The Relationship Between Brand Communication And Quality Of Service In Creating Brand Loyalty Over Brand Trust

Research Hypotheses and Literature Review

Explores the impacts of brand correspondence and the quality of service in creating brand loyalty over brand trust.

Brand, being an intangible asset among the most appreciated asset that a company has. Therefore, at the center of any marketing activity of a firm or company there is brand loyalty (He, & Li 2011). With intensified competition, fragmentation, as well as sophistication of the market, brand manufacturers are driven to become more worried about the growth as well as maintenance of permanent relationship with the consumers and hence trying to embrace relationship marketing.

Presently, the report investigates the connection between the brand correspondence and quality of the service in a social setting with an accentuation on comprehension of the connecting part of brand loyalty and trust (Wu, Yeh, & Hsiao, 2011). The following report begins by characterizing the hypotheses of the interest and creating up a classic of the connection among these paradigms. To build up constructs this paper draws from the new and rising ideas of connection marketing. Toward this path, this report show the techniques, procedures, and outcomes of the reviews intended to examine the postulates of interest.

Brand 

A brand is considered exceptionally the main component to incorporated publicizing. The brand, in progressively, is the focal point or center of what clients require, need, and contemplate to be valued (Wu, 2011). In addition, clients and purchasers have progressing connections with the brand. The aim of brand correspondence is to display the viewers to a brand, where the impact can be amplified with respect of increasing mindfulness and higher appraisal, with the aim that the consumer will go the brand, with the most astounding appraisal; to satisfy the consumer to the perfect level. Introduction to the variety correspondence affects consumer reaction that can be projected by examining features like brand awareness as far as acknowledgment and review, quality, favorability and distinctiveness of the brand association in the buyer reminiscence (Wu, 2011). The dimensions given influences different qualities of the brand congruity as well as connections between the brand relationships in customer reminiscence for creating an affirmative picture.

Communication of the brand is the key integrative component in overseeing brand associations with consumers, channel members, employees, suppliers, the media, administration regulators, as well as community (He, & Li, 2010).Brand correspondence should target to improve brand reliability by making customer more involved to the brands to reinforce the customer’s brand association after sometime. Brand correspondence is the most imperative factor for effectively propelling another administration. To ‘tangibilize’ service ideas is the key, especially those that are new to the world”. Characterized as “the buyer’s general assessment of a brand whether great or terrible”, brand dispositions typify the implying that shoppers join to brands, which thus impacts their acquiring conduct. Positive brand dispositions, for example, brand dependability and trust are imperative to the ver haul achievement and manageability of brands (Kassim, and Asiah Abdullah, 2010). All things considered, astute advertisers exhaust significant exertion on making and keeping up inspirational demeanors of their brands, this is generally accomplished via the brand’s correspondences. Brand correspondence has been reliably found to assume a vital part in making positive brand states of mind. The capacity of brand names to bring out sentiments, for example, trust, certainty and so forth demonstrates that brand titles ought not to be disregarded as a substantial and helpful road of correspondence in the production of brand defiance. In light of these discoveries the accompanying speculations are recommended. That correspondence brands have got positive influence on brand reliability.

Methods and Results

Quality of service 

Focused on assessment service quality is such that mirrors the client’s impression of components of administration, for example, association quality, result quality and physical condition quality (Yu-Jia, 2012). These components are thusly assessed in view of particular service quality measurements; dependability, affirmation, responsiveness, prevalence or empathy of the administration. It has additionally been characterized as “the level of error between clients’ standardizing desires for the administration and their view of the administration execution” characterized service quality perceived judgments, coming about because of an assessment procedure where clients contrast their expectation and the administration they see to have gotten. In addition, service quality can be split into two-specialized quality useful quality (how is finished) and (what is done).

Minimal experimental report has concentrated unequivocally on the connection between brand loyalty and trust and services quality. With respect to social expectations in administration settings, proposed a far-reaching, multi-dimensional structure of client conduct aims in services (Völckner, et al 2010). The structure was at first compromised by the accompanying four primary dimensions: informal correspondences, goals of buying, complaining behavior and price sensitivity. This literature proposes that service quality is emphatically connected with brand trust.

