The report classifies and segregates the different mentioned scenarios into self-interest, self-review, familiarity, intimidation and advocacy threats along with the corresponding reasons. These threats hinder the independence of the auditors. In part 2 of the assignment, the given scenario has been studied so as to highlight any threat to the compliance of IFAC code (Arnott, et al., 2017). In the third section of the report, several case studies have been given based on which the type of audit opinion that should be given has been stated along with the reasons.
The International Federation of Accountants is a global organization which represents the accounting profession and has issued the IFAC Code of Ethics which needs to be followed by the auditors round the world so that the independence of the auditors is not being compromised at any level and that the appropriate moral principles, norms and standards are being followed. The five fundamental principles of the code of ethics include integrity, objectivity, professional competence and due care, confidentiality and professional behaviour. It is the benchmark of the standard behaviour which is expected out of the accountant and it shows how the profession looks at the public interest responsibility (Knechel & Salterio, 2016).
In the given case, ABC firm is the audit firm for the given company “Company Ltd” for the last 10 years which can result in the familiarity threat as the auditors need to be changed from time to time in order to ensure independence in their approach and reveal the true and fair view of the company by means of audit. Secondly the audit partner also hasn’t changed for the last 10 years and it has always been John which does affects the integrity of the auditor. The other partner of the firm, Robert has always been the review auditor and has never been the lead audit partner as the CEO of the company is his wife’s father (Meroño-Cerdán, et al., 2017). This again leads to the familiarity threat which might force him to work in a biased manner considering the personal relationship and thus this again is a threat to the independence of the auditor. As per the trend of the company, the company throws a party to all its employees as well as the auditors who have worked on the audit and the party is full paid by the company. The company believes that off late this has improved the relations between the auditor and the company and that has the auditors in becoming less formal (Raiborn, et al., 2016). This again leads to the threat of self-interest whereby the auditors may not work independently and these paid parties may have a severe impact on their professional scepticism, the integrity and objectivity while doing the audit. It may lead to compromise with the professional behaviour and the due care which they should have applied while doing the audit of the company. Furthermore, John, the audit partner was being approached recently by the company for offer of employment as the director of the company for the starting term of 2 years with the condition of lowering the audit fees for current and next year. This is a clear case of advocacy threat on the audit partner who may compromise with the independence in order to become director of the company. Later on this will also take the shape of self-review threat. Thus, all in all, the given case clearly compromises with many aspects and principles laid down in IFAC Code of Ethics and threats like advocacy threat, familiarity threat and self-interest threat are quite evident on the face of it and the same will lead to threaten the independence of the auditors as well.
In the given case, the auditor was able to satisfy himself w.r.t. the balances of the accounts and hence there was no anomaly and therefore there is no indication of material misstatement of the financial statements. Thus, the auditor should give unqualified opinion in the given case (Goldmann, 2016).
In the given case, property, plant and equipment constitutes almost one-third of the total assets and thus forms a significant portion of the assets side of balance sheet. Since the client is restricting from carrying out procedures to check on the same, it might result into material misstatement if the assets are misstated in the books. Therefore in this case, the auditor should give disclaimer opinion as there is insufficient support from the management (Sonu, et al., 2017).
In the given case, the management of the company has missed one of the critical disclosures in the financial report on the contingent liability which may have a material impact if the same is converted to actual liability. Since this does not qualifies as material misstatement and only the disclosure has been missed the auditor should be issuing qualified opinion.
In the given case, there is a significant control risk prevailing in the entity as there is no controls in place to check on the accuracy of the cash sales being made and recorded. This might have a significant impact on the financial statements and might also impact the materiality and therefore the auditor should issue the disclaimer of opinion report as the auditor is not made available the requisite information which is required to complete the audit (Werner, 2017).
In the given case, the auditor is not being able to verify the opening balances of the entity for which he is doing the audit for the first time. Since opening balance verification is one of the significant areas to be checked for new client, the non-checking of the same might result in material misstatement and hence disclaimer of opinion should be given by auditor here considering unavailability of requisite information (Visinescu, et al., 2017).
You have just started auditing the financial statements of a client which has not been following the Australian Accounting Standards since it began operating four years ago.
The company has not been following Australian Accounting Standards since inception 4 years ago and therefore the auditor should be issuing the qualified opinion here. This is because the essence of accounting remains the same but the reporting may differ as per the AAS (Bumgarner & Vasarhelyi, 2018).
