I |
I |
I |
I |
C |
A |
R,A |
C |
User Acceptance Testing |
C |
C |
I |
C |
R,A |
I |
C |
A |
Deployment |
I |
C |
I |
I |
C |
I |
I |
R,A |
Post Implementation Project Review |
R |
R,A |
I |
C |
I |
I |
I |
C |
R – Responsible, A – Accountable, C – Consulted, I – Informed
The major constraints that are related to the project are unlike any other project that is Time, Scope and Cost. The detailed explanation and relationship of the constraints are provided below:
Time – It is directly related to cost as if there is delay in the project and it is not going as per the schedule then more budget will be required to complete the project. Further, if there is any changes in scope of the project then it will require more time to complete.
Scope – The changes in project scope may lead to delay or over budgeting which could eventually lead to failure of the project. The time required for implementing changes in project scope could lead to increase in time and budget for the project.
Cost – Cost is another essential factor and it is directly proportional to time and scope as changes in both have a direct impact on cost. The changes in cost may lead to delay or failure of project.
Purpose |
Channel |
Frequency |
Audience |
Responsible |
Progress of project |
Email, Team meetings |
Weekly |
CEO, Steering Committee |
Project Manager |
Conflict/issues |
Team meetings |
Bi-weekly, Monthly |
Project Manager |
Project team members |
Resource availability |
Email and Telephonic conversations |
Monthly |
CEO, Steering Committee |
Project Manager |
Technological aspects |
|
Weekly |
Steering Committee |
Technical Communicator |
The success of the project can be measured with help of certain criteria as mentioned below:
ID |
Task name |
Duration |
Start |
Finish |
Cost |
Gantt chart |
0 |
Software Development |
97.5 days |
Tue 25-09-18 |
Thu 07-02-19 |
$40,410.00 |
|
1 |
Initiation Phase |
7 days |
Tue 25-09-18 |
Wed 03-10-18 |
$2,560.00 |
|
1.1 |
Determination of project scope |
1 day |
Tue 25-09-18 |
Tue 25-09-18 |
$400.00 |
|
1.2 |
Arrangements for project sponsorship |
3 days |
Wed 26-09-18 |
Fri 28-09-18 |
$1,200.00 |
2 |
1.3 |
Defining of the preliminary resources |
2 days |
Mon 01-10-18 |
Tue 02-10-18 |
$640.00 |
3 |
1.4 |
Securing and acquiring the core resources |
1 day |
Wed 03-10-18 |
Wed 03-10-18 |
$320.00 |
4 |
M1 |
Completion of Initiation Phase |
0 days |
Wed 03-10-18 |
Wed 03-10-18 |
$0.00 |
5 |
2 |
Requirements Analysis Phase |
13.25 days |
Thu 04-10-18 |
Tue 23-10-18 |
$4,290.00 |
|
2.1 |
Gathering of requirements |
5 days |
Thu 04-10-18 |
Wed 10-10-18 |
$1,400.00 |
6 |
2.2 |
Drafting of the preliminary software requirements |
3 days |
Thu 11-10-18 |
Mon 15-10-18 |
$840.00 |
8 |
2.3 |
Development of preliminary budget |
2 days |
Tue 16-10-18 |
Wed 17-10-18 |
$640.00 |
9 |
2.4 |
Review of software specifications and budget with project team |
6 hrs |
Thu 18-10-18 |
Thu 18-10-18 |
$450.00 |
10 |
2.5 |
Incorporating the feedback acquired for software specifications |
1 day |
Thu 18-10-18 |
Fri 19-10-18 |
$280.00 |
11 |
2.6 |
Development of delivery timeline |
1 day |
Fri 19-10-18 |
Mon 22-10-18 |
$320.00 |
12 |
2.7 |
Acquisition of approvals |
