Whether to or not to vaccinate ones child is amongst the preliminary medical-related choices parents have got to render after child delivery. For the past twenty years, parents choosing never to immunize their children have increased in different countries, for a number of reasons (Fefferman & Naumova, 2015). Among these, information affirming that vaccination might include harmful chemicals or perhaps prompt some serious chronic diseases. They have adversely influenced parental behaviour toward pediatric immunization particularly vaccination against measles , mumps and rubella ( MMR ), which in turn elevates numerous the public health outcomes(Edwards, Hackell, Committee on Infectious Diseases& Committee on Practice and Ambulatory Medicine, 2016). The primary aim of this assignment is to describe information which would be provided to Susan in this scenario around vaccine safety and risks which are associated to refusing MMR vaccine, drawing on to the current evidence. It would also discuss strategies which would be used to promote effective communication with parents who had concerns regarding vaccination.
Vaccination is a highly effective approach to prevent various infectious diseases. For a person, and society in regards to the public health, prevention is a lot better even more economical than treatment (MacDonald, 2015). Vaccines are usually very safe and adverse reactions usually are unheard of. The routine immunization programmes generally safeguard many of the globe children from numerous infectious diseases that had earlier claimed millions of lives every year. When it comes to travellers, vaccination provides the possibility to avoid numerous dangerous diseases which could be encountered abroad (Fefferman, &Naumova, 2015). Measles is an infectious ailment , that could result in serious problems particularly in the children who are the age of 5 years and grownups that are over the age of twenty ( Hockenberry, Wilson & Rodgers , 2016). The most effective measles containing vaccine is MMR vaccine, which also protect one from mumps, an illness that is identified by inflammation of salivary glands, and rubella, which is an infection that could result in more severe complication in fetus in case it was acquired by an expectant mother (MacDonald, 2015).
The parental concern regarding this scenario about Joshua, not given MMR vaccine, the mother refuses, stating that she has read some concerning information on the internet in relation to potential links between the MMR vaccine and autism(Hockenberry, Wilson& Rodgers, 2016).The parents are advised to immunize their kids against MMR, but the final decision generally lies to them. This policy necessitates informed, autonomous decisions, which assumes parents do posses the appropriate and accurate information in regards to both the risks and benefits of the vaccination. This really is similar to the ailment, skill to judge precisely what is much more ideal to their children and motivation to apply autonomously to such decision (MacDonald, 2015). The parents are supposed to be well-informed and should be empowered to make their own personal choice, whether or not their ultimate decision will surely gratify the official guidelines.
Vaccine behavior generally falls on the continuum. At one end, you will find those parents that are entirely in preference of the vaccines, and on the other end there are certainly parents who confound the vaccines. In this scenario parent of Joshua is opposing this vaccination emphasizing it is related to autism (Phadke et al 2016). The common thread which is among all the parents no matter their vaccination choices is that they try to do whatever they feel ideal to their children. With the parents who fall when it comes to the vaccine opposing end of spectrum, health care providers encounter problems when they make sure to change on their attitudes about the vaccines (Phadke et al 2016). These parents might have sturdy feeling and they are much confident with what they feel to be true regarding the vaccines. In the case of this scenario the mother believe this vaccine is associated to autism, since she had read in the internet. This calls for appropriate strategies by the health care providers to communicate with the concerned parent in relation to this aspect.
