At the end of 2016, economic growth and unemployment have remained high in Greece though other countries of euro zone have recovered their position. At the end of this year, unemployment rate of Greece has become 23.1 %, which has remained the highest rate in euro zone. Labor market of this country has not been influenced instead of the broader improvements in job sectors while in other countries of Europe the average number of unemployment has reduced to 9.8 %, which has become the lowest over the last four years (Giannakis & Bruggeman, 2017). The debt burden of this economy has remained very high with 180% and consequently the growth of Greece has declined since the last three months in 2017 by 1.2 % (Financial Times., 2018). During 2015, this country has performed the worst due to higher debt crisis and has reflected uncertainty. As a result, average GDP of the euro zone has increased by 0.4% during the fourth quarter of 2016. However, the economic fall supports the claims of Syriza government regarding the imposition of more austerity (Fountas, Karatasi & Tzika, 2018). The International Monetary Fund has claimed that due to slow growth, the country cannot achieve its determined budgetary targets and consequently the country needs other structural reform for its pension and tax system.
Hence, the chief problem of Greece is unemployment and slow growth of GDP. Unemployment is considered as an economic obstacle that each country experiences. For any developed or developing country, higher rate of unemployment is not desirable. This economic phenomenon occurs when a person searches for an employment actively but cannot find a job (Bulow & Geanakoplos, 2017). Thus, unemployment sometimes is used as an indicator to represent health of an economy and for this unemployment rate is used. The unemployment rate is represented by the number of unemployed people of a country divided by the number of people in the total work force. Based on the definition of unemployment, economists have divided it into two parts, which are, involuntary and voluntary unemployment. According to the concept of involuntary unemployment, a person intends to find a job at existing wages but remains unable to find. On the contrary, voluntary unemployment indicates that a person leaves his or her job willingly or does not want to do job at existing wages. In this context, it is essential to mention that involuntary unemployment is a serious issue for an economy while voluntary unemployment is not.
Due to unemployment, an economy bears both social and economic costs that include costs of government, personal costs and costs of the country in general. Costs to government indicates as the lost of tax revenue while personal costs means loss of income. In addition to this, costs to society means loss of national income or GDP. Thus, unemployment can increase poverty level of a country and this in turn can lead households into debt, which further can increase relative poverty rates (Christiano, Eichenbaum & Trabandt, 2016). Moreover, unemployment can also reduce the amount of human capital of a country. Due to lack of job, people cannot receive proper job training and consequently they cannot improve their skills. On the other side, higher unemployment decreases tax revenue of the government, as number of taxpaying people decreases due to their no income. Moreover, people also reduce their consumption for which the amount of indirect tax also decreases. As a result, government is forced to borrow money from other internal or external sources which in turn increases burden of public debt. In addition to this, economic growth of a country can be decreased due to lower GDP. Higher level of unemployment indicates that an economy is not performing efficiently with its full capacity. As a result, total amount of output and national income for the country decreases significantly. Furthermore, unemployed person cannot purchase large number of products and for this consumption level of that person along with the country decreases.
Economic growth is other macroeconomic concept, which represents capacity of an economy to produce large number of goods and services over the year. Economic growth can be obtained from both nominal and real terms while the second one is obtained as inflation adjusted. For a country, economic growth is measured with the help of gross domestic product (GDP) and gross national product (GNP) (Herndon, Ash & Pollin, 2014). Through increasing aggregate productivity, a country can achieve economic growth.
However, unemployment can lead economic growth of a country towards negative direction. Firstly, unemployment exploits workers, as they are forced to accept low wages and to work within an unfavorable environment. Secondly, this economic phenomenon can generate a negative relation between employers and employees and consequently industrial disputes can be occurred (De Neve et al., 2018). In this context, it can be mentioned that this industrial dispute again increases unemployment to a large extend. Thirdly, unemployment along with industrial disputes brings political instability within the country. Government implements various policies to control this negative economic phenomenon. However, some these of policies may generate conflicts among citizens and the government or can generate conflicts among various political parties, which further generates instability. Fourthly, unemployment generates social problems as poverty level increases. To meet basic needs, those unemployed people involve themselves in some illegal activities that cause gambling, dishonesty and immortality.