4 hrs |
Mon 22-10-18 |
Tue 23-10-18 |
$360.00 |
13 |
M2 |
Completion of Analysis Phase |
0 days |
Tue 23-10-18 |
Tue 23-10-18 |
$0.00 |
14 |
3 |
Design Phase |
14.5 days |
Tue 23-10-18 |
Mon 12-11-18 |
$4,640.00 |
|
3.1 |
Review of preliminary software specifications |
2 days |
Tue 23-10-18 |
Thu 25-10-18 |
$560.00 |
15 |
3.2 |
Development of functional specifications |
5 days |
Thu 25-10-18 |
Thu 01-11-18 |
$1,400.00 |
17 |
3.3 |
Development of the prototype |
4 days |
Thu 01-11-18 |
Wed 07-11-18 |
$1,120.00 |
18 |
3.4 |
Review of functional specifications |
2 days |
Wed 07-11-18 |
Fri 09-11-18 |
$800.00 |
19 |
3.5 |
Incorporating feedback for functional specifications |
1 day |
Fri 09-11-18 |
Mon 12-11-18 |
$400.00 |
20 |
3.6 |
Obtaining approvals |
4 hrs |
Mon 12-11-18 |
Mon 12-11-18 |
$360.00 |
21 |
M3 |
Completion of design phase |
0 days |
Mon 12-11-18 |
Mon 12-11-18 |
$0.00 |
22 |
4 |
Development Phase |
21.75 days |
Mon 12-11-18 |
Wed 12-12-18 |
$6,600.00 |
|
4.1 |
Review of functional specifications |
1 day |
Mon 12-11-18 |
Tue 13-11-18 |
$200.00 |
23 |
4.2 |
Identifying the design parameters |
1 day |
Tue 13-11-18 |
Wed 14-11-18 |
$200.00 |
25 |
4.3 |
Assigning the development staff |
1 day |
Wed 14-11-18 |
Thu 15-11-18 |
$200.00 |
26 |
4.4 |
Development of code |
15 days |
Thu 15-11-18 |
Thu 06-12-18 |
$3,000.00 |
27 |
4.5 |
Testing by developer (primary debugging) |
15 days |
Wed 21-11-18 |
Wed 12-12-18 |
$3,000.00 |
28FS-75% |
M4 |
Completion of development phase |
0 days |
Wed 12-12-18 |
Wed 12-12-18 |
$0.00 |
29 |
5 |
Testing Phase |
48.75 days |
Mon 12-11-18 |
Fri 18-01-19 |
$8,400.00 |
|
5.1 |
Development of plans for Unit testing |
4 days |
Mon 12-11-18 |
Fri 16-11-18 |
$960.00 |
23 |
5.2 |
Development of plans for integration testing |
4 days |
Fri 16-11-18 |
Thu 22-11-18 |
$960.00 |
23 |
5.3 |
Unit Testing |
15 days |
Wed 12-12-18 |
Wed 02-01-19 |
$3,600.00 |
|
5.3.1 |
Review of modular code |
5 days |
Wed 12-12-18 |
Wed 19-12-18 |
$1,200.00 |
32,30 |
5.3.2 |
Testing the component modules |
2 days |
Wed 19-12-18 |
Fri 21-12-18 |
$480.00 |
30,35 |
5.3.3 |
Identifying the anomalies |
3 days |
Fri 21-12-18 |
Wed 26-12-18 |
$720.00 |
36 |
5.3.4 |
Modification of code |
3 days |
Wed 26-12-18 |
Mon 31-12-18 |
$720.00 |
37 |
5.3.5 |
Re-testing the modified code |
2 days |
Mon 31-12-18 |
Wed 02-01-19 |
$480.00 |
38 |
M5 |
Completion of Unit testing |
0 days |
Wed 02-01-19 |
Wed 02-01-19 |
$0.00 |
39 |
5.4 |
Integration Testing |
12 days |
Wed 02-01-19 |
Fri 18-01-19 |
$2,880.00 |
|
5.4.1 |
Testing the integration of module |
5 days |
Wed 02-01-19 |
Wed 09-01-19 |
$1,200.00 |
40 |
5.4.2 |
Identifying the anomalies |
2 days |
Wed 09-01-19 |
Fri 11-01-19 |
$480.00 |
42 |
5.4.3 |
Modification of code |
3 days |
Fri 11-01-19 |
Wed 16-01-19 |
$720.00 |
43 |
5.4.4 |
Re-testing the modified code |
2 days |
Wed 16-01-19 |
Fri 18-01-19 |
$480.00 |
44 |
M6 |
Completion of Integration testing |
0 days |
Fri 18-01-19 |
Fri 18-01-19 |
$0.00 |
45 |
6 |
Training Phase |
43.75 days |
Mon 12-11-18 |
Fri 11-01-19 |
$4,800.00 |
|
6.1 |
Development of training specifications (end users) |
3 days |
Mon 12-11-18 |
Thu 15-11-18 |
$480.00 |
23 |
6.2 |