Trust of the Brand 

The brand trust can be defined as the eagerness of the normal purchaser to depend on the capacity of the brand to give it expected results. The definition can be given into the two general ways to deal with confiding in the literature (Lai, & Chen, 2011). To begin with, trust has been seen as a principle, evaluation, or supposition around exchange partners’ steadfastness that outcomes from the accomplice’s aptitude, unwavering quality, or supposition around a trade partner’s dependability that outcomes from the ability, good quality, or purposefulness. Secondly, trust is seen as a social goal or conduct that echoes a dependency on partners and comprises vulnerability as well as uncertainty with respect to the trustee.

Brand trust prompts brand unwaveringness or commitment since trust makes trade connections that are an exceptional value. Undoubtedly, the commitment has been characterized as “a persevering desire to keep up an esteemed relationship”. Along these lines, commitment or loyalty underlies the continuous process of keeping up and continuing a valued as well as essential connection that all along has been made by the trust (Carlson, & O’Cass, 2010). As it were, commitment and trust ought to be related, in light of the fact that trust is critical in social exchanges and duty is held for such esteemed connections. In this association, trust prompts responsibility in business-to-business relational trades. Along these lines, we recommend that brand trust will add to both buy dedication and attitudinal reliability. Trusted brands ought to be obtained all the more regularly and ought to evoke a higher level of attitudinal loyalty. In light of these discoveries, the accompanying speculation is proposed, that the brand trust positively corresponds with brand loyalty.

Qualitative Analysis

Methods and Results

The figure 1 below depicts the study model directing this research. This model is based from the from various studies. The figure below of the report model postulates the brand correspondence and quality of service create brand loyalty over brand trust.

Qualitative analysis 

This is a securities evaluations that utilizations subjective verdict in light of unidentifiable statistics, for example, industry cycles, management expertise, the quality of research and development operations, and work relations. Subjective investigation is expectional from quantitative analysis, which accentuates on the statistics that might be seen in reports, for instance, asset reports (Kimpakorn, & Tocquer, 2010). Two procedures, in any situation, will regularly be used together so as to examine an organization’s tasks and evaluate its capacity as a assumption opportunity. The refinement amongst subjective and quantitative practices is like the requirement amongst manmade and human intellect (Siddiqi, K. O. 2011). Quantitative evaluations utilizes correct information sources, for example, debt, proportions, net revenues, and profit products. These might be linked to an automated model to produce a correct result, such as, the rational assessment of stock or an estimation for income development.

Data Gathering 

Oh Cheese Pizzeria Co. overall consideration is a pizza store and delivery services that the research is based. The sampling frames comprises of randomly chose 22 client feedbacks. The report is based on the development and collecting of client online views on the Oh Cheese Pizzeria Co site through a self-administered survey on a social media website. The feedback views are collected between 01/03/18 and 28/03/18.

