The Role Of Accountants And Auditors In Corporate Governance

Literature Review

Discuss about the Accountants and Auditors Responsibilities and Contributions towards Corporate Governance.

Schelker (2013, p. 277) illustrated that corporate governance remains to be the system that ensures that every director, as well as managers of different enterprises, execute their function within the framework of accountability along with transparency. These activities by corporate governance aimed at promoting confidence of various investors in business enterprises, stimulating, and sustaining progress of economy. Corporate administration dependably relies upon legitimate, regulative, together with institutional setting and it center on adjusting the interests of different investors, capital proprietors, directors, with organization business managers. The above illustrations explain why corporate governance has in recent days assumed global importance as the vital device for sustainable performance of corporate. Different scandals have occurred in the past decades to significant organizations (Martin 2010, p. 148). The serious events that have led to decline and shutting down of various companies in the past decades have shown critical role played by accountants and auditors in strengthening effective corporate governance (Hamilton and Tschopp 2012, p. 569). Therefore, society depends on professions of accounting and auditing to represent the significance reformatory function of correcting cases of anomalies that exist in operations of different businesses globally.

Accountants and auditors reports represent the fundamental approach of different organizations to give an account of the achievement of their business tasks alongside money related and property conditions for outer gatherings in the exercises. Along these lines, a few organizations that need to put resources into different countries or gather supports in the global capital commercial center need to incorporate diverse reports of accountants and auditors comprehensible for partners of business together with investors (Rada et al., 2010, p. 181). Therefore, every accountant and auditor as the responsibility of making their financial statements according to the set models acknowledged in most created countries. The requirement for worldwide standard acknowledgment has its reasonable measurement since they even out the bookkeeping and reviewing rehearses around the worldwide society, streamline stock trade business outside boundaries of a country, and enable national and international marketplace progress, along with the entire economy (Vintila and Moscu 2015, p. 91). Therefore, contribution of accountants and auditors towards corporate governance is essential since corporate governance remain to be one of the vital elements inefficiency of prosperity, growth development, along with investor trust improves. Besides, governance of corporate provides the best outline with set of goals of company as well as allocate different elements that aim at attaining objectives with monitoring of performance. Therefore, efficient management of business through suitable guidelines by accountants and auditors should offer the proper support for the board of managers as well as administrators to aim on objectives of interests for organization itself together with its stakeholders (Sampford 2012, p. 149). Concentrate on responsibilities of accountants and auditors in contributing to corporate governance in organization such as Coca-Cola Company remains to be vital as it lead to recognize management as trustees within interest of different savers as well as to secure their privileges as real managers of company.

Research Design and Methodology

There has been the logical connection between responsibilities of auditors and accountants in contributing to corporate governance in the business society in many nations globally. The goal of corporate administration stay to guarantee adjust that exist between the different performers and to execute control gadgets both for investors alongside other invested individuals in the capital of substance (Garayar et al., 2016, p. 362). Accountants and auditors responsibilities remain to be the most sensitive sector for operations of corporate governance in reducing case of the development rate along with increasing the number of services and revenues with start-ups in specific being the most vulnerable, lacking the resources to improve business operations (Mahmudur 2012, p. 114). Consequently, if proper survey is conducted in this area, it would be more advantageous to all corporate governance in the world. Therefore, major purpose of this work is to undertake the complete investigation in the field of accountants and auditors responsibilities and contributions towards corporate governance so that business can safeguard themselves against any operational failures (Abrudah et al., 2010, p. 14). The research proposal is centered on how responsibilities of accountants and auditors contribute to all kinds of operations of corporate governance especially to business that has been affected by different factors.

The organization of this research work is as follows. The first section forms the introduction of the research proposal that addresses accountants and auditors responsibilities and contributions towards corporate governance. The part is supported by the research problem along with objective of investigation fall under section one. Furthermore, other section addresses literature review of the topic of research (Christoper 2016, p. 532). The fifth section comprise of research design along with methodology that will focus on different elements such as type of analysis, research approach, type of used data, collected data, and sampling frame, methods, techniques, characteristics, and sizes. Additionally, final third section comprise of explanation of how methodology plan address all ethical concern. 

