In the past few years, there has been a growing awareness and consciousness about the impact of business operations on the surrounding society and more importantly, the environment. Phenomena like commercialization, globalization and widespread industrialization have adversely affected the environment. As a result, the onus is on the organizations and businesses to minimize their impact on the environment. However, Volkswagen has recently been charged with violations of the Clean Air Act, which regulates vehicular emissions of nitrogen oxides, which is considered to be one of the most potent pollutants in the environment at present. In September of 2015, the United States Environmental Protection Agency or EPA accused Volkswagen of willingly cheating on their emission tests (Blackwelder et al. 2016). Volkswagen had apparently installed emission controls in their engines, which were programmed in such a way that they would be activated only during the emission testing in the laboratories. Volkswagen had used this software in more than 11 million vehicles worldwide. The discovery of this scandal led to a worldwide uproar, with Volkswagen being forced to call back more than 5 million cars (Krall and Peng 2015).
Since the 1970s, the EPA has imposed stringent policies which regulate vehicular emissions in the case of all vehicles. This is because vehicular emissions consist of harmful pollutants like carbon monoxide and nitrogen oxides which detrimental to both the environment and the people who are exposed to it. The new emission standards which had been posed on the automobile companies proved to be a challenge for brands like Honda, Nissa, Hyundai and also Volkswagen. In the year 2015, Volkswagen consequently deployed a diesel dupe, which would rig the emission tests that the vehicles are subjected to. This particular software ensured that the emission controls were activated during the tests, so that the vehicles demonstrated lower levels of pollution that what they actually emitted (Mansouri 2015). A defeat software or device had been embedded in the diesel engines of more than 11 million vehicles, which would change the emission performance of the vehicle to the desired results. In other words, for quite a long time, Volkswagen had been pretending to meet the emission standards, whereas in reality, it was simply cheating its customers (Ragatz 2015).
More importantly, the attitude of the Volkswagen management and the public statements made were unethical in nature (Siano et al. 2017). Following the discovery of the scandal, Volkswagen suggested that the people involved in rigging the emission tests and had worked independently. In short, it was suggested that the management of the company was completely unaware of the implementation of such a software. In 2015, only 9 managers were accused of partaking in the scandal and they were suspended. It was a classic “bad apples” case and Volkswagen publicly stated that the unethical behavior on their part had been due to the mindset of a few employees and their inability to comply with the rules. However, internal investigations conducted later showed that at least 50 managers had been aware of such a practice. The technicians involved in the process had reportedly informed the supervisors, who had chosen to turn a blind eye. In other words, there were several people involved in the scandal, which makes the entire company responsible for the fiasco which erupted.
The economy of a particular country or a state would depend on the business and trade in that region. Every business is regulated by a certain code of ethics and morals, which determine how the people involved in the organization should act and behave. It must also be asserted that that since a business of any kind would use resources from the surrounding communities and society, it is also the responsibility of the business corporation to take care of the society they are dependent on. In other words, the society and the business that operates within in are interdependent entities. Business ethics refer to moral principles and rules which are not legally binding, but every company is expected to abide by it. The purpose of business ethics is to ensure that a company is able to regulate its impact on the society.
The key stakeholders who were affected are as follows:
It was estimated that the total number of individuals who were responsible for the scandal were more than 50. In other words, at least 50 managers were aware of the practice of rigging the emission tests. Despite the fact that the Volkswagen management denied any kind of involvement in the matter initially, they were proven to be equally guilty with internal investigations. Thus it can be claimed that organization culture was partly responsible for the failure to impose business ethics. Volkswagen spokespersons commented that the mindset of the individuals involved in the process were to blame for the failure to comply with stringent environmental policies (Lane 2016). Corporate culture refers to the working environment, or the culture prevailing in an organization, which has an impact on the decision making process of the employees, along with how they address ethical factors or incorporate ethics into the decisions (Crete 2016). Maintaining a favorable corporate culture in the workplace which incorporates ethics as an integral part of its moral principles would ensure that each employee abides by the code of ethics in the workplace. Corporate culture, depending on its nature, may very well be both the source or the solution for ethical issues at an organization. Suitable management in charge of corporate culture would set an example for the employees and impact their attitude towards their responsibilities and duties (Rhodes 2016).