Hence, for any country, unemployment is not desirable as it reduces economic growth and hampers socio-political and economical condition of it. For this, the government can take various initiatives to reduce unemployment rate and to promote economic growth with the help of monetary or fiscal policy or both. This economic phenomenon is also true for Greece as discussed above. Hence, with the help of economic data related to this country, these macroeconomic problems can be described. Moreover, this statistical data can also describe trends and fluctuation of the country’s economy that can further measure the impact of macroeconomic problem on Greece (Dritsakis & Stamatiou, 2017). After discussing these, it can be suggested that what type of measure the government can take to reduce unemployment level and to promote economic growth in this country.
Greece is located in Southern Europe and ranks as 48th largest country all over the world. In 2017, Greece has remained 7th largest economy among the 28 member of European Union. According to the report of IMF, Greece has ranked 49th and 39th for per capital purchasing power parity and per capita nominal GDP across the world, respectively (Drydakis, 2015). The economy of this developed country is chiefly based on service and industrial sectors while agricultural sector contributes small portion to the country’s total GDP. The chief industries of this country are tourism and shipping and consequently it has become the 7th most visited country of the European Union and also 16th worldwide (Papanikolaou, 2018). Within the EU, Greece has become an important producer of agricultural product. However, due to Great recession and debt-crisis of the Greek government along with debt crisis of Europe, economy of this country has decreased sharply and consequently GDP growth rate of this country has entered in the negative phase (Granados & Rodriguez, 2015). On the other side, public debt of this country has increased significantly though after 2012, Greece has reduced its sovereign debt burden significantly after negotiating the biggest debt restructure with private sector. Economic growth of Greece can be described with the help of following diagram.
Figure 1: Economic growth of Greece
Source: (tradingeconomics.com, 2018)
Figure 1 has represented economic growth of Greece since 2008. According to this diagram, it can be said that the growth rate of this country has entered into a negative phase after 2008 and has fluctuated drastically. After global financial crisis of 2008, economic growth of Greece has decreased significantly though this rate has touched its minimum point during 2011 and 2012 and has become -10%. However, after 2012, economic growth has started to improve again and in 2018 this growth rate of Greece has become 2% (tradingeconomics.com, 2018).
As a result, debt-crisis of this country has also increased significantly after 2007-2008. After great recession, the Greek crisis has started and the country has become structurally weak. This phenomenon has further generated crisis of confidence within other countries of European Union, especially Germany. The government of Greek has increased tax through 12 rounds, decreased spending and reformed from 2010 to 2016, which have generated local riots and protests across the country (Ehrmann & Fratzscher, 2017).
Figure 2: Government debt to GDP of Greece
Source: (tradingeconomics.com, 2018)
Figure 2 has represented government debt to GDP of Greece from 2008 to 2017. Based on this figure it can be stated that debt rate of this country has remained always very high and it has increased over the year. After 2009, this rate has increased because of higher government deficit compare to the expected amount along with higher costs of debt service (Wickens, 2017). The Greek government has stated that due to insufficient structural reform, debt of this country has increased to an unsustainable level. For this, the country has taken bailout loan from the International Monetary Fund, Eurogroup and European Central Bank for the year 2010, 2012 and 2015, respectively. Moreover, in 2011, € 100 billion debt has been reduced on private banks, which means, 50% debt has been relieved (tradingeconomics.com, 2018). However, Greece has become the first developed country, which cannot repay the loan of IMF during 2015 when the debt level has become almost € 30000 per capita.
After discussing economic growth rate and debt-crisis of Greece, it is essential to discuss about unemployment rate of this country and with its present situation and reasons (Kroft, Lange, Notowidigdo & Katz, 2016). The country has experienced higher unemployment for long years. In 2009, this rate has remained at 11% while just after three year this rate has become 28% in 2011 (Filinis, Karakitsios & Katsikas, 2018). However, after 2013, this rate has started to decline. Economists and politicians have considered that this prolonged unemployment has eroded potential output of this country because of the associated effects of hysteresis.
Figure 3: Unemployment rate of Greece
Source: (tradingeconomics.com, 2018)
Figure 3 has represented seasonally adjusted unemployment rate of Greece from 2008 to 2018. In 2008, unemployment rate of this country was very low though after this year, global financial crisis and economic recession has lead the unemployment rate of this country to increase further. As a result, the rate has increased significantly and in 2013, it has reached at its maximum level. However, after this year, the unemployment rate again has started to decline gradually. At present, Greek unemployment rate has stood at 20.9%, which is two times higher compare to that of euro zone (Matsaganis, 2018). This rate has included young people, aged above 24 years, by maximum number due to lack of employment. On the other contrary, jobless rate among younger person, aged between 15 and 24, has decreased by 2.4%. However, the government of this country expects that this unemployment rate can decrease to 18.4% by the end of this year due to projections of present budget (tradingeconomics.com, 2018).
