The condition mainly identifies that there are pertinent benefits given to a business analyst availing Webjet. Under the normal scenario, such benefits that the airline firms have provided are not taken into account under taxable income, as laid out in “Taxation Ruling of TR 1999/6”. However, the ruling of Australian taxation depicts that certain criteria are evident that is required to be met before allowing the expenditure in the form of tax exemption. The total benefit that Webjet has provided is not taken into account under fringe benefit tax or taxable income until such influential dynamics are proved. An association between an employer and an employee exists, when they treat each other as family members. Moreover, the reward points are provided to the staffs in relation to the agreement of employment. Finally, Webjet has made certain arrangements for the flight points. However, dissection of the scenario primarily depicts no agreement between the staffs and Webjet or the employer and Webjet, in which the benefit is excluded from taxable income (McGregor-Lowndes 2014).
According to the case study, the organisation has received a pertinent compensation from a customer in lieu of damages carried out on the capital asset. In compliance with the taxation law of Australia, the payment of total damage could not be taken into consideration under taxable income. In addition, there are various criteria that an organisation should follow for excluding the payment of damage related to capital assets in the form of capital income. Initially, the organisation needs to utilise its assets effectively that would help in minimising the taxable income. The second measure depicts that the capital asset is listed on the annual report, in which the conduction of sufficient depreciation is made. This is extremely significant, since it enables the taxation authority of the nation in understanding that the organisation uses the capital asset for above a fiscal year (Bryan, Vann and Thomas 2017).
According to the provided scenario, the manager of the nightclub has been provided with a pertinent holiday package on the part of the alcohol supplier. The pertinent arrangement primarily denotes that the alcohol supplier has provided a gift or benefit having relatively greater value. In accordance with the taxation authority of Australia, the gifts of low budget are exempted from taxable income, while the gifts of high budget are included in taxable income. This enables in reducing any type of unscrupulous actions carried out on the part of owners and staffs. Along with this, the scenario denotes that the holiday package has greater value, in which the nightclub manager is needed to include benefits in the taxable income. As remarked by McKerchar, Bloomquist and Pope (2013), the individual staffs receiving advantages from the employers are adjudged mainly as fringe benefit tax, which is incurred on the part of the employer.
According to the case study, pertinent fund is returned to the members of the Canoe Club, since the collection of additional amount is made. The monetary return from the club is primarily a refund and it could be adjudged as member income. In accordance with the taxation law, any type of expenditure carried out on clubs for private entertainment is not deductible in nature. Hence, the total fund returns could not be highlighted that the Canoe Club members have received. It could be stated that the fund return of the members of the Canoe Club could not be taken into account.
The television organisation has paid a football player to participate in the sports field diligently, under the circumstances that the sportsperson is responsible for adding the amount in taxable income. The “Taxation Ruling TR 1999/17” mainly states this situation, in which it is represented that any type of advantage that the sports person has obtained in Australia would be adjudged as taxable income. Hence, as per the ruling, the sports person needs to take into account the benefits provided on the part of the television firm in the taxable income and pertinent access to the government of Australia. As stated by Lang (2014), the measure of taxation is utilised in minimising unscrupulous measures for reducing the taxable income.
The circumstance many states that general costs are been directed in the building, where applicable costs is been considered from the student. As per the Australian tax assessment law, the circumstance for the most part expresses that student is specifically viewed as under the remuneration of building work. The measures that are utilized as a part of distinguishing the costs of building are delineated under the tax assessment decision of TR 95/22, where pertinent costs and pay are straightforwardly uncovered (Barkoczy 2016). As per the tax assessment administer applicable costs should be considered before recognizing the understudy as a building worker. The primary measure primarily expresses that development site is looked at when as a boss work is being led on the premises. The second measure expresses that works were utilized for building the premises is thought to be a representative. The third measure expresses that important learners, disciple and woodworkers are considered under the utilized works. In addition, a development site is likewise considered where venture chief is utilized for finishing and directing applicable measures for the development of the building. In this manner, from the assessment it could be comprehended that costs led on student is considered as work remuneration for the building and can be deducted in the yearly report.
Costs is been led on here and now course to become a workmanship executive, which has an important arrangements in the Australian tax collection office. Short course that is utilized by a person to improve his vocation in the brief timeframe is basically thought to be imposing deductible cost. This sort of assessment deductible cost is just considered when the investigation courses is short, for long examination courses there is no exemptions in the assessable pay (Snape and De Souza 2016). Also applicable measures as delineated by the Australian tax assessment office should be assessed by the assessable individual. At that point it is to be insignificant instruction module and programming for the course. What’s more, charges for the course should be for brief length has applicable dinners and travel costs ought to be incorporated. These measures are given by Australian tax assessment office should be assessed before utilizing the fleeting course, as a duty deductible cost. Subsequently, important expense conclusion is led by the artisanship executive, which helps in decreasing the assessable pay.