Making ethical choices would have the following impacts on Volkswagen:
The following recommendations can be made in this case:
Conclusion
In conclusion, it can be said that the Volkswagen scandal was quite damaging for the organization which had emerged as a force to be reckoned with in the automobile industry. The most important aspect to be considered during such a scandal is the damage to reputation. The above report identifies the stakeholders who were affected as part of the scandal, and even provides recommendations for the same.
The Volkswagen scandal may be analyzed from two perspectives, using ethical theories, namely utilitarianism and virtue of ethics. According to the normative ethical theory of utilitarianism, the concept of what is right and what is wrong would depend on the ultimate consequence. The theory asserts that the most ethical choice or decision will be one which produces the best results. For instance, according to this theory, an unethical act may be called right or may be justified if it succeeds in producing the benefits or advantages for parties concerned (Mill 2016). It is a reason based approach to determining what is right and what is wrong. Now there are two aspects to the Volkswagen scandal. The company owes all its stakeholders transparency in terms of policy and also environment friendly measures against the diesel emissions which are harmful in nature. From an utilitarian point of view, the question arises as to whether the actions of the company which are not entirely illegal, can still be immoral or unethical and thus warrant consequences.
If the utilitarian theory is applied to the Volkswagen scandal, one would have to look at the outcomes. In this case, the emphasis would be the good results (Lyons 2015). In other words, the emphasis would have to be placed on the benefits rather than the negative outcomes. For instance, the company’s logic in this case would be this – the rigging of the emission tests meant that the vehicles would be performing at higher rates than other vehicles. The measures imposed by the EPA were a hindrance as far as performance was concerned. Thus, the speed and the performance of the vehicles with rigged systems resulted in satisfied customers which would please the employees as well. As a result, this would be considered more significant as compared to the pain of those people who on being exposed to the vehicular emissions would suffer from respiratory diseases (Oldenkamp, Van Zelm and Huijbregts 2016). This is all the more poignant since no laws had technically been violated. However, the major problem with utilitarianism is that there is no actual way to make the decision objectively. The consequences or the negative effects on Volkswagen have not had much of an effect on its profitability either. Volkswagen admitting its mistakes and calling back its vehicles would not have much an effect on the cash flow and Volkswagen’s reputation.
Virtue ethics or virtue of ethics is another normative ethical theory which may be applied in this case. This theory emphasizes on the virtues involved in character and mind. A theorist who delves into virtue ethics would deal with the issue of ethics and the related problems. For instance, the theory covers how these ethics are acquired in real life and how they may be applied to a context. The virtue ethics theory differs from the theory of utilitarianism with regards to context and mode. While utilitarianism believes that if an action has a positive impact or a benefit associated with it which outweighs the negative consequences, then the action can be termed as ethical or right (Hursthouse 2013). However, the theory of virtue ethics emphasizes that the consequence of a particular action is of prime importance. A person or organization following the virtue ethics theory would treat others in the same manner as he himself would like to be treated (Sandler 2013). If this theory is applied to Volkswagen, then the action on part of the management was gravely wrong. The act of rigging the emission tests was not only morally wrong but also had a negative consequence (Barrett et al. 2015). The company was pretending that its vehicles abide by the measures imposed by the EPA, but in reality, it was simply cheating its customers. Moreover, the action had an impact on the people who were exposed to the harmful emissions of the vehicles as well, potentially resulting in respiratory diseases in the victims (Burki 2015). Keeping this in mind, the virtue ethics theory suggests that the actions on part of Volkswagen cannot be justified even if it proved to be beneficial for the company in terms of benefits.
From a personal point of view, I believe that the following factors make an ethical leader:
In order to manage a business according to ethical standards, I believe that a manager should be an effective leader who is able to reinforce compliance at various levels of the organization. The following things are to be kept in mind:
References:
Barrett, S.R., Speth, R.L., Eastham, S.D., Dedoussi, I.C., Ashok, A., Malina, R. and Keith, D.W., 2015. Impact of the Volkswagen emissions control defeat device on US public health. Environmental Research Letters, 10(11), p.114005.
Blackwelder, B., Coleman, K., Colunga-Santoyo, S., Harrison, J.S. and Wozniak, D., 2016. The Volkswagen Scandal.
Brown, M.E. and Treviño, L.K., 2014. Do role models matter? An investigation of role modeling as an antecedent of perceived ethical leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, 122(4), pp.587-598.