Development of training specifications (helpdesk support staff) |
3 days |
Thu 15-11-18 |
Tue 20-11-18 |
$480.00 |
23 |
6.3 |
Identifying the delivery method for training |
2 days |
Tue 20-11-18 |
Thu 22-11-18 |
$320.00 |
23 |
6.4 |
Developing the training materials |
3 wks |
Wed 12-12-18 |
Wed 02-01-19 |
$2,400.00 |
48,30,49,50 |
6.5 |
Conducting the usability study for training |
4 days |
Wed 02-01-19 |
Tue 08-01-19 |
$640.00 |
51 |
6.6 |
Finalizing the materials for training |
3 days |
Tue 08-01-19 |
Fri 11-01-19 |
$480.00 |
52 |
M7 |
Completion of training materials |
0 days |
Fri 11-01-19 |
Fri 11-01-19 |
$0.00 |
53 |
7 |
Documentation Phase |
48.75 days |
Mon 12-11-18 |
Fri 18-01-19 |
$5,040.00 |
|
7.1 |
Development of Help specification |
1 day |
Mon 12-11-18 |
Tue 13-11-18 |
$120.00 |
23 |
7.2 |
Development of Help functions and system |
3 wks |
Tue 27-11-18 |
Tue 18-12-18 |
$1,800.00 |
56,28FS-50% |
7.3 |
Review of Help documentation |
3 days |
Tue 08-01-19 |
Fri 11-01-19 |
$360.00 |
57 |
7.4 |
Incorporating the feedback on Help documentation |
2 days |
Wed 16-01-19 |
Fri 18-01-19 |
$240.00 |
58 |
7.5 |
Development of specifications for user manuals |
2 days |
Tue 13-11-18 |
Thu 15-11-18 |
$240.00 |
23 |
7.6 |
Developing user manuals |
3 wks |
Tue 18-12-18 |
Tue 08-01-19 |
$1,800.00 |
60,28FS-50% |
7.7 |
Review of all user documentation |
2 days |
Fri 11-01-19 |
Tue 15-01-19 |
$240.00 |
61 |
7.8 |
Incorporating feedback on user documentation |
2 days |
Wed 16-01-19 |
Fri 18-01-19 |
$240.00 |
62 |
M8 |
Completion of documentation phase |
0 days |
Fri 18-01-19 |
Fri 18-01-19 |
$0.00 |
63,59 |
8 |
User Acceptance Testing |
70.25 days |
Tue 23-10-18 |
Tue 29-01-19 |
$1,720.00 |
|
8.1 |
Identification of the test group |
1 day |
Tue 23-10-18 |
Wed 24-10-18 |
$320.00 |
15 |
8.2 |
Installation and deployment of software |
1 day |
Fri 18-01-19 |
Mon 21-01-19 |
$200.00 |
46,64,54 |
8.3 |
Obtaining the feedback from users |
1 wk |
Mon 21-01-19 |
Mon 28-01-19 |
$1,000.00 |
67 |
8.4 |
Evaluation of testing information |
1 day |
Mon 28-01-19 |
Tue 29-01-19 |
$200.00 |
68 |
M9 |
Completion of User Acceptance testing |
0 days |
Tue 29-01-19 |
Tue 29-01-19 |
$0.00 |
69 |
9 |
Deployment Phase |
4 days |
Tue 29-01-19 |
Mon 04-02-19 |
$800.00 |
|
9.1 |
Determination of strategy for final deployment |
1 day |
Tue 29-01-19 |
Wed 30-01-19 |
$200.00 |
70 |
9.2 |
Securing the resources for deployment |
1 day |
Wed 30-01-19 |
Thu 31-01-19 |
$200.00 |
72 |
9.3 |
Training for support staffs |
1 day |
Thu 31-01-19 |
Fri 01-02-19 |
$200.00 |
73 |
9.4 |
Deployment of system |
1 day |
Fri 01-02-19 |
Mon 04-02-19 |
$200.00 |
74 |
M10 |
Completion of Deployment |
0 days |
Mon 04-02-19 |
Mon 04-02-19 |
$0.00 |
75 |
10 |
Post Implementation Project Review |
2 days |
Mon 04-02-19 |
Wed 06-02-19 |
$640.00 |
|
10.1 |
Documentation of lessons learnt |
1 day |
Mon 04-02-19 |
Tue 05-02-19 |
$320.00 |
76 |
10.2 |
Distribution to project team members |
1 day |
Tue 05-02-19 |
Wed 06-02-19 |
$320.00 |
78 |
M11 |
Completion of Post implementation project review |
0 days |
Wed 06-02-19 |
Wed 06-02-19 |
$0.00 |
79 |
11 |
System Go-Live |
1 day |
Wed 06-02-19 |
Thu 07-02-19 |
$920.00 |