The operations of accountants and auditors in contributing to corporate governance remain to be independent, objective assurance, as well as consulting operations designed to add extra value and improve the operations of organizations. The major problem that this research aims to answer is to illustrate how responsibilities of accountants and auditors have been capable of contributing to corporate governance. 

The principal target of this research paperwork is to focus on the roles accountants and auditors towards contributing to corporate governance that help in making safe importance of different investors and contributing group. The evaluation of these two crucial powers ought to do under system that is statutory for investors alongside what really they are doing. This research paperwork chat about both points as stated above through studying cases of organization to help in attaining the best outcome.

Corporate governance according to various scholars’ remains to be system by which different organizations are designed with the objective of keeping intact as well as reveal to investors in way really reflect position of corporate. Shnitser (2010, p. 1640) stated that business governance remains to conduct operations of corporation in conformity with proprietor or advertisers, along with aspiration of various shareholders that usually will focus to develop as such currencies as probable while conforming to essential regulations of community personified in regulations along with regional ethnicity. Besides, corporate governance remain to be the idea of getting enhanced relation among organizations together with their shareholder, full revelation of data of every individual along to check management of executive inappropriate approach in their attention of business partners. Therefore, corporate governance is just a system used to direct and control the organization (Wojcik 2013, p. 337). It comprises of relations between and accountability of the organization’s stakeholders as well as the policies, law, practices, producers, principles, and standards that might influence the direction and control of organization.

The responsibilities of accountant and auditors in sector of corporate administration are to offer affirmation that the organization is in normal consistence with applicable regulations along with laws. Auditors are responsible of conducting and keeping up successful controls against representative irreconcilable circumstance and cases of fraudulent in business operations (Alavi 2017, p. 9). Besides, committees that deal with accounting and auditing consists of autonomous executives that have control over administration and accordingly going about as the sort confirmation to various investors that they will have full exposure of right realities. To have suitable corporate administration in business group, review board of trustees’ needs asset people to go about as autonomous chief on whose shoulder lays the duty (Poonam and Dhayal 2017, p. 99). The duty aid in taking association in the right bearing, interest for extra divulgences, straightforwardness alongside responsibility and execution of business gauges for financial specialists, pioneers, and ensure for investors.

The internal services of audit along with committee of audit chaired by the union-managers encompass of major function to counsel different managers of organization. Auditors need to have the best references in administering the plan of yearly records, race survey bookkeeping approaches, and in addition works on, checking interior control procedures and working system of inner and outside inspectors (Alleyne et al., 2013, p. 38). Inspectors are expressly expected to survey the bookkeeper choices alongside settling on the proposed revisions and repetitions following the review. In reactions to procedure of bookkeeping mistakes, oversights, or conflicts with the bookkeeping strategies related examiners, chiefs may propose changes before budgetary divulgence or rehashing of earlier period result

Responsibilities of auditors in contributing towards corporate governance has ensured that every investor to require straightforward and dependable information that precisely mirrors the money related circumstance of the organization for the aim of enabling smooth operations of marketplace along with appropriate allocation of capital. In the present global society increasingly turning to be globalized, different savers look for best chances to look at the organizations in the crucial parameters with a specific end goal to settle on normal choices for business operations concerning investments (Caneghem 2016, p. 2698). Therefore, accounting is remaining to be globalized as organizations are changing to be international, and range of trading activity as well as investment amongst organizations raising every time. These vital aspects strengthen basic requirement for different accounting and auditing reports that will be internationally comparable as well as consistent. Responsibilities of accountant and auditors help in improving broad concept of corporate governance that encompasses the wide range of decision made within Modern Corporation (Gramling et al., 2013, p. 591). Some of the discipline includes determining overall policy, employment goals, specifying operating goals, and implementing these goals through day-to-day decisions of managers. Additionally, function of auditors and accountants include the need to guarantee the nature of bookkeeping and control framework (Fisher 2010, p. 1521). Office speculation anticipates the formation of review boards of trustees as the way to deal with moderate office accuses along of enhance inward control being viewed as the effective observing device for enhancing procedure of correspondence in corporate administration.