A client has been using the LIFO method of accounting for inventory which is disallowed under the Australian Accounting Standards. This has had a material effect on the financial statements however its effect is currently limited to the effect on the Inventory value.
In the given case, the company has disregarded the provisions of the Australian Accounting standards intentionally and it can have material impact on the financials. Therefore, even though the practice of using LIFO method of accounting for inventory is only having effect on the inventory value currently, the overall impact is wide and pervasive and is material and so the auditor should issue adverse opinion.
The auditor of Numark has just completed the audit and is satisfied that there are no material misstatements however the client’s continuation as a going concern is in extreme doubt as its major customer has gone into liquidation and it appears very unlikely that other customers will take its place due to the highly specialised nature of its products.
This is not a matter of crisis and it is a matter of transparency about the uncertainty which should be shown by the directors in their report to keep the shareholders and other stakeholders’ informed (Fay & Negangard, 2017). The auditor should be issuing a modified report in this case and ensure that they do comment on the going concern assumption of the client in the audit report.
References
Alexander, F., 2016. The Changing Face of Accountability. The Journal of Higher Education, 71(4), pp. 411-431.
Arnott, D., Lizama, F. & Song, Y., 2017. Patterns of business intelligence systems use in organizations. Decision Support Systems, Volume 97, pp. 58-68.
Belton, P., 2017. Competitive Strategy: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. London: Macat International ltd.
Bumgarner, N. & Vasarhelyi, M., 2018. Continuous auditing—a new view.. Continuous Auditing: Theory and Application, 20(1), pp. 7-51.
Fay, R. & Negangard, E., 2017. Manual journal entry testing : Data analytics and the risk of fraud. Journal of Accounting Education, Volume 38, pp. 37-49.
Fukukawa, H. & Mock, T., 2011. Audit risk assessments using belief versus probability. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 30(1), pp. 75-99.
Goldmann, K., 2016. Financial Liquidity and Profitability Management in Practice of Polish Business. Financial Environment and Business Development, 4(3), pp. 103-112.
Kangarluie, S. & Aalizadeh, A., 2017. ‘The expectation gap in auditing. Accounting, 3(1), pp. 19-22.
Kew, J. & Stredwick, J., 2017. Business Environment: Managing in a Strategic Context. 2nd ed. London: Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development.
Knechel, W. & Salterio, S., 2016. Auditing:Assurance and Risk. 4th ed. New York: Routledge.
Lessambo, F., 2018. Audit Risks: Identification and Procedures. Auditing, Assurance Services, and Forensics, 3(1), pp. 183-202.
Meroño-Cerdán, A., Lopez-Nicolas, C. & Molina-Castillo, F., 2017. Risk aversion, innovation and performance in family firms. Economics of Innovation and new technology, pp. 1-15.
Raiborn, C., Butler, J. & Martin, K., 2016. The internal audit function: A prerequisite for Good Governance. Journal of Corporate Accounting and Finance, 28(2), pp. 10-21.
Sonu, C., Ahn, H. & Choi, A., 2017. Audit fee pressure and audit risk: evidence from the financial crisis of 2008. Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting & Economics , 24(1-2), pp. 127-144.
Visinescu, L., Jones, M. & Sidorova, A., 2017. Improving Decision Quality: The Role of Business Intelligence. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 57(1), pp. 58-66.
Werner, M., 2017. Financial process mining – Accounting data structure dependent control flow inference. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 25(1), pp. 57-80.
Essay Writing Service Features
Our Experience
No matter how complex your assignment is, we can find the right professional for your specific task. Contact Essay is an essay writing company that hires only the smartest minds to help you with your projects. Our expertise allows us to provide students with high-quality academic writing, editing & proofreading services.
Free Features
Free revision policy
$10Free bibliography & reference
$8Free title page
$8Free formatting
$8How Our Essay Writing Service Works
First, you will need to complete an order form. It's not difficult but, in case there is anything you find not to be clear, you may always call us so that we can guide you through it. On the order form, you will need to include some basic information concerning your order: subject, topic, number of pages, etc. We also encourage our clients to upload any relevant information or sources that will help.
Complete the order form
Once we have all the information and instructions that we need, we select the most suitable writer for your assignment. While everything seems to be clear, the writer, who has complete knowledge of the subject, may need clarification from you. It is at that point that you would receive a call or email from us.
Writer’s assignment
As soon as the writer has finished, it will be delivered both to the website and to your email address so that you will not miss it. If your deadline is close at hand, we will place a call to you to make sure that you receive the paper on time.
Completing the order and download