Findings of the Analysis

Theme	Sub-theme	Example
Poor customer service Hygiene	This show low quality of services. Also, the feedback shows that the product is of low quality. They is also poor customer service. Chefs were not neat Dressing code not observed	“Waited an hour and twenty minutes. Had to wait longer cause they burnt the garlic bread which doesn’t make sense cause it cooks the fastest. By time we got home the pizzas were lukewarm. Grab two pieces. When I pulled them apart there was a hair baked into the pizza and the other pizza There was no sauce on the pizza. Very disappointed. When calling they said I had to bring the pizza back. Waste my petrol just for them to remake a nasty hairy pizza? No thank you. At least the dogs had a good meals. I will never eat there again, [other company name] will now have my business. Paid $41.14 for bad food and bad service. I will make sure family and friends know as well so they don’t make the same mistake I did in choosing Oh Cheese Pizzeria. Ps. No wonder we had hairy pizza. Employee with full beard and no netting around.
Quality	They product which is pizza in this case is of low quality.	“The pizza special deals are a joke. They claim 2 toppings but only put on as if it was one topping amount. Oh Cheese Pizzeria used to be a better product but by trying to stay in competition with cheaper brands, they have become the same. It’s now also a cheap product too. Too bad.”
Diligence	This show poor product and lack of caution when preparing the product	“This was the worst pizza I have ever tried to eat. The thin crust wasn’t crispy, it was tough. The stingiest toppings ever. A frozen pizza from the store would be better. Also, they messed up my order 2 times, so I had to wait extra time for that disgusting pizza”.
Hygiene	This shows lack of professionalism since the don’t follow fundamental rule such washing hands after handling the money	“While waiting for my pizza I noticed that the employees went from handling money to work on my pizza without washing their hands. One of the employees scratched her right forearm several times while on working on my pizza without washing her hands. Very unsanitary. The pizza was okay though. I wonder why these employees don’t wear gloves while preparing the pizzas.”
Quality	Poor product and poor brand communication as they do not advertise	“Most of what’s supposed to be cheese is only soggy bread. They cheese it up and topping is a joke and don’t bother with the advertising flyer for the free extra toppings because you can never tell if they did it. It’s ruining what use to be a good thing.”
Customer service	Poor service delivery as the pizza is almost  cold and also they is the cost aspect showing their prices are high Time keeping was poor	“Online ordering is relatively easy but pizza was room temperature at best and not at all good… Bland… Not at all appetizing and I spent over $20 for this hot n spicy pizza that I will toss in the garbage. I want a refund!!!”
Poor service	Good product that met customer satisfaction but poor service delivery as they are delays.	“I ordered from Oh Cheese Pizzeria a few nights ago, the food is definitely delicious but the delivery charge is absolutely ridiculous!!! It used to be $3 Now its $9. I can order it through UBER eats for cheaper!”
Not Precise	Poor service delivery as well as poor customer service. Not straight forward	“Taking them 60 minutes to deliver the pizza when the store is only 5 mins away. The delivery guy clicked on the “Complete” button 30 mins before he deliver the pizza to your house. And when you call, the customer service doesn’t answer the question with direct answer, and sounds no patience while you are checking where your pizza is. It’s just getting worse and worse.”
Not honest	Poor work coordination as they deliver wrong order to customers Are not considerate	“We are in a disagreement now, two months after they messed up the order we had made and sent us the pizza that we had not ordered. The first round, we forced bring us the right pizza even though they were angry about the incidence. The second time we were making order, we decided put credit on our account. Now they are arguing that there were no credit on the account. So essentially, when the order is not correct, it’s a good luck if they agree to make it right. I am not happy with them.”
Not understanding		“Made an order of two big pizzas. They were dry and burnt that we could not eat. I had suffered epidural earlier hence unable drive. Made a call the following day and was told that no action could be done. Since I did not bring it back the previous night. I tried to explain the case.  Lots of pizza was still left by then. I am not sure I will order in this shop again because they do not consider customer as their first priority.”
Lack courtesy	The pizza meets the customer satisfaction but some improvement need to be made Staff get rude	“Crust tastes great, but the sauce needs some work. But better than anyone creating your own pizza. Delivery the best. Parking not so well for pickup though. Definitely order through internet as useless ordering over the phone they always get it wrong or are rude.”
Not realistic	The brand is great but the cost seems to be a bit high. Prices are high	“We love the food here. The price however makes it almost impossible to order on a regular basis. Too bad. Last time I spent $73 for a med pizza, cheesy bread and chocolate cake. Insane price in my eyes. They need to offer vouchers and do a post box drop for flyers or something like that. Or like [company name] send vouchers via an email.”
Poor Communication	Lack of proper mode of communication with client and need to have proper methods of handling customer of all ages and promoting the business.	“It was a rainy day and my two grandchildren and I stopped here for a quick pizza. The children’s ages are 4 & 5. We were never told there was going to be a wait upon ordering. I believe the service person should inform the customer of an approximate waiting period. The waiting time on our end was an hour or a little more. A server apologised for the wait several times. That didn’t help at all with the children’s restlessness. It would have soothed the children if they would have offered a free soda or samples of some sort or even a colouring book and pens. It would have occupied them for a time.” “By this time the kids had enough. They didn’t want the pizza anymore. They just wanted to go home. This was very frustrating to me because we had already waited a considerable amount time. When the pizza finally was done and the person in charge said she had put some cinnamon bites inside for a surprise for the kids. The children were excited to see what she had put inside for them. Guess what? Whatever she put in the pizza box was burnt and inedible.”
Quality	Poor product that do not meet customer expectations. Products lack steadiness	“This pizza may curb hunger but if you are looking for a taste remotely Italian forget about it. It even lacks an oregano essence. The vegetarian pizza is good. The thin and crispy is also good if you eat it immediately, otherwise it gets soggy.”
Listening	Staff are accurate and attentive	“The staff took the order promptly and looked for deals. They were accurate on the time to get the order and attentive to making the order right. Like the new look shop feels pretty comfy and home like.”
Consistency	Lack of consistence in their product as sometime they deliver according to customer expectation and other they get do not meet customer expectation. Lack dependability	“One time it is really good and the next time not so good. Last time most of the sauce was on one side and not even. The topping not even on the pizza and the dough was under cooked. Really bad. But they have agreed to give me another pizza so that’s okay.”
Responsive	Took feedbacks from customers to improve  on the quality	“I hadn’t taken anything from here for some time however it was improved than the last time I was there. The toppings was worthy, and garlic as well as other spices was in plenty. The diet was delivered within a short time, and was done in by a courteous driver. I used to take homemade pizza, however this was very good, the day when there is no enough time to prepare. Would be good if they did vouchers.”
Friendly	Great online services that are easy and customer friendly that makes client keep on coming back	“Since I can be in position to go online with ease I great and you figure out what kind of pizza your kids want (always fussy with food). Menu is good as I don’t always want pizza therefore I am happy when I take different items on the list of options. Love the other eating joints you must think about increasing a drive to pick your orders up.  You people would be irresistible!”
Creative	Well design menu which sell the brand well as well as maintaining the quality Resourceful	Pizza and other menu items have never disappointed but then I love pizza and would eat it every day. They make an obvious effort to please the public by diversifying their menu. Salad an excellent addition for a pizza order! The new sit down eating area is good too. Chairs are comfy and it feels like an Italian place.
Customer service	Good customer service and good coordination saving customers time and giving the right orders.	I ordered online and right away there was an avatar giving me info on the time it was taking to fill my order (from beginning to end). Then I was told when I could go and pick it up. When I did that I had ABSOLUTELY NO PROBLEM. Right order, courteous employee and I was IN & OUT IN NO TIME!
Innovative	Simplified online ordering and good customer service and good price with the product meeting customer expectation	“Easy to use website (phone calls not always good), great deals always. Quality food and fast delivery and quality food. Reasonable charges. Fresh products as well as attractive titles. I love that you are able to track orders online.”
Quality services	Both the brand and quality of service are okay	I love pizza and this place is awesome. Always order online.

