Taxation Law For Capital Gain Tax And Fringe Benefit Tax

What is Capital Gain Tax?

Discuss about the Taxation Law for Capital Gain Tax.

Capital gain tax is the difference between the capital proceeds and the cost of the asset or item. Receiving more for an item than the cost. Ordinary income includes other than long-term capital gains. These earnings include wages and salaries, as well as bonuses, tips, commissions, interest income, and short-term capital gains. Ordinary income is taxed at the highest tax rate (Gibson 2009, p.43).          

This type of income can be offset with standard tax deductions to arrive at taxable income for the individual for a business, ordinary income is the income from continuing operations before income taxes, excluding discontinued operations and the cumulative effect of changes in accounting principles. Peta purchased the property for two reasons, for her family to settle down and so that she can build, three units on the tennis court and sell them at a profit. The tennis court was not in a good condition but the Tennis club next door placed an offer to the tennis court since the tennis court could be of more value to them than Peta. Peta made changes to the tennis court on her own expense and sold the tennis court at a profit. She had repaid the tennis court spending $100,000 .She sold the tennis court for $600,000 (Simanovsky 2010, p. 23).

Capital gain can be characterized as the wage earned from giving services or the offer of products (stock). This class incorporates salary earned from premium, compensation, rents, sovereignties, and comparable wage streams. Standard wage is exhausted at various rates relying upon the measure of salary got by a citizen in a given duty year. In 2012, there are right now six assessment sections for burdening standard wage: 10%, 15%, 25%, 28%, 33%, and 35%. These conventional salary minor expense sections are planned to lapse toward the end of 2012. In 2013, the 10% through 28% expense rates will continue as before and the main two rates of 33% and 35% will be supplanted with higher rates, 36% and 39.6% individually.

Capital gains are normally connected with the deal or trade of property described as capital assets. The measure of increase is measured as the distinction between the sums got by the Peta   on the deal less the original price of the tennis court, balanced through the date of the deal (purchase price in addition to any changes less devaluation taken).

Taxation Rates for Capital Gain Tax

The classification of capital addition tax collection is further separated into long and short-term capital increase. On the off chance the tennis court is sold within one year of its buy, the addition is portrayed as short term and taxed at the same minor rate, as Peta’s other normal pay. In this manner, in any event for short-term gains, the duty rates are the same as the Peta’s ordinary income. Then again, if Peta holds the property for over one year before offering, the addition is described as long-term capital gain and is taxed at a great long-term rate (Duchac 2011, p.45).  

In 2012, the long term Capital gain charge rate was 15% and this returns on January 1, 2013 to the past long term rate of 20%. Long-term capital increases, on assets held for more than one year, are liable to a lesser tax rate than short-term capital gains from investment held for less than a year (Gibson 2009, p.43).            

Section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code gives tax deferral to specific trades of property held for speculation or utilized as a part of an exchange or business. To fit the bill for deferral, the property surrendered in the trade must be traded for the same substitution property. There are assortments of different necessities for deferral including time requirement, property identification and, sometimes, the utilization of a qualified delegate to encourage the trade exchange to evade real or productive receipt of the returns. In our case, the deal was negotiated between Peta and the tennis club (Simanovsky 2010, p. 23).

Capital increases emerge when you offer a capital asset, for example, a stock, for more than its price, or premise. Capital increases are further subdivided into short and long term. In the event that a stock is sold inside one year of procurement, the addition is short term and is taxed at the higher ordinary salary rate. Then again, on the off chance that you hold the stock for over a year prior to offering, the increase is long term and is taxed at the lower capital additions rate.

On the other hand, you understand a capital loss when you offer the asset for less than it worth. While not amusing to lose cash, you can decrease your tax bill by utilizing capital loss to balance capital gains. Likewise, to the degree that capital loss surpasses capital gains, you can deduct the loss against your other income up to a yearly limit of $3,000. Any extra loss over the $3,000 limit is extended to be utilized as a part of ensuing years (Simanovsky 2010, p. 23).

Long and Short-Term Capital Gain Tax

Capital gain in this case is the capital she received for the tennis court which is $600,000 subtracting the initial cost Peta incurred when repairing the old tennis court.

Capital gain =$600,000-$100,000= $500,000

Peta made $500,000 from selling her old tennis court.

$500,000 is an ordinary income since she initially had no plans of selling the tennis court but the tennis club approached her and made a deal for the old tennis court. Peta repaired the court at her own expense and sold it to the tennis club. The profit she made is her own capital gain since she got an income from selling her own property (Duchac 2011, p 45).

Fringe benefit tax (FBT) is tax that employers or companies pay benefits they provide to their employees and their families. Alan who is an employee at ABC Pty limited gets a remuneration package, which include;

Salary of $300,000

Mobile phone bill 220 per month including (GST)

Alan children’s school fees 20,000 annually. No GST

New mobile phone $2000 including GST

Annual party dinner of 6,600 including GST

ABC can claim a GST credit on items with a GST.

ABC spent 300,000+ (220*12) +20,000+2000+6600=$331,240 that year on one employee and the annual party (Leach 2010, p.45).

ABC can ask for GST credit on all products with a GST, which include mobile phone bill, school fees, new mobile phone and for the annual party. However, ABC spend a lot on employees remuneration some which they cannot get a GST credit .The company should minimize the benefit they provide to their employees since they end up spending more on their expenses instead on investing for them to get more revenue (Duchac 2011, p 45).

