Organization is associated with the complex set of actions and activities which are implemented to achieve the objectives and goals in determined approach. Every organisation works as a part of the society. Each and every organization needs to establish the relation between the economic and social benefits with the organization development. The society provides the entity with all the resources that it require and face all the negative impacts laid by business houses. As a return, the business is also required to encourage those activities that benefit the society. Corporate social responsibility (CSR) deals with this obligation of the organisations. As per CSR, the organisations are required to manage business in an environment friendly and sustainable manner. Along with the society, activities related to the welfare of the employees and their families also form a part of CSR. It is the responsibility of businesses to improve the quality of life of workforce (Schwartz, 2017). Every organization should endeavour towards delivering the best possible outcomes to society in return of what it has taken from the society while operating the business. There are several ways which could be used by organization such as corporate social responsibilities, sustainable business practice and strengthen corporate governance program in determined approach.
Contributing towards social responsibility helps the business houses in innumerable ways. However many business houses nowadays are doing virtue signalling in the name of corporate social responsibility. However, the two are different concepts and should not be mixed.
As per the perception of Mason & Simmons, 2014 it is reflected that the narrow view of corporate responsibility states the only objective of business houses as maximisation of profits. As per this view, the business houses need to focus on conducting the business with the basic standards. This is to be done by them to increase the level of profits. It is not their duty to care for social well-being. The most important feature so business houses is that they are artificial persons, and hence their responsibilities are also artificial. They need not to have emotions of social upbringing and social benefit. Their only goal is to make as much money as they can (Tai, & Chuang, 2014).
This theory argues that the business is responsible only for the owners. The reason is that their money is invested in the business activities. So the business is bound to accomplish the goals laid for the success. The whole accountability of managers is for the owners. As per this view, the only corporate responsibility of the business is the payment of tax. The tax is to be paid on the profits made by the business. The tax then can be used by the government to do social welfare. By this way the community service is also done by the organisation (Filatotchev & Nakajima, 2014).
This social responsibility includes carrying of business by the organisations in a lawfully acceptable manner. The policies should be such that increase the profits. Conduct of business should be transparent and ethical. There should be no deception and fraud in the carrying on of business. In this theory, company set up strong CSR program based on the triple bottom line in the business process which is based on the people, plant and profit. It is analyzed that company gives proper supporting system and output for the best benefits of society at large. The transparent business and ethical business practice should be undertaken to establish nexus between the organization’s goal and society development (Reverte, (2009).
The broader view of CSR focuses more on the long term goals, than just the immediate goal of profit making. This view highlights the need of the business houses to maintain healthy relationship with the society to prove its legitimacy. Only profit maximisation should not be the goal of the entity. There is another important objective that the entity must focus on. The same is believed to be their responsibility towards the benefit of society. The entity needs to resolve all the negative impacts that the business leaves on the environment (Suliman, Al-Khatib, & Thomas, 2016).
With the rise in the power of the business houses, their responsibility is also increased. The business uses the resources and the place that society has given it to operate successfully. So undoubtedly, the business is required to think for the sustainability of those resources that society has bestowed. It is for the self-benefit of the business only that it thinks for the longer run. When socially acceptable activities are done by the entity it itself become acceptable and gain huge support. The broader view is also promoted by the stakeholder theory (Dhaliwal, et al. 2012).As per this theory; every business is responsible to the society, employees, general public, environment, etc. along with the shareholders. Apart from profit, this view focuses on the protection of environment, moral duties towards the stakeholders, and maintaining sustainability (Schultz, Castelló & Morsing). The main duty of company is to keep the business more transparent towards the stakeholders and strengthen the overall outcomes and efficiency in long run (Steenkamp, 2017).
There are people supporting both the views of the corporate social responsibility. The narrow view is supported on the account that the successful organisations are way more authoritative than the society or the government. So the business shall succeed even if it does nothing for society and just strive to earn profits. The other argument put in favour of the narrow view is the responsibility of government to entertain social well welfare. Further, it is believed by these supporters that the enterprises are not experienced well to support the society. Finally it is said that if the business houses shall enter in social activities, then they shall make the societies materialistic and profit minded too (Du, Swaen, Lindgreen & Sen, 2013) .
However, the broader view of the corporate social responsibility is prompted on account, that this covers a broader sphere of society than just the immediate shareholders. A binding contract naturally is signed between the society and the organisations to support each other. The business shall gain higher reputation and acceptance if it thinks for all the stakeholders and not just for the profit making goal. The main purpose of CSR activities is to deliver the best social interest towards its society and increasing the overall output to stakeholders (Weber, & Wasieleski, 2018).
Tony Abbott, the former Prime Minister of Australia had given a statement for banks on the basis of findings of Hayne Royal Commission. The statement says that, ““I’m very disappointed in the banks and you wonder how much better the banks would have been if they had been focused on doing their core business honestly and ethically rather than running around the place virtue signalling on any number of politically correct subjects”. This case focuses on the ethical and transparent business practices which could increase the overall outcomes in determined approach (Cowen, Ferreri, & Parker, 2017).