Many experts stress the relevance of proactive intervention endeavors aimed toward broad group of vaccine hesitant parents just like Joshua mother. Parents in this instance are the continuums who are generally receptive to data with regards to vaccination from the trusted health care providers (Ginter, Duncan & Swayne, 2018). One of the approaches for communication with the concerned parent is via one on one conversation with the doctors and nurse to the large scale outreach from the health department for instance hoardings and radio ads (Townsend & Morgan, 2017). Precisely what could make the provider and parent discussion in relation to the childhood vaccination a complex is the fact that parent decision and attitude vary, based on one kind of vaccine (Ginter, Duncan & Swayne, 2018). In any cases whenever the parents have negative behaviour in relations to the vaccines, they are more often dependent on erroneous data or hearing emotional narrative accounts about the adverse reaction of the vaccine (Townsend & Morgan, 2017). The health care provider should talk to the parent one on one to correct her misperceptions about the risks. The healthcare providers could address parents’ specific concerns (Pasquale, Preiss, Silva&Garçon, 2015). They need to discuss vaccines from numerous perspectives, like the advantages of vaccination, along with risks of not vaccinating. Based on the researcher using a strategy where you tailor your discussion on one specific concern could positively impact e providers and the parent relationship and at the same time foster trust (Nyhan et al 2014). Since the health care providers could build trust with the public in vaccines, interacting accurate data regarding the risks should be component of the conversation.
The health providers could address also the issue raised by the parent through providing them an empathetic reassurance (Salmon et al 2015). The healthcare provider could assure the infant health is their top priority. Moreover, it would be important to relay your knowledge since onset of regressive autism signs generally coincides with the timing of the vaccines but is not due to the vaccines (Trevarthen, 2017). As a health professional it is very important state ones personal and professional opinion about the vaccines that are really safe (Nyhan, Reifler, Richey & Freed, 2014). This might be accomplished via reminding the parents that vaccines preventable diseases might cause severe complications and even death, which could remain a considerably threat.
Another strategy would be providing conventional wisdom. This strategy help improve parent knowledge and they would be able to make the right decision. This is an educational approach which allows the human decision making which is rational (Hadinegoro et al 2015). According to the behavioral economics, they have highlighted that human behavior is usually impacted by the deep seated cognitive biases as well as heuristics resistant to the rational impacts (Trevarthen, 2017). Become clear means correcting the parents’ knowledge gaps this could be through community campaigns, informational brochures as well as direct providers conversations and sometimes this is often not enough to address the parents who have concerns in regards to the vaccines (Nyhan, Reifler, Richey& Freed, 2014). Presently, the investigators are focusing on developing interventions aimed to improve vaccination uptake focused on how individuals think rather than how they ought to think.
Vaccines safety and adverse events is the top concerns for the parents. Communication strategies have been used by the health care providers on the specification of information to parents or even on the education interventions (Townsend & Morgan, 2017). Communication procedure helps build connection and trust which is needed. Attempts to influence utilizing graphic images or narratives have been used by the health care providers. The health care providers play an important portion being that they are the most trusted source for the vaccine data. Development and evaluating effective communication strategies to support the vaccine decision making has been important. Numerous communication strategies have been suggested particularly for vaccine hesitant and refusing parent such as the one in the case study. it is important for the health care providers be careful in addressing this issue, for instance they need to ask permission with the parent about the concerns, where they need to be careful elicit on this concern and try to address each one specifically (Hadinegoro et al. 2015). Moreover, they need to use a guiding style in which to address the parent since based on their perspective they have a belief that the vaccine are not got for their parent. In this sense they need to provide links to the resources while explaining the significance of the vaccine and why it is important to the children. The healthcare providers need to be a support discussion with downloadable resources which will help the parents to understand about the vaccines (Hadinegoro et al. 2015). For parents who decline all vaccines, a selective routine could be offered to have them started, but complete uptake of vaccines ought to be inspired. In these parents, accepting some vaccines could be a reasonable goal whenever the alternative is no vaccines. If the parents’ requirements can never be met or even the practitioner does not have the time or perhaps inclination to focus on their concerns further, referral to a specialist immunization clinic could be considered. This would help to the parent to ensure have the confidence to take their children be immunized have dismiss concerns regarding vaccines have side effects.
