The Burning of Rome by Publius Cornelius Tacitus Free Essay Example

Tacitus’ “The Burning of Rome” translated by George Gilbert Ramsay shows its significance, design, and beliefs of the burning of Rome. A large part of Ancient Rome flares throughout the Emperor Nero’s reign. Rather than rebuild the city to it’s old plan, Nero developed an enormous palace where the burnt buildings had actually been. Rumors were informed that Nero began the fire. To put an end for that reason to this report, he moved the charge onto others, and caused the most harsh tortures upon a body of males detested for their abominations, and widely understood by the name of Christians (Ramsay 327).

The significance of Ancient Rome limitation was positioned to the height of homes; open areas were left; and pillars were contributed to secure the fronts of tenements, Nero carrying out to build these at his own cost, and to turn over the structure websites, cleared of rubbish, to the proprietors (327 ). He offered premiums and he designated the marshes at Ostia for the reception of the rubbish, which was removed the Tiber in the exact same vessels, which had raised the corn.

However a devastating fire burns down the city prior to Nero came.

At this minute, individuals were experiencing the fire and blamed Nero for starting this. However Nero promised to offer land and develop structures in order to magnify his name. This occasion is outrages and slaughters that became part of Ancient Rome. The author’s design in Title of Burning of Rome is impassionate. His style is more conventional such as the writing transcending, and having sensible expressions.

It reveals the process of adding details with mental images of what the author is composing. Something ambiguous in the story would be “And now came a disastrous fire– whether it was unexpected or deliberately contrived by the Emperor stays unsure for on this point authorities are divided– more violent and damaging than any that ever befell our city.” (323-324).

It could be ambiguous because it doesn’t have the accurate detail of who started the fire, whether it was the Christians or Tacitus. Tacitus’ beliefs tell us that we must be careful to reach our goal. It’s never too late to start again. For example, Nero had the ambition to build a new city to be called after his own name (325). Nero basically made a new Rome even better. In this case, he didn’t make Rome just for himself, but for other people. Unfortunately he was considered as evil. People believe that he wanted to burn down Rome, because Rome was unpleasant looking.

Tacitus’ beliefs tell us that we must be careful for our mistakes. He has taught us about the past. This answer made perfect sense and is easily accepted. Because historians, such as Tacitus help us understand change and how the community, nation and world we live in came to be. Nero had the ambition to build a new city to be called after his own name (325). In this case, Nero made Rome even better for himself. Tacitus also believed that evil deeds of powerful people shouldn’t be ignored after their death. Nero is part of history that should not repeat itself today. Most of all, Nero made a new Rome and without him, Rome wouldn’t be as beautiful before the fire started.

Works Cited Page

1. Tacitus, Publius C. The Burning of Rome. Trans. George Gilbert Ramsay. Elements of Literature. Ed. Patricia Mcambridge. Austin: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 2006. Print. 321-27.

Remember! This is just a sample.

You can get a custom paper by one of our expert writers.

Get your custom essay

Helping students since 2015