The analysis of the social media customer feedbacks are put in a the table below.

	Positive reviews	Negative Reviews
Quality of service	4	18
Brand	10	4
staff	2	7
Price	2	6

For the clients who commented on the quality of service received most of them seem not satisfied the with the quality of service received from the staff. This is evident on the table as 4 out of the 22 client gives a positive feedback on the same. This show that the Oh Cheese Pizzeria Co. store need to really improve on the quality of service from the store to delivery.  The brand seems to have attracted quite a number of client and ten of them giving a positive feedback. However, they is a small portion of client who are not satisfied on the brand and this should make the management work and make improvement of their brand. Most of client seems to have issues with the staff, seven of them has given negative views, and the staff really need to train on customer service delivery. Lastly, the price factor in in most of the clients and the data corrected shows that the Oh Cheese Pizzeria Co. store has high charges.

Conclusion and Recommendation 

Taking everything into account, this paper has recommended what is conceivable, reasonable, and should be done by advertisers as far as brand correspondence, brand loyalty and trust and service quality. Brand correspondence impacts on brand trust. Brand correspondence makes and creates trust-based relationship stage amongst brand and client. Administration quality effects affect brand trust. Brand trust effects affect brand steadfastness. The report adds to the connection of marketing literature into three perspectives. Initially, the examination incorporates the idea of brand correspondence, product/service quality and brand trust.

