Cyclone Debbie, the strong tropical cyclone, had a lasting effect on Queensland in 2017, as it reached Hamilton Island (McMah 2017). As a result of the disaster, there was a total economic loss of over A$3.5billion, accompanied with insured loss of A$1.65 billion and 8 eights in Australia. There were no precautionary measures taken in Hamilton, and property damage was reported as a result of consistent wind flow of 119 mph, reaching up to 163 mph (Gorlay and Liddy 2017). Around 63,000 properties nearby were affected by the lack of electricity and over 300 tourists were left stranded on the Daydream island with little to no supplies. Trees were uprooted, houses collapsed, and the island’s destroyed jetty made evacuation attempts extremely hard. The incident also had major impact on wildlife, as flocked of birds were caught in the cyclone, only to be later discovered dead among the tree branches. Heavy torrential rain affected the area, with accumulation for 48 hours exceeded 39 inches, when the areas generally have any average of around 60 to 80 inches of rain in the entire year. Some of the dams overflew, such as Middle Creek, and Bruce Highway had to be closed down because of multiple sections of it being submerged in water. Further south, there was much more infrastructural damage and flooding, especially between rivers Albert and Logan. Damage to multiple industries were massive, with Queensland’s sugar industry taking a hit of A$150 million, and winter crops grown around Bowen and Gumlulosing on A$100 million as a result. The lack of proper precaution after Cyclone Yasi in 2011 calls for a push in more sophisticated layouts, planning and measures.
Overview of the Tourism and Hospitality Activity
Queensland tourism contributes overA$8 billion to Queensland’s economy. Tourism exports are often second to only coal exports (Dlgrma.qld.gov.au, n.d.). The main activities include restaurant visits, visiting friends and relatives and visiting zoos and rainforests. Natural attractions and resorts are key components in tourist attractions and activities, especially in the Douglas and Malanda areas. A major portion of international travellers backpacked through the region (Ipalawatte 2004), and has had great effect on local housing composition, among other things. Sightseeing is prominent, with the help of over 20000 available cars, for tourist (Dlgrma.qld.gov.au, n.d.). Other than resorts presenting a perfect holiday vacation, beaches, shopping, cafes and markets are extremely common among tourists. There are special, dedicated residential units for backpackers alone, as international tourists make up for the change in domestic tourists due to seasonal changes. Queensland tourism accounts for about 5 percent of the state employees and 3 percent of state product, employing over 55,000 smaller businesses, in housing, food and transportation services that Queensland expects to attract 79 to 83 million domestic tourists and 40 to 60 million international tourists (Queensland Treasury 2008). Plans to further doubling down on tourist attractions out of natural, existing biodiversity is on the table, although climate changes make it harder to maintain (Pierce 2017).
Critical Analysis of Identified legal and regulatory concerns
Lately, climate change has led to problems in the region, making tourism harder, which in turn harms the income and economy of the area. One identified issue in the face of such disaster is the lack of proper regulation for housing in Bowen, among other areas. The number of pre-regulation buildings are huge, which generally end up collapsing instead of providing shelter. Owning to Queensland’s continuous experience with, with smaller yet consistent cyclones, the Disaster Management unit’s work has been less than efficient, with outright failing to take necessary preparatory steps in Hamilton and some places places, over a type 3(later 4) cyclone. Shelters occupying up to 700 people each when people in groups of north of 25000, later 3000 and 2000 at once have been asked to move and have joined in later(McMah 2017). Insufficiently planned exits, lack of safe houses and drainage had notmade indoors extremely dangerous. The points stated in the Disaster Management Plan, including preparedness, prevention, government capacity and capability, weren’t acted upon and a complete reliance was put on community capacity and capability and relying on measures for smaller disasters, which isn’t proper after 2011’s Cyclone Yasi (Travel Weekly, 2018). Since Queensland accounts for such a huge portion of tourism revenue, both government and private sector money has gone into rebranding a post-cyclone Queensland without enforcing proper regulation(in case of building, roads, shelters and so) for a safer Queensland, in case of another such incident. Recently, an investment of mere A$ 300,000 was made in the effort to rescue the scene post disaster (Ausleisure.com.au 2018). There is little that can be done with that amount of money for an area of 1.8 km2 and what was done was a marketing campaign which didn’t exactly generate much to help. The planning in multiple places is extremely outdated and no efforts were taken to reform or revamp the areas, mostly because the place, even at its worst seems like a lucrative revenue generator to be slowly and carefully repurposed into something with a longer longevity. Incidentally, not only were many places not evacuated, there was no proper warning given in some places due to outdated modes to studying and predicting cyclones, these were also the places were the cyclone hit the place worse.
Policy Objectives
The policy objectives are as follows:
The stakeholders in the proposal include:
Department of Housing and Public Works, Queensland,
Department of Transportation and Main Roads,
Australian Government,
Australian Hotels Association,
Department of Premier and Cabinet,
QFES,
Queensland Tourism Industry Council,
Drainage Division, Queensland,
Department of Infrastructure, Local Government and Planning,
Local Housing Businesses,
Public School System, and Public Halls,
Domestic/International engineering firms(Melbourne Waters and Smith Engineering),
Queensland Police Department.