Due to recession and unemployment, poverty level of Greece has been increased noticeably. In 2015, number of people living in extreme poverty has increased by 15% while in 2009 this number was only 8.9%. The number of people, who are situated at the risk for social and poverty exclusion, has become 35.7% of total population. In addition to this, the rate of unemployment among children, aged up to 17, has 17.6% and for young people, aged between 18 to 29 years, has become 24.4%, respectively (Calvário, Velegrakis & Kaika, 2017). As unemployment has increased, getting jobs has become very difficult for citizens of this country and consequently, a quarter of population has become out of job. This rate has affected Western Greece significantly as the unemployment rate within younger generation has become more than 60% in 2015 (Meghir, Pissarides, Vayanos & Vettas, 2017). Moreover, people with no job for more than two years, has lost their health insurance and this further has increased problems related to poverty. Unemployed people have started to rely on family income and this has increased family consumption but has decreased savings and pension funds. As a result, more poverty has generated within the country. Due to lower level of savings, capital accumulation has also decreased and this further has affected total production and total income of Greece, adversely. Some other economic problems have been raised as well due to this higher rate of unemployment. The Greek people have continuously experienced job loss, wage cut, decrease in compensation of workers and benefits from social welfare. On the other side, wage of working people have also reduced. During 2008 and 2013, Greece has become 40% poorer compare to previous years while in 2014, their disposable household income has decreased below 2003 price levels (Branas et al., 2015). However, in 2016, The Economic Survey of Greece has showed strong recovery for 2017 through using some reforms in place and some outside investment in works to reduce this higher level of poverty.
In this country, both cyclical unemployment and structural unemployment have been seen. Structural unemployment has occurred because the foreign companies have shifted their businesses from this country as they have found the economy as unprofitable. Within this country, unemployment rate can be divided into three parts, which are present unemployment rate, long term unemployment rate and youth unemployment rate (Bell & Blanchflower, 2015). These three types of rates are seen within the country due to long recession and the country’s large amount of debt. This also has indicated that the economy of Greece is uncompetitive. Increasing wages cannot match the increasing productivity and consequently, this lack of competitiveness of this country has led the aggregate demand to decrease further. As a result, many firms have closed their business. In addition to this, youth unemployment along with long term unemployment rates have remained constant as the country cannot generate any vacancy for previous or fresh laid-off workers due to low productivity and low tolerance.
The Greek government has taken various policies to reduce long-term unemployment within this country. This country provides unemployment benefits though these are low and limited. These facilities are only available for those people, who have done unemployment insurance contributions and for those who have aged between 45 and 65 years, based on strict conditions. Hence, these benefits are not applicable for all. The country has also provided other benefits to assist unemployed persons from the beginning of recession (Lapavitsas, 2017). In 2014, the Greek National Reform Program has intended to use resources efficiently and reallocation of resources to develop both labor market long with youth market outcomes and to develop the economic sectors with various growth prospects. The chief reason behind implementing these policies by public sector of this country is to create more jobs. For this, the public employment service (PES) of Greece has adopted various policies with double benefits that can encourage unemployed persons (Heyes & Hastings, 2017). These policies are:
In 2009, when economic crisis started in Greece, no one could realize the duration and impact of it. However, the country has experienced higher rate unemployment as the most tremendous outcome, occurred from this crisis and recession. The International Monetary Fund (IMF), European Union (EU) and European Central Bank (ECB) have constituted Troika, to experience rigidity in labor market and unemployment, with the help of some restructured measures (Kosmidou, Kousenidis & Negakis, 2015). However, the outcome has become unexpected. Higher rate of unemployment along with austerity measures have adversely influenced individuals, economy and society.
It has been realized by the IMF, EU and ECB that some fundamental reforms are required to restructure labor market of this country. However, huge goals and contractionary fiscal policy, taken by Troika for adjusting budget, have negatively influenced the labor market. The strict measures have led many people to lose their jobs.