80 |
The identified threats relate to this particular project on Implementation of Patient appointment booking system are as below:
The response strategies that can be applied for identified risks related to chosen project for implementation of Patient appointment booking system are as below:
Mitigation strategies: The risks can be controlled by implementing mitigation strategies so that consequence of risks can be minimized. The mitigation of risks can be done through different techniques as mentioned in the previous section. The mitigation strategies for risks can help to achieve project success so that desired outcomes are in accordance with the objectives and project requirements.
Contingency planning: This method for controlling risk is termed as development of a plan to manage the outcome if it is other than the expected or actual. This planning can be used for managing exceptional risks although it may have catastrophic consequences.
Backup and Disaster recovery: This control mechanism refers to the planning for managing the outcomes of a risk in case such severe risk occurs in a project. This planning relates to backup and recovery to previous state of work in case risks have impact on progress of the project.
Risk ID |
Risk |
Risk Impact |
Likelihood of risk |
Severity of consequences |
Level of Risk |
Mitigation |
Contingency Plan |
Risk Owner |
Date Logged |
Date of Review |
01 |
Delay in progress as per schedule |
Medium |
Moderately likely |
Marginal |
Low |
Acceptance |
Monitoring of project progress on regularly |
Project Manager |
20/10/18 |
22/10/18 |
02 |
Over budgeting |
High |
Unlikely |
Marginal |
High |
Monitor and prepare |
Proper budget allocation |
Steering Committee |
25/10/18 |
26/10/18 |
02 |
Scope creep |
High |
Moderately likely |
Critical |
Very High |
Transference |
Approval for changes |
Project Manager |
30/10/18 |
02/11/18 |
04 |
Inadequate resource during execution |
Low |
Unlikely |
Negligible |
Low |
Mitigation |
Proper resource management strategies |
Project Manager |
05/11/18 |
07/11/18 |
05 |
Technical risks |
Medium |
Moderately likely |
Marginal |
Medium |
Avoidance |
Technological support as per objectives |
Developer, Deployment team |
10/11/18 |
14/11/18 |
06 |
Human error |
Low |
Highly likely |
Critical |
Low |
Avoidance |
Proper strategies for human errors |
Testers, Analyst |
16/11/18 |
18/11/18 |
07 |
Usability risk |
High |
Moderately likely |
Negligible |
High |
Mitigation |
Evaluation of outcomes as per requirements |
Developer |
22/11/18 |
25/11/18 |
08 |
Organizational risk |
High |
Unlikely |
Marginal |
Medium |
Transference |
Proper determination of the organizational goals and objectives |
Trainers |
24/11/18 |
26/11/18 |
09 |
Project team risk |
Medium |
Moderately likely |
Marginal |
Low |
Mitigation |
Conflict resolution methods |
Project Manager |
22/09/18 |
23/09/18 |
10 |
Strategic risk |
Low |
Unlikely |
Negligible |
Low |
Monitor and prepare |
Identification and evaluation of long term goals |
Steering Committee |
25/09/18 |
26/09/18 |
Eskerod, P., Huemann, M. and Savage, G., 2015. Project stakeholder management—Past and present. Project Management Journal, 46(6), pp.6-14.