Accountants help in improving the roles of corporate governance by ensuring that it increases scheme of businesses rules to express their vital choices of operations by justifying their actions. Accountants act as basis throughout which different businesses settle as well as focus after their set targets within social, legal, along with marketplace settings (Pan and Seow 2016, p. 169). Besides, due to core purpose of accounting tasks remain to track the financial performance of company as these activities perform the essential role in determining how the company fulfills its policies for corporate governance. Furthermore, essential responsibilities towards contributing to corporate administration incorporate venture arranging, open duty, investor obligation, and pay administration among other responsibilities (Sadri and Sadri 2014, p. 117). For instance, accountants are responsible for attaining favorable what is more, shrewd choices concerning how to work, when to extend and the amount to put resources into the undertaking when administration has proper information of bookkeeping. One of the major stages is that bookkeeper makes it workable for association administrators to develop plans that accomplish fitting results and to dispose of plans that hinder achievement.

Accountants are supporting corporate to remain accountable to public in the various ways. Legitimate bookkeeping enables companies to meet their commitments that include their commitments to submit charges. Accountants help corporate to release accurate and honest statements of finances every period that include the balance sheet, income statement, along with statement of equity of shareholders (Short 2013, p. 502). Accountants offer distinctive shoppers the ability to verbalize requests by constraining administration to address their necessities when settling on various operational choices. Accordingly, corporate approaches stay to be uncovered in bookkeeping records that are fundamental to open view of the partnership. Additionally, accountants help in improving responsibility of shareholders in contributing corporate governance. Accountants have the responsibilities of offering investors information they require to settle on educated choices and in addition to have their legitimate say in the approaches of the corporate administration (Tuch 2016, p. 1099). The reason for this responsibility stays to be for the most part useful for benefits since investors have the enthusiasm for the achievement of accomplishing corporate administration. Operations of accountants have huge impact on corporate governance as they influence whether different shareholders buy, sell, or hold their shares in the stock of an organization. Shareholders always rely on the statement of finances compiled by the department of accounting in order to make most crucial decisions both for them and for the organization.

Accountants have the responsibility of contributing to corporate governance by managing flow of cash during operations of different organizations. Accountants are responsible for making lasting corporate planning as well as making short-term planning to improve operations of different companies. Therefore, accountants help different leaders of companies to manage their funds, prioritize along with taking firm action concerning their finances (Ngoepe and Ngulube 2014, p. 143). During activities of accounting, directors of different corporations can be able to see what they have available to spend as well as where it should go during operations. Accountants provide necessary decisions concerning supplies, device, with work are attained because of accounting figures. Besides, accountants help corporate to direct various outline of credit as well as obtain stock of all their temporary possessions of finances (Majury 2014, p. 551). All these responsibilities of accountants help in contributing to corporate governance by allowing organizations to avoid unnecessary debt. In most cases, managers rely on data of accounting to illustrate to them how much wage they have, where it originates from and when they can hope to attain it during operations (Aleqab et al., 2015, p. 353). The accounting facts help in informing managers of organizations on when and if they can hire new workers, acquire more equipment or take on extra debt.

This research section should offer detail plan of research design as well as survey methodology. Some of the essential methodologies on investigation of accountants and auditors responsibilities and contributions towards corporate governance will be taken to analyze principal target of this investigation efficiently (Beail and William 2014, p. 89). The type of research that will be applicable during the research will be descriptive in order to attain the principal aim of the research. Some of the essential methods used will involve mixed approach by using both qualitative and quantitative technique approach. In ordered to conduct the survey, some of the methods used for data collection will be questionnaires that well-designed to contain both qualitative and quantitative questions. The other method will be the use of observation techniques of essential indicators of accountants and auditors responsibilities and contributions towards corporate governance. However, qualitative technique will perform vital function in the process of investigation (Elmhirst 2012, p. 278). The technique of using approach of qualitative will facilitate the surveyor to aim at analyzing research plan utilized, skills of sampling, gathered data, size of sample, devices used for procedure of examination, quality control, examination of gathered facts, together with ethical concerns during this investigation. The use of mixed approach in collecting data will allow surveyors to focus on the influence of responsibilities of accountants together with auditors in corporate governance.