Through fiscal policy, the government can adjust its level of expenditure and tax rates to control and influence a country’s economic condition. According to Keynes, the government can influence a production level of a country through changing public expenditure and tax levels (Jordà & Taylor, 2016). As a result, the inflation rate of a country decreases while employment and value of money increase. Hence, to mange economic condition of a country, this policy plays an important role. When a country experiences similar condition as Greece, the government can adopt contractionary fiscal policy. By decreasing tax rates, it can increase consumer spending. At the same time, by increasing public expenditure, the government can increase aggregate demand of the country (Rendahl, 2016). This further can increase productivity of the nation and this in turn can increase demand for workers. Hence, with the help of this fiscal policy, government can generate more employment opportunity along with higher wages.
However, fiscal policy depends chiefly on goals of policymakers and political orientations. Hence, for all countries, this policy does not affect equally. Sometimes, tax cut can influence only a particular group of people. This is also true when the government intends to expand total expenditure of the country. Thus, fiscal policy sometime can affect the economy in a negative way.
The central bank of any country takes monetary policy to determine size and growth rate of money supply that further can affect interest rates. This policy considers various actions like interest rate modification, transaction of government bonds and changing the rate of cash reserved kept by commercial banks. Monetary policy can be of two types, which are, contractionary and expansionary (Wu & Xia, 2016). To reduce unemployment and to increase consumer spending, the government takes expansionary monetary policy, which increases money supply within economy. This in turn stimulates economic growth of the country. After global financial crisis of 2008, central banks of many countries have applied this type of monetary policy while interest rate has become zero or low (Ricci, 2015). To apply this policy in an effective way, the central bank can apply various tools like decrease in cash reserve ratio, purchase of government bonds through open market operations and reduce bank rates. Through applying all or any one of these tools, the central bank increase money supply within the economy.
Hence, according to the macroeconomic point of view, Greece can take expansionary monetary policy and expansionary fiscal policy to reduce unemployment and to promote economic growth. However, some other policies can also be adopted to reduce unemployment rate further. This can be obtained through increasing production and develop economic condition of the country. These are explained below in the context of Greece.
Greece has applied a tight fiscal policy through decreasing government spending to reduce its budgetary deficit. However, this has made the recession worse and has increased unemployment. The country in the euro zone, has felt that they do not have any other choice to fund their deficit (Coccia, 2017). However, in this context, the government of Greece can take a step to decrease debt. This is to stop austerity though for it political willingness is required. The ECB set monetary policy through considering the entire euro zone. Hence, it cannot set separate monetary policy for Greece, based on its requirements.
In this context, the government of Greece can take flexible fiscal policy to reduce unemployment rate. However, it is important to mention that the central bank of this country cannot print money. Hence, it is difficult for the government to take expansionary monetary policy. Through reducing the level of tax and increasing interest rate, the government can influence common people to save more amount of money in bank (Smets, 2018). This further can increase capital accumulation of this country and producers can take huge amount of loan from those commercial banks to invest within their production. As a result, total production of Greece can increase and this further can generate more demand for labor. Thus, the labor market can find more job opportunities and consequently unemployed person also can job. On the other side, the government can also increase its expenditure to develop aggregate demand of this country further. With lower interest rate and lower rates along with higher level of both private and government expenditure, the country can experience growth of this economy through increasing productivity. Increase in productivity can further increase interests of foreign investors and foreign companies, who have shifted their business from here. More amount of foreign direct investment can be beneficial for this country. In addition to this, starting business of foreign companies in this country can generate more employment opportunities and as a result, unemployment rate can be reduced significantly. Moreover, through producing higher amount of output, the country can export products in foreign countries and this in turn can increase national income of Greece (Dritsakis & Stamatiou, 2017). For this, the government of Greece can impose affective trade policies to reduce trade barriers with other countries, expect the European Union.
In addition to this, the government of Greece can spend more money to provide various courses and training for new and unemployed people, so that they can find jobs overseas, based on their skills. This can further increase national income of this country. Youth unemployment is a major issue for any country as they can create human capital though due to insufficient job opportunities, they cannot utilize their skills and productive capacity. However, through providing proper training and education, the country can help those people to find jobs in foreign companies with higher wages.