There is a relationship between installments of wages or compensations to employees. Given the worker who gets the wages is working on the business income delivering activity, the positive appendages of 8-1(1) rule is fulfilled (Gibson 2009, p.2).            

At the end of the day, providing benefits to the worker ABC (particularly one that gives an extra time on the employees, for example, an exercise room benefit) can be seen as an expense of holding the services of the employees to assist the objectives of the business, which is to make income (Leach 2010, p.67). With a repayment that is for expenses connected with assisting the business interests of the employer, these can be seen as an expense of the business (as opposed to a cost of retaining the employee’s services. It ought to be welcomed that the business will fulfill the positive appendages of s 8-1(1) whether the benefits is pay, recompense, or a repayment. Further, costs connected with holding the services of workers will almost dependably be on income account (not capital record) under s 8-1 in light of the fact that such expenses are viewed as repetitive: Finally, the measure of an information charge credit the citizen has acquired under the GST Act is prohibited from the deductible sum.

Section 1031 of Internal Revenue Code

Deductibility of FBT Payable by Employer Provided the employees who got the benefit that generated the FBT 2 risk, is dealing with the business’ wage creating action (business), then the positive appendages of s 8-1(1) are fulfilled. In this case, Alan who works for ABC get the all the benefits since he provides services to the company. The services are a compensation for his services. Furthermore, the provision of a benefit will continuously be viewed as being a cost represented by the same reason given about the expense of the benefit. On the off chance that the benefit is an incidental benefit, then it will be taxed (or managed) under the FBT services, and it is excluded in the beneficiary’s (employee’s) as assessable pay.  If the benefit is not an incidental benefit, on the grounds that for it is a remittance, commission, reward, the FBT services: section (f) of the meaning of incidental benefit in s 136(1) of the FBTAA. Alternatively, maybe, it is likely to be incorporated into the recipient’s (employee’s) assessable salary for cost installment benefits, there is, or could be a three-stage process for deciding the assessable estimation of the benefit. The three stages are; Prima facie assessable worth (PFTV), PFTV diminished by beneficiary’s commitment and further decrease to assessable quality by something else deductible principle generally deductible sum (Duchac 2011, p 45).

ABC spends more on paying the FBT for the benefits they offer their employee on top of the expenses they incur on the benefits it provides to its employees. The company can get GST credit for the costs with a GST but they still spend a lot on their employees benefits. The ABC Company should balance the remuneration packages they provide their employee so that they can incur less expenses and on paying the FBT (Leach 2010, p.67).

If ABC had five employees and each employee getting the same benefits as Alan, the company would spend a lot of money on expenses instead of focusing their capital on channels that can bring income. On top of the remuneration packages they would have incurred on the employees, they would have paid more FBT for their employees and at the end; the expenses would be more than the revenue of the company making a net loss. On the other hand, the company could ask for a GST credit on products with a GST (Gibson 2009, p.2).          

If the clients came to the party, ABC could have incurred more on the dinner hence incurring more expenses and pay FBT on the same. The party had a GST so the company could get a GST credit on the expense incurred in the party (Simanovsky 2010, p.89).

ABC should balance the benefits they provide their employees so that they reduce cost or expenses spent on paying for the services and the FBT.

Reference

Bull, R. (2008). Financial ratios: How to use financial ratios to maximize value and success for your business. Amsterdam: Elsevier/CIMA Pub pg 12

Troy, L. (2008). Almanac of business and industrial financial ratios. Chicago, IL: CCH

Leach, R. (2010). Ratios made simple: A beginner’s guide to the key financial ratios. Petersfield, Hampshire: Harriman House.

DONG, B. (2008). The discretionary reporting of noncontrolling interests and its association with the market assessment of credit risk.

MARD, M. J., HITCHNER, J. R., & HYDEN, S. D. (2011). Valuation for financial reporting: fair value, business combinations, intangible assets, goodwill, and impairment analysis. Hoboken, NJ, Wiley pg.78

Gibson, C. H. (2009). Financial reporting & analysis: Using financial accounting information. Mason, OH: South-Western Cengage Learning.

Albrecht, W. S. (2007). Accounting, concepts & applications. Mason, Ohio: Thomson/South-Western.

Duchac, J. E., Warren, C. S., & Reeve, J. M. (2011). Accounting using Excel for success. Mason, Ohio: South-Western.

A dictionary of accounting. (2010). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Simanovsky, S. (2010). Accounting for beginners. Grandville, MI: Global Finance School.

EPSTEIN, B. J., BRAGG, S. M., & NACH, R. (2009). Wiley Gaap 2010: interpretation and application of generally accepted accounting principles. [includes new codification]. Hoboken, NJ, Wiley pg 156.

Kieso, d. E., weygandt, j. J., & warfield, t. D. (2011). Intermediate accounting. Vol. 1 Vol. 1. Hoboken, NJ, John Wiley & Sons.

Cch Incorporated. (2008). Top accounting issues for 2009: CPE course. Chicago, CCH.

Mackenzie, b., coetsee, d., njikizana, t., selbst, e., chamboko, r., colyvas, b., & hanekom, b., B. (2013). Wiley IFRS 2013: interpretation and application of international financial reporting standards.

PKF International Ltd. (2016). Wiley ifrs 2016: interpretation and application of international financial reporting standards. [Place of publication not identified], John Wiley.

Epstein, b. J., bragg, s. M., & nach, r., R. (2009). Wiley Gaap 2010: interpretation and application of generally accepted accounting principles. [includes new codification]. Hoboken, NJ, Wiley.