There are significant costs directed on both cosmetics and dresses on a person, which is a deductible in nature as said by the Australian tax assessment office. Be that as it may, there are sure criteria, which should be fulfilled earlier enabling the costs to be assessing deductible. The costs led on Makeup and dresses for the performing craftsman are predominantly deductible in nature. Additionally, performing craftsman is thought to be a mystical performer, vocalist, on-screen character, circus entertainer, assortment craftsman, and an artist (Braithwaite 2017). Any sort of costs directed on these people are thought to be an assessment reasoning cost. In this way, the situation expresses that significant costs are directed on cosmetics and dresses, however no divulgence is given with respect to on whom the costs are led. Henceforth, important suspicions are made that the consumption are led on performing craftsman, which could be deductible from the assessable salary and enable the person to diminish the expense payable.
Costs directed by the person by making a trip from home to work environment, is for the most part thought to be a movement of work (Cao et al. 2015). However there is no certain confirmation gave in the situation which could help in distinguishing the lawfulness, where costs are led for office purposes. The Australian tax assessment office basically expresses that any sort of costs led by a person with the end goal of office is deductible in nature from its assessable pay. In any case, any sort of thought process instead of office costs is not deductible under the tax collection law in this specific situation. Along these lines, the individual needs to distinguish real cost intention before utilizing it as assessable derivations. Saad (2014) contended that without sufficient observing it is extremely unlikely where government could distinguish the cost led by people in their pay impose record. Consequently, it could be expressed that if the costs directed for office purposes then it could be deducted from the assessable pay. In any case, this won’t lessen if the costs are directed for individual utilize.
The circumstance for the most part expresses that important costs are been led by a person from heading out to one representative to another. This principally expresses the individual is directing individual cost and setting out starting with one place then onto the next looking for work, as one individual cannot be utilized by two organizations. In this manner it could be comprehended that this sort of travel cost is an individual attempt, which can’t be deducted from the assessable salary. As per the Australian tax assessment law, the individual can’t deduct the costs from its assessable pay. Taylor and Richardson (2013) specified that with the assistance of laws gave by the Australian tax assessment expert, the Australian government is essentially ready to decrease the general tax avoidance directed by person. In this manner it could be comprehended that the costs led by the person on venture out starting with one worker then onto the next is not deductible in nature, which couldn’t diminish its general assessable salary.
The provisions of the Income Tax Assessment Ac 1936 and 1997 govern the determination of income tax payable in Australia. In addition to this the Taxation Rulings, judgment of the cases and the ATO interpretive directions also plays an important role in ascertaining the income tax liability of the taxpayer. The section 4-1 of the Income tax Assessment Act 1997 states that an individual, companies and other entities are required to pay tax on their taxable income. The section 4-15 of the ITAA 97 states that taxable income should be calculated by reducing the deduction that are allowed under tax from the assessable income. The act classifies the income according to the ordinary income under section 6-5 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 and the statutory income under section 6-10 of the ITAA 97. The section 6-5(2) and section 6-10(4) of the ITAA 97 provides that if the taxpayer is an Australian resident in that case income from all the sources should be included in the assessable income. In case the taxpayer is non-resident then income received from Australian, sources are included in the assessable income. Therefore, it can be seen that it is necessary to determine the residential status of the individual before determining the income tax liability (Pearson 2017).
The term Australian resident is defined under section 995-1 of the ITAA 1936 and it means a person who is resident in Australia as per the act. The definition of the term resident provided in section 6-1 of the ITAA 1936 mentions four tests that can be applied in determining the residential status. The para 32 of the Taxation Ruling98/17 states that the four tests for determining the residential status of individual are:
In this case, Manpreet came to Australia for studies and so he is not a resident according to the ordinary concept. Therefore, his residential status should be determined by applying statutory tests. The Para 50 of the Taxation Ruling 98/17 provides that an individual entering Australia to take up employment opportunity or a study course for more than 6 months is considered as resident for the purpose of tax. Therefore, based on the above discussion it can be said that Manpreet was a resident of Australia for the purpose of tax. That means income received from Australian sources should be included in assessable income under Division 6 of the ITAA 97.