Conclusion:
Hence, the above discussion has described about some economic concepts based on practical scenario. Macroeconomic variables can be seen in every country and this is also true for Greece. Some economic phenomenon like GDP growth rate, unemployment, inflation, foreign exchange and balance of trade can be observed in every country. Global financial crisis has negatively influenced Greece and for this the country has experienced recession. As a result, higher rate of unemployment has occurred within this country. The report has described that how this higher rate of unemployment has negatively influenced economic condition of this country and how the government cannot recover it through imposing fiscal policies. For discussing the whole scenario, the report has described about the relationship between unemployment and economic growth of a country in the context of Greece and also has discussed about public debt of this country. From this it can be said that, higher unemployment rate can lead a country to take debt from other sources, especially from the IMF and ECB. However, Greece cannot repay this loan. Hence, the country is the first developed one, who has remained unable to repay the loan of IMF. Expansionary fiscal policy also cannot resolve this economic phenomenon. Hence, from here it can be said that, theoretical concepts of macroeconomics cannot always bring accurate outcomes and Greece has experienced this. The government has taken some other policies to reduce this rate through providing various trainings and assistance to those unemployed persons. However, these policies also have failed to overcome unemployment within this county. On the other side, foreign companies and investors have lost their faith on Greece and consequently have shifted their companies to other places. Thus, from this, it can be said that economic outcome for any country can be uncertain and unpredictable.
References:
Bell, D. N., & Blanchflower, D. G. (2015). Youth unemployment in Greece: measuring the challenge. IZA Journal of European Labor Studies, 4(1), 1.
Branas, C. C., Kastanaki, A. E., Michalodimitrakis, M., Tzougas, J., Kranioti, E. F., Theodorakis, P. N., … & Wiebe, D. J. (2015). The impact of economic austerity and prosperity events on suicide in Greece: a 30-year interrupted time-series analysis. BMJ open, 5(1), e005619.
Bulow, J., & Geanakoplos, J. (2017). Greece’s sovereign debt and economic realism. CEPR Policy Insights, (90).
Calvário, R., Velegrakis, G., & Kaika, M. (2017). The political ecology of austerity: An analysis of socio-environmental conflict under crisis in Greece. Capitalism Nature Socialism, 28(3), 69-87.
Christiano, L. J., Eichenbaum, M. S., & Trabandt, M. (2016). Unemployment and business cycles. Econometrica, 84(4), 1523-1569.
Coccia, M. (2017). Asymmetric paths of public debts and of general government deficits across countries within and outside the European monetary unification and economic policy of debt dissolution. The Journal of Economic Asymmetries, 15, 17-31.
De Neve, J. E., Ward, G., De Keulenaer, F., Van Landeghem, B., Kavetsos, G., & Norton, M. I. (2018). The asymmetric experience of positive and negative economic growth: Global evidence using subjective well-being data. Review of Economics and Statistics, 100(2), 362-375.
Dritsakis, N., & Stamatiou, P. (2017). Foreign Direct Investments, Exports, Unemployment and Economic Growth in the New EU Members-A Panel Data Approach. Economia Internazionale/International Economics, 70(4), 443-468.
Drydakis, N. (2015). The effect of unemployment on self-reported health and mental health in Greece from 2008 to 2013: a longitudinal study before and during the financial crisis. Social Science & Medicine, 128, 43-51.
Ehrmann, M., & Fratzscher, M. (2017). Euro area government bonds–Fragmentation and contagion during the sovereign debt crisis. Journal of International Money and Finance, 70, 26-44.
Filinis, K., Karakitsios, A., & Katsikas, D. (2018). Employment and Unemployment in Greece Before and After the Outbreak of the Crisis. In Socioeconomic Fragmentation and Exclusion in Greece under the Crisis (pp. 55-88). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.
Fountas, S., Karatasi, P., & Tzika, P. (2018). Economic Policy Uncertainty in Greece: Measuring Uncertainty for the Greek Macroeconomy. Steady State Economy and Population, 79.
Giannakis, E., & Bruggeman, A. (2017). Economic crisis and regional resilience: Evidence from Greece. Papers in Regional Science, 96(3), 451-476.
Granados, J. A. T., & Rodriguez, J. M. (2015). Health, economic crisis, and austerity: a comparison of Greece, Finland and Iceland. Health Policy, 119(7), 941-953.
