Having balanced necessities of social, economic and environmental objectives in intensifying projects. Here, the obligation to integrate sustainability with managing projects with project management has been drawing attention on practice and academia. Particularly for huge complicated projects of construction engineering, the ways of gaining objectives that are sustainability relates in project practices are endowed with irreplaceable importance.
The City of Gold Coast is a popular area of local government. This spans from Gold Coast at Queensland in Australia along with surrounding sectors. From resident population during 2016 census, this is considered as the second biggest local government area of the nation. The council is found to maintain employees over 2,500 in number.
The following study analyzes practices on sustainable engineering management at the City of Gold Coast Australia. Further, various research methods and various analysis tools are evaluated in the study. Then the responses are examined and the core unit theory is demonstrated.
Sustainable development refers to the development meeting various necessities of the current state. This is done instead of compromising the capabilities of future generations for meeting the individual necessities. There are various causes why the government need to adopt practices of sustainability. One of the reason is the aim to gain legitimacy and competitive advantages that must be yield by sustainability practices. However, this does not mean that the government must develop the states of society and the environment (Khalid et al. 2015). Moreover, this is also helpful to gain actual business advantages at the similar time. The primary intention is threefold. This is a business method helps in raising the efficiency of upside benefits. This is helpful to control the downward risks. Further, it develops the value-driven concern for stewards of the environment.
To analyze the sustainability engineering practices at Gold Coast, Australia, various tools are used. First of BIM or Building Information Modeling is the latest software approach for designing constructions and buildings at digital scale. This enables users in creating complex and coordinated building models. Using digital software the real; physical wastes and reworks can be reduced. Besides, different project philosophies and practices can be regurgitated and renamed creatively. In this situation, none can consider the similar beating as practices of Lean Thinking. Here, the advantages and tools stemming from lean thinking are huge to fit (Long and Qu 2018). However, the main focus is that lean thinking can be seen as turning to be lean to eradicate wastes with creating value. This included a set of tools of using, best practices for imitating, amount of projects of conducting, various experts for listening, a process to develop methodology and simple transformation. Moreover, the method to eradicate or reduce various resources, that is regarded as common and creating a value-creating strategy. The key fact is that lean thinking has not been just the application to develop techniques and tools helping to reduce waste (Liniger et al. 2017). Here, lean thinking indicates the method to think that must bring forth to the process and project and generate value that is produced. However, this has not been without challenges. Moreover, it is complicated to anticipate the effects on the scenario. The idea of lean is an effective scope to cut costs particularly used in conjunction to provided models. This reconciles various lean practices with sustainability.
The necessity of the tools and methods:
In order to include effective sustainability for sustainable engineering practices at the City of Gold Coast and gaining external adoption to different sectors, they must assure various analysis tools. The project managers require to create a various set of tools and models utilized for quantifying effects of economic indicators, environmental and social indicators. This has been affecting the project, policy and program within the evaluation. These tools are helpful to deliver a transparent and uniform basis to analyze the alternatives. This widening of the analysis from the environment of the Gold Coast to sustainability indicates that apart from adding to risk analysis, social factors and extra-economic factors are also required to be taken into consideration (Schmidt et al. 2017). The methods also indicate that the government of the Gold Coast, Australia require to modify, develop and adopt a various set of tools for conducting those analysis going beyond conventional analysis. There are various tools applicable to indicate various elemental part of the assessment.
A comprehensive analysis is typical needs the implementation of the suite of methods. Various principles are needed to be considered to deploy the tools and methods. First single method or tools is needed to be comprehensive. The comprehensive analysis possibly needs the deployment of a suite of tools. This is to assess the effects of economic, environmental and social pillars of sustainability. This suite of tools must involve different dynamic analysis (Bender, Wagg and van der Heijden 2016). This must investigate the outcomes of additional scopes through the course of time or intergenerational component. These tools are intended to be able to provide various quantitative analysis of effects to the highest possible extent. This is intended to have relatively effective tools and methods that are to be transparent. Further, they should be explained easily and found out where the results of the assessment have been effectively communicated for the decision makers.