As far as a personal opinion is concerned, the statement of Tony Abbott is supported. Corporate responsibility is not just about expressing virtues by commenting on some politically hot topic, i.e. virtue signalling. Corporate social responsibility is more about being responsible for one’s actions. It has nothing to do with commentating on what others have done or are intended to do. Ethically conducting business is also a part of corporate social responsibility only. This is laid as per the narrow view of corporate social responsibility. Ethical business practice and strengthen corporate governance program have resulted to increased business outcomes of the banks (Suliman, Al-Khatib, & Thomas, 2016).
Undoubtedly, the banks need to work for profit earning but at the same time they should think for other aspects i.e. society betterment also. By conducting their business ethically, all the money that they will make will be free from any deception or fraud. This will not only make its business more transparent but also strengthen the overall outcomes to society at large. Certain part of this money however should be used for social benefit. No business can perform successfully without incorporating corporate social responsibility. It is even mandated by law now. Certain specified companies are mandatorily required to invest certain percentage of the money made by them for social causes. This could be in any form. The activity may include, opening of schools; employee welfare; water shed management; rain water harvesting; free food to school going children and conducting health camps, (Orlitzky, Schmidt, & Rynes, 2013).
Certain benefits are accrued to business entities when they indulge themselves in corporate social responsibility activities. These are below points which could be undertaken to determine the certain benefits. There are several other benefits which will be taken by the business Organizaiton if they undertake proper CSR activities.
Hence, the statement of Tony Abbott is totally correct. It is just required to draw the fine line that exists between corporate social responsibility and virtue signalling. The banks need to understand that actual actions are required to be taken. Only compelling about doing things shall not make a difference. CSR activities focus on delivering the best possible output to society and while on the other and, virtue signalling is accompanied with the code of conduct ethical business practice and conspicuous expression of moral values.
Conclusion
In a crux, to get the business set for infinite years, every business needs to broaden its thought process. Profit making must be the objective. But it should not be the only objective. The primary stakeholders being the shareholders must be benefitted. But the secondary shareholders who include society, government, public, law authorities etc. must also be taken care of. Virtue signalling in the name of corporate social responsibility must be stopped right away. A justice must be made while using the resources that society has provided. They should be judicially used to promote sustainability. After analysing all the facts and details of the CSR program, it could be inferred that each and every organization needs to manage the business operations in the best interest of society. It is done with a view to pay back to society what company has taken while operating its business.
References
Cowen, S. S., Ferreri, L. B., & Parker, L. D. (2017). The impact of corporate characteristics on social responsibility disclosure: A typology and frequency-based analysis. Accounting, Organizations and society, 12(2), 111-122.
Dhaliwal, D. S., Radhakrishnan, S., Tsang, A., & Yang, Y. G. (2012). Nonfinancial disclosure and analyst forecast accuracy: International evidence on corporate social responsibility disclosure. The Accounting Review, 87(3), 723-759.
Du, S., Swaen, V., Lindgreen, A., & Sen, S. (2013). The roles of leadership styles in corporate social responsibility. Journal of business ethics, 114(1), 155-169.
Filatotchev, I., & Nakajima, C. (2014). Corporate governance, responsible managerial behavior, and corporate social responsibility: Organizational efficiency versus organizational legitimacy?. Academy of Management Perspectives, 28(3), 289-306.
Mason, C., & Simmons, J. (2014). Embedding corporate social responsibility in corporate governance: A stakeholder systems approach. Journal of Business Ethics, 119(1), 77-86.
Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2013). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization studies, 24(3), 403-441.
Reverte, C. (2009). Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosure ratings by Spanish listed firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(2), 351-366.
Schultz, F., Castelló, I., & Morsing, M. (2013). The construction of corporate social responsibility in network societies: A communication view. Journal of business ethics, 115(4), 681-692.
Schwartz, M. S. (2017). Corporate social responsibility. Routledge. 19(1), 17-26.
Steenkamp, J. B. (2017). Corporate Social Responsibility. In Global Brand Strategy (pp. 209-238). Palgrave Macmillan, London.
Suliman, A. M., Al-Khatib, H. T., & Thomas, S. E. (2016). Corporate social responsibility. Corporate Social Performance: Reflecting on the Past and Investing in the Future, 15.
Tai, F. M., & Chuang, S. H. (2014). Corporate social responsibility. Ibusiness, 6(03), 117.
Weber, J., & Wasieleski, D. M. (Eds.). (2018). Corporate social responsibility. Emerald Group Publishing.
Essay Writing Service Features
Our Experience
No matter how complex your assignment is, we can find the right professional for your specific task. Contact Essay is an essay writing company that hires only the smartest minds to help you with your projects. Our expertise allows us to provide students with high-quality academic writing, editing & proofreading services.
Free Features
Free revision policy
$10Free bibliography & reference
$8Free title page
$8Free formatting
$8How Our Essay Writing Service Works
First, you will need to complete an order form. It's not difficult but, in case there is anything you find not to be clear, you may always call us so that we can guide you through it. On the order form, you will need to include some basic information concerning your order: subject, topic, number of pages, etc. We also encourage our clients to upload any relevant information or sources that will help.
Complete the order form
Once we have all the information and instructions that we need, we select the most suitable writer for your assignment. While everything seems to be clear, the writer, who has complete knowledge of the subject, may need clarification from you. It is at that point that you would receive a call or email from us.
Writer’s assignment
As soon as the writer has finished, it will be delivered both to the website and to your email address so that you will not miss it. If your deadline is close at hand, we will place a call to you to make sure that you receive the paper on time.
Completing the order and download