The type of data that will be utilized in this research will be primary. Administration of different questionnaires shall obtain these data to sampled respondents during the survey. Data obtained from such respondents will form the basis of primary facts that shall be used to analyze accountants and auditors responsibilities and contributions towards corporate governance (Elmhirst 2012, p. 279). Besides, observation of key indicators will help in improving the idea of obtaining primary data as the method allows the researchers to observe and record some of the responsibilities of accountants and auditors in contributing to corporate governance. Furthermore, data will be collected by different techniques. Collection will involve interviewing of identified accountants and auditors in at sampled number of companies within the identified area. The other method of collecting data will involve observation or qualitative research, survey through administrations of questionnaires that are well-designed, along with experiment for qualitative research (Henoch et al., 2016, p. 12). The use of all these method will be necessary in attaining clear knowledge of different responsibilities of accountants and auditors in contributing to corporate governance.

The sample size that the research shall aim at remains to be essential in attaining appropriate objective of the survey. The sampling frame for this study will involve the study of responsibilities of accountants and auditors in contributing to corporate governance (Smith et al., 2016, p. 698).  The frame during sampling involves organization workers, accountants, and auditors of different organizations as they will be capable of answering questions that relates with their responsibilities towards corporate governance. Besides, sampling method that will be applicable in this study will be stratified sampling technique. Here, researcher will aim at dividing the entire population of workers, auditors, and bookkeepers into various subgroups at that point haphazardly select the last subjects relatively from various strata for consider. The application of maximum variation sampling will also be of great importance as it will allow the surveyor to select the wide range of variation on dimensions of interests (Stichler 2014, p. 18). The purpose of this technique will be to identify or reveal focal topic, center components, and offer measurements that cut over the different example of study while at a similar minute offering the most obvious opportunity to archive elite or assorted varieties.

The sample size for the study will include forty different workers, thirty accountants, and thirty auditors of Coca-Cola Company that operates in different places around the global society as a way of examining the responsibilities of accountants and auditors in contributing to corporate governance. The total number of sample size chosen during the process of data gathering will be done in ensuring that the researcher seek as well as obtain necessary consent of various responsibilities of accountants and auditors in contributing to corporate governance in companies such as Coca-Cola Company. The use of questionnaires during qualitative approach will be close-ended in administering the total of one hundred respondents in every organization among the operations of Coca-Cola Company that is under investigation to attain the objective of this research.

The collected primary data will be analyzed utilization of various mathematical techniques that include statistical packages such as SPSS and multiple regressions. The use of various regressions during data analysis can be achieved through the application of several Microsoft excel software. Data can be analyzed by qualitative along with quantitative approaches by focus in on idea of attaining appropriate use of various techniques (Tayakol and Sandars 2014, p. 842). For example, usage of survey technique of qualitative of analyzing gathered data concentrate in opinion of achieving adequate data on responsibilities of accountants and auditors in contributing to corporate governance. Moreover, application of qualitative method of analyzing study focused at attaining essential utilization of range of figures, diagrams of mathematics, pie chart, or excels sheets diagrams, along with many models of statistics that are available on website platforms as well as via presentation of different journal articles.

The essential consideration of ethics in methodology includes well-versed consent, beneficence of not harming, value for secrecy, and thought of susceptible sets. This research will focus on promoting effective moral values as ethical concerns in every research work remain to be vital in all process of gathering, documenting, and analyzing data. The methodology will involve gathering of necessary data, review of several certified data as it bases the analysis on views of gathering data (Jegers 2013, p. 959). The interviewee must attain the consent of respondent before commencing asking questions in regard to subject of study. Attaining the consent help in allowing respondent to choose whether to take part in research or not. Besides, researcher will have to assure respondent that their privacy shall be granted and their views on different questions will not be shared with any individual who is not taking part in the survey (Henoch et al., 2016, p. 21). Besides, information shall only been shared with only with relevant authority so as to ensure that every view of an individual is protected. Therefore, provision of vital understanding, as well as care in the investigation, will be viewable to be within provision by professional to ensure that every individual view is taken into consideration. Besides, ideas of following basic ethics for research during review of data will help in ensuring that all the morals of the survey will be maintained to the whole point as per the obligation of the study within corporate governance.