Concerns about immunization rates continue to be high; concerns about vaccine safety are on the increase. Current communication approach based on the scientific research does not appear to lead more comfort with the vaccines. The healthcare providers are seen as reliable sources of information on vaccines issues(Salmon et al 2015). Vaccines prevent many deaths and illnesses across the world. There are many parent who accept childhood immunization, there are still who are struggling with the vaccination decision and they have difficulty try to negotiate. The health professional have a central role when it comes to maintaining the public trust in vaccination(Salmon et al 2015). This should include addressing parent vaccine concerns. The issues would certainly more likely increase as the vaccinations schedules evolves into more complex , and parents they have access to the diversified info via the internet and the social media.
References
Edwards, K. M., Hackell, J. M., Committee on Infectious Diseases, & Committee on Practice and Ambulatory Medicine. (2016). Countering vaccine hesitancy. Pediatrics, e20162146.
Fefferman, N. H., &Naumova, E. N. (2015). Dangers of vaccine refusal near the herd immunity threshold: a modelling study. The Lancet Infectious Diseases, 15(8), 922-926.
Hadinegoro, S. R., Arredondo-García, J. L., Capeding, M. R., Deseda, C., Chotpitayasunondh, T., Dietze, R., …& Tran, H. N. (2015). Efficacy and long-term safety of a dengue vaccine in regions of endemic disease.New England Journal of Medicine, 373(13), 1195- 1206.
Hockenberry, M. J., Wilson, D., & Rodgers, C. C. (2016).Wong’s Essentials of Pediatric Nursing-E-Book.Elsevier Health Sciences.
Ginter, P. M., Duncan, W. J., & Swayne, L. E. (2018). The strategic management of health care organizations. John Wiley & Sons.
MacDonald, N. E. (2015). Vaccine hesitancy: Definition, scope and determinants. Vaccine, 33(34), 4161-4164.
Nyhan, B.,Reifler, J., Richey, S., & Freed, G. L. (2014). Effective messages in vaccine promotion: a randomized trial. Pediatrics, peds-2013.
Pasquale, A. D., Preiss, S., Silva, F. T. D., &Garçon, N. (2015). Vaccine adjuvants: from 1920 to 2015 and beyond. Vaccines, 3(2), 320-343.
Phadke, V. K., Bednarczyk, R. A., Salmon, D. A., & Omer, S. B. (2016). Association between vaccine refusal and vaccine-preventable diseases in the United States: a review of measles and pertussis. Jama, 315(11), 1149-1158.
Salmon, D. A., Dudley, M. Z., Glanz, J. M., & Omer, S. B. (2015). Vaccine hesitancy: causes, consequences, and a call to action. Vaccine, 33, D66-D71.
Trevarthen, C. (2017). The function of emotions in early infant communication and development.In New perspectives in early communicative development (pp. 48-81). Routledge.
Townsend, M. C., & Morgan, K. I. (2017).Psychiatric mental health nursing: Concepts of care in evidence-based practice. FA Davis
Essay Writing Service Features
Our Experience
No matter how complex your assignment is, we can find the right professional for your specific task. Contact Essay is an essay writing company that hires only the smartest minds to help you with your projects. Our expertise allows us to provide students with high-quality academic writing, editing & proofreading services.
Free Features
Free revision policy
$10Free bibliography & reference
$8Free title page
$8Free formatting
$8How Our Essay Writing Service Works
First, you will need to complete an order form. It's not difficult but, in case there is anything you find not to be clear, you may always call us so that we can guide you through it. On the order form, you will need to include some basic information concerning your order: subject, topic, number of pages, etc. We also encourage our clients to upload any relevant information or sources that will help.
Complete the order form
Once we have all the information and instructions that we need, we select the most suitable writer for your assignment. While everything seems to be clear, the writer, who has complete knowledge of the subject, may need clarification from you. It is at that point that you would receive a call or email from us.
Writer’s assignment
As soon as the writer has finished, it will be delivered both to the website and to your email address so that you will not miss it. If your deadline is close at hand, we will place a call to you to make sure that you receive the paper on time.
Completing the order and download