Validation Statement
Something that has to be understood is that Queensland, while being a major source of income, hasn’t been put money into by the government outside of advertising. Around A$ 300,000 has gone into post Debbie recovery and efforts are more on using the small money to market the place and hoping others donate than actual ground level recovery (Pierce 2017). Considering Queensland’s multiple experience with such disaster, a sustainable, long term, low damage taking solution is necessary. If the entire money is spent on marketing the place, it not only leaves the locals to recover on their own, it tests the limits of small businesses to do so repeatedly. Considering the value of Queensland as a tourist attraction, undermining the need for rapid and sophisticated checks and measures will take a hit on the economy in the long run, or even short, if the damage is as consistent and timely as it has been for so long. The damage to smaller hotels and restaurants due to flooding and lack of strict regulation, could potentially affect tourism income to north of over A$500 million alone, let alone the unavoidable loss of A$250 million from sugar industry and winter crops.Renovating and repurposing existing buildings and businesses cuts out cost for the most parts in long term, to monetarily invest more in satellite systems, specialised on-site crew on shores, and a revamped drainage system. A certification from government for private housing incentives the corporation because it adds to better marketing and PR, while post disaster tax deductions helps them keep in live with the program. Redistribution and reallocation of assets is crucial to make sure that a great generator of revenue doesn’t become an unsalvageable scenario every few years, after only a few more disasters waiting to happen.
References
Ausleisure.com.au. (2018). Queensland tourism industry rallies following Cyclone Debbie – Australasian Leisure Management. [online] Available at: https://www.ausleisure.com.au/news/queensland-tourism-industry-rallies-following-cyclone-debbie/ [Accessed 15 Sep. 2018].
Australian Bureau of Statistics, Tourist accommodation, Small Area Data, Queensland, Cat No 8635.3.
Campos, M., Drake, L. and Anaman, K. (1999). Impact of Tropical Cyclone Warning Information on Incomes of Commercial Tourist Accommodation Operators Along the Queensland Coast. Economic Analysis and Policy, 29(2), pp.207-215.
Dlgrma.qld.gov.au. (n.d.). The economic and social impacts of tourism in the Far North Queensland planning region. [online] Available at: https://www.dlgrma.qld.gov.au/resources/plan/far-north-queensland/background/tourism-report.pdf [Accessed 15 Sep. 2018].
Gorlay, C. and Liddy, M. (2017). Up to 263kph: Cyclone Debbie’s wind speeds visualised. [online] ABC News. Available at: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-03-28/cyclone-debbie-wind-speed-tracker/8392288 [Accessed 15 Sep. 2018].
Ipalawatte, C (2004): TRA niche market report number 4, Backpackers in Australia, 2003, Tourism Research Australia, Tourism Australia, Canberra.
McMah, L. (2017). Tourists forced to abandon holiday plans as Cyclone Debbie intensifies off Qld coast. [online] NewsComAu. Available at: https://www.news.com.au/travel/travel-updates/incidents/tourists-forced-to-abandon-holiday-plans-as-cyclone-debbie-intensifies-off-qld-coast/news-story/f5d8e4f63d1169b6d75c7b7b54190c35 [Accessed 15 Sep. 2018].
Pierce, J. (2017). Tourism boost after Debbie. [online] NewsComAu. Available at: https://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/home/outdoors/tourism-australia-tourism-and-events-queensland-to-deliver-major-marketing-campaign-for-state/news-story/4f080be76467c7fde57411576725e070 [Accessed 15 Sep. 2018].
Queensland Treasury, Office of Economic and Social Research, FNQ 2025 Planning area economic profile 2008.
Tourism Research Australia (2008), Tourism profiles for Local Government Areas in regional Australia—Queensland.
Travel Weekly. (2017). Cyclone Debbie’s impact on tourism – Travel Weekly. [online] Available at: https://www.travelweekly.com.au/article/cyclone-debbies-impact-on-tourism/ [Accessed 15 Sep. 2018].
Essay Writing Service Features
Our Experience
No matter how complex your assignment is, we can find the right professional for your specific task. Contact Essay is an essay writing company that hires only the smartest minds to help you with your projects. Our expertise allows us to provide students with high-quality academic writing, editing & proofreading services.
Free Features
Free revision policy
$10Free bibliography & reference
$8Free title page
$8Free formatting
$8How Our Essay Writing Service Works
First, you will need to complete an order form. It's not difficult but, in case there is anything you find not to be clear, you may always call us so that we can guide you through it. On the order form, you will need to include some basic information concerning your order: subject, topic, number of pages, etc. We also encourage our clients to upload any relevant information or sources that will help.
Complete the order form
Once we have all the information and instructions that we need, we select the most suitable writer for your assignment. While everything seems to be clear, the writer, who has complete knowledge of the subject, may need clarification from you. It is at that point that you would receive a call or email from us.
Writer’s assignment
As soon as the writer has finished, it will be delivered both to the website and to your email address so that you will not miss it. If your deadline is close at hand, we will place a call to you to make sure that you receive the paper on time.
Completing the order and download