Harris, E., 2017. Strategic project risk appraisal and management. Routledge.
Harrison, F. and Lock, D., 2017. Advanced project management: a structured approach. Routledge.
Heagney, J., 2016. Fundamentals of project management. Amacom.
Heldman, K., 2018. PMP: project management professional exam study guide. John Wiley & Sons.
Hornstein, H.A., 2015. The integration of project management and organizational change management is now a necessity. International Journal of Project Management, 33(2), pp.291-298.
Joslin, R. and Müller, R., 2015. Relationships between a project management methodology and project success in different project governance contexts. International Journal of Project Management, 33(6), pp.1377-1392.
Kerzner, H. and Kerzner, H.R., 2017. Project management: a systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling. John Wiley & Sons.
Kerzner, H., 2017. Project management metrics, KPIs, and dashboards: a guide to measuring and monitoring project performance. John Wiley & Sons.
Kerzner, H., 2018. Project management best practices: Achieving global excellence. John Wiley & Sons.
Larson, E.W., Gray, C.F., Danlin, U., Honig, B. and Bacarini, D., 2014. Project management: The managerial process (Vol. 6). Grandview Heights, OH: McGraw-Hill Education.
Leach, L.P., 2014. Critical chain project management. Artech House.
Marchewka, J.T., 2014. Information technology project management. John Wiley & Sons.
Martinelli, R.J. and Milosevic, D.Z., 2016. Project management toolbox: tools and techniques for the practicing project manager. John Wiley & Sons.
Mir, F.A. and Pinnington, A.H., 2014. Exploring the value of project management: linking project management performance and project success. International journal of project management, 32(2), pp.202-217.
Nicholas, J.M. and Steyn, H., 2017. Project management for engineering, business and technology. Routledge.
Schwalbe, K., 2015. Information technology project management. Cengage Learning.
Svejvig, P. and Andersen, P., 2015. Rethinking project management: A structured literature review with a critical look at the brave new world. International Journal of Project Management, 33(2), pp.278-290.
Todorovi?, M.L., Petrovi?, D.?., Mihi?, M.M., Obradovi?, V.L. and Bushuyev, S.D., 2015. Project success analysis framework: A knowledge-based approach in project management. International Journal of Project Management, 33(4), pp.772-783.
Too, E.G. and Weaver, P., 2014. The management of project management: A conceptual framework for project governance. International Journal of Project Management, 32(8), pp.1382-1394.
Turner, J.R., 2014. Handbook of project-based management(Vol. 92). New York, NY: McGraw-hill.
Turner, R., 2016. Gower handbook of project management. Routledge.
Essay Writing Service Features
Our Experience
No matter how complex your assignment is, we can find the right professional for your specific task. Contact Essay is an essay writing company that hires only the smartest minds to help you with your projects. Our expertise allows us to provide students with high-quality academic writing, editing & proofreading services.Free Features
Free revision policy
$10Free bibliography & reference
$8Free title page
$8Free formatting
$8How Our Essay Writing Service Works
First, you will need to complete an order form. It's not difficult but, in case there is anything you find not to be clear, you may always call us so that we can guide you through it. On the order form, you will need to include some basic information concerning your order: subject, topic, number of pages, etc. We also encourage our clients to upload any relevant information or sources that will help.
Complete the order formOnce we have all the information and instructions that we need, we select the most suitable writer for your assignment. While everything seems to be clear, the writer, who has complete knowledge of the subject, may need clarification from you. It is at that point that you would receive a call or email from us.
Writer’s assignmentAs soon as the writer has finished, it will be delivered both to the website and to your email address so that you will not miss it. If your deadline is close at hand, we will place a call to you to make sure that you receive the paper on time.
Completing the order and download