Burki, T.K., 2015. Diesel cars and health: the Volkswagen emissions scandal. The Lancet Respiratory Medicine, 3(11), pp.838-839.
Crête, R., 2016. The Volkswagen scandal from the viewpoint of corporate governance. European Journal of Risk Regulation, 7(1), pp.25-31.
Demirtas, O. and Akdogan, A.A., 2015. The effect of ethical leadership behavior on ethical climate, turnover intention, and affective commitment. Journal of Business Ethics, 130(1), pp.59-67.
Hursthouse, R., 2013. Normative virtue ethics. ETHICA, 645.
Jordan, J., Brown, M.E., Treviño, L.K. and Finkelstein, S., 2013. Someone to look up to: Executive–follower ethical reasoning and perceptions of ethical leadership. Journal of Management, 39(3), pp.660-683.
Jung, K., Chilton, K. and Valero, J.N., 2017. Uncovering stakeholders in public–private relations on social media: a case study of the 2015 Volkswagen scandal. Quality & Quantity, 51(3), pp.1113-1131.
Krall, J.R. and Peng, R.D., 2015. The Volkswagen scandal: Deception, driving and deaths. Significance, 12(6), pp.12-15.
Lane, E.L., 2016. Volkswagen and the High-tech Greenwash. European Journal of Risk Regulation, 7(1), pp.32-34.
Lyons, D., 2015. Utilitarianism. Wiley Encyclopedia of Management, pp.1-4.
Mansouri, N., 2016. A case study of Volkswagen unethical practice in diesel emission test. International Journal of Science and Engineering Applications, 5(4), pp.211-216.
Mill, J.S., 2016. Utilitarianism. In Seven Masterpieces of Philosophy (pp. 337-383). Routledge.
Oldenkamp, R., van Zelm, R. and Huijbregts, M.A., 2016. Valuing the human health damage caused by the fraud of Volkswagen. Environmental pollution, 212, pp.121-127.
Ragatz, J.A., 2015. What Can We Learn from the Volkswagen Scandal?.
Rhodes, C., 2016. Democratic business ethics: Volkswagen’s emissions scandal and the disruption of corporate sovereignty. Organization Studies, 37(10), pp.1501-1518.
Sandler, R.L., 2013. Environmental virtue ethics. International Encyclopedia of Ethics.
Schiermeier, Q., 2015. The science behind the Volkswagen emissions scandal. Nature News.
Siano, A., Vollero, A., Conte, F. and Amabile, S., 2017. “More than words”: Expanding the taxonomy of greenwashing after the Volkswagen scandal. Journal of Business Research, 71, pp.27-37.
Yidong, T. and Xinxin, L., 2013. How ethical leadership influence employees’ innovative work behavior: A perspective of intrinsic motivation. Journal of business ethics, 116(2), pp.441-455.
Yukl, G., Mahsud, R., Hassan, S. and Prussia, G.E., 2013. An improved measure of ethical leadership. Journal of leadership & organizational studies, 20(1), pp.38-48.
Zhou, A., 2016. Analysis of the Volkswagen scandal possible solutions for recovery.
Essay Writing Service Features
Our Experience
No matter how complex your assignment is, we can find the right professional for your specific task. Contact Essay is an essay writing company that hires only the smartest minds to help you with your projects. Our expertise allows us to provide students with high-quality academic writing, editing & proofreading services.
Free Features
Free revision policy
$10Free bibliography & reference
$8Free title page
$8Free formatting
$8How Our Essay Writing Service Works
First, you will need to complete an order form. It's not difficult but, in case there is anything you find not to be clear, you may always call us so that we can guide you through it. On the order form, you will need to include some basic information concerning your order: subject, topic, number of pages, etc. We also encourage our clients to upload any relevant information or sources that will help.
Complete the order form
Once we have all the information and instructions that we need, we select the most suitable writer for your assignment. While everything seems to be clear, the writer, who has complete knowledge of the subject, may need clarification from you. It is at that point that you would receive a call or email from us.
Writer’s assignment
As soon as the writer has finished, it will be delivered both to the website and to your email address so that you will not miss it. If your deadline is close at hand, we will place a call to you to make sure that you receive the paper on time.
Completing the order and download