Here, the sustainability impact analysis tool is to be used. This is to assess the possible impacts of the project of Gold Coast, Australia over their financial, environmental and social pillars of sustainability. Further, this analysis is also useful to create various integrated policies considering the total account of the dimensions of sustainable development. Besides, this also involves the long-term, intangible and cross-cutting considerations of the sustainability policies. The environmental effect analysis tends to concentrate mainly on the various types of projected environment effects over specific action and alternatives to that action (Keesstra et al. 2018). Here, the reason behind the environmental analysis is to assure total consideration of various environmental effects and alternatives. This deal with the understanding that those considerations ordinarily can decrease the effects of the environment of the decision. Here, the sustainability effect analysis has aimed to decrease the impacts of the environment. Besides, this is also helpful to optimize the specific contribution of decision regarding sustainability.
In this project, the SIAT or Sustainability Impact Assessment Tool can be used. This a DG Trade-specific tool to support important negotiations of trade. This delivers the commission with the detailed assessment of practical environmental impacts, human rights, social and economic effects of the present negotiations of trade. The analysis is the scope for stakeholders and has various purposes (Malano and van Hofwegen 2018). This involves feeding of data to and helps to steer the negotiations, analyzing the modifications that have been caused due to a trade agreement. It also includes analysis of changes that are caused due to a trade agreement. It is useful to determine probable trade-offs and assuring that the choices of related policies have been optimized. Further, the Sustainability Impact Assessment Tool has been contributing to the evidence-based, transparent and sound transparent trade negotiations.
Here, an analysis is done to provide the appropriate and clear direction. This is based on the pieces of evidence on how the resource, infrastructure and engineering managers can develop the engineering management practices for Gold Coast, Australia for a proactive sustainable future. Firstly, the beginning must be done by analyzing the present project sustainability. Prior considering the steps towards the higher sustainability, it is vital to understand where one can have been presently standing (Ansari and Kant 2017). The sustainability analysis is helpful to seek the higher scopes for development and help to measure the progress as the initiatives of the sustainability take shape. During analyzing the project sustainability, the idea of sustainability applies to any project and practices of project management. Next, the efforts and costs are required to be developed. Besides, the efficiency advantages of the reputation, potential cost savings and the environment of Gold Coast that has been resulting (Enoch 2016). Next, a sustainability strategy is to be developed.
As the analysis is finished, the next step is drafting the strategy defining the goals of the organization to develop sustainability. This is the way in which the developments are achieved and what Gold Coast gains in the overall process. Thus, the developments are gained and what Gold Coast has been hoping to gain in the overall process. Same as the project plan, the strategy must involve the departments, roles and people liable for taking forward the initiative of sustainability and authority level that have been finding the project priorities. Then there is the adoption of sustainability standards. Since, the interest in project sustainability improves the government of the Gold Coast, must start to set standards to help executive leaders and their project’s managers. This is to find out whether they have been meeting the goals of sustainability. Then, they should look for sustainability in vendors and partners (Li et al. 2017). Moreover, asking suppliers and vendors to develop the sustainability of the Gold Coast’s government can decrease their environmental footprints. Apart from this, this can lead to wider developments among the other clients of their vendors also.
Further, there must be effective communication present. As with any organizational effort, the spread of word is the key to success. Then, as the strategy of sustainability has been defined, the project team should be engaged to the process. Next, feedbacks must be asked regarding sustainability goals and new ideas are to be solicited that the employees have been based on prior projects. It must be reminded that more ownership is felt by the team members in a sustainability effort, the difficult it becomes to make it a success (Obersteiner et al. 2018). Here, the vital element to reach a sustainable solution through projects is to broaden the viewpoint. This has been not sufficient on the project lifecycle of Gold Coast.
First of all the “ex-post” view on the projects are to be understood. Before starting from a new project, the development path should be analyzed leading to the project. This is irrespective of the past project having outcomes that are inputted to the latest projects. Further, the political process forming the opinion of the lessons, experiences and stakeholders are learnt collected during the same type of projects. Here, for example, good sustainable practices and developing the process are to be used (Olawumi and Chan 2018). Before starting the new project, it is recommended to do the feasibility study and analysis of sustainability impact. Further, the outcomes are helping to create the business case and plan of project management supporting the goals and ambitions of the management of Gold Coast’s to fetch sustainability. After this, there must be the ab initio perspective on the Gold Coast project. Moreover, the projects to be considered sustainability from the starting, through applying various sustainable tools, methods and practices, creating project aims. This must cover the manage and sustainability of the project sustainably. For instance, the saving resources in various sectors possible are to be considered (Faleschini et al. 2016). Further, the sustainability in project means indicates to have a wider look different processes like purchasing of processes. This includes overlapping various lifecycles of systems, services, process and products from the initial idea to decommissioning.