List of References

Abrudan Caciora, VS, Rada, IC, Magdoiu, LD, & Pacala, A. 2010. ‘The Corporate Governance in Companies — An Alternative for Changing the General Management (II)’, Journal of Electrical & Electronics Engineering, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 13-16.

Alavi, H. 2017. ‘Risk Management Techniques and their Application to Documentary Discrepancy in Letter of Credit Transaction’, European Journal of Economic Studies, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 4-17.

Aleqab, MA, Nurunnabi, M, & Adel, D. 2015. ‘Mind the Gap: Accounting Information Systems Curricula Development in Compliance With IFAC Standards in a Developing Country’, Journal of Education for Business, vol. 90, no. 7, pp. 349-358. Available from: 10.1080/08832323.2015.1068155. [25 May 2018].

Alleyne, P, Weekes-Marshall, D, & Arthur, R. 2013. ‘Exploring Factors Influencing Whistle-blowing Intentions among Accountants in Barbados’, Journal of Eastern Caribbean Studies, vol. 38, no. 1/2, pp. 35-62.

Beail, N, & Williams, K. 2014. ‘Using Qualitative Methods in Research with People Who Have Intellectual Disabilities’, Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 85-96. Available from: 10.1111/jar.12088. [25 May 2018].

Caneghem, T. 2016. ‘NPO Financial Statement Quality: An Empirical Analysis Based on Benford’s Law’, Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary & Nonprofit Organizations, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 2685-2708. Available from: 10.1007/s11266-015-9629-4. [25 May 2018].

Christopher, J. 2012. ‘The adoption of internal audit as a governance control mechanism in Australian public universities – views from the CEOs’, Journal of Higher Education Policy & Management, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 529-541. Available from: 10.1080/1360080X.2012.716001. [25 May 2018].

Elmhirst, R. 2012. ‘Methodological dilemmas in migration research in Asia: research design, omissions and strategic erasures’, Area, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 274-281. Available from: 10.1111/j.1475-4762.2012.01070.x. [25 May 2018].

Fisher, W. 2010. ‘Lawyers Keep Out: Why Attorneys Should Not Participate in Negotiating Critical Financial Numbers Reported by Public Company Clients’, Brigham Young University Law Review, vol. 2010, no. 5, pp. 1501-1554.

Garayar, A, Heras-Saizarbitoria, I, & Boiral, O. 2016. ‘Adoption of the UN Global Compact in Spanish banking: a case study’, Journal of Public Affairs (14723891), vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 359-367. Available from: 10.1002/pa.1596. [25 May 2018].

Gramling, AA, Nuhoglu, NI, & Wood, DA. 2013. ‘A Descriptive Study of Factors Associated with the Internal Audit Function Policies Having an Impact: Comparisons Between Organizations in a Developed and an Emerging Economy’, Turkish Studies, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 581-606. Available from: 10.1080/14683849.2013.833019. [25 May 2018].

Hamilton, T, & Tschopp, D. 2012. ‘The Market for Corporate Responsibility Reporting in the Americas’, Growth & Change, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 563-589. Available from: 10.1111/j.1468-2257.2012.00598.x. [25 May 2018].

Henoch, I, Carlander, I, Holm, M, James, I, Kenne Sarenmalm, E, Lundh Hagelin, C, Lind, S, Sandgren, A, & Öhlén, J. 2016. ‘Palliative Care Research – A Systematic Review of foci, designs and methods of research conducted in Sweden between 2007 and 2012’, Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 5-25. Available from: 10.1111/scs.12253. [25 May 2018].

Jegers, M. 2013. ‘Do Nonprofit Organisations Manage Earnings? An Empirical Study’, Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary & Nonprofit Organizations, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 953-968. Available from: 10.1007/s11266-012-9291-z. [25 May 2018].