Greece GDP Annual Growth Rate | 1996-2018 | Data | Chart | Calendar. (2018). Retrieved from https://tradingeconomics.com/greece/gdp-growth-annual
Greece Government Debt to GDP | 1980-2018 | Data | Chart | Calendar. (2018). Retrieved from https://tradingeconomics.com/greece/government-debt-to-gdp
Greece Unemployment Rate | 1998-2018 | Data | Chart | Calendar | Forecast. (2018). Retrieved from https://tradingeconomics.com/greece/unemployment-rate
Greek unemployment rises to 23.1% | Financial Times. (2018). Retrieved from https://www.ft.com/content/63aacbfc-b2f1-3887-b487-1dc3438a6a39
Herndon, T., Ash, M., & Pollin, R. (2014). Does high public debt consistently stifle economic growth? A critique of Reinhart and Rogoff. Cambridge journal of economics, 38(2), 257-279.
Heyes, J., & Hastings, T. (2017). Economic and labour market change and policies: Before and beyond austerity in Europe. Trade Unions and Migrant Workers: New Contexts and Challenges in Europe, 23.
Jordà, Ò., & Taylor, A. M. (2016). The time for austerity: estimating the average treatment effect of fiscal policy. The Economic Journal, 126(590), 219-255.
Kosmidou, K. V., Kousenidis, D. V., & Negakis, C. I. (2015). The impact of the EU/ECB/IMF bailout programs on the financial and real sectors of the ASE during the Greek sovereign crisis. Journal of Banking & Finance, 50, 440-454.
Kroft, K., Lange, F., Notowidigdo, M. J., & Katz, L. F. (2016). Long-term unemployment and the Great Recession: the role of composition, duration dependence, and nonparticipation. Journal of Labor Economics, 34(S1), S7-S54.
Lapavitsas, C. (2017). Eurozone Failure, German policies, and a New Path for Greece: Policy Analysis and Proposals. Rosa Luxemburg Stiftung Publikationen, (3).
Matsaganis, M. (2018). Income support policies and labour market reforms under austerity in Greece. Labour Market Policies in the Era of Pervasive Austerity: A European Perspective, 43.
Meghir, C., Pissarides, C. A., Vayanos, D., & Vettas, N. (2017). 1 The Greek Economy before and during the Crisis—and Policy Options Going Forward. Beyond Austerity: Reforming the Greek Economy, 1.
Papanikolaou, N. (2018). MEASURING ECONOMIC & COMPETITIVENESS INDICATORS OF EUROPEAN COUNTRIES AFTER ECONOMIC CRISIS OF 2008: THE CASE OF GREECE AND GERMANY. Economic and Social Development: Book of Proceedings, 279-284.
Rendahl, P. (2016). Fiscal policy in an unemployment crisis. The Review of Economic Studies, 83(3), 1189-1224.
Ricci, O. (2015). The impact of monetary policy announcements on the stock price of large European banks during the financial crisis. Journal of Banking & Finance, 52, 245-255.
Smets, F. (2018). Monetary and Fiscal Policy Interactions and the Labor Market. International Journal of Central Banking.
Wickens, M. (2017). A Macroeconomic Perspective on the Greek Debt Crisis. In Political Economy Perspectives on the Greek Crisis (pp. 157-175). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.
Wu, J. C., & Xia, F. D. (2016). Measuring the macroeconomic impact of monetary policy at the zero lower bound. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 48(2-3), 253-291
Essay Writing Service Features
Our Experience
No matter how complex your assignment is, we can find the right professional for your specific task. Contact Essay is an essay writing company that hires only the smartest minds to help you with your projects. Our expertise allows us to provide students with high-quality academic writing, editing & proofreading services.
Free Features
Free revision policy
$10Free bibliography & reference
$8Free title page
$8Free formatting
$8How Our Essay Writing Service Works
First, you will need to complete an order form. It's not difficult but, in case there is anything you find not to be clear, you may always call us so that we can guide you through it. On the order form, you will need to include some basic information concerning your order: subject, topic, number of pages, etc. We also encourage our clients to upload any relevant information or sources that will help.
Complete the order form
Once we have all the information and instructions that we need, we select the most suitable writer for your assignment. While everything seems to be clear, the writer, who has complete knowledge of the subject, may need clarification from you. It is at that point that you would receive a call or email from us.
Writer’s assignment
As soon as the writer has finished, it will be delivered both to the website and to your email address so that you will not miss it. If your deadline is close at hand, we will place a call to you to make sure that you receive the paper on time.
Completing the order and download