Unethical Practices Of Australian Mining Giants In Regards To Climate Change Threats

Violation of Climate Change Policies

Business ethics is known as the tool which regulates the behavior and activities of every organization. These regulations ensure that all the activities of the organization work in favor of the society as well as for the country (Svensson & Wood, 2008). Similar, Australia also follows business ethics in their country related to all kind of businesses but it was found that many big mining companies are practicing unethical practices in their business operation in order to increase their profit margin.  It seems that their only objective is to make the profit and for this, they are ready to keep society on risk in terms of environment control (Wallace & Sheldon, 2015). It also comprises the ethical decision outline which is linked with the ethical issues happened in this article and measures to control these kinds of incidents.

On the 4th of December, 2018 Ben seems a business journalist disseminated a small report in the online newspaper ‘The Guardian’ underneath the titled “Australian mining giants ‘may be breaking the law’ by neglecting climate change threats”. This article comprises the authentic attitude of these big organizations in the direction of the significance of the Paris agreement which was organized for forming safety guidelines connected to climate change (Rogelj et al, 2016). This editorial includes all the materials of unethical activities done by big Australian giant mining corporations alongside having strict laws contrary to such activities.

Chairman of Senex energy was asked questions connected to the climate change rules in relations of carbon emission which is recognized as one of the key reason for carrying an indeterminate variation in the climate. One of the questions was do their company process function in a range of 2C or 3C temperature. Deprived of displaying any unwillingness in his response, he answered that their company process does not function on both of the temperature directive, neither 2C nor 3C. It clearly shows that corporations in Australia have become very mean when it derives to profit-making; they are standing by to oversee every single law connected to the climate controller but are not willing to give up some portion of the decrease in their turnover percentage (Bhimani, 2008). They do not pay any attention towards the community in which they are functioning and are indirectly encouraging other corporates to go for related kind of acts by inspiring their workforces to do such unethical activities by offering them indirect bribes. Indirect bribes are like an upsurge in their salary along with creating unethical organization culture in which everybody has to add something to the profit-making purpose of the company (Jenkins, 2009). These corporations play their business strategies in such a manner that many times even government was not able to track whether the company is functioning ethically or unethically and this backdoor loophole offers them the chance by which they are creating confusion in climate control temperature.

Unethical Business Practices

In this article, it has been explored that numerous mining corporations see climate control as obstacles to their monetary aspects and therefore they try every single business strategy to overcome climate change regulations. According to the report published by Australian securities and investments commission; it was explored that big mining giants of Austrian mining businesses are behind this breach of conduct connected to climate change threats by abandoning the influence of their actions on the public (Smee, 2018). From years, the government of Australian have been stressing on the business marketplace to conduct a corporate meeting each year to identify the issues connected to environmental sustainability, which will also include stakeholders of the corporates. But these corporations have straight overlooked the entire elements associated with climate change by present the declaration that it is producing a threat to their financial competence (Barkemeyer, Holt, Preuss & Tsang, 2014). As per business rule, it is the main importance of the director of any group to consider these climate changes as a significant portion of their business functions. It has been explored that directors of these corporations have intentionally breached all the legal accountabilities associated to the business ethics and are really confessing that they are the culprit on the open podium of a business meeting organized by shareholders. Similar, kind of question-related to the Paris agreement was questioned from Chairman of Prairie mining, Mr. Ian Middlemas. His response was very wicked from a moral point of view. He reacted that it is none of their concern which means they are overseeing the regulations and are involved in unethical practices for their personal benefit on an open platform.

These declarations are now flattering real worries connected to ethical business follows. Let us assume that if it is being questioned to Energy drink organization that does they add preservatives to their merchandise and their response will be like we are taking care of it (Bruhn, 2009). Therefore there is a probability that other company will get inspired from these acts and will start practicing such kind of unethical practices in their organizations.

Such kind of unethical business practices is really enclosed us in a circle against the idea which was formed related to climate change regulations and efforts connected to promote awareness about the Paris agreement (Schleussner et al., 2016). It has just given an impression that was are active in Perth and are concern about Sydney.

Government’s Action and Ethical Guidelines

An audit was conducted by ASIC department in which it has involved around 60 corporations and was shocked that out of 60 corporations only 10 corporations sense that environments can be a threat for resources. In this review, those corporations were also included which organize climate hazard meeting each year and has not revealed any type of declaration regarding their monetary influence (Xu, Jiang,  Fargher & Carson, 2011). It involves accountability of the executive of the corporate to propose an investigative statement in which they have to explore all the threat aspects associated to the climate modification controller along with the dimension methodologies so that management will be skillful to track all the activities of the corporates linked to these unethical actions.

It is not only top-level executives which form ethical rubrics for the businesses but even businesses also form their own guiding principle in such a manner which will not only benefit the businesses but also the employees of the businesses (Garavan & McGuire, 2010). Accomplishment ethical business practices not only aid the businesses to evade any type of consequence but it also aids the businesses to produce a unique appearance in the corporate world which in reappearance aids the businesses to appeal a big pool of brilliant attentions towards them, faithfulness from clients as well as appealing a great number of investors.