Prior examinations rarely analyzed the part of brand correspondence and product/service quality recognitions in molding brand loyalty and trust associations with clients. Also, the present examination illustrates the advantages of brand correspondence and administration quality in making brand trust as well as dependability. Additionally, this present examination exhibits the advantages of putting resources into connections in view of administration quality, mark correspondence, trust, and dependability. The fundamental targets of this overview were; to blend the ideas of services/products quality, brand correspondence, brand loyalty and trust inside an incorporated model; as well as testing this model experimentally. The outcomes demonstrate that impression of brand correspondences and administration/product quality might be seen precursors to the brand trust, thus, influences brand steadfastness. At long last, this paper has recommended methods for how to create brand dependability as well as trust in a social setting with brand correspondence and administration quality.

Currently, the report shows solid experimental support for the connections between brand correspondence, benefit quality, brand loyalty and brand trust. The essential confinement of this exploration is, it investigates just two service/product classifications, conceivably restricting the generalizability to other areas. When all is said in done, these discoveries ought to be duplicated with various item classes and brands. Likewise, the present examination did not analyze individual variables, brand association and brand identity. In general, despite everything we have to build up a more point by point comprehension of the connection between brand trust what’s more, other relationship advertising related factors, for example, brand understanding. Brand involvement conceptualization as well as scale improvement are vital for comprehension and overseeing brand trust

References 

Carlson, J., & O’Cass, A. (2010). Exploring the relationships between e-service quality, satisfaction, attitudes and behaviours in content-driven e-service web sites. Journal of services marketing, 24(2), 112-127.

Casidy, R. (2014). Linking brand orientation with service quality, satisfaction, and positive word-of-mouth: Evidence from the higher education sector. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 26(2), 142-161.

He, H., & Li, Y. (2010). Key service drivers for high-tech service brand equity: The mediating role of overall service quality and perceived value. Journal of Marketing Management, 27(1-2), 77-99.

He, H., & Li, Y. (2011). CSR and service brand: The mediating effect of brand identification and moderating effect of service quality. Journal of Business Ethics, 100(4), 673-688.

Hussain, R., Al Nasser, A., & Hussain, Y. K. (2015). Service quality and customer satisfaction of a UAE-based airline: An empirical investigation. Journal of Air Transport Management, 42, 167-175.

Kassim, N., & Asiah Abdullah, N. (2010). The effect of perceived service quality dimensions on customer satisfaction, trust, and loyalty in e-commerce settings: A cross cultural analysis. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 22(3), 351-371.

Kimpakorn, N., & Tocquer, G. (2010). Service brand equity and employee brand commitment. Journal of Services Marketing, 24(5), 378-388.

Lai, W. T., & Chen, C. F. (2011). Behavioral intentions of public transit passengers—The roles of service quality, perceived value, satisfaction and involvement. Transport Policy, 18(2), 318-325.

Ryu, K., Lee, H. R., & Gon Kim, W. (2012). The influence of the quality of the physical environment, food, and service on restaurant image, customer perceived value, customer satisfaction, and behavioral intentions. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 24(2), 200-223.

Siddiqi, K. O. (2011). Interrelations between service quality attributes, customer satisfaction and customer loyalty in the retail banking sector in Bangladesh. International Journal of Business and Management, 6(3), 12.

Völckner, F., Sattler, H., Hennig-Thurau, T., & Ringle, C. M. (2010). The role of parent brand quality for service brand extension success. Journal of Service Research, 13(4), 379-396.

Wang, Chung?Yu. “Service quality, perceived value, corporate image, and customer loyalty in the context of varying levels of switching costs.” Psychology & Marketing 27, no. 3 (2010): 252-262.

Wu, C. C. (2011). The impact of hospital brand image on service quality, patient satisfaction and loyalty. African Journal of Business Management, 5(12), 4873.

Wu, P. C., Yeh, G. Y. Y., & Hsiao, C. R. (2011). The effect of store image and service quality on brand image and purchase intention for private label brands. Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ), 19(1), 30-39.

Yu-Jia, H. (2012). The moderating effect of brand equity and the mediating effect of marketing mix strategy on the relationship between service quality and customer loyalty: The case of retail chain stores in Taiwan. International Journal of Organizational Innovation (Online), 5(1), 155.