Manpreet has enrolled in a course and has incurred substantial expenditure for the self-education purpose. In order to determine whether the self-education expenses will be deducted is determined by the Taxation Ruling 98/9. The section 8-1 of the ITAA 97 provides that expenses that areconnected to self-education expenses that related to the income earning activity are allowed as education. The Para 13 of the Taxation Ruling 98/9 states that if the income earning activity of the taxpayer is based on certain skill and the self-education helps in improving those kills then the expenses incurred in the self-education expenses are allowed as deduction. The Para 14 of the Taxation Ruling 98/9 provides that if the self-education helps the taxpayer in increasing the income then it is allowed as deduction (Petty et al. 2015). The Para 23 of the Taxation ruling 98/9 provides that in case the self-education expenses are allowed as deduction then the expenses that are allowed as deduction are:
In the case of Lunney V FC of T. Haley V FC of T(1958) 100 CLR 478it is stated that the expenses are allowed as deduction if the expenditure is helpful in generating income. In case of Manpreet the expenses in self-education has not helped him in increasing the income hence the expenses related to education are not deductible (Harris 2013).
|
Tax payable Computation |
||
|
Particulars |
Amount |
Amount |
|
Gross Salary |
$ 45,000.00 |
|
|
Foreign Income |
||
|
Income From Trust |
$ 10,000.00 |
|
|
Total Income |
$ 55,000.00 |
|
|
Deductions |
||
|
Purchase of mobile work purpose |
$ 500.00 |
|
|
Total Deductions |
$ 500.00 |
|
|
Taxable Income |
$ 54,500.00 |
|
|
Total tax |
$ 9,259.50 |
|
|
Low income tax offset |
$ 182.50 |
|
|
Medicare Levy |
$ 1,090.00 |
|
|
Tax Payable |
$ 10,167.00 |
References:
Barkoczy, S., 2016. Foundations of Taxation Law 2016. OUP Catalogue.
Braithwaite, V. ed., 2017. Taxing democracy: Understanding tax avoidance and evasion. Routledge.
Bryan, M., Vann, V. and Thomas, S.B., 2017. Equity and trusts in Australia. Cambridge University Press.
Cao, L., Hosking, A., Kouparitsas, M., Mullaly, D., Rimmer, X., Shi, Q., Stark, W. and Wende, S., 2015. Understanding the economy-wide efficiency and incidence of major Australian taxes. Treasury WP, 1.
Harris, P., 2013. Corporate tax law: Structure, policy and practice. Cambridge University Press.
James, S., Sawyer, A. and Wallschutzky, I., 2015. Tax simplification: A review of initiatives in Australia, New Zealand and the United Kingdom. eJournal of Tax Research, 13(1), p.280.
Lang, M., 2014. Introduction to the law of double taxation conventions. Linde Verlag GmbH.
McGregor-Lowndes, M., 2014. The not for profit sector in Australia: Fact sheet. ACPNS Current Issues Information Sheet 2014/4.
McKerchar, M., Bloomquist, K. and Pope, J., 2013. Indicators of tax morale: an exploratory study. eJournal of Tax Research, 11(1), p.5.
Pearson, G., 2017. Further challenges for Australian consumer law. In Consumer Law and Socioeconomic Development (pp. 287-305). Springer, Cham.
Petty, J.W., Titman, S., Keown, A.J., Martin, P., Martin, J.D. and Burrow, M., 2015. Financial management: Principles and applications. Pearson Higher Education AU.
Petty, J.W., Titman, S., Keown, A.J., Martin, P., Martin, J.D. and Burrow, M., 2015. Financial management: Principles and applications. Pearson Higher Education AU.
Ross, M., Walker, J. and Walker, J., 2017. Multinationals targeted down under. Taxation in Australia, 52(1), p.22.
Saad, N., 2014. Tax knowledge, tax complexity and tax compliance: Taxpayers’ view. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 109, pp.1069-1075.
Snape, J. and De Souza, J., 2016. Environmental taxation law: policy, contexts and practice. Routledge.
Taylor, G. and Richardson, G., 2013. The determinants of thinly capitalized tax avoidance structures: Evidence from Australian firms. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 22(1), pp.12-25.
Essay Writing Service Features
Our Experience
No matter how complex your assignment is, we can find the right professional for your specific task. Contact Essay is an essay writing company that hires only the smartest minds to help you with your projects. Our expertise allows us to provide students with high-quality academic writing, editing & proofreading services.
Free Features
Free revision policy
$10Free bibliography & reference
$8Free title page
$8Free formatting
$8How Our Essay Writing Service Works
First, you will need to complete an order form. It's not difficult but, in case there is anything you find not to be clear, you may always call us so that we can guide you through it. On the order form, you will need to include some basic information concerning your order: subject, topic, number of pages, etc. We also encourage our clients to upload any relevant information or sources that will help.
Complete the order form
Once we have all the information and instructions that we need, we select the most suitable writer for your assignment. While everything seems to be clear, the writer, who has complete knowledge of the subject, may need clarification from you. It is at that point that you would receive a call or email from us.
Writer’s assignment
As soon as the writer has finished, it will be delivered both to the website and to your email address so that you will not miss it. If your deadline is close at hand, we will place a call to you to make sure that you receive the paper on time.
Completing the order and download