Currently, persons all over the globe are getting more thoughtful towards the matters which can influence the humanity on a global podium. The latest tendency of corporate has shifted from generating profit towards the handling matters associated with the society on the worldwide level (Vilanova, Lozano & Arenas, 2009). But there are certain corporates which still oversee these commercial morals for their turnover and one such episode has happened in Australia associated to mining industries which are been blamed of overseeing the rules linked to climate regulator rules of Australia.

As per the study, Australia government has focused on the midpoint for strategy department in command to control these types of matter which have warned those corporates which are included in unprincipled climate regulator practices by showing the conclusion of being involved in such performs (Svensson & Wood, 2008). In 2018, Australia government has designed their guidelines on the foundation of environmental strategies which is being directed by the principles of eco-sustainable reform. It has become obligatory to successfully accomplish all the possessions in both natural as well as the man-made type and must comprise community in all climate-related choices. As per this the regulation it is the responsibility of the state-run administration as well as zones for the main part of the environmental matters by offering a certain portion of their control to the administration of those zones (ICLG, 2018). It is obligatory for every state and zones must that their instruction departments must take upkeep of all these environmental substances. These rules have been reformed in the constitution of Australia. But still, there is always the possibility of a loophole in these strict guidelines which are unintentionally providing some help to these big mining giants. It is very difficult for exploring the minor difference in the percentage variations connected to the extraction process, so somewhere it is offering some escape route to these mining companies to perform their unethical practices (Mankelow, 2008).

As per seven moral outlines, it is advisable that agencies must suppress the offender to decrease the quantity of risk produced by them in terms of climate change control and must supervise all  happenings associated to the agreement. Here, the government must include strict action like charging the offender with penalties which range from heavy fines to a year imprisonment. According to ethical outline, government or controlling administration must force the accused to obligatory take an ethical business training program connected to such actions (Thomson & Wilson, 2009). As per these ethical outlines it becomes moral responsibility of the climate control department to carry out the audit procedure round each financial year in instruction to have precision data information about the present and past action of the organization and this seem to be one of the best time because at this time each business corporate will be in the progression of making money in connection to growth and development.

Conclusion

Ethics are not only constructing chunks of the society but it is also the construction chunks of the business operating in the global market. Each business corporate is really involved in numerous actions which obligate a straight or unintended influence on the community. Hence, it becomes the obligation of the administration to uphold the law and directive by which the business corporate operates on the nation land will not oversee guidelines associated to climate deviations or any corporate morals in command to attain monetary benefit. The administration must organize a training program which will deliver all the essential evidence linked with obligations of business ethics. This information will also involve real case studies linked with breach of conduct done by numerous organizations.

References

Smee, B. (2018). Australian mining giants ‘may be breaking law’ by ignoring climate change risks [online]. Retrieved from : https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2018/dec/05/australian-mining-giants-may-be-breaking-law-by-ignoring-climate-change-risks

Xu, Y., Jiang, A. L., Fargher, N., & Carson, E. (2011). Audit reports in Australia during the global financial crisis. Australian Accounting Review, 21(1), 22-31.

Garavan, T. N., & McGuire, D. (2010). Human resource development and society: Human resource development’s role in embedding corporate social responsibility, sustainability, and ethics in organizations. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 12(5), 487-507.

Vilanova, M., Lozano, J. M., & Arenas, D. (2009). Exploring the nature of the relationship between CSR and competitiveness. Journal of Business Ethics, 87(1), 57-69.

ICLG. (2018). Environment and climate law Australia 2018 [online]. Retrieved from: https://iclg.com/practice-areas/environment-and-climate-change-laws-and-regulations/australia

Thomson, G., & Wilson, N. (2009). Public attitudes to laws for smoke-free private vehicles: a brief review. Tobacco control, 18(4), 256-261.

Svensson, G., & Wood, G. (2008). A model of business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 77(3), 303-322.

Rogelj, J., Den Elzen, M., Höhne, N., Fransen, T., Fekete, H., Winkler, H., & Meinshausen, M. (2016). Paris Agreement climate proposals need a boost to keep warming well below 2 C. Nature, 534(7609), 631.

Bhimani, A. (2008). Making corporate governance count: the fusion of ethics and economic rationality. Journal of Management & Governance, 12(2), 135-147.

Jenkins, H. (2009). A ‘business opportunity’model of corporate social responsibility for small?and medium?sized enterprises. Business ethics: A European review, 18(1), 21-36.

Barkemeyer, R., Holt, D., Preuss, L., & Tsang, S. (2014). What happened to the ‘development’in sustainable development? Business guidelines two decades after Brundtland. sustainable development, 22(1), 15-32.

Bruhn, J. G. (2009). The functionality of gray area ethics in organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 89(2), 205.

Svensson, G., & Wood, G. (2008). A model of business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 77(3), 303-322.

Mankelow, G. (2008). Social responsibility paradox of small business human resource management practices. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19(12), 2171-2181.

Wallace, M., & Sheldon, N. (2015). Business research ethics: Participant observer perspectives. Journal of Business Ethics, 128(2), 267-277.

Schleussner, C. F., Rogelj, J., Schaeffer, M., Lissner, T., Licker, R., Fischer, E. M., & Hare, W. (2016). Science and policy characteristics of the Paris Agreement temperature goal. Nature Climate Change, 6(9), 827.