This includes more just the core of nature, society, external stakeholders and stakeholders to be considered. The sustainable, in essence, need to think wider, adopt thinking of systems and become aware of the complexity in program and projects. Further, there is ex-ante over the projects. This is self-explanatory that the sustainability is not ending as the project deliverables are approved. The sustainability for Gold Coast begins here delivering more than a product and output or services. Here, the impact is to be aimed with long-term results and methodical advantages. However, there can be an argument that there is no responsibility of the project managers further. The answer is positive. This is because the project temporary and one cannot ask anyone to be accountable for anything beyond Gold Coast’s life-cycle. There must be the project sponsor managing the government and at the top managers of Gold Coast’s project. In the present case, the sustainable and change solutions in the format of a program must be preferred including benefit realization (Valipour 2017). Further, the project is instrumental to gain the long term result and requires the help to achieve sustainable solutions. Remaining within time, budget and requirements are the success of project management and no success for the project. This is more holistic and considering the sustainability to must higher form.
The above analysis also helps in understanding the sustainability of project management at Gold Coast has not been injecting various strategies and tools to present project management practices. This has been concerned with the overall government, impacting strategies, roles, cultures, organizational structures. The KPIs has been required for been more holistic. Moreover, the views are required to be more systematic and enclose various stages of the project (Black and McBean 2017). Besides, from a theoretical perspective, the significance of project managers are not restricted to various functional roles. This is as implementers of technical and sustainable solutions. It is vital to delivering sustainability that has been including serious problematic practices and assumptions. This is to develop and institutionalize the latest organizational working arrangements and models. This instance of change in institutional practices is related to shifting of duration in the project life-cycle. This delivery of ultimately of service is the ending of the project part from project management process has been beginning to consider the account of using of investment of projects. This is beyond the ending of project activities (Zavadskas et al. 2018). Thus, the overall paradigm shift has been inking to the idea of sustainability consequently rising in the necessity to contribute to optimizing the business of the investment that is initialized by the Gold Coast’s project. This also involves managing the project dynamics and complexity and constantly adjust the project restrictions.
Conclusion:
The present project on Gold Coast, Australia can make sustainable development to the area. This is hence expected that the idea of sustainability is reflected in project management. Though some aspects of sustainability have been seen in different standards of project management, it is seen that the effect of sustainability has been totally identified. These standards of the project managers have not been totally reflected in various aspects of the sustainability derived from the idea of sustainable developments. From the ideas of sustainability, the above sustainable project managements discussed can be effectively deployed. Here, the environmental, social and economic effects can be considered and the impacts for now and future generations can be considered. Besides, the development of a framework is used for determining the aspects of sustainability and project criteria. Here, the indicators or criteria applies to various levels of project and affecting the results and effects. However, it is understood from the study that more activities are needed to be done over the implications of sustainable projects. Here, the definition developed has been providing a foundation for future development and effective operationalization.
References:
Ansari, Z.N. and Kant, R., 2017. A state-of-art literature review reflecting 15 years of focus on sustainable supply chain management. Journal of cleaner production, 142, pp.2524-2543.
Bardos, R.P., Bone, B.D., Boyle, R., Evans, F., Harries, N.D., Howard, T. and Smith, J.W., 2016. The rationale for simple approaches for sustainability assessment and management in contaminated land practice. Science of the Total Environment, 563, pp.755-768.
Bender, S.F., Wagg, C. and van der Heijden, M.G., 2016. An underground revolution: biodiversity and soil ecological engineering for agricultural sustainability. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 31(6), pp.440-452.
Black, K. and McBean, E., 2017. Analysis of challenges and opportunities to meaningful Indigenous engagement in sustainable water and wastewater management. Water Policy, p.wp2017078.
Enoch, M., 2016. Sustainable transport, mobility management and travel plans. Routledge.