Mahmudur Rahim, M. 2012. ‘Legal Regulation of Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence from Bangladesh’, Common Law World Review, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 97-133.

Majury, N. 2014. ”Trusting the numbers’: mineral prospecting, raising finance and the governance of knowledge’, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 545-558. Available from: 10.1111/tran.12044. [25 May 2018].

Martin, R. 2010. ‘Transferring Corporate Governance Codes: Form or Substance? Corporate Governance in Hungary’, Europe-Asia Studies, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 145-171. Available from: 10.1080/09668130903385440. [25 May 2018].

Ngoepe, M, & Ngulube, P. 2014. ‘The Need for Records Management in the Auditing Process in the Public Sector in South Africa’, African Journal of Library, Archives & Information Science, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 135-150.

Pan, G, & Seow, P. 2016. ‘Preparing accounting graduates for digital revolution: A critical review of information technology competencies and skills development’, Journal of Education for Business, vol. 91, no. 3, pp. 166-175. Available from: 10.1080/08832323.2016.1145622. [25 May 2018].

Poonam, & Dhayal, N. 2017. ‘Forensic Accounting: A Tool for Detecting and Preventing Frauds’, International Journal of Multidisciplinary Approach & Studies, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 97-102.

Rada, IC, P?cal?, A, M?gdoiu, LD, & Abrudan Caciora, VS. 2010. ‘The Corporate Governance in Companies — An Alternative for Changing the General Management (I)’, Journal of Electrical & Electronics Engineering, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 179-182.

Sadri, S, & Sadri, J. 2014. ‘Using Soft System Methodology for Understanding CSR’, International Journal of Multidisciplinary Approach & Studies, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 110-123.

Sampford, C. 2012. ‘Fractured International Environmental Governance and the Potential Role of the Commonwealth in Biodiversity and Climate Change’, Round Table, vol. 101, no. 2, pp. 147-156. Available from: 10.1080/00358533.2012.661530. [25 May 2018].

Schelker, M. 2013. ‘Auditors and Corporate Governance: Evidence from the Public Sector’, Kyklos, vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 275-300. Available from: 10.1111/kykl.12021. [25 May 2018].

Shnitser, N. 2010. ‘A Free Pass for Foreign Firms? An Assessment of SEC and Private Enforcement Against Foreign Issuers’, Yale Law Journal, vol. 119, no. 7, pp. 1638-1701.

Short, J. 2013. ‘Competing Normative Frameworks and the Limits of Deterrence Theory: Comments on Baker and Griffith’s Ensuring Corporate Misconduct’, Law & Social Inquiry, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 493-511. Available from: 10.1111/lsi.12018. [25 May 2018].

Smith, SK, Mountain, GA, & Hawkins, R. 2016. ‘A scoping review to identify the techniques frequently used when analysing qualitative visual data’, International Journal of Social Research Methodology, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 693-715. Available from: 10.1080/13645579.2015.1087141. [25 May 2018].

Stichler, J. 2014. ‘The Ethics of Research, Writing, and Publication’, Health Environments Research & Design Journal (HERD) (Vendome Group LLC), vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 15-19.

Tavakol, M, & Sandars, J. 2014. ‘Quantitative and qualitative methods in medical education research: AMEE Guide No 90: Part II’, Medical Teacher, vol. 36, no. 10, pp. 838-848. Available from: 10.3109/0142159X.2014.915297. [25 May 2018].

Tuch, A. 2016. ‘Banker Loyalty in Mergers and Acquisitions’, Texas Law Review, vol. 94, no. 6, pp. 1079-1154.

Vintila, G, & Moscu, R. 2015. ‘A Comparative Approach To Corporate Governance Systems In Terms Of Corporate Governance Codes Of Emerging Markets’, Journal of Public Administration, Finance & Law, no. 7, pp. 89-95.

Wójcik, D. 2013. ‘Where governance fails: Advanced business services and the offshore world’, Progress in Human Geography, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 330-347. Available from: 10.1177/0309132512460904. [25 May 2018].