Faleschini, F., Zanini, M.A., Pellegrino, C. and Pasinato, S., 2016. Sustainable management and supply of natural and recycled aggregates in a medium-size integrated plant. Waste Management, 49, pp.146-155.
Keesstra, S., Nunes, J., Novara, A., Finger, D., Avelar, D., Kalantari, Z. and Cerdà, A., 2018. The superior effect of nature based solutions in land management for enhancing ecosystem services. Science of the Total Environment, 610, pp.997-1009.
Khalid, R.U., Seuring, S., Beske, P., Land, A., Yawar, S.A. and Wagner, R., 2015. Putting sustainable supply chain management into base of the pyramid research. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 20(6), pp.681-696.
Khalili, N.R., Duecker, S., Ashton, W. and Chavez, F., 2015. From cleaner production to sustainable development: the role of academia. Journal of Cleaner Production, 96, pp.30-43.
Li, F., Liu, X., Zhang, X., Zhao, D., Liu, H., Zhou, C. and Wang, R., 2017. Urban ecological infrastructure: An integrated network for ecosystem services and sustainable urban systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 163, pp.S12-S18.
Liniger, H., Mekdaschi, R., Moll, P. and Zander, U., 2017. Making sense of research for sustainable land management. Centre for Development and Environment (CDE), University of Bern and Helmholtz-Centre for Environmental Research GmbH–UFZ.
Long, H. and Qu, Y., 2018. Land use transitions and land management: A mutual feedback perspective. Land Use Policy, 74, pp.111-120.
Malano, H.M. and van Hofwegen, P., 2018. Management of irrigation and drainage systems. CRC Press.
Obersteiner, M., Walsh, B., Frank, S., Havlík, P., Cantele, M., Liu, J., Palazzo, A., Herrero, M., Lu, Y., Mosnier, A. and Valin, H., 2016. Assessing the land resource–food price nexus of the Sustainable Development Goals. Science advances, 2(9), p.e1501499.
Olawumi, T.O. and Chan, D.W., 2018. A scientometric review of global research on sustainability and sustainable development. Journal of cleaner production.
Schmidt, E., Chinowsky, P., Robinson, S. and Strzepek, K., 2017. Determinants and impact of sustainable land management (SLM) investments: A systems evaluation in the Blue Nile Basin, Ethiopia. Agricultural Economics, 48(5), pp.613-627.
Taticchi, P., Garengo, P., Nudurupati, S.S., Tonelli, F. and Pasqualino, R., 2015. A review of decision-support tools and performance measurement and sustainable supply chain management. International Journal of Production Research, 53(21), pp.6473-6494.
Valipour, M., 2017. Global experience on irrigation management under different scenarios. Journal of water and land development, 32(1), pp.95-102.
Xu, X. and Luo, X., 2018. A System Dynamics Approach to Integrating Sustainable Land Use with Transportation System Based on Access Management.
Zavadskas, E., Antucheviciene, J., Vilutiene, T. and Adeli, H., 2018. Sustainable decision-making in civil engineering, construction and building technology. Sustainability, 10(1), p.14.
Essay Writing Service Features
Our Experience
No matter how complex your assignment is, we can find the right professional for your specific task. Contact Essay is an essay writing company that hires only the smartest minds to help you with your projects. Our expertise allows us to provide students with high-quality academic writing, editing & proofreading services.
Free Features
Free revision policy
$10Free bibliography & reference
$8Free title page
$8Free formatting
$8How Our Essay Writing Service Works
First, you will need to complete an order form. It's not difficult but, in case there is anything you find not to be clear, you may always call us so that we can guide you through it. On the order form, you will need to include some basic information concerning your order: subject, topic, number of pages, etc. We also encourage our clients to upload any relevant information or sources that will help.
Complete the order form
Once we have all the information and instructions that we need, we select the most suitable writer for your assignment. While everything seems to be clear, the writer, who has complete knowledge of the subject, may need clarification from you. It is at that point that you would receive a call or email from us.
Writer’s assignment
As soon as the writer has finished, it will be delivered both to the website and to your email address so that you will not miss it. If your deadline is close at hand, we will place a call to you to make sure that you receive the paper on time.
Completing the order and download